A Qualitative Study on Innovation and Its Effects in the Supply Chain

Yıl 2026, Sayı: 59 , 58 - 77 , 30.04.2026

Hülya Tuğçe Ülger , Hasan Bülbül

https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1775994

https://izlik.org/JA44BC52WR

Öz

In today’s technological age, with the changes that occur and the radical solutions that initiatives produce, the supply chain is rapidly developing and renewing. With the impact of digitalization on the industrial world, companies have started to include innovative applications in their supply chains. Within the scope of this study, it is aimed to investigate the perspective of companies on innovation in the supply chain, their innovative applications and their effects in the context of Turkey. At the same time, innovations carried out within the framework of sustainability and their results are also among the objectives. Unlike previous studies on the examined subjects, a qualitative approach was adopted in this study; semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 companies operating in different sectors. The obtained data were analyzed using the content analysis method with MAXQDA software. It was understood that the findings do not contradict the quantitative studies in the literature. It was determined that innovation is widely accepted in order to improve cooperation between companies, reduce costs, speed up processes, increase customer satisfaction and competitiveness. It was also determined that integrating technological developments in supply chains is important and that there is awareness among companies on environmental sustainability issues. In the conclusion section of the study, the findings are discussed and suggestions are presented for practitioners.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supply Chain , Innovation , Green Innovation , Sustainability

Tedarik Zincirinde Yenilikçilik ve Etkileri Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma

https://izlik.org/JA44BC52WR

Öz

Günümüz teknoloji çağında değişimlerin meydana gelmesiyle ve girişimlerin radikal çözümler üretmesiyle beraber tedarik zinciri hızla gelişmekte ve yenilenmektedir. Dijitalleşmenin endüstri dünyasına etkisiyle firmalar tedarik zincirlerine inovatif uygulamaları dâhil etmeye başlamıştır. Bu çalışma kapsamında, Türkiye bağlamında firmaların tedarik zincirinde yenilikçiliğe bakışı, yenilikçi uygulamaları ve etkilerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Aynı zamanda sürdürülebilirlik çerçevesinde yürütülen yenilikler ve sonuçları da amaçlar arasında yer almıştır. İncelenen konulara ilişkin önceki çalışmalardan farklı olarak bu çalışmada nitel bir yaklaşım benimsenmiş; farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren 18 firma ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler MAXQDA yazılımı ile içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulguların literatürdeki nicel araştırmalar ile çelişmediği anlaşılmıştır. Firmalar arasında işbirliğini geliştirmek, maliyetleri azaltmak, süreçleri hızlandırmak, müşteri memnuniyetini ve rekabet gücünü artırmak için yenilikçiliğin büyük bir kabul gördüğü tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca tedarik zincirlerinde teknolojik gelişmelerin entegre edilmesinin önemli olduğu ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik konularında firmalar arasında farkındalığın bulunduğu saptanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuç bölümünde bulgular tartışılmış ve uygulayıcılar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarik Zinciri , Yenilik , Yeşil Yenilik , Sürdürülebilirlik

