Öz Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Aracı Olarak Kullanılan Web Tabanlı Yansıtıcı Günlüklerin Beden Eğitimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Yansıtıcı Düşünme ve Öğrenme Motivasyonuna Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, uzaktan eğitimde öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme aracı olarak kullanılan web tabanlı yansıtıcı günlük destekli öğretimin beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme ve öğrenme motivasyonuna etkisini belirlemektir. Araştırma, karşılaştırmalı eşitlenmemiş gruplar son test deseninin kullanıldığı deneysel bir çalışmadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Spor Bilimleri Fakültesinde öğrenimine devam eden 68 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada uygulama öncesinde Beden Eğitimi Bilimine Giriş dersini alan öğrenciler kontrol grubu (n=38), Beden Eğitimi ve Sporun Temelleri dersini alan öğrenciler ise deney grubu (n=30) olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada veriler, Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeyini Belirleme Ölçeği ve Güdülenme Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde t testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları kontrol ve deney grubu öğrencilerinin yansıtıcı düşünme ölçeği toplam puanları ve alışkanlık, anlama, yansıtma, kritik yansıtma alt ölçek puanları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca grupların, güdülenme ölçeği toplam puanları ve içsel hedef belirleme, dışsal hedef belirleme, görev değeri, öğrenmeye ilişkin kontrol inancı, öğrenme ve performans ile ilgili öz yeterlik alt ölçek puanlarının benzer olduğu bulunmuştur. Ancak, deney grubunun sınav kaygısı alt ölçeği puanlarının anlamlı düzeyde düşük olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, uzaktan eğitimde kullanılan web tabanlı yansıtıcı günlüklerin beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme ve öğrenme motivasyonlarını artırmada etkili araç olmadığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yansıtıcı günlük
• yansıtıcı düşünme
• motivasyon
• öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme
• öğretmen adayı
• beden eğitimi

Investigation of the Effect of Web Based Reflective Journals Used as a Self-Regulated Learning Tool on Physical Education Teacher Candidates' Reflective Thinking and Learning Motivation

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of web-based reflective journal-supported instruction, used as a self-regulated learning tool in distance education, on the reflective thinking and learning motivation of physical education prospective teachers. The research is an experimental study using a comparative unequalised groups post-test design. The study group consists of 68 students continuing their education at the Faculty of Sports Sciences. In the study, students who took the Introduction to Physical Education course prior to the application were designated as the control group (n=38), while students who took the Fundamentals of Physical Education and Sports course were designated as the experimental group (n=38). Data were collected using the Reflective Thinking Level Determination Scale and the Motivation Scale. The t-test was used to analyse the data obtained. The research findings revealed no statistically significant difference between the control and experimental group students in terms of their total reflective thinking scale scores and their subscale scores for habit, understanding, reflection, and critical reflection. Furthermore, it was found that the groups were similar in terms of their motivation scale total scores and subscale scores for internal goal setting, external goal setting, task value, belief in control over learning, and self-efficacy related to learning and performance. However, it was determined that the experimental group's test anxiety subscale scores were significantly lower. In conclusion, it can be said that web-based reflective journals used in distance education are not effective tools for increasing reflective thinking and learning motivation among physical education prospective teachers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Reflective journal
• reflective thinking
• motivation
• self-regulated learning
• prospective teachers
• physical education

Kaynakça

1. Akkoyunlu, B., Telli, E., Menzi Çetin, N., & Dağhan, G. (2016). Views of prospective teachers about reflective journals on teacher education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(4), 312-330. doi: 10.17569/tojqi.60515
2. Al-Rawahi, N. M., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2015). The effect of reflective science journal writing on students' self-regulated learning strategies. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(3), 367-379.
3. Arsal, Z. (2010). The effects of journals on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(1), 85-103.
4. Aymen Peker, E., Taş, E., Apaydın, Z., & Akman, E. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji dersi yaşamımızdaki elektrik ünitesi için düşünme ajandası (öğrenci günlüğü) tutulması ve tutulan ajandaların öğrencilerin akademik başarısı üzerindeki etkileri. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 3(3), 8-27.
5. Başol, G., & Evin-Gencel, İ. (2013). Yansıtıcı düşünme düzeyini belirleme ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 929-946.
6. Bayrak, F., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2011). Ağ günlük uygulamasının yansıtıcı düşünme becerisi üzerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(40), 93-104.
7. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
8. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199-210. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4

9. Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2020). Effects of mobile-app learning journals vs online training on specific self-regulated learning components. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2351-2372. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09781-6
10. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
11. Cengiz, C., & Karataş, F. Ö. (2014). Yansıtıcı düşünmeyi geliştirme: Fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları ile gerçekleştirilen yansıtıcı günlük tutma uygulamasının etkileri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(4), 120-129.
12. Chirema, K. D. (2007). The use of reflective journals in the promotion of reflection and learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27(3), 192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.04.007
13. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review 24(2), 205–249. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
14. Collin, S., & Karsenti, T. (2011). The collective dimension of reflective practice: The how and why. Reflective Practice, 12(4), 569-581. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2011.590346
15. Çınargür, H. E. (2021). Beden eğitimi ve spor derslerinde öğrenme için ölçme uygulamalarının öğrencilerin motivasyon ve öz-düzenleme düzeyleri üzerine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkez
16. Çırak Kurt, S., Yıldırım, I. (2021). The effects of blogging on pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking and self-efficacy. Reflective Practice, 22(2), 233-249. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2021.1879772
17. Dent, A. L., & Koenka, A. C. (2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8.
18. Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Fabriz, S., & Büttner, G. (2015). Fostering self-regulated learning among students by means of an electronic learning diary: A training experiment. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(1), 77-97. doi: 10.1891/1945-8959.14.1.77
19. Duban, N., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının yansıtıcı düşünme eğilimleri ve yansıtıcı öğretmen özellikleriyle ilgili görüşleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 343-360.
20. El-Adl, A., & Alkharusi, H. (2020). Relationships between self-regulated learning strategies, learning motivation and mathematics achievement. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 15(1), 104–111. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v15i1.4461
21. Ergöz, G. (2008). Öz-düzenleyici öğrenmenin ve güdüleyici inançların matematik başarısı içinde araştırılması (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkez
22. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540
23. Fabriz, S., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Poarch, G., & Büttner, G. (2014). Fostering self-monitoring of university students by means of a standardized learning journal - A longitudinal study with process analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 239-255. doi: 10.1007/s10212-013-0196-z
24. Friesner, T., & Hart, M. (2005). Learning logs: Assessment or research method?. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 3(2), 117-122.
25. Gustiani, S. (2020). Students’ motivation in online learning covid -19 pandemic era: A case study. Holistics Journal, 12(2), 23-40.
26. Hand, B., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021-1035. doi: 10.1080/095006999290165
27. Hanlon, E. H., & Schneider, Y. (1999, April). Improving math proficiency through self-efficacy training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED433236.pdf
28. Jado, S. M. A. (2015). The effect of using learning journals on developing self-regulated learning and reflective thinking among pre-service teachers in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(5), 89-103.
29. Karasar, N. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayınevi.
30. Kesebir, G., & Öksüz, C. (2022). The effects of student mathematics journals on achievement, motivation and metacognitive awareness: Mixed methods design. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 23(2), 59-83. doi: 10.4256/ijmtl.v23i2.458
31. Lang, G. (2018). Using learning journals to increase metacognition, motivation, and learning in computer information systems education. Information Systems Education Journal, 16(6), 39-47.
32. Lund, J. L., & Kirk, M. F. (2002). Performance-based assessment for middle and high school physical education. Human Kinetics Publishers.
33. Moon, J. (2001). Reflection in higher education learning. https://cdn-prod-pdfsimpli-wpcontent.azureedge.net/pdfseoforms/pdf-20180219t134432z-001/pdf/reflection-paper-template.pdf
34. Mou, T. Y. (2020). Students' evaluation of their experiences with project-based learning in a 3D design class. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 159-170. doi: 10.1007/s40299-019-00462-4
35. Mou, T. Y. (2023). Online learning in the time of the COVID-19 crisis: Implications for the self-regulated learning of university design students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 185-205. doi: 10.1177/14697874211051
36. Nicol DJ, & Macfarlane-Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31(2), 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
