Karma Hükümetten Denetim ve Dengeye Erkler Ayrılığı İlkesi

Yıl 2022, , 1667 - 1704, 15.09.2022

Aslan Delice

https://doi.org/10.15337/suhfd.1095794

Öz

Tarih boyunca en iyi yönetimin hangisi olduğu ve nasıl gerçekleştirileceği filozof ve hukukçuları hep meşgul etmiştir. Aristo’dan 17. asra kadar toplumun farklı kesimlerinin iktidara ortak edilmesine odaklanılmış, ılımlılık ve ölçüye dayanan, alt sınıflara iktidardan pay veren karma hükümetlerin en iyi devlet şekli olduğu kabul edilmiştir. 17. asırdan itibaren denge fikrinden uzaklaşılarak, mülkiyet ve özgürlükleri içeren burjuva kapitalist değerlerin korunması temel amaç haline getirilmiştir. Üç işlevin üç ayrı organa verilmesiyle oluşacak özgürlükler alanında kendini gerçekleştiren bireylerin refah ve adaletin kaynağı olacağı beklentisi, erkler ayrılığının kabulündeki asıl saiktir. Geniş halk kitlelerinin gerçekleşmeyen adalet ve refaha ilişkin hayal kırıklıkları modern negatif anayasacılık kurgusunun temellerinin sorgulanması için yeterli bir gerekçedir. Çalışma karma hükümetten farklı olarak erkler ayrılığının tüm kesimlerin değil sermaye sınıfının çıkarları doğrultusunda anayasal bir yapı oluşturduğu fikrine dayanır. TBMM’nin yürürlüğe koyduğu kanunlar da dahil olmak üzere hiçbir işleminin yargı denetimine tabi tutulmaması teklifi de halk adına egemenliği kullanan yasama organıyla diğerleri arasındaki bozulan dengenin yeniden tesisi için önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Karma Hükümet, Erkler Ayrılığı, Denetim ve Denge, Anayasa Yargısı, Egemenlik.

