Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 55, 11 - 35, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01

Öz

This study aimed to determine the relationship between communication and knowledge-sharing levels and organisational ambidexterity levels of nurses working in university hospitals in the TRC1 (Gaziantep, Adıyaman, Kilis) Region of Turkey. Through simple random sampling, 318 nurses working in university hospitals in the TRC1 Region were reached. As a result of the analysis, a positive linear and significant relationship was determined between communication and information sharing and organisational ambidexterity. In addition, it is a remarkable result of this study that the communication, knowledge sharing, and organisational ambidexterity levels of the Y-generation nurses are at the lowest level compared to the other generation nurses.

Kaynakça

  • Aamir, A. et al. (2021), “Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: Mediating Role of Employee’s Ambidexterity”, Sustainability, 13, 12788.
  • Ahammad, M.F. et al. (2019), “Organisational ambidexterity and human resource practices”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 503-507.
  • Al‐Alawi, A. et al. (2007), “Organisational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22-42.
  • Al-Shawabkeh, K.M. (2018), “Exploring the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing between Human Resource Development and Organisational Ambidexterity”, European Journal of Scientific Research, 149(3), 345-361.
  • Alshawabkeh, R. et al. (2020), “The intervening role of ambidexterity in the knowledge management project success connection”, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 56-66.
  • Altındiş, S. et al. (2011), “Örgütsel Bilgi Paylaşımını Engelleyen Faktörler: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Görgül Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (26), 45-61.
  • Andersen, T.J. & B. Nielsen (2007), “The Effective Ambidextrous Organisation: A Model of Integrative Strategy-Making Processes”, SMS 27th Annual International Conference, 14-17 October, San Diego, California.
  • Andrea, B. et al. (2016), “Y and Z generations at workplaces”, Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90-106.
  • Anthoine, E. et al. (2014), “Development and psychometric testing of a scale assessing the sharing of medical information and interprofessional communication: the CSI scale”, BMC Health Services Research, 14(126), 1-9.
  • Bakan, I. et al. (2017), “The relationship between organisational ambidexterity and organisational learning: an empirical study”, Turan, 9(33), 10-17.
  • Baškarada, S. et al. (2016), “Leadership and organisational ambidexterity”, Journal of Management Development, 35(6), 778-788.
  • Bolisani, E. et al. (2014), “Wiki as a Knowledge Management System in a Small Project‐Based Company: Benefits, Issues and Managerial Challenges”, in: C. Vivas & P. Sequeira (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém Portugal, 4-5 September, Published by Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, UK.
  • Borzillo, S. et al. (2012), “Communities of practice: keeping the company agile”, Journal of Business Strategy, 33(6), 22-30.
  • Boumgarden, P. et al. (2012), “Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organisational performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587-610.
  • Bramhall, E. (2014), “Effective communication skills in nursing practice”, Nursing Standard, 29(14), 53-59.
  • Brown, S.L. & K.M. Eisenhardt (1998), Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos, Harvard Business Press, USA.
  • Chang, Y.Y. & M. Hughes (2012), “Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms”, European Management Journal, 30(1), 1-17.
  • Cingöz, A. & A. Akdoğan (2015), “Örgütsel ustalık (Organisational Ambidexterity): Örgütsel ustalık düzeyini belirlemede araştırıcı ve yararlanıcı stratejilerin etkileşimsel rolü”, Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 59-67.
  • Connelly, L. (2012), “Correlations”, Medsurg Nursing, 21(3), 171-172.
  • Coughlan, M. et al. (2007), “Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research”, British Journal of Nursing, 16(11), 658-663.
  • Dinç, S. et al. (2007), “Knowledge, Opinion and Expectations of Students in Harran University School of Nursing”, Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing, 10(1), 1-9.
  • Duncan, R.B. (1976), “The ambidextrous organisation: designing dual structures for innovation”, in: R.H. Killman et al. (eds.), The Management of Organisation (167-188), North Holland, New York.
