BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TEDARİK ZİNCİRİNDE BİLGİ ÇARPITMASININ ETKİSİ: KIRBAÇ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2006, Sayı: 15, 483 - 496, 01.02.2006

Turan Paksoy Esra Keskin

Öz

Tedarik zinciri üyeleri birbiriyle sürekli etkileşim halindedir. Tedarik zincirinde bilginin paylaşımında ortaya çıkan aksaklıklar zincirde aksamalara ve verimsizliklere neden olur; aşırıstok yatırımlarıortaya çıkar, abartılısiparişseviyeleri ve maliyetlerin yükselmesine neden olan talep dalgalanmalarıoluşur. Bu çalışmada, tedarik zincirinde bilgi çarpıtmasının ortaya çıkardığıetkiler, kırbaç etkisi olarak adlandırılan bu durumun işletmelerde oluşturduğu olumsuzluklar ve çözüm yöntemleri ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Bilgi Çarpıtması Kırbaç Etkisi

Kaynakça

  • CHEN, F., DREZNER, Z., RYAN, J., SİMCHI-LEVİ, D., 2000a, Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information, Management Science 46 (3), 436- 443.
  • CHEN, F., RYAN, J., SIMCHI-LEVİ, D., 2000b, The impact of exponantial smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect, Naval Research Lojistics 47 (4), 271-286.
  • CARLSSON, C., FULLÉR, R., 2002, A position paper on the agenda for decision analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131, 3- 11.
  • DEJONCKHEERE, J., DISNEY, S. M., LAMBRECHT, M. R., TOWILL, D. R., 2004, The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: a control engineering perspective, European Journal of Operational Research 153, 727- 750.
  • DEJONCKHEERE, J., DISNEY, S. M., LAMBRECHT, M. R., TOWILL, D. R., 2003, Measuring the Bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach to analyse forecasting induced Bullwhip in order-up-to policies, European Journal of Operational Research 147, 567-590.
  • FIALA, P., 2004, Information sharing in supply chains, The International Journal Of Management Science(In press).
  • KARAYALÇIN, İ., 1986, Endüstri Mühendisliği Ve Üretim Yönetimi El Kitabı, 1. Baskı, Çağlayan Basımevi, İstanbul.
  • KIMBROUGH, S.O., WU, D.J., ZHANG,F., 2002, Computers play beer game: can artificial agents manage supply chains?, Desicion Support Systems 33, 323-333.
  • LEE, H. L., PADMANABHAN, P., WHANG, S.,1997b. The bullwhip effect in supply chains, Sloan Management Rewiew 38 (3),93-102.
  • MACHUCA, J. A. D., BARAJAS, R. P., 2004, The impact of electronic data interchange on reducing bullwhip effect and supply chain inventory costs, Transportation Research Part E 40, 209-228.
  • MASON-JONES, R., TOWILL, D.R., 1997, Informatiın Enrichment: Designing supply chain for competitive advantage, International Jurnal of Supply Chain Management 2 (4), 137-148.
  • METTERS, R., 2002, Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Journal of Operations Management 15 (2), 89-100.
  • MIN, H., ZHOU, G., 2002,, Supply Chain Modeling: past, present and future, Computers& Industrial Engineering, Vol 43, Issue 1-2, pp 231-249.
  • PAKSOY, T., ALTIPARMAK, F., 2003, Dağıtım ağlarının tasarımı ve eniyilemesi kapsamında tedarik zinciri ve lojistik yönetimine bir bakış: son gelişmeler ve genel durum, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Dergisi 2003/4, 149-167.
  • SCHMENNER, R. W., 2001, Looking ahead by looking back: Swift, even flow in the history of manufacturing, Production and Operations Management 10 (1), 87-96.
  • SENGE, P., (1991), Beşinci Disiplin, (Çev. Ayşegül İldeniz, Ahmet Doğukan), 2. Baskı, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • TOWILL, D.R., MCCULLEN, P., 1999, The impact of an agile manufacturing programme on supply chain dynamics, International Journal Logistic Management 10 (1), 83-96.
  • ZHANG, X., 2004, Delayed demand information and dampened bullwhip effect, Operations Research Letters, (In Press).

