İçsel Konuşma Sıklığına Göre Bilişsel ve Fizyolojik Stres Tepkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 , 44 - 63 , 29.04.2026

Zayna Kaleem , Zeynep Küçük

https://izlik.org/JA97ZX78ZF

Öz

İçsel konuşmanın sıklığı ve buna duyulan ihtiyaç kişiler arası farklılılar göstermekle birlikte içsel konuşma sıklığı, duygu düzenleme ve dürtü kontrol süreçleriyle ilişkili görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, içsel konuşma (İK) sıklığının bireylerin duygu düzenlemesi, dürtüsel davranışları ve fizyolojik stres tepkileri ile ilişkisini incelemiştir. Örneklem, 18–39 yaş aralığında ikinci dili İngilizce olan 35 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılar içsel konuşma sıklığını ölçen VISQ (varieties of inner speech questionaire) anketinden alınan puana göre yüksek ve düşük içsel konuşma olmak üzere iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Bu çalışma Duygu düzenleme ölçeği (ERQ) ve Dürtüsel Davranış Ölçeği (UPPS) puanlarının yüksek ve düşük içsel konuşma grupları arasında farklılaşacağı; stres koşulu ile dinlenim koşulu karşılaştırıldığında düşük ve yüksek içsel konuşma grubunun fizyolojik tepkilerinin (deri iletkenliği yanıtı ve kalp ritmi (HR)) farklılaşacağı hipotezini araştırmaktadır. Stres koşulu, zaman limitli Stroop ve zihinsel aritmetik görevleriyle oluşturulmuştur ve fizyolojik tepkiler BIOPAC® MP36 sistemi kullanılarak kaydedilmiştir. Gruplar arası (İK düşük-İK yüksek) analizler bağımsız örneklemler t-testi ile, grup içi analizler (baseline SCL, HR- görev SCL, HR) ise tekrarlı ölçümlü ANOVA ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, duygu düzenleme ölçeği ve dürtüsellik ölçeği puanlarında gruplar arasında (düşük ve yüksek içsel konuşma) anlamlı bir fark olmadığını göstermiştir. Deri iletkenliği düzeyi (SCL) ve HR tepkileri zihinsel aritmetik görevi boyunca dinlenim durumuna göre anlamlı biçimde artmış ve zaman limitli Stroop görevindeki tepki süreleri ve doğruluk oranlarında ise anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. SCL veya HR tepkilerinde gruplar arasında (düşük ve yüksek içsel konuşma) anlamlı bir fark gözlenmemiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre, zihinsel artimetik görev ile oluşturulmuş stres koşulunda fizyolojik stres tepkileri oluşmasına karşın, içsel konuşma sıklığının strese verilen emosyonel veya fizyolojik tepkiler üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığını göstermektedir. İçsel konuşma sıklığının yüksek ve düşük olarak belirlenmesinde kullanılacak ölçeği dikkate alarak, gelecek çalışmaların örneklem büyüklüğü ve görev sırası etkileri gibi faktörleri ele alması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İçsel Konuşma , Stres Tepkisi , Dürtüsellik , Duygu Düzenleme

Proje Numarası

1

The Role of Inner Speech in Modulating Electrophysiological Stress Responses

https://izlik.org/JA97ZX78ZF

Öz

The frequency and reliance on inner speech (IS) vary across individuals and may influence self-regulation processes such as emotion regulation and impulse control. This study examined whether IS frequency is associated with differences in emotion regulation, impulsive behavior, and physiological stress responses. The sample consisted of 35 university students aged 18–39 who completed self-report measures and were categorized into high and low IS groups based on the Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire (VISQ-R). Emotion regulation (ERQ), impulsive behavior (UPPS), and cognitive status (MMSE) were also assessed. Stress was induced through Stroop and mental arithmetic tasks, and physiological responses, skin conductance level (SCL) and heart rate (HR), were recorded during baseline and task phases using the BIOPAC® MP36 system.
It was hypothesized that IS frequency would differentiate self-report measures as well as HR and SCL responses, reflecting variations in autonomic nervous system activity. Between-group comparisons were conducted using independent samples t-tests, and within-group changes were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results showed no significant group differences in emotion regulation or impulsivity. Although SCL and HR increased significantly during the task phases, indicating successful stress induction, no IS-related differences were found in physiological responses, reaction times, or accuracy on Stroop tasks. These findings suggest that while the stress manipulation was effective, IS frequency did not substantially affect cognitive or physiological outcomes. Future research should consider larger sample sizes and counterbalancing task order.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Inner Speech , Stress Response , Impulsivity , Emotion Regulation

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards for research involving human participants. All procedures were approved by Isik University's Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection, and participant anonymity and confidentiality were ensured throughout the study.