  • Ekambaram, A. et al. (2018), “The role of big data and knowledge management in improving projects and project-based organisations”, Procedia Computer Science, (138), 851-858.
  • Erdoğan, S. & Y. Yazıcıoğlu (2004), SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Fahrudi, A.N. et al. (2017), “Managing organisational learning ambidexterity in a resource-constrained environment: An exploratory study of Australian large service organisations”, The XXVIII ISPIM Innovation Conference Innovation Symposium, June 18-21, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ferreira, M. et al. (2016) “Clinical skills and communication in nursing students”, icH&Hpsy 2nd International Conference on Health and Health Psychology, June.
  • Ferreira, V. (2014), “Wiki as a knowledge management tool: the case of a non‐profit administrative entity”, in: C. Vivas & P. Sequeira (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém Portugal, 4-5 September, Published by Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, UK.
  • Gehrke, A. & Md. M. Hasan (2020), “Knowledge Sharing Process in Organisations: An Integrative Framework”, Master Thesis, University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies Department of Business and Economics Studies.
  • Gibson, C. & J. Birkinshaw (2004), “The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organisational ambidexterity”, Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
  • Gliem, J.A. & R.R. Gliem (2003, October 8-10), “Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales”, Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education (82-88), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Good, D. & E.J. Michel (2013), “Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts”, The Journal of Psychology, 147(5), 435-453.
  • Gottems, L.B.D. et al. (2018), “Good practices in normal childbirth: reliability analysis of an instrument by Cronbach’s Alpha”, Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, 26, e3000.
  • Göriş, S. et al. (2014), “Nurses’ Professional Values and Affecting Factors”, Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 5(3), 137-142.
  • Gray, J. & H. Laidlaw (2004), “Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction”, Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 425-448.
  • Guettel, W.H. & S. Konlechner (2007), “Dynamic Capabilities and The Ambidextrous Organisation: Empirical Results From Research Intensive Firms”, SMS 27th Annual International Conference, October 14-17, San Diego, California.
  • Güllüoğlu, Ö. (2012), Örgütsel İletişim, Eğitim Akademi Yayınları, Eğitim Kitabevi, Konya.
  • Güttel, W. & S. Konlechner (2007), “Dynamic capabilities and competence obsolescence: empirical data from research-intensive firms”, in: Proceedings of OLKC - Learning Fusion (357-374), Ontario, Canada, June 14-17.
  • Harsono, M. (2016), “Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing to Individual Performance: The Role of Organisational Culture and Relationship Quality as Moderator in Family Business”, IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM), 4, 67-78.
  • Hew, K.F. & N. Hara (2007), “Knowledge sharing in online environments: A qualitative case study”, J.Am.Soc.Inf.Sci., (58), 2310-2324.
  • Hughes, P. et al. (2020), “Micro-foundations of organisational ambidexterity in the context of cross-border mergers and acquisitions”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153, 4-5.
  • Im, G. & A. Rai (2008), “Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganisational Relationships”, Management Science, 54, 1281-1296.
  • Ipe, M. (2003), “Knowledge sharing in organisations: A conceptual framework”, Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337-359.
  • Jeskey, M. et al. (2011), “Nurse adoption of continuous patient monitoring on acute post‐surgical units: managing technology implementation”, Journal of Nursing Management, 19(7), 863-875.
  • Ji, H. & S-Y. Zou (2017), “The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Organisational Performance and the Countermeasures”, International Conference on Education Science and Economic Management (ICESEM), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Volume 106, Atlantis Press, 256-259.
  • Junni, P. et al. (2013), “Organisational ambidexterity and performance: a meta-analysis”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.
  • Katou, A.A. et al. (2020), “A trilogy of organisational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, nurse work engagement and environmental changes”, Journal of Business Research, 128, 688-700.
  • Kauppila, O.-P. et al. (2011), “Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries”, Management Learning, 42(4), 395-418.