Kaynakça

• Abdelkafi, N. & Pero, M. (2018). Supply Chain Innovation-Driven Business Models: Exploratory Analysis and Implications for Management. Business Process Management Journal, 24(2), 589-608. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-05-2016-0109
• Ageron, B., Lavastre, O. & Spalanzani, A. (2013). Innovative Supply Chain Practices: The State of French Companies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 265-276. doi:10.1108/SCM-03-2012-0082
• Agigi, A., Mocke, K., Carrim, I. & Keen, L. (2021). Managing the Dependency of Focal Firms on Innovative Suppliers: A Qualitative Study of Automotive Manufacturers in South Africa. Africa Journal of Management, 7(1), 31-57.
• Ahmad K., Islam M.S., Jahin M.A. & Mridha M.F. (2024). Analysis of Internet of Things Implementation Barriers in The Cold Supply Chain: An Integrated ISM-MICMAC and DEMATEL Approach. PLoS ONE, 19(7), 1-31. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304118
• Arlbjørn, J. S., De Haas, H. & Munksgaard, K. B. (2011). Exploring Supply Chain Innovation. Logistics Research, 3, 3-18. doi:10.1007/s12159-010-0044-3
• Azadegan, A. & Dooley, K.J. (2010). Supplier Innovativeness, Organizational Learning Styles and Manufacturer Performance: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6), 488-505. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.02.001
• Bai, X., Coelho, A. & Cancela, B. L. (2023). The Relationship Between Green Supply Chain and Green Innovation Based on the Push of Green Strategic Alliances. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1026-1041. doi:10.1002/csr.2619
• Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel Araştırma Süreci: Nitel Bir Araştırma Nasıl Yapılır?. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(2), 368-388. doi:10.31592/aeusbed.598299
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Bello, D. C., Lothia, R. & Sangtani, V. (2004). An Institutional Analysis of Supply Chain Innovation in Global Marketing Channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(1), 57-64. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.011
• Berneis, M., Winkler, H. & Abdelkafi, N. (2024). Insights from Interviews with German Supply Chain Managers: A Study of Supply Chain Transformations and Emerging Issues. 5th International Conference on Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing, Procedia Computer Science, 232, 1079-1088. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.106
• Bozarth, C. C., Handfield, R. B. & Weiss, H. J. (2008). Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Chapman, R.L., Soosay, C. & Kandampully, M. (2003). Innovation in Logistic Services and the New Business Model: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(7), 630-637. doi:10.1108/09600030310499295
• Chu, S.H., Yang, H., Lee, M., & Park, S. (2017). The Impact of Institutional Pressures on Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: Top Management Roles and Social Capital. Sustainability, 9(5), 764. doi:10.3390/su9050764
• Craighead, C. V., Hult, G. T. M. & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2009). The Effects of Innovation-Cost Strategy, Knowledge and Action in the Supply Chain on Firm Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 27(5), 405-421. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.01.002
• Çokluk, Ö., Yılmaz, K. & Oğuz, E. (2011). Nitel Bir Görüşme Yöntemi: Odak Grup Görüşmesi. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4(1), 95-107.
• Dubey, R., Singh, T. & Tiwari, S. (2012). Supply Chain Innovation is a Key to Superior Firm Performance an Insight from Indian Cement Manufacturing. International Journal of Innovation Science, 4(4), 217-230. doi:10.1260/1757-2223.4.4.217
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Blome, C. & Papadopoulos, T. (2019). Big Data and Predictive Analytics and Manufacturing Performance: Integrating Institutional Theory and Resource‐Based View. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 341-361. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12355
• Erciş, A. & Can, P. (2013). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin İnovasyon Stratejilerine Etkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 95-122.
• Erdem, Ö., Mızrak, M. & Kemer, A. K. (2018). Yöresel Yemeklerin Bölge Restoranlarında Kullanılma Durumu: Mengen Örneği. Uluslararası Türk Dünyası Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 44-61.
• Gupta, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S. & Rezaei, J. (2020). Barriers and Overcoming Strategies to Supply Chain Sustainability Innovation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104819. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104819
• Güvener, H. & Aytekin, M. (2022). İnovatif Liderliğin Tedarik Zinciri Performansına Etkisinde Tedarik Zinciri İnovasyonunun Aracılık Rolü. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(36), 1267-1286. doi:10.21076/vizyoner.1098477
• Güzel, D. & Yazıcılar, F. G. (2016).Tedarik Zinciri İnovasyonunun Performansa Etkisi: Bir Uygulama. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(47), 872-877.
• Haddouch, H., Fath, K., El Oumami, M. & Beidouri, Z. (2022). Exploratory Qualitative Study of the Supply Chain Management Practices in the Moroccan Companies. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30(1), 1-8. doi:10.2478/mspe-2022-0001
• Heikkinen, A. R. (2023). Supply Chain Innovation and Supplier Innovativeness in Global, Multi-Industrial Companies: Insights through A Case Study of A Strong Exemplar. Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT Bachelor’s Thesis in Supply Management.
• Jajja, M. S. S., Asif, M., Shah, S. A. A. & Chatha, K. A. (2020). Supply Chain Innovation Research: Content Analysis Based Review. Benchmarking: an International Journal, 27(2), 666-694. doi:10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0297
• Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
• Kıral, B. (2020). Nitel Bir Veri Analizi Yöntemi Olarak Doküman Analizi. Siirt Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 170-189.
• Kocabasoglu Hillmer, C., Roden, S., Vanpoucke, E., Son, B.G. & Lewis, M.W. (2023). Radical Innovations as Supply Chain Disruptions? A Paradox Between Change and Stability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 59(3), 3-19. doi:10.1111/jscm.12299
• Kohli, A. S. & Sharma, D. K. (2007). Supply Chain Management and Its Impact on Operation Decision. International Journal of Effective Management, 4(1), 47-64.
