Öz
Yıldırma genellikle literatürde bireyler arasında gerçekleşen bir olgu olarak ele alınmaktaysa da aslında çok daha genişçaplı şekilde, toplumsal şiddetin yansımalarından biri olarak değerlendirilebilir. Bununla birlikte yıldırma küreselleşme, artan rekabet baskısı, yaşanan ekonomik istikrarsızlık, örgütsel yeniden yapılanmalar ve güç dağılımındaki eşitsizlikler nedeniyle en fazla işdünyasının karşılaştığıbir olgudur. Yıldırma davranışları, çok çeşitli, doğrudan ve dolaylıolacak tarzda ama planlı, bilinçli, güdülenmişolan saldırgan davranışlarıkapsamaktadır. Yıldırma davranışlarının, bireylerin ruhsal bütünlüklerini bozması, aktif durumdan alıp pasif durma getirmesi, kişisel güveni zedelemesi, stres ve depresyon yaratmasıgibi bireysel sonuçlarıdışında önemli örgütsel sonuçlarıda vardır. Bunlar arasında ise; verim ve motivasyonun düşmesi, işgücü devir oranlarının artışı, örgütsel güvenin sarsılmasıve yabancılaşma sayılabilir. Bireysel ve örgütsel hatta toplumsal düzeyde ciddi olumsuz sonuçlar doğurabilen yıldırma olgusunun farkına varılması, nedenlerinin belirlenmesi ve önlemlerin geliştirilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışma, ampirik bir araştırmayla bu konulara ışık tutmayıamaçlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Aguino K. and Byron K. (2002). Dominating Interpersonal Behavior and Perceived Victimization in Groups:Evidende for a Curvilinear Relationship, Journal of Management, 28(1),69-87.
- Baldry A.C. and Farrington D. P. (2000). Bullies and Delinquents: Personal Characteristics and Parental Styles, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,10,17-31.
- Bayrak S. (2001). İş Ahlakı ve Sosyal Sorumluluk, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., İstanbul.
- Einarsen, S. (1999). The Nature and Causes of Bullying at Work, International Journal of Manpower, 20 (1/2), 16-27.
- Employee Rights Quarterly (ERQ) (2000). Workplace Bullying: The Silent Epidemic
- Heaven, P. C. L., Grene, R. L., Stones C. R. and Caputi, P. (2000). Levels of Social Dominance Orientation in Three Societies, Journal of Social Psychology, 140(4), 530-532.
- Heinemann,(1972), The Mobbing Encyclopaedia, http://www.leymann.se/English/frame
- Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplace, Violance and Victims, 5(2).119-126.
- Leymann, H. (1996). The Content and development of Mobbinf at Work, Europen Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165-184.
- Menesini E., Sanchez V., Fonzi A., Ortega R., Costabile A., Lo Feudo G. (2003) Moral Emotions and Bullying. A Cross-National Comparison of Diffenrences Between Bullies, Victims and Outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 515-530.
- Namie, E. G. (2000). Research From The Workplace Bullying & Trauma Institute. US. Hostile Workplace Survey, http://www.workdoctor.com/home /twd/employers /res/surf200qv. html.
- O’Moore M. and etc, (2003). The Rates and Relative Risks of Workplace Bullying in Ireland a Country of High Economic Growth, International Journal Management and Decision Making, 4 (1), 82-95.
- Schmitt, M., Branscombe, N. R. and Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes Toward Group-Based Inequality: Social Dominance or Social Identity?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
- Solmuş, T. (2005). İş Yaşamında Travmalar: Cinsel Taciz ve Duygusal Zorbalık/Taciz, İş-Güç End. İliş. ve İns. Kay. D, 7(2)
- Timmerman G. and Bajeme C. (2000). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Perceptions and Experiences of Sexual Harassment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 188-205.
- Tutar, H. (2004). İş Yerinde Psikolojik Şiddet Sarmalı: Nedenleri ve Sonuçları, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, T.C. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi BİİBF, 92- 104.
