The Effects of Coase’s Thought on the Development of the New Institutional Economics

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 29, 11 - 22, 29.10.2016

Meryem Filiz Baştürk

https://doi.org/10.17233/se.78962

Cited By: 1

Öz

Among the current trends of economics, the new institutional economics is gaining more and more importance. The characteristic of the new institutional economics is that it has integrated instutions into the research field of economics. With the new institutional economics, the research field of neoclassical economics has widened, and different disciplines such as law, sociology, organizational theory and political science have started to be analyzed from an economic perspective. Although the new institutional economics started to develop in the 1970s, its origins can be traced back to Coase’s paper on “The Nature of the Firm”. As stated by Williamson, one of the leading theorists of the new institutional economics, it continues to develop in two aspects. First, it focuses on governance structure and contributes to the development of transaction cost economics. Second, it deals with institutional environment and provides a basis for the economics of property rights. This study will discuss the ideas of Coase, known as the founder of the new instutional economics, and also the contibutions of his studies to the development of the new instutional economics.

Kaynakça

• Alchian, A.A. (1965), “Some Economics of Property Rights”, in: The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis, vol. II, (ed. S.G. Madema), Aldershot: Edward Elgar Pub., 193-206.
• De Alessi, L. & R.J. Staaf (1989), “Property Rights and Choice”, Law and Economics, (ed. N. Mercuro), Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 175-200.
• Butler M.R. & R.F. Garnett (2003), “Teaching the Coase Theorem: Are We Getting it Right?”, American Economic Journal, 31(2), 133-145.
• Calabresi, G. & A.D. Melamed (1972), “Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral”, Harvard Law Review, 85(6), 1089-1128.
• Coase, R.H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, IV(13-16), 386-405.
• Coase, R.H. (1959), “The Federal Communications Commissions”, Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1-40.
• Coase, R.H. (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
• Coase, R.H. (1988a), “The Nature of the Firm: Influence”, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 33-47.
• Coase, R.H. (1988b), “The Nature of the Firm: Meaning”, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4(1), 19-32.
• Coase, R.H. (1988c), “Notes on the Problem of Social Cost”, The Firm the Market and the Law, Chicago, The University of Chicago Pres, 157-185.
• Coase, R.H. (1998), “The New Institutional Economics”, The American Economic Review, 88(2), 72-74.
• Cooter, R. & T. Ulen (2004), Law and Economics, Boston Pearson Addison Wesley.
• Çetin, T. (2012), “Yeni Kurumsal İktisat”, Sosyoloji Konferansları, 45(2012-1), 43-73.
• Demir, Ö. (1996), Kurumcu İktisat, Vadi Yayınları, Temmuz 1996.
• Demsetz, H. (1972), “When Does the Rule of Liability Matter?”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 13-28.
• Hodgson, G.M. (1989), “Institutional Economic Theory: The Old versus the New”, Review of Political Economy, 1(3), 249-269.
• Hodgson, G.M. (2000), “What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?”, Journal of Economic Issues, 34(2), 317–329.
• Klein, P.G. (1998), “New Institutional Economics”, in: Encylopedia Law and Economics, (ed. B. Bouckeart & G. De Geest), Edward Elgar Company & University of Ghent, New York.
• Langlois, R.N. (1998), “Transaction Costs, Production Costs and the Passage of Time”, in: Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, (ed. S.G. Medema), Boston, Kulwer Academic Publishers, 1-21.
• Medema, S.G. (1994), Ronald H. Coase, London, The Macmillan Pres.
• Medema, S.G. (1995), The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis – vol. I, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Pub.
• North, D.C. (1992), “Institutions and Economic Theory”, The American Economist, 36(1), 3-6.
• Oğuz, F. (2003), Mülkiyet Hakları Bir Ekonomik Analiz, İstanbul, Roma Yayınları.
• Parisi, F. (1999), “Coase Theorem and Transcation Cost Economics in Law”, The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, (ed. J.G. Backhaus), Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 7-39.
• Posner, R.A. (1993), “Nobel Laureate: Ronald Coase and Methodology”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 195-210.
• Samuels, W.J. & S.G. Medema (1998), “Ronald Coase on Economic Policy Analysis: Framework and Implications”, in: Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, (ed. SG. Medema), Kulwer Academic Publishers, 161-183.
• Şenalp, M.G. (2007), “Dünden Bugüne Kurumsal İktisat”, in: Kurumsal İktisat, (ed. E. Özveren), İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
• Williamson, O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrusut Implications, New York, Macmillan Pub.
• Williamson, O.E. (1994), “Introduction”, in: The Nature of the Firm Origins, Evolution, and Development, (ed. O.E. Williamson & S.G. Winter), Oxford University Pres, 3-17.
• Williamson, O.E. (1995), “A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Economic Organization”, in: The Legacy of Ronald Coase in Economic Analysis Volume I, (ed. S.G.Medema), Clentham, Edward Elgar Publishing Company, 248-257.
• Williamson, O.E. (1998a), “Transaction Cost Economics: How it Works; where it is Headed”, The Economist, 146(1), 23-58.
• Williamson, O.E. (1998b), “Revisiting Legal Realism: The Law, Economics, and Organization Perspective”, in: Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, (ed. S.G. Medema), Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 119-159.
• Williamson, O.E. (2000), “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead”, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595 – 613.
• Yılmaz, F. (2002), “Piyasa – Firma Ayrımı Tartışmaları Çerçevesinde Firma Teorisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1/2002, 67-82.
• Zerbe, R.O. & S.G. Medema (1998), “Ronald Coase, The British Tradition, and the Future of Economic Method”, in: Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, (ed. S.G.Medema), Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 209-238.