ANALYSIS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION LEVELS AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS OF ACADEMICIANS

Yıl 2018, , 107 - 118, 01.04.2018

Pınar Karacan Doğan

https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000348

Öz

The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between the organizational justice and organizational identification perceptions of the academicians in terms of some variables. The descriptive review model was used in the study as the method. As the data collection tool, the “Organizational Justice Perception Scale”, which was developed by Colquitt (2001) whose Turkish adaptation was performed by Özmen, Arnak and Özeri (2007), and the “Organizational Identification Scale”, which was developed by Mael and Ashforth (1992) whose Turkish adaptation was performed by Polat (2009), were used in the study. The study group consisted of 207 volunteering participants (152 male, 55 female) who worked at Sports Sciences Faculties of universities and who were selected according to the simple random sampling method The Multilinear Regression Analysis was used to examine the effect of organizational justice scores of the academicians who worked at Sports Sciences Faculties of universities on organizational identification levels. For the purpose of determining the difference between the organizational justice and organizational identification levels of the academicians according to gender and marital status, the Independent Samples t-test was applied; and the One-Way ANOVA test was applied to determine the difference according to service years and the department worked at. The significance level was determined as 0.05. As a result, it was determined that there is a positive and significant relation between the procedural justice, distributional justice and interpersonal justice levels, which are among the sub-dimensions of organizational justice of academicians who worked at sport sciences faculties, and their organizational identification levels; the organizational identification levels of the participants were high; their organizational justice perceptions were above the medium level, and the service years, which is one of the demographical variables, increased, it had a positive effect on these levels

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational justice, Organizational identification

