Technological Innovations and Firm Internationalisation

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 52, 71 - 85, 28.04.2022

Gamze Öztürk Danışman

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.02.05

Öz

This paper explores the relevance of technological innovations for the internationalisation of manufacturing firms. It differentiates between two technological innovations: eco-innovations and generic-technological innovations (i.e., intelligent manufacturing). By pooling the Flash Eurobarometer-415 and -433 surveys, we use a broad firm-level sample of 4954 European and non-European (the US and Switzerland) manufacturing firms. Appling the Heckman selection model, the findings indicate that eco-innovations positively affect the decision of the firms to internationalise whilst showing no significant impact on the level of international operations. On the other hand, generic-technological innovations positively affect both the decision and the level of global operations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Internationalisation, Eco-Innovation, Intelligent Manufacturing, Generic-Technological Innovations

Uluslararasılaşma, Eko-İnovasyon, Akıllı Üretim, Jenerik-Teknolojik İnovasyon

Öz

Bu makale, teknolojik inovasyonların imalat firmalarının uluslararası operasyonlarına etkisini incelemektedir ve iki tür teknolojik yeniliğe odaklanmaktadır: eko-inovasyonlar ve jenerik-teknolojik yenilikler (akıllı üretim). Flash Eurobarometer-415 ve Flash Eurobarometer-433 anketlerini bir araya getirerek, 4954 adet Avrupa ve Avrupa dışı (ABD ve İsviçre) imalat firmasından oluşan firma düzeyinde geniş bir örneklem kullanılmaktadır. Ekonometrik analizlerde Heckman seçim modeli uygulanmaktadır. Bulgulara göre eko-inovasyon, firmaların uluslararasılaşma kararlarını olumlu etkilemektedir, ancak uluslararası operasyonların düzeyi üzerinde önemli bir etki göstermemektedir. Jenerik-teknolojik yenilikler ise uluslararası operasyonların hem kararını hem de seviyesini olumlu yönde etkilemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararasılaşma, Eko-İnovasyon, Akıllı Üretim, Jenerik-Teknolojik İnovasyon