37. Nilson, L. B., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Creating self-regulated learners: Strategies to strengthen students’ self-awareness and learning skills. Routledge.
38. Nugent A., Lodge, J. M., Carroll, A., Bagraith, R., MacMahon, S., Matthews, K. E., & Sah, P. (2019). Higher Education Learning Framework: An evidence informed model for university learning. The University of Queensland. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:348c85f/UQ348c85f_OA.pdf
39. Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory - 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21. doi: 10.3102/0013189X004010007
40. Peeters, J., De Backer, F., Reina, V. R., Kindekens, A., Buffel, T., & Lombaerts, K. (2014). The role of teachers’ self-regulatory capacities in the implementation of self-regulated learning practices. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1963-1970. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.504
41. Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: the role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393-418. doi: 10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x
42. Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., Graham, M., & Shaw, R. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note taking, and test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 335–346. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.335
43. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.
44. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River.
45. Pollard, A. (2015). Web-based journals in the classroom: Motivation and autonomous learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 20-31. doi: 10.17509/ijal.v4i2.680
46. Potdevin, F., Vors, O., Huchez, A., Lamour, M., Davids, K., & Schnitzler, C. (2018). How can video feedback be used in physical education to support novice learning in gymnastics? Effects on motor learning, self-assessment and motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(6), 559-574. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2018.1485138
47. Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect: from testing to teaching. ELT Journal, 49(1), 13-25. doi: 10.1093/elt/49.1.13
48. Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842-866. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.001
49. Russell, J. M., Baik, C., Ryan, A. T., & Molloy, E. (2022). Fostering self-regulated learning in higher education: Making self-regulation visible. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 97-113.
50. Schmidt, K., Maier, J., & Nückles, M. (2012). Writing about the personal utility of learning contents in a learning journal improves learning motivation and comprehension. Education Research International, 2012, 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2012/319463
51. Schmitz, B., & Perels, F. (2011). Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized journals. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 255-273. doi: 10.1007/s11409-011-9076-6
52. Shoffner, M. (2008). Informal reflection in pre‐service teacher education. Reflective Practice, 9(2), 123-134. doi: 10.1080/14623940802005392
53. Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86-103. doi: 10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
54. Stevens, D. D., & Cooper, J. E. (2023). Journal keeping: How to use reflective writing for learning, teaching, professional insight and positive change. Taylor & Francis.
55. Stout, C. J. (1989). Teachers' views of the emphasis on reflective teaching skills during their student teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 89(4), 511-527.
56. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
57. Tsingos-Lucas, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., Schneider, C. R., & Smith, L. (2016). The effect of reflective activities on reflective thinking ability in an undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(4), 65. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80465
58. van Den Hurk, M. (2006). The relation between self-regulated strategies and individual study time, prepared participation and achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(2), 155-169. doi: 10.1177/1469787406064752
59. Walmsley, C., & Birkbeck, J. (2006). Personal narrative writing: A method of values reflection for BSW students. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26(1-2), 111-126. doi: 10.1300/J067v26n01_07
60. Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281-299. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1
61. Wong, F. K., Kember, D., Chung, L. Y., & CertEd, L. Y. (1995). Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(1), 48-57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010048.x
62. Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
63. Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18-25. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.11.001
64. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
65. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9780203839010
66. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goals setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676. doi: 10.2307/1163261