- Yücetürk, E. E. (2003). Bilgi Çağında örgütlerin Görünmeyen Yüzü: Mobbing, http://www.bilgiyonetimi.org.
- Zapf, D., (1999). Organizational Work Group Related and Personal Causes of Mobbing/Bullying at Work, International Journal of Manpower, 20, 70-85.
Öz
Also mobbing has been considered as a fact eventuating between individuals in the literature it can actually be assessed as a reflection of a big worth social violence. Nonetheless mobbing is a fact that mostly the business world encounter because of the globalization, increasing competition pressure, experienced economic instability, organizational restructuring and the inequalities in the distribution of power. Mobbing behaviors include various, in a direct or indirect fashion but planned, conscious and motivated aggressive behaviors. Mobbing behaviors have important organizational effects other than the individual effects such as damaging the spiritual integrity, taking the person from the active position and bringing him into a passive position, damaging the self confidence, creating stress and depression. Among them the decrease in motivation and efficiency, the increase in employee turnover rate, the damage of organizational trust and alienation can be listed. Having serious unfavorable effects both on an individual and organizational even on a social basis; realizing the mobbing behavior, identifying the reasons of it and taking the necessary caution is essentially important. This study aims at throwing light on these subjects through an empirical study
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Aguino K. and Byron K. (2002). Dominating Interpersonal Behavior and Perceived Victimization in Groups:Evidende for a Curvilinear Relationship, Journal of Management, 28(1),69-87.
- Baldry A.C. and Farrington D. P. (2000). Bullies and Delinquents: Personal Characteristics and Parental Styles, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,10,17-31.
- Bayrak S. (2001). İş Ahlakı ve Sosyal Sorumluluk, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., İstanbul.
- Einarsen, S. (1999). The Nature and Causes of Bullying at Work, International Journal of Manpower, 20 (1/2), 16-27.
- Employee Rights Quarterly (ERQ) (2000). Workplace Bullying: The Silent Epidemic
- Heaven, P. C. L., Grene, R. L., Stones C. R. and Caputi, P. (2000). Levels of Social Dominance Orientation in Three Societies, Journal of Social Psychology, 140(4), 530-532.
- Heinemann,(1972), The Mobbing Encyclopaedia, http://www.leymann.se/English/frame
- Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplace, Violance and Victims, 5(2).119-126.
- Leymann, H. (1996). The Content and development of Mobbinf at Work, Europen Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165-184.
- Menesini E., Sanchez V., Fonzi A., Ortega R., Costabile A., Lo Feudo G. (2003) Moral Emotions and Bullying. A Cross-National Comparison of Diffenrences Between Bullies, Victims and Outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 515-530.
- Namie, E. G. (2000). Research From The Workplace Bullying & Trauma Institute. US. Hostile Workplace Survey, http://www.workdoctor.com/home /twd/employers /res/surf200qv. html.
- O’Moore M. and etc, (2003). The Rates and Relative Risks of Workplace Bullying in Ireland a Country of High Economic Growth, International Journal Management and Decision Making, 4 (1), 82-95.
- Schmitt, M., Branscombe, N. R. and Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes Toward Group-Based Inequality: Social Dominance or Social Identity?, British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
- Solmuş, T. (2005). İş Yaşamında Travmalar: Cinsel Taciz ve Duygusal Zorbalık/Taciz, İş-Güç End. İliş. ve İns. Kay. D, 7(2)
- Timmerman G. and Bajeme C. (2000). The Impact of Organizational Culture on Perceptions and Experiences of Sexual Harassment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 188-205.
- Tutar, H. (2004). İş Yerinde Psikolojik Şiddet Sarmalı: Nedenleri ve Sonuçları, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, T.C. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi BİİBF, 92- 104.
- Yücetürk, E. E. (2003). Bilgi Çağında örgütlerin Görünmeyen Yüzü: Mobbing, http://www.bilgiyonetimi.org.
- Zapf, D., (1999). Organizational Work Group Related and Personal Causes of Mobbing/Bullying at Work, International Journal of Manpower, 20, 70-85.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Research Article |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Ağustos 2006 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2006 Sayı: 16 |