TURKISH ADAPTATION OF SENSE OF COMMUNITY IN SPORT INSTRUMENT: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Öz

PPurpose of this study was adapting “Sense of Community in Sport Instrument” (SCS) developed by Warner, Kerwin, and Walker (2013). Sample consisted of 124 females, 98 males, and 222 in total athletes (Mage = 15 ± 1.91 years). developed to assess sense of community in sport setting. The scale includes 21 items and 6 sub-dimensions: Administrative Consideration, Common Interest, Competition, Equity in Administrative Decisions, Leadership Opportunities, and Social Spaces. Descriptives, Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient, Pearson correlation analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis were used in data analyses. Correlation values between Turkish and English forms differ between 0.76 - 0.97 while, internal consistency coefficients were between 0.67 - 0.84 for sub-dimensions. According to confirmatory factor analysis, factor loadings of the scale range between 0.59 and 0.81. Turkish version of SCS with displayed an acceptable and/or perfect model-data fit (χ2/df = 1.95, RMSEA=0.066, CFI=0.97, NFI=0.94, NNFI=0.96, GFI=0.87). When findings are interpreted, it may be said that the model was found fit and questionnaire has construct validity. Therefore, as a valid and reliable scale, Turkish version of “Sense of Community in Sport Instrument” can be used in forthcoming studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sense of community,sense of community in sports,youth sports

SPORDA TOPLULUK HİSSİ ÖLÇEĞİNİ (STHÖ) TÜRKÇEYE UYARLAMA: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

BBu çalışmanın amacı, Warner, Kerwin, ve Walker (2013) tarafından geliştirilen Sporda Topluluk Hissi Ölçeğinin (STHÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlanmasıdır. Araştırmaya 124 kız, 98 erkek, toplam 222 aktif sporcu (ort.yaş= 15 ± 1.91 yıl) katılmıştır. STHÖ; spor ortamında topluluk hissini ölçmek amacıyla geliştirilmiştir. Ölçek 21 madde ve 6 alt boyuttan oluşmaktadır: İdari Değerlendirme, Ortak İlgi, İdari Kararlarda Eşitlik, Liderlik Fırsatları, Sosyal Alanlar, Rekabet. Verilerin analizinde betimleyici analizler, Cronbach’s alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı, pearson korelasyon analizi ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Türkçe İngilizce formların korelasyonlarının 0.76 - 0.93 arasında; iç tutarlık değerlerinin 0.67 - 0.84 arasında değiştiği görülmektedir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre, faktör yük değerlerinin ise 0.59 ve 0.81 arasında olduğu bulunmuştur. STHÖ’nin, model veri uyumuyla ilişkili olan değerlerinin (χ2/sd=1.95, RMSEA= 0.066, CFI= 0.97, NFI=0.94, NNFI=0.96, GFI=0.87) kabul edilebilir ve mükemmel uyum sınırlarında göstermektedir. Elde edilen sonuçların tamamı ele alındığında, modelin veriyle uyum gösterdiği ve ölçeğin yapısal geçerliğe sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Sonuç olarak, “Sporda Topluluk Hissi Ölçeği” Türkçe versiyonu geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olarak araştırmalarda kullanılabileceği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• topluluk hissi,sporda topluluk hissi,genç sporu

Kaynakça

1. Arague, J.C., Kang, G., Melia, K. (2018). Impact of Recreational Sports to Individuals with Physical and Developmental Disabilities and their Caregivers: A Pilot Study. Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 5, 136-147.
2. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social science & medicine, 51(6), 843-857.
3. Bishop, P. D., Chertok, F., & Jason, L. A. (1997). Measuring sense of community: Beyond local boundaries. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18(2), 193-212.
4. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
5. Cicognani, E., Mazzoni, D., Albanesi, C., & Zani, B. (2015). Sense of community and empowerment among young people: Understanding pathways from civic participation to social well-being. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(1), 24-44.
6. Chavis, D. M., Hogge, J. H., McMillan, D. W., & Wandersman, A. (1986). Sense of community through Brunswik’s lens: A first look. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 24–40.
7. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. (3. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
8. Dionigi, R. A., & Lyons, K. (2010). Examining layers of community in leisure contexts: A case analysis of older adults in an exercise intervention. Journal of leisure research, 42(2), 317.

