AİLENİN SOSYAL HİZMET LİTERATÜRÜNDEKİ YERİ: LİSANSÜSTÜ TEZLER ÜZERİNDEN BİR BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet bilim dalında aile konusuna yönelik akademik üretimin durumunu analiz etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi (YÖKTEZ) veri tabanında 2025 yılı Mart ayına kadar erişime açık olan, sosyal hizmet disiplininde aile temalı hazırlanmış 137 lisansüstü tez, nitel bir araştırma yöntemi olan içerik analiziyle incelenmiştir. Bulgular, aile konulu sosyal hizmet tezlerinin ağırlıklı olarak kadın araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlandığını göstermektedir. Tez sayısında yıllara göre artış gözlenirken, yüksek lisans tezlerinin doktora tezlerine kıyasla daha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Tezlerde en sık çocuk ve aile refahı ile engellilik ve aile konuları ele alınırken, göç, yoksulluk ve aile içi şiddet gibi konular daha az incelenmiştir. Araştırma yöntemleri açısından nicel çalışmalar baskın olup özellikle doktora düzeyinde nitel ve karma yöntem kullanımı artmıştır. Tüm tezler Türkçe yazılmış olup bu tezlerin belirli üniversitelerde yoğunlaştığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, sosyal hizmet alanında aile temalı akademik çalışmaların giderek arttığı, ancak doktora düzeyinde ve belirli konularda araştırma eksikliklerinin bulunduğu görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, sosyal hizmet disiplininde doktora programlarının desteklenmesi, metodolojik çeşitliliğin artırılması ve uluslararası akademik katılımın teşvik edilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal hizmet
• aile
• lisansüstü tezler
• bibliyometrik analiz

THE PLACE OF FAMILY IN SOCIAL WORK LITERATURE: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF POSTGRADUATE THESES

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the state of academic production on family-related topics within the field of social work in Türkiye. The research examines 137 postgraduate theses on family themes in the social work discipline, accessible in the National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education (YÖKTEZ) database as of March 2025, using content analysis, a qualitative research method. The findings indicate that graduate theses on family-related social work topics have predominantly been conducted by female researchers. While an increase in the number of theses has been observed over the years, master's theses outnumber doctoral dissertations. The most frequently studied topics include child and family welfare and disability, while issues such as migration, poverty, and domestic violence receive comparatively less attention. Quantitative studies are dominant in terms of research methods, though qualitative and mixed-method approaches have become more prevalent at the doctoral level. All theses are written in Turkish and are concentrated in certain universities. In conclusion, while family-related academic studies in social work are increasing, research gaps remain at the doctoral level and in specific topics. Therefore, supporting doctoral programs in social work, enhancing methodological diversity, and encouraging international academic engagement are recommended.

Keywords

• Social work
• family
• postgraduate theses
• bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

1. Akyüz, M. ve Altun, F. (2022). Aileye yönelik sosyal politikaların süreç analizi yoluyla incelenmesi. Sosyal Çalışma Dergisi, 6(2), 170-184.
2. Alptekin, K. (2024). Sosyal hizmet eğitiminin niteliğini geliştirme çalışmaları 2016-2021 yılları arası. Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Yayınları.
3. Alptekin, K., Topuz, S. ve Zengin, O. (2017). Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet eğitiminde neler oluyor?. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 28(2), 50-69.
4. Aparicio, M., Centeno, C., Carrasco, J.M., Barbosa, A. and Arantzamendi, M. (2017). What are families most grateful for after receiving palliative care? Content analysis of written documents received: A chance to improve the quality of care. BMC Palliative Care, 16, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0229-5
5. Bağış, M., Kryeziu, L., Kurutkan, M.N. and Ramadani, V. (2023). Women entrepreneurship in family business: Dominant topics and future research trends. Journal of Family Business Management, 13(3), 687-713. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-03-2022-0040
6. Bazen, A., Barg, F.K. and Takeshita, J. (2021). Research techniques made simple: An introduction to qualitative research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(2), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.029
7. Beach, S.R., Schulz, R., Donovan, H. and Rosland, A.M. (2021). Family caregiving during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Gerontologist, 61(5), 650-660. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab049
8. Bhadra, S. (2022). Psychosocial support for protection of children in disasters. Deb, S. (Ed.). In Child safety, welfare and well-being: Issues and challenges (pp. 453-482). Springer Singapore.