Kaynakça

• Adams JS (1963): Toward an understanding of in- equity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422.
• Akduman G, Hatipoğlu Z, Yüksekbilgili Z (2015): Medeni durumuna göre örgütsel adalet algısı. Ulus- lararası Akademik Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 1-13.
• Akyel Y (2017): Yönetim bağlamında adalet ve gü- ven. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Alexander S, Ruderman M (1987): The role of pro- cedural and distributive justice in organizational be- havior. Social Justice Research, 1: 177-98.
• Ambrose ML, Schminke M (2009): The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 491– 500.
• Aytaç KY (2017): Investigating the working life quality and organizational commitment behaviors of academicians carrying on duties in faculties of sports science. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(11), 603-628.
• Bamber EM, Iyer VM (2002): Big 5 auditors’ pro- fessional and organizational identification: Con- sistency or conflict? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(2), 21-38.
• Başar U (2011): Örgütsel adalet algısı, örgütsel öz- deşleşme ve iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkilere yönelik görgül bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Biçkes DM, Yılmaz C (2017): Çalışanların örgütsel güven algılamalarının özdeşleşme düzeyleri üzerin- deki etkisi: amprik bir çalışma. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Der- gisi, 14(2), 301-322.
• Bies RJ, Moag JF (1986): Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, 1, 43-55, Green- wich, CT: JAI Press.
• Brewer MB, Kramer RM (1986): Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
• Büyüköztürk Ş (2011): Sosyal b l mler ç n ver ana- lizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Candan H (2014): Çalışanların örgütsel adalet ve ör- gütsel güven algılamalarının örgütsel bağlılığa et- kisi: bir kamu kurumu üzerinde araştırma. Gazian- tep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4):889-917.
• Cheney G (1983): On the various changing mean- ings of organization membership: A field study of organizational identification, Communication Mon- ographs, 50, 342-362.
• Chernyak-Hai L, Tziner A (2012): Organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBS): Socio- psychological antecedents and consequences. International Re- view of Social Psychology, 25(3/4), 53–92.
• Cheung MF, Law MC (2008). Relationships of or- ganizational justice and organizational identifica- tion: The mediating effects of perceived organiza- tional support in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(2), 213-231.
• Cohen-Charash Y, Spector PE (2001): The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organiza- tional Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2): 278-321.
• Colquitt JA (2001): On the dimensionality of organ- izational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
• Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter CO, Ng KY (2001): Justice at the millenium: A meta ana- lytic review of 25 years of organizational justice re- search. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425- 445.
• Cremer D (2005): Procedural and distributive jus- tice effects moderated by organizational identifica- tion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(1), 4-13.
• Cropanzano R, Folger R (1991): “Procedural justice and worker motivation” in R. Steers & L. Porter (Ed.), Motivation and Work Behavior, New York: McGraw–Hill, 131–143.
• Cropanzano R, Prehar CA, Chen PY (2002): Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group and Organization Management, 27, 324–351.
• Cüce H, Güney S, Tayfur Ö (2013): Örgütsel adalet algılarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Hacettepe Üni- versitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1): 1-30.
• Çakar ND (2015): Toplumsal cinsiyet temelinde ör- gütsel adalet algısı: etik iklimin rolü. KADEM Ka- dın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 79-94.
• Çetinkaya M, Çimenci S (2014): Örgütsel adalet al- gısının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki et- kisi ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: Yapısal eşitlik modeli çalışması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(23), 237-278.
• Çokluk Ö, Şekerc oğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş (2010): Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Dailey RC, Kirk DJ (1992): Distributive and proce- dural justice as antecedents of job dissatisfaction and intent to turnover. Human Relations, 45(3): 305- 317.
• Deutsch M (1975): Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994): Or- ganizational images and member identification. Ad- ministrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
• Edwards MR (2005): Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 207-230.
• Foley S, Kıdder DL, Powell GN (2002): The per- ceived glass ceiling and justice perceptions: An in- vestigation of hispanic law associates. Journal of Management, 28(4), 471-496.
• Folger R, Konovsky MA (1989): Effects of proce- dural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions, Academic Management Journal, 32(1), 115– 30.
• Greenberg J (1987): A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 1987, 9-22.
• Greenberg J (1990a): Organizational justice: yester- day, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
• Greenberg J (1990b): Looking fair us being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Re- search in Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 111-157.
• Greenberg J (1993): “The social side of fairness: in- terpersonal and informational classes of organiza- tional justice” Cropanzano (eds.) Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Re- source Management, Hillsale, NJ Lawrence Erl- baum Associates.
• Homans GC (1961): Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• İşcan ÖF (2006): Dönüştürücü/etkileşimci liderlik algısı ve örgütsel özdeşleşme ilişkisinde bireysel farklılıkların rolü. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 11(6), 160-177.
• Karabey CN, İşcan ÖF (2007): Örgütsel özdeş- leşme, örgütsel imaj ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davra- nışı ilişkisi: bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İkti- sadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 231-241.
• Karasar N (2005): Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. An- kara: Nobel Yayın & Dağıtım.
• Konovsky, MA (2000): Understanding procedural justice and its ımpact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 489-511.
• Korkut H (1990): Üniversitelerde akademik olma- yan personelin iş doyumu ve örgütle özdeşleşmesi. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu Matbaası.
• Leventhal GS (1976): The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in exper- imental social psychology, 9, 91-131, New York: Academic Press.
• Leventhal, GS (1980): What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fair- ness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Green- berg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, 27-55, New York: Plenum Press.
• Lipponen J, Wisse B, Perala J (2011): Perceived jus- tice and group identification: The moderating role of previous identification. Journal of personnel psy- chology, 10(1), 13.
• Lovelace K, Rosen B (1996): Differences in achiev- ing person-organization fit among diverse groups of managers. Journal of Management, 22, 703-722.
• Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992): Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organiza- tional Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
• Moorman, RH (1991): Relationship between organ- izational justice and organizational citizenship be- haviors: Do fairness perceptions influence em- ployee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
• Mowday RT (1987): Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations, in Steers M.R. Porter, L.W. (Ed), Motivation and Work Behavior (4. Ed), New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 89-110.
• Mueller CW, Iverson RD, Jo DG (1999): Justice evaluations in two cultural contexts: A comparison of the US and South Korea. Human Relations, 52, 869–893.
• Nartgün ŞS, Kalay M (2014): Öğretmenlerin örgüt- sel destek, örgütsel özdeşleşme ile örgütsel sinizm düzeylerine ilişkin görüşleri, Turkish Studies, 2014; 9(2): 1361-1376.
• Olkkonen ME, Lipponen J (2006): Relationships be- tween organizational justice, identification with or- ganization and work unit, and group-related out- comes. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes, 100(2), 202-215.
• Özdemir A (2010): Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin algıla- nan örgütsel destek, cinsiyet ve kıdem değişkenle- rine göre incelenmesi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(1), 237-250.
• Özmen ÖN, Arbak Y, Özer Süral P (2007): Adalete verilen değerin adalet algıları üzerindeki etkisinin sorgulanmasına ilişkin bir araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış, 7(1), 17-33.
• Polat M (2009): Örgütsel özdeşleşmenin öncülleri ve ardılları üzerine bir saha araştırması, Yayınlan- mamış Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
• Polat M, Meydan CH (2010): Örgütsel özdeşleşme- nin sinizm ve işten ayrılma niyeti ile ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 145- 172.
• Sarıkoyuncu EŞ, Ağca A (2018): Örgütsel adaletin muhasebecilerin iş memnuniyeti üzerine etkisi: Kü- tahya örneği. Muhasebe ve Finans Dergisi, 77, 27- 44.
• Scott C, Corman S, Cheney G (1988): Development of a structurational model of ıdentification in the or- ganization”, Communication Theory, 8(3), 298-336.
• Tolukan E, Şahin MY, Koç M (2016): Cimnastik antrenörlerinin örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeyleri ve iş- ten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi, Turkish Studies, 11(8): 377-398.
• Tompkins PK, Cheney G (1985): Communication and unobtrusive control in contemporary organiza- tions. Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new directions, 13, 179-210.
• Turunç Ö (2011): Örgütsel adalet n çalışanların ör- gütsel özdeşleşme ve işten ayrılma niyetine etkisi: örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü. “İş, güç” En- düstrı̇ İl şk ler ve İnsan Kaynakları Derg s , 13(1), 143-166.
• Turunç Ö, Çelik M (2010): Çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve iş stresinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansına etkisi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 183-206.
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2003): The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and coop- erative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349-361.
• Yazıcıoğlu İ, Topaloğlu IG (2009): Örgütsel adalet ve bağlılık ilişkisi: konaklama işletmelerinde bir uy- gulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 1(1): 3-16.