• Kunkel, S., Matthess, M., Xue, B. & Beier, G. (2022). Industry 4.0 in Sustainable Supply Chain Collaboration: Insights from an Interview Study with International Buying Firms and Chinese Suppliers in the Electronics Industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, 106274. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106274
• Lavastre, O., Ageron, B., Chaze-Magnan, L. & Spalanzani, A. (2014). Innovative Supply Chain Practices (ISCP) in Supply Chain Management: Development and Validation of a Measurement Scale. M@n@gement, 17(4), 263-298.
• Lee, S. M., Lee, D. & Schniederjans, M. J. (2011). Supply Chain Innovation and Organizational Performance in the Healthcare Industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(11), 1193-1214. doi:10.1108/01443571111178493
• Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S. & Subba Rao, S. (2006). The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.002
• Lin, C. Y. (2008). Determinants of the Adoption of Technological Innovations by Logistics Service Providers in China. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 19-38. doi:10.1386/ijtm.7.1.19_1
• Linton, J. D., Klassen, R. & Jayaraman, V. (2007). Sustainable Supply Chains: An Introduction. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1075-1082. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.012
• Lotfi, Z., Mukhtar, M., Sahran, S. & Zadeh, A. T. (2013). Information Sharing in Supply Chain Management. Procedia Technology. 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, ICEEI 2013, 11, 298-304. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.194
• Moreira, A. C., Ferreira, L. M. D. F. & Zimmermann, R. A. (2018). Innovation and Supply Chain Management Relationship, Collaboration and Strategies. Springer, 3-32.
• Morledge, R., Knight, A. & Grada, M. (2009). The Concept and Development of Supply Chain Management in the UK Constructon Industry. Constructon Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Case Studies, Blackwell Publishing, 23-41.
• Mulyani, S. & Basrowi, B. (2024). The Effect of Environmentally Oriented Leadership and Public Sector Management Quality on Supply Chain Performance: The Moderating Role of Public Sector Environmental Policy. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 471-480.
• Nazir, S., Zhaolei, L., Mehmood, S. & Nazir, Z. (2024). Impact of Green Supply Chain Management Practices on the Environmental Performance of Manufacturing Firms Considering Institutional Pressure as a Moderator. Sustainability, 16(6), 2278. doi:10.3390/su16062278
• Panayides, P. M. & Lun, V. Y. H. (2009). The Impact of Trust on Innovativeness and Supply Chain Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 35-46. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.025
• Popa, I. L., Preda, G. & Boldea, M. (2010). A Theoretıcal Approach of the Concept of Innovation. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society, 1, 151-156.
• Prasad, B. & Junn, P. (2016). CEO Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Organizational Innovation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism. Management Decision, 54(7), 1542-1568. doi:10.1108/MD-11-2014-0651
• Purwaningsih, E., Muslikh, M., Suhaeri, S. & Basrowi, B. (2024). Utilizing Blockchain Technology in Enhancing Supply Chain Efficiency and Export Performance, and Its Implications on the Financial Performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 449-460.
• Roy, S., Sivakumar, K. & Wilkinson, I. F. (2004). Innovation Generation in Supply Chain Relationships: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 61-79. doi:10.1177/0092070303255470
• Roy, S. & Mohanty, R. P. (2023). Green Logistics Operations and Its Impact on Supply Chain Sustainability: An Empirical Study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1447-1476. doi:10.1002/bse.3531
• Sabri, Y., Micheli, G.J.L & Nuur, C. (2018). Exploring The Impact of Innovation Implementation on Supply Chain Configuration. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 49, 60-75. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.06.001
• Seidiaghilabadi, F., Seidiaghilabadi, Z. & Miralmasi, A. (2019). Identifying Research Gaps in Supply Chain Innovation. in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation in Supply Chain Management: Innovative Approaches for Supply Chains. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), epubli GmbH, Berlin, 27, 298-330.
• Seo Y.J., Dinwoodie J. & Kwak D.W. (2014). The Impact of Innovativeness on Supply Chain Performance: Is Supply Chain Integration a Missing Link?. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 733-746. doi:10.1108/SCM-02-2014-0058
• Shashi, M. (2022). Digital Strategies to Improve the Performance of Pharmaceutical Supply Chains. Doctoral Theses, Walden University, College of Management and Technology, ProQuest LLC.
• Simões, A., Oliveira, L., Rodrigues, J. C., Simas, O., Dalmarcı, G. & Barros, A. C. (2019). Environmental Factors Influencing the Adoption of Digitalization Technologies in Automotive Supply Chains. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), IEEE, 1-7. doi:10.1109/ICE.2019.8792639
• Story, W. K. (2016). Impact of Supply Chain Technology Response Capability on Firm Performance and Supply Chain Technology Performance. University of Memphis Digital Commons, Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Web: https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/etd/1328
• Sunil, K. (2019). Supply Chain Innovation: The Core Capabilities Required and Expected Outcomes. Journal of Information Technology & Software Engineering, 9(2), 256-271.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
• Yang, F. & Zhang, X. (2017). The Impact of Sustainable Supplier Management Practices on Buyer-Supplier Performance: An Empirical Study in China. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(1), 112-132. doi:10.1108/RIBS-08-2016-0043
• Yıldırım, K. (2010). Nitel Araştırmalarda Niteliği Artırma. İlköğretim Online, 9(1), 79-92.
• Yıldız, B. & Çetindaş, A. (2020). Tedarikçilerle Yapılan İnovasyon Faaliyetlerinin Yeni Ürün Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Aracı Rolü. Turkish Studies-Social, 15(8), 3781-3798.
• Yoon, S. N., Lee, D. H. & Schniederjans, M. (2016). Effects of Innovation Leadership and Supply Chain Innovation on Supply Chain Efficiency: Focusing on Hospital Size. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 113, 412-421. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.015