BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 28, 255 - 267, 14.04.2016

Sadık Kılıç Kemal Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.17233/se.10589
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, işçilerin sendikalaşma eğilimlerinin ve ikame etkisi ve baskı etkisine yönelik algılarının düzeyini belirlemek ve bu etkilerle sendikalaşma eğilimi arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu amaçla 215 işçiye anket uygulanmıştır. Bahsi geçen düzeyleri belirlemek için tanımlayıcı istatistiklerden, bahsi geçen ilişkiyi tespit etmek için çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda, işçilerin üzerinde çok yüksek düzeyde baskı etkisi olduğu ve çok düşük düzeyde ikame etkisi bulunduğu ve işçilerin sendikalaşma eğiliminin hayli yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiş ve sendikalaşma eğiliminin, baskı etkisi tarafından anlamlı bir şekilde açıklanmakta olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Badigannavar, V. & J. Kelly (2005), “Why Are Some Uinon Organizing Compaigns More Succesful Than Others”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 515-535.
  • Baruch, Y. (1998), “The Rise and Fall of Organizational Commitment”, Human Systems Management, 17(2), 135-143.
  • Beck, U. (1987), “Beyond Status and Class: Will There Be an Invidiualised Class Society?”, in: V. Meja, D. Misgeld & N. Stehr (ed.), Modern German Sociology, New York: Columbia University Press, 340-356.
  • Blyton, P. & P. Turnbull (2004), The Dynamics of Employee Relations, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Braverman, H. (1998), Labor and Monopoly Capital (25th Anniversary Edition b.), New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, K. (2009), “No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing”, EPI Briefing Paper, 235, Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Bronfenbrenner, K. & T. Juravich, (1994), “The Impact of Employer Opposition on Union Certification Win Rates”, Working Paper, 113, Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Brown, H.P. (1990), “Counter Revolution of Our Time”, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 29(1), 1-14.
  • Bryson, A. & R. Gomez & P. Willman (2004), “The End of the Affair?: The Decline in Employers’ Propensity to Unionize”, in: J. Kelly & P. Willman (ed.), Union Organization and Activity, London: Routledge, 129-149.
  • Charlwood, A. (2002), “Why Do Non-union Employees Want to Unionize? Evidence from Britain”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), 463-491.
  • Charlwood, A. (2003), “Willingness to Unionize amongst Non-union Workers”, in: H. Gospel & S. Wood (ed.), Representing Workers: Trade Union Recognition and Membership in Britain, London: Routledge, 51-71.
  • D’Art, D. & T. Turner (2003), “Independent Collective Representation: Providing Effectiveness, Fairness, and Democracy in the Employment Relationship”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15(4), 169-181.
  • Dundon, T. (2002), “Union Avoidance and Employer Hostility to Union Organizing in the UK”, Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting, Atlanta: Industrial Relations Research Association Series, 233-242.
  • Dundon, T. & D. Rollinson (2004), Employment Relations in Non-Union Firms, London: Routledge.
  • Fiorito, J. (2001), “Human Resource Management Practices and Worker Desires for Union Representation”, Journal of Labor Research, 22(2), 335-354.
  • Fiorito, J. (2003), “Union Organizing in the United States”, in: G. Gall (ed.), Union Organizing: Campaingning for Trade Union Recognition, London: Routledge, 191-210.
  • Fox, A. (1974), Beyond Contract: Power, Work and Trust Relations, London: Faber & Faber.
  • Freeman, R.B. (2007), “Do Workers Still Want Union? More Than Ever”, EPI Briefing Paper, 182, Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Freeman, R.B. & M.M. Kleiner (1988), “Employer Behavior in the Face of Union Organizing Drives”, Working Paper Series, 2805, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Frege, C.M. & J. Kelly (2003), “Union Revitalization Strategies in Comparative Perspective”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 7-24.
  • Frege, C.M. & J. Kelly (2004), “Union Strategies in Comprative Context”, C.M. Frege & J. Kelly (ed.), Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, 31-44.
  • Gall, G. (2002), “Employer Opposition to Union Recognition in Britain”, Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting, Atlanta: Industrial Relations Research Association Series, 243-256.
  • Gall, G. (2003), “Employer Opposition to Union Recognition”, in G. Gall (ed.), Union Organizing: Campaigning for Trade Union Recognition, London: Routledge, 79-96.
  • Gall, G. (2004), “British Employer Resistance to Trade Union Recognition”, Human Resorce Management Journal, 14(2), 36-53.
  • Gall, G. (2009), “What is to be Done with Union Organising?”, in G. Gall (ed.), Union Revitalisation in Advanced Economies: Assessing the Contribution of Union Organising, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-16.
  • Gall, G. & S. McKay (2001), “Facing ‘Fairness at Work’: Union Perception of Employer Opposition and Response to Union Recognition”, Industrial Relations Journal, 32(2), 94-113.
  • Gallie, D. & A. Felstead & F. Green (2001), “Employer Policies and Organizational Commitment in Britain 1992-97”, Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1083-1101.
  • Geare, A. & F. Edgar & I. McAndrew (2006), “Employment Relationships: Ideology and HRM Practice”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1190-1208.
  • Geare, A. & F. Edgar & I. McAndrew (2009), “Workplace Values and Beliefs: An Empirical Study of Ideology, High Commitment Management and Unionisation”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 1146-1171.
  • Greenwood, M.R. (2002), “Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, 261-278.
  • Guest, D.E. (1987), “Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations”, Journal of Management Studies, 14(5), 503-521.
  • Haynes, P. & P. Boxal & K. Macky (2006), “Union Reach, the ‘Representation Gap’ and the Prospects for Unionism in New Zeland”, Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 193-216.
  • Heery, E. & J. Kelly & J. Waddington (2003), “Union Revitalization in Britain”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 79-97.
  • Kaufman, B.E. (2008), “Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions in-between”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(2), 314-339.
  • Kelly, J. (1998), Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves, London: Routledge.
  • Kılıç, S. (2014), “Mobilizasyon Teorisi ve Kolektivizm Bağlamında Endüstri İlişkilerinde ‘Dönüşüm’: Perakende Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Kılıç, S. & K. Yıldız (2015), “İş Arayanların Sendika Talebi ve Sendika Algısı: Türkiye’deki Temsil Boşluğu Hakkında Bazı İşaretler”, Siyaset Ekonomi ve Yönetim, 16. Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Kongresi Özel Sayısı, 191-204.
  • Legge, K. (1995), Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
  • Machin, S. & S. Wood (2005), “Human Resource Management as a Substitute for Trade Unions in British Workplaces”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58(2), 201-218.
  • McLoghlin, I. & S. Gourlay (1992), “Enterprise without Unions: the Management of Employment Relations in Non-union Firms”, Journal of Management Studies, 29(5), 669-691.
  • Moody, K. (2009), “Union Organising in the US: New Tactics, Old Barriers”, in G. Gall (ed.), The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 10-27.
  • Peetz, D. (2010), “Are Individualistic Attitudes Killing Collectivism?” Eurepean Review of Labour and Research, 16(3), 383-398.
  • Purcell, J. (1993), “The Challenge of Human Resource Management for Industrial Relations Research and Practice”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(3), 511-527.
  • Robinson, I. (2008), “What Explains Unorganized Worker’s Growing Demand for Unions?”, Labor Studies Journal, 33(3), 235-243.
  • Roche, W.K. (2001), “Accounting for the Trend in Trade Union Recognition in Ireland”, Industrial Relations Journal, 32(1), 37-54.
  • Roche, W.K. (1998), “Between Regime Realignment and Fragmentation: Irish Industrial Relations in the 1990s”, Industrial Relations Journal, 29(2), 112-125.
  • Thompson, P. & B. Harley (2007), “HRM and the Worker: Labor Process Perspective”, P. Boxal, J. Purcell and P. Wright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, New York: Oxford University Press, 147-165.
  • Troy, L. (2004), The Twilight of the Old Unionism, New York: Sharpe Inc.
  • Turner, T. & D. D’Art (2012), “Public Perceptions of Trade Unions in Countries of the European Union: A Casual Analysis”, Labor Studies Journal, 37(1), 33-55.
  • Yıldırım, E. (1997), Endüstri İlişkileri Teorileri, Sakarya: Değişim.

İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 28, 255 - 267, 14.04.2016

Sadık Kılıç Kemal Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.17233/se.10589
Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, işçilerin sendikalaşma eğilimlerinin ve ikame etkisi ve baskı etkisine yönelik algılarının düzeyini belirlemek ve bu etkilerle sendikalaşma eğilimi arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu amaçla 215 işçiye anket uygulanmıştır. Bahsi geçen düzeyleri belirlemek için tanımlayıcı istatistiklerden, bahsi geçen ilişkiyi tespit etmek için çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonunda, işçilerin üzerinde çok yüksek düzeyde baskı etkisi olduğu ve çok düşük düzeyde ikame etkisi bulunduğu ve işçilerin sendikalaşma eğiliminin hayli yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiş ve sendikalaşma eğiliminin, baskı etkisi tarafından anlamlı bir şekilde açıklanmakta olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Badigannavar, V. & J. Kelly (2005), “Why Are Some Uinon Organizing Compaigns More Succesful Than Others”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 515-535.
  • Baruch, Y. (1998), “The Rise and Fall of Organizational Commitment”, Human Systems Management, 17(2), 135-143.
  • Beck, U. (1987), “Beyond Status and Class: Will There Be an Invidiualised Class Society?”, in: V. Meja, D. Misgeld & N. Stehr (ed.), Modern German Sociology, New York: Columbia University Press, 340-356.
  • Blyton, P. & P. Turnbull (2004), The Dynamics of Employee Relations, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Braverman, H. (1998), Labor and Monopoly Capital (25th Anniversary Edition b.), New York: Monthly Review Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, K. (2009), “No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing”, EPI Briefing Paper, 235, Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Bronfenbrenner, K. & T. Juravich, (1994), “The Impact of Employer Opposition on Union Certification Win Rates”, Working Paper, 113, Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Brown, H.P. (1990), “Counter Revolution of Our Time”, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 29(1), 1-14.
  • Bryson, A. & R. Gomez & P. Willman (2004), “The End of the Affair?: The Decline in Employers’ Propensity to Unionize”, in: J. Kelly & P. Willman (ed.), Union Organization and Activity, London: Routledge, 129-149.
  • Charlwood, A. (2002), “Why Do Non-union Employees Want to Unionize? Evidence from Britain”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), 463-491.
  • Charlwood, A. (2003), “Willingness to Unionize amongst Non-union Workers”, in: H. Gospel & S. Wood (ed.), Representing Workers: Trade Union Recognition and Membership in Britain, London: Routledge, 51-71.
  • D’Art, D. & T. Turner (2003), “Independent Collective Representation: Providing Effectiveness, Fairness, and Democracy in the Employment Relationship”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 15(4), 169-181.
  • Dundon, T. (2002), “Union Avoidance and Employer Hostility to Union Organizing in the UK”, Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting, Atlanta: Industrial Relations Research Association Series, 233-242.
  • Dundon, T. & D. Rollinson (2004), Employment Relations in Non-Union Firms, London: Routledge.
  • Fiorito, J. (2001), “Human Resource Management Practices and Worker Desires for Union Representation”, Journal of Labor Research, 22(2), 335-354.
  • Fiorito, J. (2003), “Union Organizing in the United States”, in: G. Gall (ed.), Union Organizing: Campaingning for Trade Union Recognition, London: Routledge, 191-210.
  • Fox, A. (1974), Beyond Contract: Power, Work and Trust Relations, London: Faber & Faber.
  • Freeman, R.B. (2007), “Do Workers Still Want Union? More Than Ever”, EPI Briefing Paper, 182, Washington: Economic Policy Institute.
  • Freeman, R.B. & M.M. Kleiner (1988), “Employer Behavior in the Face of Union Organizing Drives”, Working Paper Series, 2805, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Frege, C.M. & J. Kelly (2003), “Union Revitalization Strategies in Comparative Perspective”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 7-24.
  • Frege, C.M. & J. Kelly (2004), “Union Strategies in Comprative Context”, C.M. Frege & J. Kelly (ed.), Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, 31-44.
  • Gall, G. (2002), “Employer Opposition to Union Recognition in Britain”, Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting, Atlanta: Industrial Relations Research Association Series, 243-256.