  • Korkmaz, Ö.Y. (2010), “Transformation of the nursing profession”, Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 7(3), 3-5.
  • Kortmann, S. (2015), “The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity‐oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666-684.
  • Kotlarsky, J. & I. Oshri (2005), “Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects”, European Journal of Informational Systems, 14(1), 37-48.
  • Kyriakopoulos, K. & C. Moorman (2004), “Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219-240.
  • Li, C.R. (2013), “How top management team diversity fosters organisational ambidexterity: the role of social capital among top executives”, Journal of Organisational Change Management, 26(5), 874-896.
  • Lin, H.E. et al. (2017), “Aligning knowledge assets for exploitation, exploration, and ambidexterity: a study of companies in high‐tech parks in China”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(2), 122-140.
  • Lis, A. et al. (2018), “The Concept of the Ambidextrous Organisation: Systematic Literature Review”, International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17, 77-97.
  • Lubatkin, M.H. et al. (2006), “Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration”, Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672.
  • Mannor, M. (2007), “Building Ambidexterity: Generating KnowledgeBased Diversity to Promote Creative Balance in Organisations”, SMS 27th Annual International Conference, October 14-17, San Diego, California.
  • March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning”, Organisation Science, 2(1), 71-87.
  • Marri, M.Y.K. et al. (2019), “Structural Ambidexterity: Exploring Alternative Pro-Ambidexterity Conducive Structural Designs for Recourse-Constrained Organisations”, Archives of Business Research, 7(12), 307-320.
  • O’Daniel, M. & A.H. Rosenstein (2008), “Professional Communication and Team Collaboration”, in: R.G. Hughes (ed.), Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Chapter 33.
  • Ojha, D. et al. (2018), “Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organisational learning and moderating role of uncertainty”, International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215-231.
  • O'Reilly, C.A. & M.L. Tushman (2011), “Organisational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit”, California Management Review, 53(4), 5-22.
  • O'Reilly, C.A. & M.L. Tushman (2013), “Organisational ambidexterity: past, present, and future”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
  • Ouakouak, M.L. & N. Ouedraogo (2017), “Effects of initiative-friendly culture, individual creativity, and knowledge sharing on innovation: Mediating and moderating approaches”, International Journal of Business and Economics, 2(1), 1-20.
  • Pai, P. & H.T. Tsai (2016), “Reciprocity norms and information-sharing behavior in online consumption communities: An empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators”, Information & Management, 53(1), 38-52.
  • Palanisamy, R. & J. Verville (2015), “Factors enabling communication-based collaboration in interprofessional healthcare practice: A case study”, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(2), 8-27.
  • Parlayan, M.A. & S. Dökme (2016), “Özel hastanelerdeki hemşire ve hastaların iletişim seviyelerinin değerlendirilmesi: Bir hastane örneği”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 265-284.
  • Patel, P.C. et al. (2013), “Walking the tightrope: an assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organisational ambidexterity”, Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420-1442.
  • Petro, Y. (2017), “Ambidexterity through Project Portfolio Management Resolving paradoxes in organisations”, Doctoral Dissertation, The British University.
  • Pun, J. et al. (2020), “Training in communication and interaction during shift-to-shift nursing handovers in a bilingual hospital: A case study”, Nurse Education Today, 84, 104212.
  • Quan, S.D. et al. (2013), “It's not about pager replacement: An in‐depth look at the interprofessional nature of communication in healthcare”, Journal of Hospital Medicine, 8(3), 137-143.
  • Raisch, S. & J. Birkinshaw (2008), “Organisational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.
  • Rana, M.H. & M.S. Malik (2017), “Impact of human resource (HR) practices on organisational performance: Moderating role of Islamic principles”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(2), 186-207.
  • Ruhomauly, Z. et al. (2019), “Improving the quality of handover: implementing SBAR”, Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 54.
  • Savolainen, R. (2017), “Information sharing and knowledge sharing as communicative activities”, Information Research, 22(3), 1-20.
