DOPİNGDE AHLAKTAN UZAKLAŞMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRK KÜLTÜRÜNE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı doping kullanımındaki ahlaktan uzaklaşma mekanizmalarını ölçmek üzere Kavussanu, Hatzigeorgiadis, Elbe ve Ring (2016) tarafından geliştirilen Dopingte Ahlaktan Uzaklaşma Ölçeği’ni (Moral Disengagement in Doping – MDDS) Türk kültürüne uyarlamak ve psikometrik özelliklerini değerlendirmektir. Araştırma grubunu yaşları 17-31 arasında değişen 32 farklı spor branşından 264 sporcu oluşturmuştur. Sporcuların yaş ortalamaları 19,25±1,96 ve spor yaşı ortalamaları 4,85±3,15 yıldır. Sporcuların %41,7’si (n=110) kadın, %58,3’ü (n=154)ise erkektir. MDDS’nin geçerliği DFA ile test edilmiştir. Uyum indeksleri tüm parametrelerde mükemmel uyum göstermiştir (Ki-kare/sd=1,44; RMSEA=0,041; GFI=0,99; AGFI=0,96; CFI=1,00; NNFI=0,99; SRMR=0,027). Sonuç olarak, Dopingte Ahlaktan Uzaklaşma Ölçeği Türkçe versiyonuna ait verilere bakıldığında ölçeğin güvenirliğinin oldukça yüksek olduğu, yakınsak ve eş zaman geçerliğine ait parametrelerin kabul edilebilir seviyelerde olduğu görülmekte ve doping kullanımına ait ahlaktan uzaklaşma mekanizmalarını belirlemek isteyen Türkiye’deki araştırmalarda bu ölçeğin kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Doping,Ahlaktan Uzaklaşma,Geçerlik,Güvenirlik

ADAPTATION OF THE MORAL DISENGAGEMENT IN DOPING SCALE INTO TURKISH CULTURE: A VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Moral Disengagement in Doping – MDDS developed by Kavussanu, Hatzigeorgiadis, Elbe ve Ring(2016) and evaluate its psychometric properties. The study group consisted of 264 athletes from 32 different sports branches and aged between 17-31. The average age of the athletes is 19.25 ± 1.96 and the average sport experience is 4.85 ± 3.15 years. 41.7% (n = 110) of the athletes are female and 58.3% (n = 154) are male.The MDDS validated with CFA. Fit indices values for all parameters were found to be excellent (Chi-square/df=1,44; RMSEA=0,041; GFI=0,99; AGFI=0,96; CFI=1,00; NNFI=0,99; SRMR=0,027). As a result, the reliability of the Turkish version of the MDDS is high enough, convergent and concurrent validity parameters are at acceptable levels. It can be said that researchers in Turkey who want to determine the moral disengagement mechanism in doping could be utilized this scale.

Keywords

• Doping,Moral Disengagement,Validity,Reliability

Kaynakça

1. Alaranta, A., Holmila, J., Palmu, P., Pietilä, K., Helenius, I. (2006). Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 27, 842e846.
2. Alpar, R. (2010). Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinde Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
3. Balçıkanlı, G. S. (2013). The Turkish adaptation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 271-276.
4. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines, J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 364.
6. Boardley, I. D., Grix, J. (2014). Doping in bodybuilders: A qualitative investigation of facilitative psychosocial processes. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 6(3), 422-439.
7. Boardley, I. D., Grix, J., Dewar, A. J. (2014). Moral disengagement and associated processes in performance-enhancing drug use: a national qualitative investigation. Journal of sports sciences, 32(9), 836-844.
8. Boardley, I. D., Grix, J., Harkin, J. (2015). Doping in team and individual sports: a qualitative investigation of moral disengagement and associated processes. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 7(5), 698-717.

9. Boardley, I., Smith, A. L., Mills, J. P., Grix, J., Wynne, C., Wilkins, L. (2017). Development of Moral Disengagement and Self-Regulatory Efficacy Assessments Relevant to Doping in Sport and Exercise. Retrieved from osf.io/preprints/sportrxiv/y8v4q
10. Boardley, I. D., Kavussanu, M. (2007). Development and validation of the moral disengagement in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(5), 608-628.
11. Boardley, I. D., Kavussanu, M. (2008). The moral disengagement in sport scale–short. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(14), 1507-1517.
12. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
13. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
14. Çetin, E., Dölek, B.E., Orhan, Ö. (2008). Gazi üniversitesi beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin ergojenik yardımcılar, doping ve sağlık hakkındaki bilgi ve alışkanlıklarının belirlenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 129-132.
15. De Hon, O., Kuipers, H., Van Bottenburg, M. (2015). Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods. Sports Medicine, 45(1), 57-69.
16. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application (2nd edn.). London: Sage.
17. Donovan, R. J., Egger, G., Kapernick, V., Mendoza, J. (2002). A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport. Sports Medicine, 32 (4), 269- 284.
18. Gürpinar, B. (2014). Adaptation of the Attitudes to Moral Decision-Making in Youth Sport Questionnaire into Turkish Culture: A Validity and Reliability Study in a Turkish Sample. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176).
19. Gürpinar B. (2015). Sporda ahlaktan uzaklaşma ölçeği kısa formunun Türk kültürüne uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Spormetre, 13(1), 57-64.
20. Gradidge, P., Coopoo, Y., Constantinou, D. (2011). Prevalence of performance-enhancing substance use by Johannesburg male adolescents involved in competitive high school sports. Archives of Exercise in Health and Disease, 2(2), 114-119.
21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited.
22. Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
23. Kavussanu, M., Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(1), 97-117.
24. Kavussanu, M., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Elbe, A. M., Ring, C. (2016). The moral disengagement in doping scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 188-198.
25. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
26. Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Development of the attitudes to moral decision-making in youth sport questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(3), 369-392.
27. Lucidi, F., Zelli, A., Mallia, L., Grano, C., Russo, P. M., Violani, C. (2008). The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents' use of doping substances. Journal of sports sciences, 26(5), 447-456.
28. Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Brand, R., Baumgarten, F., Tsorbatzoudis, H., Zelli, A., Lucidi, F. (2016). Doping use in sport teams: The development and validation of measures of team-based efficacy beliefs and moral disengagement from a cross-national perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 25, 78-88.
29. Ntoumanis, N., Barkoukis, V., Gucciardi, D. F., Chan, D. K. C. (2017). Linking coach interpersonal style with athlete doping intentions and doping use: A prospective study. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(3), 188-198.
30. Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Barkoukis, V., Backhouse, S. (2014). Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 44(11), 1603-1624.
31. Petroczi, A., Aidman, E. (2008). Psychological drivers in doping: the life-cycle model of performance enhancement. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 3(7).
32. Petróczi, A., Strauss, B. (2015). Understanding the psychology behind performance-enhancement by doping. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 137-139.
33. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
34. Tabachnick B. G., Fidel, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. (Fifth Edition). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
35. TDK Yazın Terimleri Sözlüğü (2019). Erişim Tarihi: 11/07/2019.
36. World Anti-Doping Agency-WADA. (2019). 2019 List of Prohibited Substances and Methods. Montreal, Canada. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/content/what-is-prohibited Erişim Tarihi: 11/07/2019.
37. Zabala, M., Morente-Sánchez, J., Mateo-March, M., Sanabria, D. (2016). Relationship between self-reported doping behavior and psychosocial factors in adult amateur cyclists. The Sport Psychologist, 30(1), 68-75.