Dupin, the Purloiner of the Purloined Letter: A Hero? Or A Plagiarist?
Öz
“The Purloined Letter” is the third of the three Dupin stories that Edgar A. Poe wrote and published in 1844. Contrary to being a typical example of detective fiction which usually involves an investigation to find out what is being kept hidden, “The Purloined Letter” is rather concerned with finding out what is being kept in plain sight. Dupin’s familiarity with logic, math and physics enables him to look at the matter at hand from an exceptionally distinct perspective. Unlike the chief police officer of the Paris Police Department, Dupin firmly believes that the purloined letter has never been concealed at all. To prove his point, he emphasizes the ability to identify with the opponent and draws an analogy from a game of guessing in which one player is expected to make a correct guess about what the other player is thinking of. Dupin also makes a philosophical point regarding the failure of human mind to notice the obvious, which is a result of its tendency to believe that it can find the obvious in minute details. Dupin also believes that the only way to obtain the letter is to purloin it back from the robber who purloined it. And hence he purloins the letter in almost the same way as it was first purloined. The purloining of the letter is mirrored in the re-purloining of it. In the light of all this, this paper aims to explain why the Police fail to find the letter and why the letter gets back to its owner only after the purloining of the letter repeats itself.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Bretzius, Stephen. (1995). “The Figure-Power Dialectic: Poe's "Purloined Letter".” MLN 110(4), 679-691. Retrieved October 6, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3251199
- Derrida, Jacques et al. (1999). “The Purveyor of Truth.” Yale French Studies (96), 124-197. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3040722
- Irwin, John T. (1986). “Mysteries We Reread, Mysteries of Rereading: Poe, Borges and the Analytic Detective Story; Also Lacan, Derrida, and Johnson.” MLN 101(5), 1168-1215. Retrieved December 7, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2905715
- Lacan, Jacques and Jeffrey Mehlman. (1972). “Seminar on "The Purloined Letter".” Yale French Studies (48), 39-72. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2929623
- Johnson, Barbara. (1977). “The Frame of Reference: Poe, Lacan, Derrida.” Yale French Studies (55/56), 457-505. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2930445
- Kennedy, J. Gerald. (1996). “The Violence of Melancholy: Poe against Himself.” American Literary History 8(3), 533-551. Retrieved November 20, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/490156
- Poe, Edgar Allan. (1946). “The Purloined Letter.” In Edgar Allan Poe (Auth.), Tales of Mystery and Imagination (pp. 454-470). London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
- Richard, Claude. (1981). “Destin, Design, Dasein: Lacan, Derrida and "The Purloined Letter".” The Iowa Review 12(4), 1-11. Retrieved 11 17, 2020, from https://jstor.org.org/stable/20155773
- Riddel, Joseph N. (1979). “The "Crypt" of Edgar Poe.” boundary 2, 7(3), 117-144. Retrieved November 23, 2020, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/303167
- Rollason, Christopher. (1988). “The Detective Myth in Edgar Allan Poe's Dupin Trilogy.” In Brian Docherty (Ed.), American Crime Fiction: Studies in the Genre (pp. 4-22). London: Macmillan Press.
