Bibliometric Analysis of the Concept of Green Innovation: An Application in Scopus Database

Öz

ABSTRACT Purpose - The aim of this study is to analyze the content of articles on "green innovation" through various variables. Methodology - In the study, bibliometric analysis was conducted to determine the extent to which an environmentally sensitive business understanding, which is important for businesses, is studied in academia. The data were obtained by searching the Scopus database with the keyword "green innovation". The 414 articles obtained were analyzed using R software within the framework of the variables of number of authors, authors with the most publications, year of publication, country of publication and journal of publication. Findings - According to the data obtained as a result of the analysis, 71% of the articles have two, three and four authors. There has been a significant increase in the number of articles after 2016. China takes the lead in terms of the country where the articles are published. Sustainability and Strategy and the Environment are the journals with the highest number of publications in the field. Conclusions - As a result, it is seen that the reflection of the ecological crisis on society has started to be felt in daily life, and the interest of businesses in green innovation in the context of social responsibility has increased. Keywords: Innovation, Green Innovation, Bibliometric Analysis JEL Codes: O32, Q53, Q56 ÖZ Amaç - Bu araştırmanın amacı, “yeşil inovasyon” konusunu işleyen makalelerin içeriğinin çeşitli değişkenler aracılığıyla incelenmesidir. Yöntem - Çalışmada işletmeler adına önem arz eden ve çevreye karşı duyarlı bir işletmecilik anlayışının akademide ne derece çalışıldığının tespiti için bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Araştırmada veriler Scopus veri tabanında “green innovation” anahtar kelimesi ile yapılan tarama sonucunda elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen 414 makale R yazılımı kullanılarak yazar sayısı, en çok yayın yapan yazarlar, yayımlandığı yıl, yayımlandığı ülke ve yayımlandığı dergi değişkenleri çerçevesinde incelemeye tabi tutulmuştur. Bulgular - Yapılan inceleme sonucunda elde edilen verilere göre makalelerin %71’i iki, üç ve dört yazarlıdır. Makale sayısında 2016 yılından sonra önemli bir artış ivmesi görülmektedir. Makalelerin yayımlandığı ülke bazında ise başı Çin çekmektedir. Sustainability ve Strategy and the Environment dergileri alanda en çok yayın yapılan dergilerdir. Sonuç - Sonuç olarak ekolojik krizin topluma yansımasının gündelik yaşamda da hissedilmeye başlanmasıyla birlikte işletmelerin toplumsal sorumluluk bağlamında yeşil inovasyona yönelik ilgilerinin arttığı görülmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: İnovasyon, Yeşil İnovasyon, Bibliyometrik Analiz JEL Kodları: O32, Q53, Q56

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innavation
• Green Innovation
• Bibliometric Analysis

Yeşil İnovasyon Kavramının Bibliyometrik Analizi: Scopus Veri Tabanında Bir Uygulama

Öz

ÖZ Amaç - Bu araştırmanın amacı, “yeşil inovasyon” konusunu işleyen makalelerin içeriğinin çeşitli değişkenler aracılığıyla incelenmesidir. Yöntem - Çalışmada işletmeler adına önem arz eden ve çevreye karşı duyarlı bir işletmecilik anlayışının akademide ne derece çalışıldığının tespiti için bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. Araştırmada veriler Scopus veri tabanında “green innovation” anahtar kelimesi ile yapılan tarama sonucunda elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen 414 makale R yazılımı kullanılarak yazar sayısı, en çok yayın yapan yazarlar, yayımlandığı yıl, yayımlandığı ülke ve yayımlandığı dergi değişkenleri çerçevesinde incelemeye tabi tutulmuştur. Bulgular - Yapılan inceleme sonucunda elde edilen verilere göre makalelerin %71’i iki, üç ve dört yazarlıdır. Makale sayısında 2016 yılından sonra önemli bir artış ivmesi görülmektedir. Makalelerin yayımlandığı ülke bazında ise başı Çin çekmektedir. Sustainability ve Strategy and the Environment dergileri alanda en çok yayın yapılan dergilerdir. Sonuç - Sonuç olarak ekolojik krizin topluma yansımasının gündelik yaşamda da hissedilmeye başlanmasıyla birlikte işletmelerin toplumsal sorumluluk bağlamında yeşil inovasyona yönelik ilgilerinin arttığı görülmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: İnovasyon, Yeşil İnovasyon, Bibliyometrik Analiz JEL Kodları: O32, Q53, Q56 ABSTRACT Purpose - The aim of this study is to analyze the content of articles on "green innovation" through various variables. Methodology - In the study, bibliometric analysis was conducted to determine the extent to which an environmentally sensitive business understanding, which is important for businesses, is studied in academia. The data were obtained by searching the Scopus database with the keyword "green innovation". The 414 articles obtained were analyzed using R software within the framework of the variables of number of authors, authors with the most publications, year of publication, country of publication and journal of publication. Findings - According to the data obtained as a result of the analysis, 71% of the articles have two, three and four authors. There has been a significant increase in the number of articles after 2016. China takes the lead in terms of the country where the articles are published. Sustainability and Strategy and the Environment are the journals with the highest number of publications in the field. Conclusions - As a result, it is seen that the reflection of the ecological crisis on society has started to be felt in daily life, and the interest of businesses in green innovation in the context of social responsibility has increased. Keywords: Innovation, Green Innovation, Bibliometric Analysis JEL Codes: O32, Q53, Q56