  • Gall, G. (2003), “Employer Opposition to Union Recognition”, in G. Gall (ed.), Union Organizing: Campaigning for Trade Union Recognition, London: Routledge, 79-96.
  • Gall, G. (2004), “British Employer Resistance to Trade Union Recognition”, Human Resorce Management Journal, 14(2), 36-53.
  • Gall, G. (2009), “What is to be Done with Union Organising?”, in G. Gall (ed.), Union Revitalisation in Advanced Economies: Assessing the Contribution of Union Organising, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-16.
  • Gall, G. & S. McKay (2001), “Facing ‘Fairness at Work’: Union Perception of Employer Opposition and Response to Union Recognition”, Industrial Relations Journal, 32(2), 94-113.
  • Gallie, D. & A. Felstead & F. Green (2001), “Employer Policies and Organizational Commitment in Britain 1992-97”, Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1083-1101.
  • Geare, A. & F. Edgar & I. McAndrew (2006), “Employment Relationships: Ideology and HRM Practice”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1190-1208.
  • Geare, A. & F. Edgar & I. McAndrew (2009), “Workplace Values and Beliefs: An Empirical Study of Ideology, High Commitment Management and Unionisation”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 1146-1171.
  • Greenwood, M.R. (2002), “Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis”, Journal of Business Ethics, 261-278.
  • Guest, D.E. (1987), “Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations”, Journal of Management Studies, 14(5), 503-521.
  • Haynes, P. & P. Boxal & K. Macky (2006), “Union Reach, the ‘Representation Gap’ and the Prospects for Unionism in New Zeland”, Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 193-216.
  • Heery, E. & J. Kelly & J. Waddington (2003), “Union Revitalization in Britain”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 79-97.
  • Kaufman, B.E. (2008), “Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions in-between”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(2), 314-339.
  • Kelly, J. (1998), Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves, London: Routledge.
  • Kılıç, S. (2014), “Mobilizasyon Teorisi ve Kolektivizm Bağlamında Endüstri İlişkilerinde ‘Dönüşüm’: Perakende Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Kılıç, S. & K. Yıldız (2015), “İş Arayanların Sendika Talebi ve Sendika Algısı: Türkiye’deki Temsil Boşluğu Hakkında Bazı İşaretler”, Siyaset Ekonomi ve Yönetim, 16. Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Kongresi Özel Sayısı, 191-204.
  • Legge, K. (1995), Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
  • Machin, S. & S. Wood (2005), “Human Resource Management as a Substitute for Trade Unions in British Workplaces”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58(2), 201-218.
  • McLoghlin, I. & S. Gourlay (1992), “Enterprise without Unions: the Management of Employment Relations in Non-union Firms”, Journal of Management Studies, 29(5), 669-691.
  • Moody, K. (2009), “Union Organising in the US: New Tactics, Old Barriers”, in G. Gall (ed.), The Future of Union Organising: Building for Tomorrow, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 10-27.
  • Peetz, D. (2010), “Are Individualistic Attitudes Killing Collectivism?” Eurepean Review of Labour and Research, 16(3), 383-398.
  • Purcell, J. (1993), “The Challenge of Human Resource Management for Industrial Relations Research and Practice”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(3), 511-527.
  • Robinson, I. (2008), “What Explains Unorganized Worker’s Growing Demand for Unions?”, Labor Studies Journal, 33(3), 235-243.
  • Roche, W.K. (2001), “Accounting for the Trend in Trade Union Recognition in Ireland”, Industrial Relations Journal, 32(1), 37-54.
  • Roche, W.K. (1998), “Between Regime Realignment and Fragmentation: Irish Industrial Relations in the 1990s”, Industrial Relations Journal, 29(2), 112-125.
  • Thompson, P. & B. Harley (2007), “HRM and the Worker: Labor Process Perspective”, P. Boxal, J. Purcell and P. Wright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, New York: Oxford University Press, 147-165.
  • Troy, L. (2004), The Twilight of the Old Unionism, New York: Sharpe Inc.
  • Turner, T. & D. D’Art (2012), “Public Perceptions of Trade Unions in Countries of the European Union: A Casual Analysis”, Labor Studies Journal, 37(1), 33-55.
  • Yıldırım, E. (1997), Endüstri İlişkileri Teorileri, Sakarya: Değişim.
Toplam 50 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Sadık Kılıç Bu kişi benim