  • Schober, P. et al. (2018), “Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation”, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
  • Senthilnathan, S. (2019), “Usefulness of Correlation Analysis”, SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3416918.
  • Skok, W. & S. Tahir (2010), “Developing A Knowledge Management Strategy for the Arab World”, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC), 41(7), 1-11.
  • Sönmez-Çakır, F. & Z. Adıgüzel (2020), “Evaluation of Empowering Leadership and Knowledge Sharing on Organisation and Organisation Employees”, Optimum Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 7(2), 593-612.
  • Stein, H. (1968), “On Einstein Minkowski space-time”, The Journal of Philosophy, 65(1), 5-23.
  • Subaciute, E. & J.R. Rao (2019), “The Role of Design Thinking in Managing Organisational Change”, Master's Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology.
  • Taber, K.S. (2018), “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education”, Res.Sci.Educ, 48, 1273-1296.
  • Tamayo-Torres, J. et al. (2017), “Ambidexterity, Performance and Environmental Dynamism”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(3), 282-299.
  • Tan, T.C. et al. (2017), “Nurse-physician communication-An integrated review”, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(23-24), 3974-3989.
  • Tong, C. et al. (2013), “The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on the Relationship between Organisational Culture and Job Satisfaction”, International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 3, 9-37.
  • Turkelson, C. et al. (2017), “Improving nursing communication skills in an intensive care unit using simulation and nursing crew resource management strategies: an implementation project”, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 32(4), 331-339.
  • Turner, N. & L. Lee-Kelley (2013), “Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics”, Management Learning, 44, 179-196.
  • Vrontis, D. et al. (2017), “Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374-388.
  • Wasilewski, J. (2019), “Ambidexterity and innovation in chief nursing officers in the healthcare setting”, Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University.
  • Wasko, M. & S. Faraj (2005), “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice”, Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, 29(1), 35-58.
  • Wei, Z. et al. (2014), “Organisational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832-847.
  • Whitman, M. & W.J. Davis (2009), “Registered nurses' perceptions of cultural and linguistic hospital resources”, Nursing Outlook, 57, 35-41.
  • Wu, D. et al. (2015), “Knowledge heterogeneity and team knowledge sharing as moderated by internal social capital. Social behavior and personality”, An International Journal, 43(3), 423-436.
  • Yaman, S. & S. Tekin (2010), “Öğretmenler için hizmet içi eğitime yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi”, Bayburt Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 76-88.
  • Yang, L.R. et al. (2012), “Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice”, Automation in Construction, 22, 182-191.
  • Yılmaz, A.T. & A. Yıldırım (2018), “İletişim ve bilgi paylaşımı ölçeği’nin türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği”, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(70), 76-90.
  • Zhang, A.Y. et al. (2011), “Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organisations: The role of group processes”, Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 851-862.

İletişim ve Bilgi Paylaşımı ile Örgütsel Ustalık Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: TRC1 Bölgesi Hemşireleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 55, 11 - 35, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin TRC1 (Gaziantep, Adıyaman, Kilis) bölgesindeki üniversite hastanelerinde çalışan hemşirelerin iletişim ve bilgi paylaşım düzeyleri ile örgütsel ustalık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Basit tesadüfi örnekleme yoluyla TRC1 Bölgesi'ndeki üniversite hastanelerinde çalışan 318 hemşireye ulaşılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda iletişim ve bilgi paylaşımı ile örgütsel ustalık arasında pozitif yönde doğrusal ve anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Ayrıca Y kuşağı hemşirelerin iletişim, bilgi paylaşımı ve örgütsel ustalık düzeylerinin diğer kuşak hemşirelere göre en düşük düzeyde olması bu çalışmanın dikkat çekici bir sonucudur.

Kaynakça

  • Aamir, A. et al. (2021), “Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: Mediating Role of Employee’s Ambidexterity”, Sustainability, 13, 12788.
