Women Labour: What Was It? What Is It Now? A Theoretical Analysis Based on Different Economic Perspectives

Öz

One of the main mechanisms of development in economies is the efficient use of factors of production. In the use of labour, one of the primary production resources in economies, it can be said that there is a distribution in favour of men in many countries in terms of existing gender patterns. Women's labour remains secondary because men are central in almost all social institutions and relations, and men's leading position is also considered. Women are generally held responsible for domestic work, making them less likely to benefit from labour markets and educational opportunities than males. However, within the framework of the evolution of economic thought and development, economics emerged as a separate discipline following the Second World War. Some changes in women’s labour and pertinent views about it have occurred. The impact of women's labour on development has begun to be grasped. In all these contexts, in this study, the socio-economic and cultural advancement and turn of women’s labour concerning the evolution of economic thought and development economics are investigated, and the place and magnitude of women's labour in development are discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Women Labour
• Economic Thought
• Economic Development
• Domestic Labour

Kadın Emeği: Neydi, Ne Oldu? Farklı İktisadi Anlayışlar Temelinde Kuramsal Bir Analiz

Öz

Ekonomilerde kalkınmanın temel sağlayıcı mekanizmalarından biri üretim faktörlerinin etkin kullanımıdır. Ekonomilerde ana üretim kaynaklarından biri olan emeğin kullanımında, birçok ülkede var olan toplumsal cinsiyet kalıpları bağlamında erkekler lehine bir dağılım olduğu söylenebilir. Kadının ve kadın emeğinin ekonomilerde ikincil planda kalmasının temel sebebi, hemen hemen bütün toplumsal kurum ve ilişkilerde erkeklerin merkezi konumda yer alması ve erkeklerin merkezi konumunun veri olarak ele alınmasıdır. Kadınların ev içi işlerden genel olarak sorumlu tutulması da kadınların işgücü piyasalarından ve eğitim olanaklarından erkeklere göre daha az faydalanmalarına yol açmaktadır. Ancak; iktisadi düşüncenin ve bunun yanı sıra İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonraki yıllarda ayrı bir disiplin olarak ortaya çıkan kalkınma iktisadının evrimi çerçevesinde, kadın emeği ve bununla ilgili görüşlerde birtakım değişiklikler meydana gelmiştir. Kadın emeğinin kalkınma üzerindeki etkisi anlaşılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada, iktisadi düşüncenin ve kalkınma iktisadının evrimi bağlamında kadın emeğinin sosyoekonomik ve kültürel gelişimi ve değişimi incelenerek, kalkınmada kadın emeğinin yeri ve önemi ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kadın Emeği
• İktisadi Düşünce
• İktisadi Kalkınma
• Ev İçi Emek

Kaynakça

1. Agarwal, B. (1994), “Gender and command over property: A critical gap in economic analysis and policy in South Asia”, World Development, 22(10), 1455-1478.
2. Altınbaş, D. (2006), “Feminist Tartişmalarda Liberal Feminizm”, Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9, 21-52.
3. Amin, S. (1974), Accumulation on a World Scale: Critique of the Theory of Underdevelopment, Monthly Review Press U.S.
4. Anker, R. (1997), “Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex: an Overview”, International Labour Review, 136(3), 315-339.
5. Baran, P.A. (1958), “The Political-economy of Growth”, Economist, 186(8), 658-658.
6. Beneria, L. et al. (2000), “Introduction: Globalization and Gender”, Feminist Economics, 6(3), vii-xviii.
7. Berik, G. & N. Çagatay (1992), “Industrialization Strategies and Gender Composition of Manufacturing in Turkey”, in: N. Folbre et al. (eds.), Women’s Work in the World Economy (41-60), New York: New York University Press.
8. Berik, G. (2000), “Mature Export-led Growth and Gender Wage Inequality in Taiwan”, Feminist Economics, 6(3), 1-26.