Destekleyen Kurum

Isik University

Proje Numarası

1

Kaynakça

• Aldao, Amelia, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, and Sheri Schweizer (2010). "Emotion-Regulation Strategies Across Psychopathology: A Meta-Analytic Review", Clinical Psychology Review, 30 (2): 217–237
• Alderson-Day, Ben, and Charles Fernyhough (2015). "Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology", Psychological Bulletin, 141 (5): 931–965.
• Alderson-Day, Ben, Katharina Mitrenga, Sarah Wilkinson, Simon McCarthy-Jones, and Charles Fernyhough (2018). "The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire – Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and Refining Links Between Inner Speech and Psychopathology", Consciousness and Cognition, 65: 48–58.
• Arnsten, Amy F. T. (2009). "Stress Signalling Pathways That Impair Prefrontal Cortex Structure and Function", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10 (6): 410–422.
• Baron, Liron S., and Yael Arbel (2022). "Inner Speech and Executive Function in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Implications for Assessment and Intervention", Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 7 (6): 1645–1659.
• Berntson, Gary G., James T. Bigger Jr., David L. Eckberg, Paul Grossman, Peter G. Kaufmann, M. Malik, H. N. Nagaraja, Stephen W. Porges, John P. Saul, Peter H. Stone, and M. W. van der Molen (1997). "Heart Rate Variability: Origins, Methods, and Interpretive Caveats", Psychophysiology, 34 (6): 623–648.
• Biopac Systems Inc. (n.d.). "BIOPAC: Life Science Hardware & Software", https://www.biopac.com
• Dugré, Jessica R., Charles Giguère, Stéphane Potvin, Alexandre Dumais, and Cigarette Signature (2019). "The Psychometric Properties of a Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale Among Psychiatric Patients Evaluated in an Emergency Setting", Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10: 420071.
• Fernyhough, Charles (2004). "Alien Voices and Inner Dialogue: Towards a Developmental Account of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations", New Ideas in Psychology, 22 (1): 49–68.
• Fernyhough, Charles, and Anna M. Borghi (2023). "Inner Speech as Language Process and Cognitive Tool", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27 (12): 1180–1193.
• Folstein, Marshal F., Susan E. Folstein, and Paul R. McHugh (1975). ""Mini-Mental State": A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician", Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12 (3): 189–198.
• Gross, James J. (1998). “The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review”, Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.
• Gross, James J., and Oliver P. John (2003). "Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2): 348–362.
• Gupta, Gaurav, M. Khan, K. I. Sherwani, and Manaullah (2023). "Overview of the Effect of Physiological Stress on Different Biological Signals", International Conference on Recent Advances in Electrical, Electronics & Digital Healthcare Technologies (REEDCON), 251–255.
• Karthikeyan, P., Murugappan Murugappan, and Sazali Yaacob (2011). "A Review on Stress Inducement Stimuli for Assessing Human Stress Using Physiological Signals", IEEE 7th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, 420–425.
• Kreibig, Silvia D. (2010). "Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Emotion: A Review", Biological Psychology, 84 (3): 394–421.
• MacLeod, Colin M. (1991). “Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review”, Psychological bulletin, 109(2), 163–203.
• Radun, Jukka (2022). "Acute Stress Effects of Impulsive Noise During Mental Work", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 529: 116904.
• Lupien, Sonia J., Francois Maheu, Ming Tu, Alexandra Fiocco, and Tania E. Schramek (2007). "The Effects of Stress and Stress Hormones on Human Cognition: Implications for the Field of Brain and Cognition", Brain and Cognition, 65 (3): 209–237.
• Luzzani, Giulia, Ilaria Buraioli, Giulia Guglieri, and Danilo Demarchi (2024). "SCL, PPG and Skin Temperature as Predictive Signals for Mental Failure by a Statistical Analysis on Stress and Mental Workload", IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 6: 248–255.
• Preece, David A., Rodrigo Becerra, Krystle Robinson, and James J. Gross (2019). "The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties in General Community Samples", Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (5): 1–12.
• Raghunathan, R. S., R. J. Musci, N. Knudsen, and S. B. Johnson (2023). "What Children Do While They Wait: The Role of Self-Control Strategies in Delaying Gratification", Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 226: 105576.
• Raio, Claudia M., Titilayo A. Orederu, Lauren Palazzolo, Arielle A. Shurick, and Elizabeth A. Phelps (2013). "Cognitive Emotion Regulation Fails the Stress Test", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (37): 15139–15144.
• Racy, Famira, Alain Morin, Cindy LeBel, and Julia Hagerty (2022). "Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Representative Inner Speech Questionnaires", Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 883959.
• Salas, Christian E., Osvaldo Castro, Darinka Radovic, James J. Gross, and Oliver Turnbull (2018). "The Role of Inner Speech in Emotion Dysregulation and Emotion-Regulation Strategy Use", Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 50 (2): 63–72.
• Thayer, Julian F., and Richard D. Lane (2000). "A Model of Neurovisceral Integration in Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation", Journal of Affective Disorders, 61 (3): 201–216.
• Tombaugh, Tom N., and Nancy J. McIntyre (1992). "The Mini-Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review", Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40 (9): 922–935.
• Tullett, Alexa M., and Michael Inzlicht (2010). "The Voice of Self-Control: Blocking the Inner Voice Increases Impulsive Responding", Acta Psychologica, 135 (2): 252–256.
• Uttl, Bob, Alain Morin, and Brent Hamper (2011). "Are Inner Speech Questionnaires Reliable and Valid?", Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30: 1719–1723.
• Weinstein, Neil D. (1978). "Individual Differences in Reactions to Noise: A Longitudinal Study in a College Dormitory", Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (4): 458–466.
• Whiteside, Stephen P., and Donald R. Lynam (2001). "The Five Factor Model and Impulsivity: Using a Structural Model of Personality to Understand Impulsivity", Personality and Individual Differences, 30 (4): 669–689.