  • Ahammad, M.F. et al. (2019), “Organisational ambidexterity and human resource practices”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 503-507.
  • Al‐Alawi, A. et al. (2007), “Organisational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22-42.
  • Al-Shawabkeh, K.M. (2018), “Exploring the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing between Human Resource Development and Organisational Ambidexterity”, European Journal of Scientific Research, 149(3), 345-361.
  • Alshawabkeh, R. et al. (2020), “The intervening role of ambidexterity in the knowledge management project success connection”, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 56-66.
  • Altındiş, S. et al. (2011), “Örgütsel Bilgi Paylaşımını Engelleyen Faktörler: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Görgül Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (26), 45-61.
  • Andersen, T.J. & B. Nielsen (2007), “The Effective Ambidextrous Organisation: A Model of Integrative Strategy-Making Processes”, SMS 27th Annual International Conference, 14-17 October, San Diego, California.
  • Andrea, B. et al. (2016), “Y and Z generations at workplaces”, Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90-106.
  • Anthoine, E. et al. (2014), “Development and psychometric testing of a scale assessing the sharing of medical information and interprofessional communication: the CSI scale”, BMC Health Services Research, 14(126), 1-9.
  • Bakan, I. et al. (2017), “The relationship between organisational ambidexterity and organisational learning: an empirical study”, Turan, 9(33), 10-17.
  • Baškarada, S. et al. (2016), “Leadership and organisational ambidexterity”, Journal of Management Development, 35(6), 778-788.
  • Bolisani, E. et al. (2014), “Wiki as a Knowledge Management System in a Small Project‐Based Company: Benefits, Issues and Managerial Challenges”, in: C. Vivas & P. Sequeira (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém Portugal, 4-5 September, Published by Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, UK.
  • Borzillo, S. et al. (2012), “Communities of practice: keeping the company agile”, Journal of Business Strategy, 33(6), 22-30.
  • Boumgarden, P. et al. (2012), “Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organisational performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587-610.
  • Bramhall, E. (2014), “Effective communication skills in nursing practice”, Nursing Standard, 29(14), 53-59.
  • Brown, S.L. & K.M. Eisenhardt (1998), Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos, Harvard Business Press, USA.
  • Chang, Y.Y. & M. Hughes (2012), “Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small- to medium-sized firms”, European Management Journal, 30(1), 1-17.
  • Cingöz, A. & A. Akdoğan (2015), “Örgütsel ustalık (Organisational Ambidexterity): Örgütsel ustalık düzeyini belirlemede araştırıcı ve yararlanıcı stratejilerin etkileşimsel rolü”, Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 59-67.
  • Connelly, L. (2012), “Correlations”, Medsurg Nursing, 21(3), 171-172.
  • Coughlan, M. et al. (2007), “Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research”, British Journal of Nursing, 16(11), 658-663.
  • Dinç, S. et al. (2007), “Knowledge, Opinion and Expectations of Students in Harran University School of Nursing”, Journal of Atatürk University School of Nursing, 10(1), 1-9.
  • Duncan, R.B. (1976), “The ambidextrous organisation: designing dual structures for innovation”, in: R.H. Killman et al. (eds.), The Management of Organisation (167-188), North Holland, New York.
  • Ekambaram, A. et al. (2018), “The role of big data and knowledge management in improving projects and project-based organisations”, Procedia Computer Science, (138), 851-858.
  • Erdoğan, S. & Y. Yazıcıoğlu (2004), SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Fahrudi, A.N. et al. (2017), “Managing organisational learning ambidexterity in a resource-constrained environment: An exploratory study of Australian large service organisations”, The XXVIII ISPIM Innovation Conference Innovation Symposium, June 18-21, Vienna, Austria.
  • Ferreira, M. et al. (2016) “Clinical skills and communication in nursing students”, icH&Hpsy 2nd International Conference on Health and Health Psychology, June.