9. Fairley, S., & Tyler, B. D. (2012). Bringing baseball to the big screen: Building sense of community outside of the ballpark. Journal of Sport Management, 26(3), 258-270.
10. Fisher, A. T., Sonn, C. C., & Bishop, B. J. (2002). Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications. (A. T. Fisher, C. C. Sonn, & B. J. Bishop, Eds.). New York, NY, US: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
11. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
12. Goodwin, D., Johnston, K., Gustafson, P., Elliott, M., Thurmeier, R., & Kuttai, H. (2009). It’s okay to be a quad: Wheelchair rugby players’ sense of community. Adapted physical activity quarterly, 26(2), 102-117.
13. Goodwin, D. L., Lieberman, L. J., Johnston, K., & Leo, J. (2011). Connecting through summer camp: Youth with visual impairments find a sense of community. Adapted physical activity quarterly, 28, 40-55.
14. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.
15. Kerwin, S., Warner, S., Walker, M., & Stevens, J. (2015). Exploring sense of community among small-scale sport event volunteers. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(1), 77-92.
16. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say?. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202-220.
17. Legg, E., Wells, M. S., & Barile, J. P. (2015). Factors related to sense of community in youth sport parents. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 33(2), 73-86.
18. Legg, E., Rose, J., Tanner, P. J., & Newland, A. (2018). Exploring sense of community in a relocated sports fan group. Sport in Society, 21(9), 1319-1336.
19. Legg, E., Wells, M., Newland, A., & Tanner, P. (2017). Exploring sense of community in adult recreational tennis. World Leisure Journal, 59(1), 39-53.
20. Lin, Y. C., Chalip, L., & Christine Green, B. (2016). The essential role of sense of community in a youth sport program. Leisure Sciences, 38(5), 461-481.
21. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of Community: A Definition and Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.
22. Murphy, C.O. & Davidshofer, K.R. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications.
23. Nistor, N., Daxecker, I., Stanciu, D., & Diekamp, O. (2015). Sense of community in academic communities of practice: Predictors and effects. Higher Education, 69(2), 257-273.
24. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGrawHill.
25. Peachey, J. W., Cohen, A., Borland, J., & Lyras, A. (2011). Building social capital: Examining the impact of Street Soccer USA on its volunteers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 48(1), 20-37.
26. Pickett, A. C., Goldsmith, A., Damon, Z., & Walker, M. (2016). The influence of sense of community on the perceived value of physical activity: A cross-context analysis. Leisure sciences, 38(3), 199-214.
27. Phipps, C., Cooper, N., Shores, K., Williams, R., & Mize, N. (2015). Examining the relationship between intramural sports participation and sense of community among college students. Recreational Sports Journal, 39(2), 105-120.
28. Sarason, S.B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco, CA: lossey-Bass.
29. Sayer, E., Beaven, A., Stringer, P., & Hermena, E. (2013). Investigating sense of community in primary schools. Educational & Child Psychology, 30(1), 9-25.
30. Scotto di Luzio, S., Guillet‐Descas, E., Procentese, F., & Martinent, G. (2017). Construction and validation of the Sport Sense of Community in Adolescence Questionnaire (SSCAQ). Journal of Community Psychology, 45(6), 783-795.
31. Stevens, E. B., Jason, L. A., Ferrari, J. R., Olson, B., & Legler, R. (2012). Sense of community among individuals in substance abuse recovery. Journal of groups in addiction & recovery, 7(1), 15-28.
32. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S. (2015). Using multivariate statistics. M Baloğlu (çev.), (6. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
33. Tingle, J. K., Warner, S., & Sartore-Baldwin, M. L. (2014). The experience of former women officials and the impact on the sporting community. Sex Roles, 71(1-2), 7-20.
34. Warner, S., & Dixon, M. A. (2011). Understanding sense of community from the athlete’s perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 25(3), 257-271.
35. Warner, S., Dixon, M. A., & Chalip, L. (2012). The impact of formal versus informal sport: Mapping the differences in sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(8), 983-1003.
36. Warner, S., Kerwin, S., & Walker, M. (2013). Examining sense of community in sport: Developing the multidimensional ‘SCS’ Scale. Journal of Sport Management, 27(5), 349-362.
37. Warner, S., Sparvero, E., Shapiro, S., Anderson, A. (2017). Yielding healthy community with sport? Journal of Sport for Development, 5(8), 41-52.
38. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D., F., and Summers, G. (1977), "Assessing reliability and stability in panel models," Sociological Methodology, 8 (1), 84-136.
39. Wolf-Wendel, L., Toma, J. D., & Morphew, C. C. (2001). There's no" I" in" team": Lessons from athletics on community building. The Review of Higher Education, 24(4), 369-396.