9. Cassinat, J.R., Whiteman, S.D., Serang, S., Dotterer, A.M., Mustillo, S.A., Maggs, J.L. and Kelly, B.C. (2021). Changes in family chaos and family relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 57(10), 1597–1610. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001217
10. Cedeño, D. (2023). Social exclusion and inclusion: A social work perspective. Families in Society, 104(3), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894221147576
11. Creamer, E.G., Collins, K.M. and Poth, C. (2025). The implications of a mixed methods way of thinking to practice. Methodological Innovations, 18(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991251325470
12. Dominelli, L. (2023). Social work practice during times of disaster: A transformative Green Social Work Model for theory, education and practice in disaster interventions. Routledge.
13. Fayaz, I. and Gulzar, F. (2025). Thrive, don’t survive: Building work-life balance with family support, grit and self-efficacy. IIMT Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IIMTJM-05-2024-0057
14. Ferreira, E., Sofia Figueiredo, A. and Santos, A. (2024). Unveiling the narratives of portuguese professionals engaged with domestic violence victims: Persistent challenges and novel COVID-19 impacts. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 40(7-8), 1643-1667. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241262243
15. Fook, J. (2022). Social work: A critical approach to practice. Sage Publications.
16. Frost, N., Devaney, C. and Herrera-Pastor, D. (2020). Understanding contemporary family support: Reflections on theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Social Work and Social Sciences Review: An İnternal Journal of Applied Research, 21(2), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v21i2.1420
17. Fuseini, S. (2024). “Suffering in silence”: How social workers in child welfare practice experience and manage burnout. Children and Youth Services Review, 166, 107939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107939
18. Garbarino, J. (2017). Children and families in the social environment: Modern applications of social work. Routledge.
19. Güldalı, P.Ş. ve Gümüştekin K. (2024). Çalışma yaşamı, madde bağımlılığı ve işyerinde sosyal hizmet. S.E. Hacıbektaşoğlu ve F. Deniz (Ed.) İşyerlerinde iyilik hali: Sağlık, güvenlik ve sosyal politikalar içinde (128-146 ss.). Serüven Yayınevi.
20. Healy, L.M. and Thomas, R.L. (2020). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world. Oxford University Press.
21. Kadan, G. (2022). Covid-19 pandemisinde çocuk ve ailelere yönelik yapılan makalelerin incelenmesi. Çocuk ve Gelişim Dergisi, 4(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.36731/cg.991558
22. Karataş, K. ve Erkan, G. (2002). Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet eğitiminin tarihçesi. Ü. Onat (Ed.) Sosyal hizmet eğitiminde yeni yaklaşımlar içinde. Sosyal Hizmet Sempozyumu 2002, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Hizmetler Yüksekokulu Yayını No.: 17.
23. Kavgaoğlu, D., Altundal, Ü. ve Çay Padalıhasanoğlu, E. (2021). Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet alanındaki lisansüstü tezlerin içerik analizi. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Social Sciences Journal, 7(2), 61-69.
24. Khalid, S. and Tadesse, E. (2022). Faculty research productivity at women’s universities through the lens of preference theory. Higher Education, 83(5), 949-968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00717-4
25. Kourgiantakis, T., Ashcroft, R., Mohamud, F., Fearing, G. and Sanders, J. (2021). Family-focused practices in addictions: A scoping review. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 21(1), 18–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2020.1870287
26. Lee, M.Y., Eads, R., Lightfoot, E., LaSala, M.C. and Franklin, C. (2023). Current landscape of doctoral education in social work: A look at the PhD and DSW programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 59(3), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2203195
27. Livings, J. (2013). A content analysis of eighteen scholarly journals: What has been written about online family therapy?. Texas Woman's University.
28. Makhanya, T.B. (2023). The gendered role of social work as a social construct: A call for critical discourse. Gender and Behaviour, 21(2), 21559-21556.
29. Maynard, B.R., Vaughn, M.G., and Sarteschi, C.M. (2014). The empirical status of social work dissertation research: Characteristics, trends and implications for the field. British Journal of Social Work, 44(2), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs123
