Araştırma Makalesi

COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4 1 Aralık 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY

Öz

Numerous methods have been suggested for analysis of costumer intention, from surveys to statistical models. The most recent couple of years, various machine learning methods have effectively been utilized to costumer-centric decision-making problems. The trend of patient revisit intention analysis has an improved reliance on computerized decision making models. Computerized decision-making may never take the place of the hospital managers, but it can provide decision support via a simple questionnaire. In this paper, it is carried on a comparative evaluation of the performance of ten widely used machine learning methods, (i.e., logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, support vector machines, IBk, KStar, locally weighted learning, decisionstump, C4.5., randomtree and reduced error pruning tree) for the aim of suggesting appropriate machine learning techniques in the context of patient revisit intention prediction problem. Experimental results reveal that the C4.5 tree demonstrates to be the most suitable predictive model since it has the highest overall average accuracy (95.24%) and a very low percentage error on both Type I (3.40%) and Type II (23.53%) errors, closely followed by the locally weighted learning (94.44%, 3.43%, 31.58%) and decisionstump (94.05%, 3,85%, 30.00%), whereas the logistic regression and the IBk algorithms appear to be the worst in terms of average accuracy (87.30% and 88.49%, respectively) and Type II error (70.37% and 68.18%, respectively). Besides the randomtree (6.36%) and the IBk (6.09%) algorithms appear to be the worst in terms of type I error. As a result, this study has demonstrated the promising attempt of incorporating sentiment classification into patient revisit intention.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Al-Refaie, A., 2011, “A Structural Model to Investigate Factors Affect Patient Satisfaction and Revisit Intention in Jordanian Hospitals”, International Journal of Artificial Life Research, Vol. 2(4), pp. 43-56.
  2. Al Snousy, M. B., El-Deeb, H. M., Badran, K., Al Khlil, I. A., 2011, “Suite of Decision Tree-based Classification Algorithms on Cancer Gene Expression Data”, Egyptian Informatics Journal, Vol. 12(2), pp. 73-82.
  3. Aliman, N. K., Mohamad, W. N. (2013). “Perceptions of Service Quality and Behavioral Intentions: A Mediation Effect of Patient Satisfaction in the Private Health Care in Malaysia”, International Journal of Marketing Studies, Vol. 5(4), pp. 15-29.
  4. Anbarasi, M., Anupriya, E., Iyengar, N. C. S. N., 2010, “Enhanced Prediction of Heart Disease with Feature Subset Selection using Genetic Algorithm”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2(10), pp. 5370-5376.
  5. Arif, M., Ishihara, T., Inooka, H., 2001, “Incorporation of Experience in Iterative Learning Controllers using Locally Weighted Learning”, Automatica, Vol. 37(6), pp. 881-888.
  6. Aydogmus, H.Y., Ekinci, A., Erdal, H.İ., Erdal, H., 2015, “Optimizing the Monthly Crude Oil Price Forecasting Accuracy via Bagging Ensemble Models”, Journal of Economics and International Finance, Vol. 7(5), pp. 127-136.
  7. Aydogmus, H.Y., Erdal, H.İ., Karakurt, O., Namli, E., Turkan, Y.S., Erdal, H., 2015, “A Comparative Assessment of Bagging Ensemble Models for Modeling Concrete Slump Flow”, Computers and Concrete, Vol. 16(5), pp. 741-757.
  8. Aydogmus, H.Y., Turkan, Y.S., 2016, “Passenger Demand Prediction for Fast Ferries Based on Neural Network and Support Vector Machine”, Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 8(1), pp. 209-216.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Aralık 2016

Kabul Tarihi

19 Nisan 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Demirdöğen, O., Erdal, H., & Akbaba, A. İ. (2017). COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5(4), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.15317/Scitech.2017.99
AMA
1.Demirdöğen O, Erdal H, Akbaba Aİ. COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY. sujest. 2017;5(4):386-401. doi:10.15317/Scitech.2017.99
Chicago
Demirdöğen, Osman, Hamit Erdal, ve Ahmet İlker Akbaba. 2017. “COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi 5 (4): 386-401. https://doi.org/10.15317/Scitech.2017.99.
EndNote
Demirdöğen O, Erdal H, Akbaba Aİ (01 Aralık 2017) COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi 5 4 386–401.
IEEE
[1]O. Demirdöğen, H. Erdal, ve A. İ. Akbaba, “COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY”, sujest, c. 5, sy 4, ss. 386–401, Ara. 2017, doi: 10.15317/Scitech.2017.99.
ISNAD
Demirdöğen, Osman - Erdal, Hamit - Akbaba, Ahmet İlker. “COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi 5/4 (01 Aralık 2017): 386-401. https://doi.org/10.15317/Scitech.2017.99.
JAMA
1.Demirdöğen O, Erdal H, Akbaba Aİ. COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY. sujest. 2017;5:386–401.
MLA
Demirdöğen, Osman, vd. “COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, c. 5, sy 4, Aralık 2017, ss. 386-01, doi:10.15317/Scitech.2017.99.
Vancouver
1.Osman Demirdöğen, Hamit Erdal, Ahmet İlker Akbaba. COMPARING VARIOUS MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR PREDICTION OF PATIENT REVISIT INTENTION: A CASE STUDY. sujest. 01 Aralık 2017;5(4):386-401. doi:10.15317/Scitech.2017.99

MAKALELERINIZI 

http://sujest.selcuk.edu.tr

uzerinden gonderiniz