Yıl 2006, Sayı: 15, 483 - 496, 01.02.2006

Turan Paksoy Esra Keskin

Öz

Distorted information in a supply chain causes inefficiencies for all members. The common symptoms of bullwhip effect could be excessive inventory, exaggerated order swings etc. The demand order variability in the supply chain is amplified as they moved up the supply chain. This paper considers the effect of information distortion; causes of the bullwhip effect and the methods for counteract the bullwhip effect

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supply Chain Management Information Distortion Bullwhip Effect

Kaynakça

  • CHEN, F., DREZNER, Z., RYAN, J., SİMCHI-LEVİ, D., 2000a, Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information, Management Science 46 (3), 436- 443.
  • CHEN, F., RYAN, J., SIMCHI-LEVİ, D., 2000b, The impact of exponantial smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect, Naval Research Lojistics 47 (4), 271-286.
  • CARLSSON, C., FULLÉR, R., 2002, A position paper on the agenda for decision analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131, 3- 11.
  • DEJONCKHEERE, J., DISNEY, S. M., LAMBRECHT, M. R., TOWILL, D. R., 2004, The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: a control engineering perspective, European Journal of Operational Research 153, 727- 750.
  • DEJONCKHEERE, J., DISNEY, S. M., LAMBRECHT, M. R., TOWILL, D. R., 2003, Measuring the Bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach to analyse forecasting induced Bullwhip in order-up-to policies, European Journal of Operational Research 147, 567-590.
  • FIALA, P., 2004, Information sharing in supply chains, The International Journal Of Management Science(In press).
  • KARAYALÇIN, İ., 1986, Endüstri Mühendisliği Ve Üretim Yönetimi El Kitabı, 1. Baskı, Çağlayan Basımevi, İstanbul.
  • KIMBROUGH, S.O., WU, D.J., ZHANG,F., 2002, Computers play beer game: can artificial agents manage supply chains?, Desicion Support Systems 33, 323-333.
  • LEE, H. L., PADMANABHAN, P., WHANG, S.,1997b. The bullwhip effect in supply chains, Sloan Management Rewiew 38 (3),93-102.
  • MACHUCA, J. A. D., BARAJAS, R. P., 2004, The impact of electronic data interchange on reducing bullwhip effect and supply chain inventory costs, Transportation Research Part E 40, 209-228.
  • MASON-JONES, R., TOWILL, D.R., 1997, Informatiın Enrichment: Designing supply chain for competitive advantage, International Jurnal of Supply Chain Management 2 (4), 137-148.
  • METTERS, R., 2002, Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains, Journal of Operations Management 15 (2), 89-100.
  • MIN, H., ZHOU, G., 2002,, Supply Chain Modeling: past, present and future, Computers& Industrial Engineering, Vol 43, Issue 1-2, pp 231-249.
  • PAKSOY, T., ALTIPARMAK, F., 2003, Dağıtım ağlarının tasarımı ve eniyilemesi kapsamında tedarik zinciri ve lojistik yönetimine bir bakış: son gelişmeler ve genel durum, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Dergisi 2003/4, 149-167.
  • SCHMENNER, R. W., 2001, Looking ahead by looking back: Swift, even flow in the history of manufacturing, Production and Operations Management 10 (1), 87-96.
  • SENGE, P., (1991), Beşinci Disiplin, (Çev. Ayşegül İldeniz, Ahmet Doğukan), 2. Baskı, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • TOWILL, D.R., MCCULLEN, P., 1999, The impact of an agile manufacturing programme on supply chain dynamics, International Journal Logistic Management 10 (1), 83-96.
  • ZHANG, X., 2004, Delayed demand information and dampened bullwhip effect, Operations Research Letters, (In Press).
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Turan Paksoy Bu kişi benim

Esra Keskin Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Şubat 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Sayı: 15

Kaynak Göster

APA Paksoy, T., & Keskin, E. (2006). TEDARİK ZİNCİRİNDE BİLGİ ÇARPITMASININ ETKİSİ: KIRBAÇ ETKİSİ. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(15), 483-496.


24108  28027

Bu eser Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.