9. Blau, F. & C. Jusenius (1976), “Economists' Approaches to Sex Segregation in the Labor Market: An Appraisal”, Signs, 1(3), 181-199.
10. Blossfeld, H.P. & H. Hofmeister (2006), Globalization, Uncertainty and Women’s Careers: an International Comparison, Edward Elgar Publishing.
11. Bodkin, R.G. (1999), “Women’s Agency in Classical Economic Thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill, and J.S. Mill”, Feminist Economics, 5(1), 45-60.
12. Brown, H. (2014), “Marx on Gender and the Family: A Summary”, Monthly Review, 66(2), 48-57.
13. Brown, L. (1984), “Neoclassical Economics and the Sexual Division of Labor”, Eastern Economic Journal, 10(4), 367-379.
14. Çağatay, N. & G. Berik (1990), “Transition to Export-led Growth in Turkey: Is There a Feminization of Employment?”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 22(1), 115-134.
15. Çağatay, N. & Ş. Özler (1995), “Feminization of the Labor Force: The Effects of Long-term Development and Structural Adjustment”, World Development, 23(11), 1883-1894.
16. Carney, J.A. (1992), “Peasant Women and Economic Transformation in the Gambia”, Development and Change, 23(2), 67-90.
17. Carr, M. et al. (2000), “Globalization and Home-based Workers”, Feminist Economics, 6(3), 123-142.
18. Chen, M. (2005), “Rethinking the Informal Economy: Linkages with the Formal Economy and the Formal Regulatory Environment”, (No. 2005/10), WIDER Research Paper.
19. Delphy, C. (1977), The Main Enemy, London: Women’s Research and Resources Centre.
20. Delphy, C. (1999), Baş Düşman Patriyerkinin Ekonomi Politiği, (Trs. L. Aykent-Tunçman), İstanbul: Saf.
21. Doeringer, P.B. & M.J. Piore (1971), Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis, Lexington, MA, Heath.
22. Dos Santos, T. (1970), “The Structure of Dependence”, The American Economic Review, 60(2), 231-236.
23. Edgeworth, F.Y. (1922), “Equal Pay to Men and Women for Equal Work”, The Economic Journal, 32(128), 431-457.
24. Eğitim Sen (2005), “Kapitalist Küreselleşme ve Kadın Emeği”, içinde: Eğitim Sen 1. Kadın Kurultayı, Sorgulamak ve Değiştirmek İçin, Eğitim Sen Publications, Ankara.
25. Einstein, H. (2013), “Feminizm ve Neoliberal Küreselleşme Arasında Gizli ve Tehlikeli Bir İlişki Mi Mevcut?”, içinde: A. Özuğurlu (ed.) 21. Yüzyıl Feminizmine Doğru: Neoliberalizmin Ötesinde Bir Kadın Hareketi İçin Tartışmalar (29-67), Ankara: Notabene.
26. Elson, D. & R. Pearson (1981), “Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers”: An Analysis of Women's Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing”, Feminist Review, 7(1), 87-107.
27. Engels, F. & K. Marx (1968), “Manifesto of the Communist Party”, in: K. Marx & F. Engels, Selected Works (35-63), London: Lawrence and Wishart.
28. Engels, F. (1972), The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, New York: International Publishers.
29. Engels, F. [1968 (1884)], The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
30. England, P. & N. Folbre (2001), “Reforming the Social Family Contract: Public Support for Child Rearing in the United States”, in: G.J. Duncan & P.L. Chase-Lansdale (eds.), For Better or Worse: Welfare Reform and the Well-Being of Children and Families (290-306), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. England, P. et al. (2001), “The Public Benefits and Private Costs of Caring Labor”, Unpublished Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
32. Evans, J. (1995), Feminist Theory Today: an Introduction to Second-Wave Feminism, London: Sage Books.
33. Ferber, M.A. (1995), “The Study of Economics: A Feminist Critique”, The American Economic Review, 85(2), 357-361.
34. Fernández-Kelly, P. & D. Wolf (2001), “A Dialogue on Globalization”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(4), 1243-1249.
35. Folbre, N. (2001), The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values, New York: New Press.
36. Folbre, N. (2006), “Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy”, Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183-199.
37. Frank, A.G. (1966), “The Development of Underdevelopment”, Monthly Review, 18(4), 17-31.
38. Frobel, F. et al. (1980), The New International Division of Labour: Structural Unemployment in Industrialised Countries and Industrialisation in Developing Countries, Cambridge University Press.
39. Gillis, S. & R. Munford (2004), “Genealogies and Generations: The Politics and Praxis of Third Wave Feminism”, Women's History Review, 13(2), 165-182.