  • Ferreira, V. (2014), “Wiki as a knowledge management tool: the case of a non‐profit administrative entity”, in: C. Vivas & P. Sequeira (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém Portugal, 4-5 September, Published by Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, UK.
  • Gehrke, A. & Md. M. Hasan (2020), “Knowledge Sharing Process in Organisations: An Integrative Framework”, Master Thesis, University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies Department of Business and Economics Studies.
  • Gibson, C. & J. Birkinshaw (2004), “The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organisational ambidexterity”, Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
  • Gliem, J.A. & R.R. Gliem (2003, October 8-10), “Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales”, Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education (82-88), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Good, D. & E.J. Michel (2013), “Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts”, The Journal of Psychology, 147(5), 435-453.
  • Gottems, L.B.D. et al. (2018), “Good practices in normal childbirth: reliability analysis of an instrument by Cronbach’s Alpha”, Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, 26, e3000.
  • Göriş, S. et al. (2014), “Nurses’ Professional Values and Affecting Factors”, Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 5(3), 137-142.
  • Gray, J. & H. Laidlaw (2004), “Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction”, Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 425-448.
  • Guettel, W.H. & S. Konlechner (2007), “Dynamic Capabilities and The Ambidextrous Organisation: Empirical Results From Research Intensive Firms”, SMS 27th Annual International Conference, October 14-17, San Diego, California.
  • Güllüoğlu, Ö. (2012), Örgütsel İletişim, Eğitim Akademi Yayınları, Eğitim Kitabevi, Konya.
  • Güttel, W. & S. Konlechner (2007), “Dynamic capabilities and competence obsolescence: empirical data from research-intensive firms”, in: Proceedings of OLKC - Learning Fusion (357-374), Ontario, Canada, June 14-17.
  • Harsono, M. (2016), “Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing to Individual Performance: The Role of Organisational Culture and Relationship Quality as Moderator in Family Business”, IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM), 4, 67-78.
  • Hew, K.F. & N. Hara (2007), “Knowledge sharing in online environments: A qualitative case study”, J.Am.Soc.Inf.Sci., (58), 2310-2324.
  • Hughes, P. et al. (2020), “Micro-foundations of organisational ambidexterity in the context of cross-border mergers and acquisitions”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 153, 4-5.
  • Im, G. & A. Rai (2008), “Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganisational Relationships”, Management Science, 54, 1281-1296.
  • Ipe, M. (2003), “Knowledge sharing in organisations: A conceptual framework”, Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337-359.
  • Jeskey, M. et al. (2011), “Nurse adoption of continuous patient monitoring on acute post‐surgical units: managing technology implementation”, Journal of Nursing Management, 19(7), 863-875.
  • Ji, H. & S-Y. Zou (2017), “The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Organisational Performance and the Countermeasures”, International Conference on Education Science and Economic Management (ICESEM), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Volume 106, Atlantis Press, 256-259.
  • Junni, P. et al. (2013), “Organisational ambidexterity and performance: a meta-analysis”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312.
  • Katou, A.A. et al. (2020), “A trilogy of organisational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, nurse work engagement and environmental changes”, Journal of Business Research, 128, 688-700.
  • Kauppila, O.-P. et al. (2011), “Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries”, Management Learning, 42(4), 395-418.
  • Korkmaz, Ö.Y. (2010), “Transformation of the nursing profession”, Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 7(3), 3-5.
  • Kortmann, S. (2015), “The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity‐oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666-684.
  • Kotlarsky, J. & I. Oshri (2005), “Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects”, European Journal of Informational Systems, 14(1), 37-48.
  • Kyriakopoulos, K. & C. Moorman (2004), “Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219-240.
  • Li, C.R. (2013), “How top management team diversity fosters organisational ambidexterity: the role of social capital among top executives”, Journal of Organisational Change Management, 26(5), 874-896.
  • Lin, H.E. et al. (2017), “Aligning knowledge assets for exploitation, exploration, and ambidexterity: a study of companies in high‐tech parks in China”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(2), 122-140.