Kaynakça

• ACKERMAN, Bruce, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2010.
• ACKERMAN, Bruce, The New Separation of Powers, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• AQUINAS, Thomas, Summa Theologica, Çev.: Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Benziger Bros. edition, 1947.
• AQUINAS, Thomas, Treatise on Law, Çev.: REGAN, Richard J., Indianapolis, Cambridge, 2000.
• ARISTOTLE, Politics, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, Çev.: JOWETT, Benjamin; BARNES, Jonathan (Eds.), New Jersey, 1995.
• ATAR, Yavuz, Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Ankara, 2021.
• BANKS, William C., Efficiency in Government: Separation of Powers Reconsidered, Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1984.
• BARBER, N. W., The Principles of Constitutionalism, Oxford, 2018.
• BARENDT, Eric, Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• BELLAMY, Richard, Introduction, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• BELLAMY, Richard, The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Democracy, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• BÖCKENFÖRDE, Ernst-Wolfgang, Constitutional and Political Theory, KÜNKLER, Mirjam / STEIN, Tine (Eds.), Oxford, 2017.
• BONILLA MALDONADO, Daniel, The Conceptual Architecture of The Principle of Separation of Powers, in BILCHITZ, David / LANDAU, David (Eds.), The Evolution of the Separation of Powers: Between the Global North and the Global South, Cheltenham, 2018.
• BRAITHWAITE, John, On Speaking Softly and Carrying Big Sticks: Neglected Dimensions of a Republication Separation of Powers, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• BRENNAN Geoffrey / HAMLIN, Alan, A Revisionist View of The Separation of Powers, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• CAN, Osman, Anayasayı Değiştirme İktidarı ve Denetim Sorunu, AÜSBF Dergisi, Cilt 62, Sayı 3, 2007, s.101-139.
• CANETTI, Elias, Kitle ve İktidar, Çev.: AYGEN, Gülşat, İstanbul, 2019.
• CAROLAN, Eoin, The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State, Oxford, 2009.
• DAHL, Robert A., Demokrasi Üzerine, Çev.: KADIOĞLU, Betül, Ankara, 2021.
• DWORKIN, Ronald, Judicial Discretion, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• ELLIS, Richard J., Judging Executive Power: Sixteen Supreme Court Cases That Have Shaped American Presidency, Lanham, 2009.
• EREN, Abdurrahman, Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri, Genel Esaslar-Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Ankara, 2021.
• FRIEDRICH, Carl J., Constitution and Constitutionalism, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, SILLS, David L. (Eds.), Vol. 3., USA, 1968.
• GENOVESE, Michael A. / SPITZER, Robert J., The Presidency and Constitution Cases and Controversies, New York, 2005.
• GOODIN, Robert E., Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• GÖZLER, Kemal, Türk Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri, Bursa, 2018.
• GRIMM, Dieter, Constitutionalism: Past, Present, and Future, Oxford, 2016.
• HABERMAS, Jurgen, Between Facts and Norms, Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge and Massachussets, 1996.
• HARTOG, François, Eskiler, Modernler, Yabanıllar, Çev.: KAHİLOĞULLARI, Adnan, İstanbul, 2020.
• HAYEK, F.A., Freedom and the Rule of Law, The first of two talks, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• HOLCOMBE, Randall G., From Liberty to Democracy: The Transformation of American Government, Ann Arbor, 2002.
• JENKINS, David, The Lockean Constitution: Separation of Powers and the Limits of Prerogative, McGill Law Journal, 56(3), 2011, 543–589.
• KELSEN, Hans, General Theory of Law and State, Çev.: WEDBERG, Anders, Massachusetts, 1949.
• KOMMERS, Donald P. / FINN, John E. / JACOBSOHN, Gary J., American Constitutional Law, Vol.1: Governmental Powers and Democracy, Lanham, 2010.
• LENAERTS, Koen, Constitutionalism and The Many Faces of Federalism, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• LOCKE, John, Yönetim Üzerine İkinci İnceleme - Sivil Yönetimin Gerçek Kökeni Boyutu ve Amacı Üzerine Bir Deneme, Çev.: BAKIRCI, Fahri, Ankara, 2012
• LUHMANN, Niklas, Law as a Social System, Çev.: ZIEGERT, Klaus A., New York, 2004.
• LUHMANN, Niklas, Trust and Power, Çev.: DAVIS, Howard / RAFFAN, John / ROONEY, Kathryn, New York, 1979.
• MACRIDIS, Roy C., Political Executive, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, SILLS, David L. (Eds.), Vol. 12., USA, 1968.
• MANSFIELD JR, Harvey C., Taming The Prince / The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power, New York, 1989.
• MARSILIUS OF PADUA, The Defender of The Peace, Çev.: BRETT, Annabel, New York, 2005.
• McCLOSKEY, Robert G., Constitutional Law/III-Civil Liberties, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, SILLS, David L. (Eds.), Vol. 3, USA, 1968.
• McILWAIN, Charles Howard, Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, New York, 1947.
• MÖLLERS, Christoph, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers, Oxford, 2013.
• MONTESQUIEU, Kanunların Ruhu Üzerine, Çev.: GÜNEN, Berna, İstanbul, 2017, s.11-12.
• NEUSTADT, Richard E., Presidential Government, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, SILLS, David L. (Eds.), Vol. 12., USA, 1968.
• NICHOLS, David K., UnLocke[e]ing the Constitutional Separation of Powers, in LIEBERT, Hugh / MCDOWELL, Garry / PRICE, Terry L. (Eds.) Executive Power in Theory and Practise, New York, 2012.
• ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Ankara, 2010.
• POLYBIUS, The Histories, Volume III, Çev.: PATON, W. R., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979.
• POSNER, Richard A., An Affair of State/The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
• RADIN, Margaret Jane, Reconsidering The Rule of Law, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• RAZ, Joseph, The Rule of Law and Its Virtue, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• ROCHE, John P., Constitutional Law / II-Distribution of Powers, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, SILLS, David L. (Eds.), Vol. 3., USA, 1968.
• SCHAPIRO, Martin, Stability and Change in Judicial Decision-Making, Incrementalism or Stare Decisis, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• SCHMITT, Carl, Constitutional Theory, Çev.: SEITZER, Jeffrey, Durham and London, 2008.
• SHANE, Peter M., Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy, Chicago and London, 2009.
• SHARP, Malcolm P., The Classical American Doctrine of the Separation of Powers, University of Chicago Law Review, 2, No. 3, April 1935, s.385-436.
• SIEYÉS, Emmanuel-Joseph, Üçüncü Sınıf Nedir, Çev.: BİRKAN, İsmet, Ankara, 2005.
• SUNSTEIN, Cass R., Incompletely Theorized Agreements, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• TANÖR, Bülent / YÜZBAŞIOĞLU, Necmi, 1982 Anayasasına Göre Türk Anayasa Hukuku, İstanbul, 2018.
• TEUBNER, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Çev.: NORBURY, Gareth, Oxford, 2012.
• TURPIN, Colin / TOMKINS, Adam, British Government and the Constitution Text and Materials, Cambridge, 2011.
• UZZELL, Lynn, Locke’s Latent Sovereign, in LIEBERT, Hugh / MCDOWELL, Garry / PRICE, Terry L. (Eds.) Executive Power in Theory and Practise, New York, 2012.
• VILE, M. J. C., Constitutionalism and The Separation of Powers, Indianapolis, 1998.
• WALDRON, Jeremy, Is The Rule of Law An Essentially Contested Concept (In Florida)?, in BELLAMY, Richard (Eds.), The Rule of Law and The Separation of Powers, New York, 2016.
• WEBER, Max, On Law in Economy and Society, Çev.: SHILS, Edward / RHEINSTEIN, Max, Cambridge and Massachussets, 1966.
• YOO, John, Modern Executive Tames Obama, in LIEBERT, Hugh / MCDOWELL, Garry / PRICE, Terry L. (Eds.) Executive Power in Theory and Practise, New York, 2012.
• Declaration of the Rights of Man – 1789 Avalon Project - Declaration of the Rights of Man - 1789 (yale.edu) (31.10.2021)
• Teşkilâtı Esasiye Kanunu https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/tr/mevzuat/onceki-anayasalar/1921-anayasasi/ (22.11.2021)
• Roll Call Vote 116th Congress - 2nd Session https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=2&vote=00034 (28.01.2022)
• Trump acquitted for second time following historic Senate impeachment trial https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/13/politics/senate-impeachment-trial-day-5-vote/index.html (28.01.2022)
• The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2018 https://www.government.nl/topics/constitution/documents/reports/2019/02/28/the-constitution-of-the-kingdom-of-the-netherlands (03.01.2022)
• Section 33 – Notwithstanding clause https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art33.html (28.12.2021)
• The Constitution of The Republic of Poland of 2nd April, 1997 https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm (27.12.2021)