Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching

Sayı: 42 1 Ağustos 2019
Emine Eda Ercan Demirel
PDF İndir
TR EN

Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching

Öz

This present study aims to investigate the efficiency of cooperative learning and traditional instruction in terms of vocabulary recognition in foreign language teaching. In line with this purpose, the study searches for the answer of the following research question: “Is there a significant difference between the vocabulary learning performances of the students who were taught through cooperative learning method and the students who were taught through traditional methods?”and tries to find out whether students’ vocabulary could be enriched through an instruction which emphasizes the role of cooperation rather than competition among students in teaching vocabulary. The study employs a quantitative research design comparing cooperative learning versus traditional method in terms of vocabulary learning/teaching. The instruments of the study cover a pre-test, a posttest, 8 reading texts, worksheets, posters, and quizzes. The test in concern- the vocabulary test- underwent a process with the guidance and supervision of language and scale development experts, and then was finalised to be used as the pre-test and posttest Cronbach’s alpha 0.83 . The participants were freshmen at Selcuk University School of Foreign Languages SOFL . The study was carried out in a four-week experimental process on two groups- experimental and control – each of which consisted of 18 students. A pre-test was applied at the beginning of the process to make sure if the two groups were equal in terms of their prior vocabulary knowledge and see the improvement afterwards. Throughout the study, the experimental group experienced learning vocabulary through Cooperative Learning CL and the control group was taught through traditional instruction- the gloss and the use of a monolingual dictionary with the same vocabulary syllabus for both groups. At the end of four weeks, a post-test -the same as the pre-test- was applied. Collected data was analysed through SPSS. The results indicated that the participants of the experimental group who had the Cooperative Learning experience led to better results in terms of vocabulary learning than the other students who were taught through the traditional instruction

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vocabulary Learning,Cooperative Learning,Student-based Learning

Kaynakça

  1. Açıkgöz, K. (1990). “İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme ve geleneksel öğretimin öğrencilerin akademik başarısı, hatırda tutma düzeyleri ve duyuşsal özellikleri üzerindeki etkileri”. I. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ankara, Turkey, 25-28 Eylül, MEB Yayınları, Ankara 1993; s.187-201.
  2. Ahmad, Z. and Mahmood, N. (2010). “Effects of Cooperative Learning vs. Traditional Instruction on Prospective Teachers’ Learning Experience and Achievement”, Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 43 (1): 151-164.
  3. Ajaja, P.O. and Eravwoke, O.U. (2010). “Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategy on Junior Secondary School Students Achievement in Integrated Science”, Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14 (1) [Online] Available at: [Erişim tarihi 5 August, 2019 13:41:47 GMT ].
  4. Butler, Linda. Password 1: A Reading and Vocabulary Text, New York, Longman, 2003.
  5. Büyükkaragöz, Savaş. Program Geliştirme Kaynak Metinler, Konya, Kuzucular Ofset, 1997.
  6. Demirel, Özcan. İlköğretim Okullarında Yabancı Dil Öğretimi, İstanbul, Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1999.
  7. Ercan, E.E. (2009). “Teaching vocabulary through cooperative learning”. Unpublished MA thesis, Selçuk University Institute of Social Sciences ELT Department.
  8. Erdem Mete, Defne. Opinions of Pre-service English Language Teachers on an Intercultural Training Integrated Oral Communication Skills Course, (in Educational Sciences ed. O. Kutlu, pp.31-50), Ankara, Akademisyen Kitabevi, 2018.
  9. Gillies, Robyn, M. and Ashman, Adrian F. Cooperative Learning the Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Groups, Great Britain, MPG Books Ltd, 2003.
  10. Gillies, Robyn, M., Ashman, Adrian F. and Terwel, Jan. The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom, New York, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2008.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ercan Demirel, E. E. (2019). Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 42, 344-354. https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU
AMA
1.Ercan Demirel EE. Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching. SUSBED. 2019;(42):344-354. https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU
Chicago
Ercan Demirel, Emine Eda. 2019. “Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sy 42: 344-54. https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU.
EndNote
Ercan Demirel EE (01 Ağustos 2019) Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 42 344–354.
IEEE
[1]E. E. Ercan Demirel, “Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching”, SUSBED, sy 42, ss. 344–354, Ağu. 2019, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU
ISNAD
Ercan Demirel, Emine Eda. “Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 42 (01 Ağustos 2019): 344-354. https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU.
JAMA
1.Ercan Demirel EE. Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching. SUSBED. 2019;:344–354.
MLA
Ercan Demirel, Emine Eda. “Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sy 42, Ağustos 2019, ss. 344-5, https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU.
Vancouver
1.Emine Eda Ercan Demirel. Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching. SUSBED [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2019;(42):344-5. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA27ED55CU