  • Lis, A. et al. (2018), “The Concept of the Ambidextrous Organisation: Systematic Literature Review”, International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17, 77-97.
  • Lubatkin, M.H. et al. (2006), “Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration”, Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672.
  • Mannor, M. (2007), “Building Ambidexterity: Generating KnowledgeBased Diversity to Promote Creative Balance in Organisations”, SMS 27th Annual International Conference, October 14-17, San Diego, California.
  • March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning”, Organisation Science, 2(1), 71-87.
  • Marri, M.Y.K. et al. (2019), “Structural Ambidexterity: Exploring Alternative Pro-Ambidexterity Conducive Structural Designs for Recourse-Constrained Organisations”, Archives of Business Research, 7(12), 307-320.
  • O’Daniel, M. & A.H. Rosenstein (2008), “Professional Communication and Team Collaboration”, in: R.G. Hughes (ed.), Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Chapter 33.
  • Ojha, D. et al. (2018), “Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organisational learning and moderating role of uncertainty”, International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215-231.
  • O'Reilly, C.A. & M.L. Tushman (2011), “Organisational ambidexterity in action: how managers explore and exploit”, California Management Review, 53(4), 5-22.
  • O'Reilly, C.A. & M.L. Tushman (2013), “Organisational ambidexterity: past, present, and future”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
  • Ouakouak, M.L. & N. Ouedraogo (2017), “Effects of initiative-friendly culture, individual creativity, and knowledge sharing on innovation: Mediating and moderating approaches”, International Journal of Business and Economics, 2(1), 1-20.
  • Pai, P. & H.T. Tsai (2016), “Reciprocity norms and information-sharing behavior in online consumption communities: An empirical investigation of antecedents and moderators”, Information & Management, 53(1), 38-52.
  • Palanisamy, R. & J. Verville (2015), “Factors enabling communication-based collaboration in interprofessional healthcare practice: A case study”, International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(2), 8-27.
  • Parlayan, M.A. & S. Dökme (2016), “Özel hastanelerdeki hemşire ve hastaların iletişim seviyelerinin değerlendirilmesi: Bir hastane örneği”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 265-284.
  • Patel, P.C. et al. (2013), “Walking the tightrope: an assessment of the relationship between high-performance work systems and organisational ambidexterity”, Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420-1442.
  • Petro, Y. (2017), “Ambidexterity through Project Portfolio Management Resolving paradoxes in organisations”, Doctoral Dissertation, The British University.
  • Pun, J. et al. (2020), “Training in communication and interaction during shift-to-shift nursing handovers in a bilingual hospital: A case study”, Nurse Education Today, 84, 104212.
  • Quan, S.D. et al. (2013), “It's not about pager replacement: An in‐depth look at the interprofessional nature of communication in healthcare”, Journal of Hospital Medicine, 8(3), 137-143.
  • Raisch, S. & J. Birkinshaw (2008), “Organisational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.
  • Rana, M.H. & M.S. Malik (2017), “Impact of human resource (HR) practices on organisational performance: Moderating role of Islamic principles”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(2), 186-207.
  • Ruhomauly, Z. et al. (2019), “Improving the quality of handover: implementing SBAR”, Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 54.
  • Savolainen, R. (2017), “Information sharing and knowledge sharing as communicative activities”, Information Research, 22(3), 1-20.
  • Schober, P. et al. (2018), “Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation”, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
  • Senthilnathan, S. (2019), “Usefulness of Correlation Analysis”, SSRN Electronic Journal, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3416918.
  • Skok, W. & S. Tahir (2010), “Developing A Knowledge Management Strategy for the Arab World”, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC), 41(7), 1-11.
  • Sönmez-Çakır, F. & Z. Adıgüzel (2020), “Evaluation of Empowering Leadership and Knowledge Sharing on Organisation and Organisation Employees”, Optimum Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 7(2), 593-612.
