Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Eril Söz, Mekan ve Zamanın Çözünmesi: T. S. Eliot'n "Burnt Norton" ve "East Coker" Adlı Şiirleri

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1532 - 1546, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.1564746

Öz

Bu çalışma, T.S. Eliot’ın Dört Kuartet’indeki “Burnt Norton” ve “East Coker” adlı şiirleri anaç ve dişil olanı, post-yapısalcı feminist teorilerden yararlanarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Eliot’un bütün şiirlerinin ve bu iki şiirin cinsiyet ilişkileri ve anaç açısından ayrıntılı bir şekilde anlaşılması, Eliot’ın biyografisi, evlilikleri de dahil olmak üzere kadınlarla ilişkileri, dalgalı dini yaşantısı ve 1927’de Anglikan Kilisesi’ne geçişinin bir kombinasyonu olan bir analizi gerektirir; ki bu aslında özü bulma arzusuyla bağlantılıdır. Eliot’un İngiltere Kilisesi’ne resmen geçişi ve Anglo-Katolisizm’den daha yüksek bir kilise versiyonu arayışı, dinin bu mezhebinin enkarnasyon ve Meryem’in sublimasyonu doktrinlerine daha yakın olması anaç kavramının daha derin bir şekilde anlaşılması için önemlidir. Bu iki husus, T.S. Eliot’ın son dönem çalışmalarındaki cinsiyet tartışmasında özellikle önemlidir, çünkü bu hususlar sınırların bulanıklaşmasına, zıtlıkların birleşmesine ve nihai olana ulaşmada dişil öğenin öneminin anlaşılmasına alan açarlar. Öte yandan, kadınları arzu nesnesi olarak ele alıp heteroseksüel normlara tutunmak yerine, son dönem eserlerinde ve özellikle Dört Kuartet’te kadın, anlamlı bir varoluş ve ruhun birliğe doğru yolculuğunun tamamlanması için olmazsa olmaz olan ilahi bir unsur haline gelir.

Kaynakça

  • Battersby, C. (1998). The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. Routledge.
  • Blamires, H. (1969). Word unheard: A guide through Eliot’s Four Quartets. Methuen.
  • Brown, D. (1996). HD.’s “Trilogy”: Modern gnosticism? Literature and Theology, 10 (4), 351-360.
  • Butler, J. (1989). The body politics of Julia Kristeva. Hypatia, 3(3).
  • Dekoven, M. (1999). Modernism and gender. In M. Levenson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Modernism (pp. 174-193). Cambridge University Press.
  • Eliot, T. S. (1963). Collected poems, 1909-1962. Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original Work Published 1934)
  • Geary, M. K. (2016). T. S. Eliot and the mother: Ambivalence, allegory and form. (Published Doctorate Thesis). University of Birmingham.
  • Gish, N. K. (1981). Time in the poetry of T.S. Eliot: A study in structure and theme. Barnes & Noble Books.
  • Haffey, K. (2019). Literary modernism, queer temporality: Eddies in time. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hart, K. (2015). Eliot’s Rose Garden: Some phenomenology and theology in “Burnt Norton”. Christianity and Literature, 64(3), 243-265. Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. Sage Publications
  • Irigaray, L. (2002). The Forgotten Mystery of Female Ancestry. In M. Joy, K. O’Grady& J.L. Poxon (Eds.), French feminists on Religion: A Reader (pp.68-75). Routledge.
  • Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. L.S. Roudiez (ed), T. Gora, A. Jardine & L. S. Roudiez (trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)
  • Kristeva, J. (1981). Women’s time. (A. Jardine & H. Blake, Trans.). Signs, 7(1), 13–35.
  • Li, V. (1997). T. S. Eliot and the language of hysteria. Dalhousie Review 77(3), 323-34.
  • Longenecker, M. (1997). Women, ecology, and the environment: An introduction. NWSA Journal, 9(3), 1–17.
  • Lorraine, R. C. (2011) Recovering Jouissance: Feminist Aesthetics and Music. In K. Pendle(Ed.), Women & Music: A History (2nd Edition) (pp.3-18). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1991)
  • Murphy, R. E. (2007). Critical companion to T.S. Eliot: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. Facts On File.
  • Pondrom, C. (2005). Conflict and concealment: Eliot’s approach to women and gender. In D. Chinitz (Ed.), A Companion to Eliot (pp. 323-334). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Schneider, E. (1975). T. S. Eliot: The pattern in the carpet. University of California Press.
  • Stone, A. (2012). Feminism, psychoanalysis, and maternal subjectivity. Routledge.
  • Vachhani, S. J. (2019). Rethinking the politics of writing differently through écriture Féminine. Management Learning, 50(1), 11–23.