Kemal Yıldız Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 14 Nisan 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Nisan 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 28

Kaynak Göster

APA Kılıç, S., & Yıldız, K. (2016). İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki. Sosyoekonomi, 24(28), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.10589
AMA Kılıç S, Yıldız K. İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki. Sosyoekonomi. Nisan 2016;24(28):255-267. doi:10.17233/se.10589
Chicago Kılıç, Sadık, ve Kemal Yıldız. “İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi Ve Bu Etkiler Ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”. Sosyoekonomi 24, sy. 28 (Nisan 2016): 255-67. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.10589.
EndNote Kılıç S, Yıldız K (01 Nisan 2016) İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki. Sosyoekonomi 24 28 255–267.
IEEE S. Kılıç ve K. Yıldız, “İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”, Sosyoekonomi, c. 24, sy. 28, ss. 255–267, 2016, doi: 10.17233/se.10589.
ISNAD Kılıç, Sadık - Yıldız, Kemal. “İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi Ve Bu Etkiler Ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”. Sosyoekonomi 24/28 (Nisan 2016), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.10589.
JAMA Kılıç S, Yıldız K. İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki. Sosyoekonomi. 2016;24:255–267.
MLA Kılıç, Sadık ve Kemal Yıldız. “İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi Ve Bu Etkiler Ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki”. Sosyoekonomi, c. 24, sy. 28, 2016, ss. 255-67, doi:10.17233/se.10589.
Vancouver Kılıç S, Yıldız K. İkame Etkisi, Baskı Etkisi ve Bu Etkiler ile Sendikalaşma Eğilimi Arasındaki İlişki. Sosyoekonomi. 2016;24(28):255-67.

Cited By

ENDÜSTRİ İLİŞKİLERİ TARAFLARININ DEĞERLENDİRMELERİYLE İNSAN KAYNAKLARI YÖNETİMİ VE SENDİKALAR ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ
Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute
Serap DEMİRLER
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.829624
 Kapak Resmi İndir