  • Stein, H. (1968), “On Einstein Minkowski space-time”, The Journal of Philosophy, 65(1), 5-23.
  • Subaciute, E. & J.R. Rao (2019), “The Role of Design Thinking in Managing Organisational Change”, Master's Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology.
  • Taber, K.S. (2018), “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education”, Res.Sci.Educ, 48, 1273-1296.
  • Tamayo-Torres, J. et al. (2017), “Ambidexterity, Performance and Environmental Dynamism”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(3), 282-299.
  • Tan, T.C. et al. (2017), “Nurse-physician communication-An integrated review”, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(23-24), 3974-3989.
  • Tong, C. et al. (2013), “The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on the Relationship between Organisational Culture and Job Satisfaction”, International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 3, 9-37.
  • Turkelson, C. et al. (2017), “Improving nursing communication skills in an intensive care unit using simulation and nursing crew resource management strategies: an implementation project”, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 32(4), 331-339.
  • Turner, N. & L. Lee-Kelley (2013), “Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics”, Management Learning, 44, 179-196.
  • Vrontis, D. et al. (2017), “Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374-388.
  • Wasilewski, J. (2019), “Ambidexterity and innovation in chief nursing officers in the healthcare setting”, Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University.
  • Wasko, M. & S. Faraj (2005), “Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice”, Information Technologies and Knowledge Management, 29(1), 35-58.
  • Wei, Z. et al. (2014), “Organisational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832-847.
  • Whitman, M. & W.J. Davis (2009), “Registered nurses' perceptions of cultural and linguistic hospital resources”, Nursing Outlook, 57, 35-41.
  • Wu, D. et al. (2015), “Knowledge heterogeneity and team knowledge sharing as moderated by internal social capital. Social behavior and personality”, An International Journal, 43(3), 423-436.
  • Yaman, S. & S. Tekin (2010), “Öğretmenler için hizmet içi eğitime yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi”, Bayburt Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 76-88.
  • Yang, L.R. et al. (2012), “Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice”, Automation in Construction, 22, 182-191.
  • Yılmaz, A.T. & A. Yıldırım (2018), “İletişim ve bilgi paylaşımı ölçeği’nin türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirliği”, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(70), 76-90.
  • Zhang, A.Y. et al. (2011), “Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organisations: The role of group processes”, Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 851-862.
Toplam 96 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gülşen Kırpık 0000-0003-4785-9624

Yasin Çetin 0000-0001-5783-5701

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 5 Temmuz 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 55

Kaynak Göster

APA Kırpık, G., & Çetin, Y. (2023). Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region. Sosyoekonomi, 31(55), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01
AMA Kırpık G, Çetin Y. Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region. Sosyoekonomi. Ocak 2023;31(55):11-35. doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01
Chicago Kırpık, Gülşen, ve Yasin Çetin. “Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region”. Sosyoekonomi 31, sy. 55 (Ocak 2023): 11-35. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01.
EndNote Kırpık G, Çetin Y (01 Ocak 2023) Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region. Sosyoekonomi 31 55 11–35.
IEEE G. Kırpık ve Y. Çetin, “Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region”, Sosyoekonomi, c. 31, sy. 55, ss. 11–35, 2023, doi: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01.
ISNAD Kırpık, Gülşen - Çetin, Yasin. “Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region”. Sosyoekonomi 31/55 (Ocak 2023), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01.
JAMA Kırpık G, Çetin Y. Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region. Sosyoekonomi. 2023;31:11–35.
MLA Kırpık, Gülşen ve Yasin Çetin. “Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region”. Sosyoekonomi, c. 31, sy. 55, 2023, ss. 11-35, doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.01.01.
Vancouver Kırpık G, Çetin Y. Examining the Relationship Between Communication and Information Sharing and Organisational Ambidexterity: A Study on Nurses in TRC1 Region. Sosyoekonomi. 2023;31(55):11-35.