40. Günday, P.D. (2011), “Ekonomik Kalkınmada Kadın’ın Önemi ve Katkısı”, Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Social Sciences.
41. Hartmann, H. (1976), “Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(3), 137-169.
42. Hartmann, H.I. (1979), “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union”, Capital & Class, 3(2), 1-33.
43. Hartmann, H.I. (1987), “Changes in Women’s Economic and Family Roles in Post World War II United States”, in: L. Beneria & C. Stimpson (eds.), Women, Households, and the Economy (33-64), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
44. Hekman, S. (1992), “John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women: The Foundations of Liberal Feminism”, History of European Ideas, 15(4-6), 681-686.
45. Işık, E. ve U. Serdaroğlu (2015), “Kadın Emeği Feminist İktisadın Yol Haritası Üzerinden Bir Okuma”, Türk Tabipleri Birliği Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi, 15(56), 6-14.
46. Jenkins, R. (1984), “Divisions Over the International Division of Labour”, Capital & Class, 8(1), 28-57.
47. Jevons, W.S. (1883), Methods of Social Reform And Other Papers, London: Macmillan.
48. Jones, G.W. (2007), “Delayed Marriage and Very Low Fertility in Pacific Asia”, Population and Development Review, 33(3), 453-478.
49. Kalaycı, İ. (2017), “Feminist İktisat: Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliğine Seçenek Bir Bakış”, Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(12), 533-542.
50. Konca, B. (2016), “İktisatta Feminist Bir Bakış: 2000 Sonrası Dönemde Kadın İşgücünün Ekonomideki Yeri”, Master’s Thesis, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Institute of Social Sciences.
51. Kotef, H. (2009), “On Abstractness: First Wave Liberal Feminism and the Construction of The Abstract Woman”, Feminist Studies, 35(3), 495-522.
52. Kuhn, S. & B. Bluestone (1987), “Economic Restructuring and the Female Labour Market: The Impact of Industrial Change on Women”, in: L. Beneria & C. Stimpson (eds.), Women, Households, and the Economy (3-32), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
53. Kuiper, E. & D.K. Barker (2006), Feminist Economics and the World Bank History, Theory and Policy, Routledge: New York.
54. Leon, M. (2009), “Gender Equality and the European Employment Strategy: the Work/Family Balance Debate”, Social Policy & Society, 8(2), 197-209.
55. Lombardo, E. & P. Meier (2006), “Gender mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a feminist reading?”, European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(2), 151-166.
56. Luxton, M. (2014), “Marxist Feminism and Anticapitalism: Reclaiming Our History, Reanimating Our Politics”, Studies in Political Economy, 94(1), 137-160.
57. Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
58. Marshall, A. (1901), Elements of Economics of Industry, (3rd Edition), London: Macmillan.
59. Marshall, A. (1930), Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
60. Marx, K. & F. Engels (1848), Manifesto of the Communist Party, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
61. Marx, K. (2018), The Communist Manifesto: & Selected Writings, Boxtree.
62. Marx, K. [1867 (1976)], Capital, Volume 1. New York: Penguin Books.
63. Massow, F.V. (2000), “We Are Forgotten on Earth: International Development Targets, Poverty, and Gender in Ethiopia”, Gender & Development, 8(1), 45-54.
64. Mill, J.S. (2000), The Subjection of Women, Peterborough, Broadview Press.
65. Mitter, S. (1986), Common Fate, Common Bond: Women in the Global Economy, London: Pluto Press.
66. Moghadam, V.M. (2005), “Women's Economic Participation in the Middle East: What Difference Has the Neoliberal Policy Turn Made?”, Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 1(1), 110-146.
67. Molyneux, C. (2012), “Ev Emeği Tartışması ve Ötesi”, içinde: G. Acar-Savran & N. Tura-Demiryontan (eds.), Kadının Görünmeyen Emeği (115-157), İstanbul: Yordam.
68. Molyneux, M. (2001), “Mobilisation without Emancipation? Women’s Interests, the State and Revolution in Nicaragua”, in: Women’s Movements in International Perspective (38-59), Palgrave Macmillan, London.
69. Moser, C.O.N. (1992), “Adjustment from Below: Low-Income Women, Time and the Triple Role in Guayaquil, Ecuador”, in: H. Afshar & C. Dennis (eds.), Women and Adjustment Policies in the Third World (87-116), Basingstoke: Macmillan.
