Yazılım Tanımlı Yerleşke Ağlarının Geliştirilmesi için Bir Derleme

Öz

Bilgisayar ağlarındaki kullanıcı sayıları ve yükleri sürekli olarak artmakla birlikte, ağ yönetim metodolojileri iletişim teknolojisindeki hızlı gelişmeye ayak uyduramadığı için karmaşık ve yüksek maliyetli bir işletme fonksiyonu olarak geride kalmıştır. Yazılım Tanımlı Ağ kavramı bilgisayarlarda uygulanan sanallaştırma ile benzer yöntemleri kullanarak ağ trafiğini düzenleyen cihazların yönetiminin ayrı bir yönetim katmanından yapılmasını sağlayacak uygulamaların geliştirilmesini önermektedir. Sanallaştırma ve ayrı bir katmandan yönetim, bilgisayar ağlarının daha esnek kullanılmasına olanak sağlayacak, Bilgi Teknolojileri yönetiminin düşük maliyetli ve kolaylıkla gerçekleştirilmesine katkıda bulunacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• SDN
• Açık Akış
• Yazılım Tanımlı Ağ
• Yönetim Birimi
• Ağ Parametreleri

An Overview of Software Defined Campus Networks

Öz

The number of users and overall workload on computer networks increase continually. However, the management of the computer networks infrastructure in which taking the advantage of rapid changes in technology is still complicated and exteremely expensive. The concept of Software Defined Networks (SDN) proposes the development of software tools with new applications to decouple the network devices from the network traffic as similar as virtualization technologies. This will help computer networks being more flexible and contribute the management of Information Technologies with a higher functionality and lower cost.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• SDN
• Open Flow
• Software Defined Network
• Controller
• Network Parameters

Kaynakça

1. Astuto B., Nunes A., Mendonca M., Nguyen X.N., Obraczka K., Turletti T., 2014, “A Survey of Software Defined Networks: Past, Present and Future of Programmable Networks”. IEEE Comm. Survey and Tutorials, 16(3).
2. Campbell T., Katzela I., Miki K., Vincente J., 1999, “Open Signaling for ATM, Internet and Mobile Networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 29(1), 97-108.
3. Casado M., Freedman M.J., Pettit J., Luo J., McKeown N., Shenker S., 2006, “Sane: A Protection Architecture for Enterprise Networks”, 15th Conf. on USENIX Security Symposium, Conference Proceeding (Article no. 10).
4. Casado M., Garfinkel T., Akella A., Freedman M.J., Boneh D., McKeown N., Shenker S., 2007, “Ethane: Taking Control of the Enterprise”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(4), 1-12.
5. Cisco Networks, (23.10.2015), “Cisco APIC”, http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/cloud-systemsmanagement/application-policy-infrastructure-controller-apic/products-technical-referencelist. html.
6. Denton J., 2014, “Learning OpenStack Networking (Neutron)”, Packt Publishing Ltd.
7. Doria A., Helstrand F., Sundell K., Worster T., 2002, “General Switch Management Protocol GMSPV3”, Internet Requests for Commence (RFC), 2070-3292, ISSN(print), 2070-1721.
8. Feng X., Shen J., Fan Y., 2009, “REST: An Alternative to RPC for Web Services Architecture”, IEEE In Future Information Networks, Conference Proceeding (ICFIN), 7-10.

9. Fernandez M.P., 2014, “Evaluating Openflow Controller Paradigms”, ICN2013 Conference Proceeding, 151-157.
10. Greenberg A., Hjalmytsson G., Maltz D.A., Myers A., Rexford J., Xie G., Yan H., Zhan J., Zhang H., 2005, “A Clean Slate 4D Approach to Network Control and Management”. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Review, 35(5), 41-54.
11. Hayward S.S., O’Callaghan E., Sezer S., 2013, “SDN Security: A Survey”, IEEE SDN4FNS Conference Proceeding, 56-62.
12. HP Company, (23.10.2015), “Search HP.com”, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/networking/sdn/devcenterindex. html.
13. Jiang L., Yang X., Li T., 2014, “The Analysis and Design for a Network Analysis System Based on WinPcap”. Communications Security Conference Conference Proceeding, Article No. 731.
14. Juniper Networks, (23.10.2015), “Contrail Open SDN”, http://www.juniper.net/us/en/productsservices/ sdn/ contrail/.
15. Kim H., Benson T., Akella A., 2011, “The Evolution of Network Configuration: A Tale of Two Campuses”, ACM Internet Measuring Conference, SIGCOMM, Conference Proceeding.
16. Kim H., Feamster N., 2013, “Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking”, IEEE Comm. Magazine, 51(2), 114-119.
17. Kreutz D., Ramos F., Verissimo P., Rothenberg C.E., Azodolmolky S., Uhlig S., 2014, “Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey”. ArXiv preprint, arXiv:1406. 044.
18. Linux Foundation, (23.10.2015), “Open Daylight Project”, http://www.opendaylight.org/.
19. Luo T., Tan H.P., Quan P.C., Law Y.W., Jin J., 2012, “Enhancing Responsiveness and Scalability for Openflow Networks, via Control Message Quenching”, IEEE ICTC Conference Proceeding, 348- 353.
20. NOXRepo Community, (23.10.2015), “Open Source Control Platforms for Software Defined Networks”, http://www.noxrepo.org/pox/about-pox/.
21. McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G, Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J., 2008, “Openflow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Review, 38(2).
22. Open Networking Foundation, (23.10.2015), “Openflow Switch Specification (Wire Protocol 0x5)”, http://www. opennetworking.org.
23. Open Networking Foundation, (23.10.2015), “Northbound Interface Working Group Charter v1.1.pdf”, http://www. opennetworking.org.
24. Pavitra H., Sagar B.M., Srivanasan G.N, Parashant V., 2014, “An Overview of Software Defined Networking”, International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 3(11), 3053-3055.
25. Project Floodlight Community, (23.10.2015), “A Big Switched Networks Sponsored Project”, http://www. Projectfloodlight.org/floodlight/.
26. Sezer S., Hayward S.S., 2013, “Are We Ready for SDN? Implementation Challenges for Software Defined Networks”, IEEE Communications. Magazine, 51(7), 36-43.
27. Teannenhouse D.L., Wetherall D.J., 2002, “Towards an Active Network Architecture”, DARPA Active Networks Conference and Exposition.