30. Mayring, P. (2021). Qualitative content analysis: A step-by-step guide. Sage Publications
31. McVicar, A., Munn-Giddings, C. and Abu-Helil, C. (2012). Exploring the development of action research in nursing and social care in the UK: A comparative bibliometric review of action research designs in social work (2000–2010). Action Research, 10(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750312439902
32. Metz, A., Jensen, T., Farley, A., Boaz, A., Bartley, L. and Villodas, M. (2022). Building trusting relationships to support implementation: A proposed theoretical model. Frontiers in Health Services, 2, 894599. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.894599
33. Muller-Kluits, N. and Slabbert, I. (2020). The role of social workers in addressing caregiver burden in families of persons with disabilities. South African Health Review, 1, 137-145.
34. Padgett, D.K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research. Sage publications.
35. Pulman, A. and Fenge, L.A. (2023). Building capacity for social care research – ways of improving research skills for social workers. Social Work Education, 43(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2221276
36. Rai, A., Ravi, K., Shrestha, N. and Alvarez-Hernandez, L.R. (2023). Culturally responsive domestic violence interventions for immigrant communities in the United States: A scoping review. Journal of Social Work in the Global Community, 7(1), 1.
37. Santos, J.M., Horta, H. and Amâncio, L. (2020). Research agendas of female and male academics: A new perspective on gender disparities in academia. Gender and Education, 33(5), 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844
38. Settersten Jr, R.A., Bernardi, L., Härkönen, J., Antonucci, T.C., Dykstra, P.A., Heckhausen, J. and Thomson, E. (2020). Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research, 45, 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360
39. Shah, M., Rizzo, S., Percy-Smith, B., Monchuk, L., Lorusso, E., Tay, C. and Day, L. (2021). Growing up under COVID-19: Young people’s agency in family dynamics. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 722380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.722380
40. Shahin, M.M. (2024). Reality of the generalist social work practice in marital and family counseling ınstitutions. International Journal of Halal Research, 6(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijhr.6.1.20-30.2024
41. Sirotkina, R. and van Ewijk, H. (2021). ‘There is No future with no acknowledgement of the past’ - Phenomenological approach in analysing postgraduate studies in social work in Estonia. Social Work Education, 42(7), 1019–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2021.2012564
42. Slayter, E.M., Kattari, S.K., Yakas, L., Singh, R.C., Goulden, A., Taylor, S. and Prince, D. (2023). Beyond ramps, curb cuts, and captions: A call for disability justice in social work. Social Work, 68(1), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac045
43. Thompson, K., Manshack, L. and Van Schuyver, J. (2022). The significance of indigenous field education: An analysis of the social workers advancing through grounded education program. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 7, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-021-00187-9
44. Tracy, S.J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley ve Sons.
45. Viitasalo, K., Kaitsaari, T., Kaittila, A., Moisio, M. and Hakovirta, M. (2023). Promoting financial capability within the field of social work practice among families with children: A systematic review. European Journal of Social Work, 27(3), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2236326
46. Vikander, M. and Källström, Å. (2024). What children exposed to domestic violence value when meeting social workers: A practice‐oriented systematic research review. Child ve Family Social Work, 29(1), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13073
47. Yuda, T.K. and Munir, M. (2023). Social insecurity and varieties of family resilience strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(7/8), 756-776. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2022-0201
48. Zengin, O. ve Çalış, N. (2017). Türkiye’de sosyal hizmet araştırması: Son 10 yılda sosyal hizmet anabilim dallarında yazılan tezler üzerine bir inceleme. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 1260-1273.