70. Nelson, J.A. (1995), “Feminism and Economics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 131-148.
71. North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
72. North, D.C. (1994), “‘Economic Performance Through Time”, American Economic Review, 84(3), 359-368.
73. Nurkse, R. (1952), “Some International Aspects of the Problem of Economic Development”, The American Economic Review, 42(2), 571-583.
74. Öz, C.S. & S. Karagöz (2015), “Avrupa 2020 Hedeflerinin Avrupa İstihdam Stratejisi Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi”, Bilgi, 31, 99-122.
75. Pearce, K.C. (1999), “The Radical Feminist Manifesto as Generic Appropriation: Gender, Genre, and Second Wave Resistance”, Southern Journal of Communication, 64(4), 307-315.
76. Petchesky, R.P. (2003), Global Prescriptions: Gendering Human Rights, London-New York: Zed Books.
77. Peterson, V.S. (2008), “New Wars’ and Gendered Economies”, Feminist Review, 88(1), 7-20.
78. Pigou, A.C. (1960), The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan.
79. Pujol, M. (1984), “Gender And Class in Marshall's “Principles of Economics”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(3), 217-234.
80. Pujol, M.A. (1992), Feminism and Antifeminism in Early Economic Thought, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
81. Pujol, M.A. (1995), “Into The Margin”, in: E. Kuper & J. Sap (eds.), Out of The Margin: Feminist Perspectives On Economics (17-34), New York: Routledge.
82. Pyle, J.L. & K.B. Ward (2003), “Recasting our Understanding of Gender and Work During Global Restructuring”, International Sociology, 18(3), 461-489.
83. Reich, M. et al. (1973), “Dual Labor Markets: a Theory of Labor Market Segmentation”, The American Economic Review, 63(2), 359-365.
84. Robinson, F. (2006), “Beyond Labour Rights: the Ethics of Care and Women's Work in The Global Economy”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(3), 321-342.
85. Rosenstein-Rodan, P.N. (1943), “Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe”, The Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202-211.
86. Rostow, W. (1952), “A Historian's Perspective on Modern Economic Theory”, The American Economic Review, 42(2), 16-29.
87. Rostow, W. (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Schulman, B. (2004), “Effective Organizing in Terrible Times: The Strategic Value of Human Rights for Transnational Anti-Racist Feminisms”, Meridians, 4(2), 102-108.
89. Schweitzer, M.M. (1980), “World War II and Female Labor Force Participation Rates”, The Journal of Economic History, 40(1), 89-95.
90. Scott, B.K. (1995), Refiguring Modernism: Women of 1928 (Vol. 1), Indiana University Press.
91. Seguino, S. & C. Grown (2006), “Gender Equity and Globalization: Macroeconomic Policy for Developing Countries”, Journal of International Development, 18(8), 1081-1104.
92. Serdaroğlu, U. (1995), “İktisatta Kadın Bakış Açısını Değiştirecek Bir Yaklaşım Postmodernist Olabilir Mi?”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 6(15), 53-74.
93. Serdaroğlu, U. (1997), Feminist İktisat’ın Bakışı Postmodernist mi?, İstanbul: Sarmal.
94. Smith, A. [1776 (1976)], An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Smith, E.S. (2001), “John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women A Re-Examination”, Polity, 34(2), 181-203.
96. Snyder, R.C. (2008), “What is Third-Wave Feminism? A New Directions Essay”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(1), 175-196.
97. Standing, G. (1989), “Global Feminization through Flexible Labor”, World Development, 17(7), 1077-1095.
98. Strassmann, D. (1995), “Creating a Forum for Feminist Economic Inquiry”, Feminist Economics, 1(1), 1-5.
99. Strober, M.H. (1994), “Rethinking Economics through a Feminist Lens”, The American Economic Review, 84(2), 143-147.
100. Thompson, B. (2002), “Multiracial Feminism: Recasting the Chronology of Second Wave Feminism”, Feminist Studies, 28(2), 337-360.
101. Toksöz, G. (2011), Kalkınmada Kadın Emeği, İstanbul: Varlık.
102. Truman, H.S. (1949), Inaugural Address: Thursday, January 20, 1949, Western Standard Publishing Company.
103. Waring, M. & G. Steinem (1988), If Women Counted: a New Feminist Economics, San Francisco: Harper and Row.
104. Wilber, C.K. & K.P. Jameson (2013), Socialist Models of Development, Oxford: Pergamon.
105. World Bank (2012), World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development, Washington DC: World Bank.