Anahtar Kelimeler

• inovasyon
• yeşil inovasyon
• bibliyometrik analiz

Kaynakça

1. Akbari, M., Padash, H., Shahabaldini Parizi, Z., Rezaei, H., Shahriari, E., & Khosravani, A. (2022). A bibliometric review of green innovation research: identifying knowledge domain and network. Quality & Quantity, 1-31.
2. Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9(6), 1011.
3. Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917.
4. Antonioli, D., Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2013). Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies. Research Policy, 42(4), 975-988.
5. Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 210-220.
6. Arici, H. E., & Uysal, M. (2022). Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity: A systematic review. The Service Industries Journal, 42(5-6), 280-320.
7. Asadi, S., Pourhashemi, S. O., Nilashi, M., Abdullah, R., Samad, S., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Aljojo, N. & Razali, N. S. (2020). Investigating influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry. Journal of cleaner production, 258, 120860.
8. Atik, H. (2005). Yenilik ve ulusal rekabet gücü, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. Bala Y. & Utlu, N. (2020). İnovasyon ve Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun Kurumsal İmaj Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2), 162-179.

9. Barry, D. M., & Kanematsu, H. (2016). European Union (EU) directives and regulations. In Corrosion Control and Surface Finishing (pp. 89-96). Springer, Tokyo.
10. Bulut, Ç & Arpak, H. (2012). İnovasyon, Direnç ve İletişim: Kavramsal Bir Tartışma, Yenilik-Yenileşim-İnovasyon Dünyasına Bir Yolculuk, Editör Selçuk Karaata, EGİAD Ege Genç Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği Yayınları, 5-19.
11. Burki, U., & Dahlstrom, R. (2017). Mediating effects of green innovations on interfirm cooperation. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 25(2), 149-156.
12. Caiado, R. G. G., Scavarda, L. F., Azevedo, B. D., de Mattos Nascimento, D. L., & Quelhas, O. L. G. (2022). Challenges and benefits of sustainable industry 4.0 for operations and supply chain management—A framework headed toward the 2030 agenda. Sustainability, 14(2), 830.
13. Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature climate change, 8(6), 462-468. Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of business ethics, 81(3), 531-543.
14. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of business ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
15. Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822-836.
16. Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of business ethics, 95(3), 471-486.
17. Donthu, N., Gremler, D. D., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2022). Mapping of Journal of Service Research themes: A 22-year review. Journal of Service Research, 25(2), 187-193.
18. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of business research, 109, 1-14.
19. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., & Gupta, P. (2021). Forty years of the International Journal of Information Management: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102307. Drucker, P. (2002). Melhor de Peter Drucker: homem, sociedade, administração. NBL Editora. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152.
20. Evren, S., & Kozak, N. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of tourism and hospitality related articles published in Turkey. Anatolia, 25(1), 61-80.
21. Faheem, A., Nawaz, Z., Ahmed, M., Haddad, H., & Al-Ramahi, N. M. (2023). Past Trends and Future Directions in Green Human Resource Management and Green Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(1), 133.
22. Fan, F., Lian, H., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2021). Can environmental regulation promote urban green innovation Efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125060.
23. Farrukh, M., Javed, S., Raza, A., & Lee, J. W. C. (2021). Twenty years of green innovation research: trends and way forward. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development.
24. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2008). A economia da inovação industrial. Campinas, SP: Editora da UNICAMP.
25. Gürkan, G., Demiralay, T. (2017). Bireysel yenilikçiliğin çalışanın yenilikçi davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde içsel motivasyonun aracılık etkisi. Journal of Entrepreneurship And Innovation Management, 6(1), 65-90.
26. Gürlek, M., & Koseoglu, M. A. (2021). Green innovation research in the field of hospitality and tourism: The construct, antecedents, consequences, and future outlook. The Service Industries Journal, 41(11-12), 734-766.
27. Harzing, A. W. (2012). Reflections on the h-index. Business&Leadership, 1(9), 101-106.
28. Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715.
29. Hirsch, J. E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(49), 19193-19198.
30. Jun, W., Ali, W., Bhutto, M. Y., Hussain, H., & Khan, N. A. (2019). Examining the determinants of green innovation adoption in SMEs: A PLS-SEM approach. European Journal of Innovation Management.
31. Kahn, K. B. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61(3), 453-460.
32. Kemp, R. (2010). Eco-Innovation: definition, measurement and open research issues. Economia politica, 27(3), 397-420.
33. Khan, S. J., Kaur, P., Jabeen, F., & Dhir, A. (2021). Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 3273-3296.
34. Küçükoğlu, M. T., & Pınar, R. İ. (2015). Positive influences of green innovation on company performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1232-1237.
35. Lee, I. S., Lee, H., Chen, Y. H., & Chae, Y. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of research assessing the use of acupuncture for pain treatment over the past 20 years. Journal of Pain Research, 13, 367.
36. Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X., & Ning, L. (2018). Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1089-1104.
37. Li, F., Zhang, H., & Wei, X. (2023). Visualization analysis of research hotspots and frontiers on factors influencing urban green innovation—Based on CiteSpace knowledge map. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(1), 2067.
38. Lin, H. E., McDonough III, E. F., Lin, S. J., & Lin, C. Y. Y. (2013). Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 262-278.
39. Mishra, D. R., & Albalushi, J. (2023). Digital Finance & Green Innovation Review Paper with special reference to Oman and Bibliometric Analysis for the Duration of 2017-2023. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (E-ISSN: 2582-2160).
40. Oduro, S., Maccario, G., & De Nisco, A. (2021). Green innovation: a multidomain systematic review. European Journal of Innovation Management.
41. OECD, P.B., 2009. Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation: towards a green economy, Policy Brief-OECD Observer.
42. OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Paris, OECD Publications.
43. Porter, M.E., Reinhardt, F.L., 2007. A strategic approach to climate. Harv. Bus. Rev. 22–24.
44. Porter, ME (1989). A Vantagem Competitiva das Nações. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
45. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
46. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
47. Sağlam, Ş., & Kurutkan, M. N. (2021). Bilim Haritalama Tekniklerine Göre 5s Modelinin Bibliyometrik Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 61-81.
48. Sakai, S. I., Yoshida, H., Hirai, Y., Asari, M., Takigami, H., Takahashi, S., Tomoda, K., Soyucu, M.V., Wejchert, J., Schmid-Unterseh, T., Douvan, A.R., Hathaway, R., Hylander, L.D., Fischer, H., Oh, G.J., Jinhui, L., & Chi, N. K. (2011). International comparative study of 3R and waste management policy developments. Journal of material cycles and waste management, 13(2), 86-102.
49. Schumpeter, A. J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
50. Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. George Allen & Unwin.
51. Schumpeter, JA (1985). Teoria do Desenvolvimento Econômico: Uma Investigação Sobre Lucros, Capital, Cr_edito, Juro e o Ciclo Econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural.
52. Seyhan, M. (2021). Yönetsel bağlamda yeşil inovasyonun evriminin bibliyometrik analizi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20 (2), 611-625.
53. Seyran, F. (2021). Şiddet İşyeri Çalışmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi , 17 (36), 2868-2889.
54. Shah, N., & Soomro, B. A. (2021). Internal green integration and environmental performance: The predictive power of proactive environmental strategy, greening the supplier, and environmental collaboration with the supplier. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1333-1344.
55. Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., & Appolloni, A. (2021). Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4206-4222.
56. Sharma, T., Chen, J., & Liu, W. Y. (2020). Eco-innovation in hospitality research (1998-2018): a systematic review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
57. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 16(S1), 183-200.
58. Sikandar, H., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2022). A Bibliometric analysis of Green Innovation Research. Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Journal, 3(1), 31-43.
59. Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green innovation strategy and green innovation: The roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135-150.
60. Takalo, S. K., & Tooranloo, H. S. (2021). Green innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 122474.
61. Takalo, S. K., Tooranloo, H. S., & Parizi, Z. S. (2021). Green innovation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279(1), 1–22.
62. Tang, L., Shi, J., Yu, L., & Bao, Q. (2017). Economic and environmental influences of coal resource tax in China: A dynamic computable general equilibrium approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 34-44.
63. TDK, https://sozluk.gov.tr/ , Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2022.
64. Tekin, I. H., & Kocaoglu, D. F. (2011, July). A bibliometric analysis on green innovations, green investments and green venture capital. In 2011 Proceedings of PICMET'11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET) (pp. 1-14). IEEE.
65. The UCL Green Innovation Policy Commission, Innovation for a Green Recovery: Business and Government in Partnership, A Business Perspective on Public Policy and Governance of Green Innovation, 2021
66. Tseng, M. L., Wang, R., Chiu, A. S., Geng, Y., & Lin, Y. H. (2013). Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. Journal of cleaner production, 40, 71-82.
67. Uzkurt, C. (2010). İnovasyon Yönetimi: İnovasyon Nedir, Nasıl Yapılır ve Nasıl Pazarlanır?, Ankara Sanayi Odası Yayın Organı, Ankara.
68. Wang, Y. F., Chen, S. P., Lee, Y. C., & Tsai, C. T. S. (2013). Developing green management standards for restaurants: An application of green supply chain management. International journal of Hospitality management, 34, 263-273.
69. Yalçın, H. (2010). Millî Folklor dergisinin bibliyometrik profili (2007-2009). Millî Folklor , 22 (85), 205-211.
70. Yiğit, S. (2014). İnovasyonun çevreci yüzü ve Türkiye. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 21(1), 251-265.
71. Yin, J., Gong, L., & Wang, S. (2018). Large-scale assessment of global green innovation research trends from 1981 to 2016: A bibliometric study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 827-841.
72. Zhou, X., Yu, Y., Yang, F., & Shi, Q. (2021). Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of green innovation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 124464.