T.S. Eliot’s “Burnt Norton” and “East Coker”: The Patriarchal Word, Space and Temporal Unbound

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 1532 - 1546, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.1564746

Öz

This study aims at analyzing the maternal and the feminine in T.S. Eliot’s “Burnt Norton” and “East Coker” in his Four Quartets benefiting from post-structural feminist theories. An elaborate understanding of his poetry and these two poems in terms of gender relations and the maternal involves an analysis that is a combination of Eliot’s biography, his relations to women including his marriages, his fluctuating religious life and conversion to the Anglican Church in 1927, which actually involves a desire to find the essence. His formal conversion to Church of England and pursuit of a high-church version of Anglo-Catholicism is significant for a deeper understanding of the maternal in that this sect of the religion included doctrines of incarnation and sublimation of Mary. These two aspects are particularly important in the discussion of gender in T.S. Eliot’s late works since they open up space for the blurring of boundaries, the unification of opposites and the significance of the feminine element in reaching the ultimate. Besides, instead of treating women as objects of desire and clinging to heterosexual norms, the female becomes the divine element in his late works and particularly Four Quartets, which is quintessential for a meaningful existence and the completion of the soul’s journey towards unity.

Kaynakça

  • Battersby, C. (1998). The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. Routledge.
  • Blamires, H. (1969). Word unheard: A guide through Eliot’s Four Quartets. Methuen.
  • Brown, D. (1996). HD.’s “Trilogy”: Modern gnosticism? Literature and Theology, 10 (4), 351-360.
  • Butler, J. (1989). The body politics of Julia Kristeva. Hypatia, 3(3).
  • Dekoven, M. (1999). Modernism and gender. In M. Levenson (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Modernism (pp. 174-193). Cambridge University Press.
  • Eliot, T. S. (1963). Collected poems, 1909-1962. Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original Work Published 1934)
  • Geary, M. K. (2016). T. S. Eliot and the mother: Ambivalence, allegory and form. (Published Doctorate Thesis). University of Birmingham.
  • Gish, N. K. (1981). Time in the poetry of T.S. Eliot: A study in structure and theme. Barnes & Noble Books.
  • Haffey, K. (2019). Literary modernism, queer temporality: Eddies in time. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hart, K. (2015). Eliot’s Rose Garden: Some phenomenology and theology in “Burnt Norton”. Christianity and Literature, 64(3), 243-265. Healy, K. (2000). Social work practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. Sage Publications
  • Irigaray, L. (2002). The Forgotten Mystery of Female Ancestry. In M. Joy, K. O’Grady& J.L. Poxon (Eds.), French feminists on Religion: A Reader (pp.68-75). Routledge.
  • Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. L.S. Roudiez (ed), T. Gora, A. Jardine & L. S. Roudiez (trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1977)
  • Kristeva, J. (1981). Women’s time. (A. Jardine & H. Blake, Trans.). Signs, 7(1), 13–35.
  • Li, V. (1997). T. S. Eliot and the language of hysteria. Dalhousie Review 77(3), 323-34.
  • Longenecker, M. (1997). Women, ecology, and the environment: An introduction. NWSA Journal, 9(3), 1–17.
  • Lorraine, R. C. (2011) Recovering Jouissance: Feminist Aesthetics and Music. In K. Pendle(Ed.), Women & Music: A History (2nd Edition) (pp.3-18). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1991)
  • Murphy, R. E. (2007). Critical companion to T.S. Eliot: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. Facts On File.
  • Pondrom, C. (2005). Conflict and concealment: Eliot’s approach to women and gender. In D. Chinitz (Ed.), A Companion to Eliot (pp. 323-334). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Schneider, E. (1975). T. S. Eliot: The pattern in the carpet. University of California Press.
  • Stone, A. (2012). Feminism, psychoanalysis, and maternal subjectivity. Routledge.
  • Vachhani, S. J. (2019). Rethinking the politics of writing differently through écriture Féminine. Management Learning, 50(1), 11–23.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Edebi Teori, Edebi Çalışmalar (Diğer)
Bölüm EDEBİYAT / ARAŞTIRMA MAKALELERİ
Yazarlar

Zehra Gündar 0000-0002-1942-4618

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 10 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 27 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Gündar, Z. (2024). Eril Söz, Mekan ve Zamanın Çözünmesi: T. S. Eliot’n "Burnt Norton" ve "East Coker" Adlı Şiirleri. Söylem Filoloji Dergisi, 9(3), 1532-1546. https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.1564746