Kaynakça

• Alvarez, R. (2004), “Sources of export success in small and medium-sized enterprises: the impact of public programs”, International Business Review, 13(3), 383-400.
• Amemiya, Y. (1985), “Instrumental variable estimator for the nonlinear errors-in-variables model”, Journal of Econometrics, 28(3), 273-289.
• Amit, R. & P.J. Schoemaker (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
• Azar, G. & F. Ciabuschi (2017), “Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness”, International Business Review, 26(2), 324-336.
• Barney, J. (1986), “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy”, Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
• Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Bustos, P. (2011), “Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: Evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms”, American Economic Review, 101(1), 304-40.
• Camisón, C. & A. Villar-López (2014), “Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance”, Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.
• Cassiman, B. & E. Golovko (2011), “Innovation and internationalization through exports”, Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 56-75.
• Coad, A. & R. Rao (2008), “Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach”, Research Policy, 37(4), 633-648.
• Coad, A. et al. (2016), “Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role?”, Research Policy, 45(2), 387-400.
• Costantini, V. & M. Mazzanti (2012), “On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports”, Research Policy, 41(1), 132-153.
• Coombs, J.E. & P.E. Bierly (2001), “Looking through the kaleidoscope: Measuring technological capability and performance”, Academy of Management Proceedings, B1-B7.
• Coombs, J.E. & P.E. Bierly (2006), “Measuring technological capability and performance”, R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
• Copeland, B.R. & M.S. Taylor (2004), “Trade, growth, and the environment”, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71.
• Dalgıç, B. & B. Fazlıoğlu (2021), “Innovation and firm growth: Turkish manufacturing and services SMEs”, Eurasian Business Review, 11(3), 395-419.
• Damanpour, F. & W.M. Evan (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 392-409.
• Damanpour, F. et al. (2009), “Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675.
• Damanpour, F. & D. Aravind (2011), “Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents”, Management and Organization Review, 8, 423-454.
• Danisman, G.O. (2022), “What Drives Eco-Design Innovations in European SMEs?” [Chapter], in: Disruptive Technologies and Eco-Innovation for Sustainable Development, IGI Global.
• Demirel, P. & G.O. Danisman (2019), “Eco‐innovation and firm growth in the circular economy: Evidence from European small‐and medium‐sized enterprises”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1608-1618.
• Demirel, P. & E. Kesidou (2019), “Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847-857.
• Fazlıoğlu, B. et al. (2019), “The effect of innovation on productivity: Evidence from Turkish manufacturing firms”, Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 439-460.
• Filbeck, G. & R.F. Gorman (2004), “The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 29(2), 137-157.
• Ganotakis, P. & J.H. Love (2011), “R&D, product innovation, and exporting: evidence from UK new technology based firms”, Oxford Economic Papers, 63(2), 279-306.
• Greene, W.H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education India.
• Gunday, G. et al. (2011), “Effects of innovation types on firm performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, 133, 662-676.
• Heckman, J.J. (1979), “Sample selection bias as a specification error”, Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161.
• Kafouros, M.I. et al. (2008), “The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance”, Technovation, 28(1-2), 63-74.
• Levinson, A. & M. Taylor (2008), “Unmasking the pollution haven effect”, International Economic Review, 49(1), 223-54.
• Levinson, A. (2010), “Offshoring pollution: is the US increasingly importing polluting goods?”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(1), 63-83.
• Matanda, M.J. & S. Freeman (2009), “Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement”, International Business Review, 18, 89-107.
• Mazzucato, M. & S. Parris (2015), “High-growth firms in changing competitive environments: the US pharmaceutical industry (1963 to 2002)”, Small Business Economics, 44(1), 145-170.
• Metcalfe, J.S. (1994), “Evolutionary economics and technology policy”, The Economic Journal, 104(425), 931-944.
• Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National innovation systems: a comparative analysis, Oxford University Press on Demand.
• Ortega, M.J.R. (2010), “Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities' moderating roles”, Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273-1281.
• Peteraf, M.A. (1993), “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view”, Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
• Pla-Barber, J. & J. Alegre (2007), “Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry”, International Business Review, 16(3), 275-293.
• Popp, D. (2005), “Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models”, Ecological Economics, 54(2-3), 209-226.
• Porter, M.E. (1991), “America’s Green Strategy”, Reader in Business and the Environment, 33.
• Porter, M.E. & C. van der Linde (1995), “Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
• Rexhäuser, S. & C. Rammer (2014), “Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the Porter hypothesis”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(1), 145-167.
• Singh, D.A. (2009), “Export performance of emerging market firms”, International Business Review, 18(4), 321-330.
• Sousa, C.M.P. et al. (2014), “Testing for linear and quadratic effects between price adaptation and export performance: The impact of values and perceptions”, Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 501-520.
• Stucki, T. et al. (2018), “How different policy instruments affect green product innovation: A differentiated perspective”, Energy Policy, 114, 245-261.
• Tsai, K.H. (2004), “The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan's electronics industry”, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(2), 183-195.
• van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. et al. (2000), “Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy”, Ecological Economics, 32, 43-61.
• Walker, R.M. (2004), “Innovation and organisational performance: Evidence and a research agenda”, Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper, (002).
• Wang, C.H. et al. (2008), “Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty”, Technovation, 28(6), 349-363.
• Wagner, M. (2007), “On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: evidence from German manufacturing firms”, Research Policy, 36(10), 1587-1602.
• Westhead, P. et al. (2001), “The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 333-358.
• Yang, C.C. et al. (2009), “Assessing resources, logistics service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container shipping services in Taiwan”, International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 4-20.
• Zahra, S.A. & J.G. Covin (1995), “Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43-58.