Form Follows Numbers: The Dual Axis of Numerical Sovereignty in the Dictation of Urban Space and Architectural Form

Öz

Amaç – Bu çalışma, modernist “biçim işlevi izler” aksiyomuna karşı, belirli sayısal değerlerin çağdaş kent morfolojisini ve anıtsal mimariyi nasıl dikte ettiğini açıklayan “Biçim Sayıları İzler” (FFN) paradigmasını önermektedir. Yöntem – Sayısal egemenlik, soyut mekânın üretimi ve mimari gösterge-değeri üzerine kurulu karşılaştırmalı çoklu-vaka analiziyle, sayısal metriklerin yapısal ve ekonomik rasyonaliteleri aştığı vakalar egemen ve hegemonik gücün çift ekseninde incelenmektedir. Bulgular – Sayılar; siyasi hafızayı, demografik orantısallığı ve kozmik uyumu somutlaştıran egemen mekânsal göstergeler olarak işler. Türkiye rasyonel-bürokratik ekseni, Doğu Asya ve küresel örnekler ise kültürel-kozmolojik ekseni temsil eder. Sonuç – Sayısal dikte, işlevselciliği tümüyle geçersiz kılmaktan çok, işlevselci pragmatizmin sembolik iletişim uğruna bilinçli olarak aşıldığı özgün bir morfolojik durumdur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Biçim Sayıları İzler (FFN), Sayısal Egemenlik, Mekânsal Gösterge, Anıtsallık, Mekânsallaşma. JEL Kodları: R14, R52, Z13

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biçim Sayıları İzler (FFN)
• Sayısal Egemenlik
• Mekânsal Gösterge
• Anıtsallık
• Mekânsallaşma.

Destekleyen Kurum

The single author conducted all stages of the study (contribution rate 100%).

Etik Beyan

This study did not require ethics committee approval; the relevant information should be confirmed by the author(s). In case of detection of a contrary situation, the Journal of Social Economic Research has no responsibility and all responsibility belongs to the author(s) of the study.

Form Follows Numbers: The Dual Axis of Numerical Sovereignty in the Dictation of Urban Space and Architectural Form

Öz

Purpose – This study challenges the modernist axiom “form follows function” by introducing “Form Follows Numbers” (FFN), a paradigm that explains how specific numerical values dictate contemporary urban morphology and monumental architecture. Methodology – Drawing on numerical sovereignty, the production of abstract space, and architectural sign-value, the study uses a comparative multiple-case analysis to examine instances in which numerical metrics override structural and economic rationalities, arranging them along a dual axis of sovereign and hegemonic power. Findings – Numbers function as sovereign spatial signifiers that materialise political memory, demographic proportionality, and cosmic harmony. Turkey exemplifies the rational-bureaucratic axis, whereas East Asian and global cases reveal the cultural-cosmological axis. Conclusions – Rather than universally replacing functionalism, the numerical dictation of form is a specialised morphological condition in which functionalist pragmatism is deliberately set aside in favour of symbolic communication. Keywords: Form Follows Numbers (FFN), Numerical Sovereignty, Spatial Signifier, Monumentality, Spatialisation. JEL Codes: R14, R52, Z13

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Form Follows Numbers (FFN)
• Numerical Sovereignty
• Spatial Signifier
• Monumentality
• Spatialisation.

Destekleyen Kurum

The single author conducted all stages of the study (contribution rate 100%).

Etik Beyan

This study did not require ethics committee approval; the relevant information should be confirmed by the author(s). In case of detection of a contrary situation, the Journal of Social Economic Research has no responsibility and all responsibility belongs to the author(s) of the study.

Kaynakça

1. Al-Kodmany, K. (2015). Eco-towers: Sustainable cities in the sky. WIT Press.
2. Anadolu Ajansı. (2019, May 3). Büyük Çamlıca Camii ibadete açıldı [Grand Çamlıca Mosque opens for worship]. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/buyuk-camlica-camisi-ibadete-acildi/1468641
3. Atomium. (n.d.). History and architecture. Retrieved May 12, 2026, from https://atomium.be/the_building
4. Aveni, A. F. (2001). Skywatchers (Rev. ed.). University of Texas Press.
5. Batuman, B. (2018). New Islamist architecture and urbanism: Negotiating nation and Islam through built environment in Turkey. Routledge.
6. Binder, G. (2001). Tall buildings of Asia & Australia. Images Publishing.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
8. Brownell, S. (2008). Beijing’s games: What the Olympics mean to China. Rowman & Littlefield.

9. Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge University Press.
10. Council of the European Union. (2016). Europa Building: A new home for the European Council. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/
11. CTBUH [Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat]. (2018). Jeddah Tower: Engineering the world’s tallest building. The Skyscraper Center. https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/jeddah-tower/2
12. CTBUH [Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat]. (2024). Jin Mao Tower building data. The Skyscraper Center. https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/
13. Eco, U. (1986). Function and sign: Semiotics of architecture. In M. Gottdiener & A. Lagopoulos (Eds.), The city and the sign: An introduction to urban semiotics (pp. 55–86). Columbia University Press.
14. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
15. Federal Highway Administration. (2003, May 31). U.S. 666: “Beast of a highway”? U.S. Department of Transportation. https://highways.dot.gov/highway-history/general-highway-history/us-666-beast-highway
16. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
17. Goldberger, P. (2005). Up from zero: Politics, architecture, and the rebuilding of New York. Random House.
18. Hannah, R., & Magli, G. (2011). The role of the sun in the Pantheon’s design and meaning. Numen, 58(4), 486–513. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852711X577050
19. Inglis, K. S. (2008). Sacred places: War memorials in the Australian landscape (3rd ed.). Melbourne University Publishing.
20. KGM [Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü]. (2022). 1915 Çanakkale Bridge: Project details. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure.
21. Koch, N. (2010). The monumental and the miniature: Imagining ‘modern’ Astana. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(8), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.521854
22. Kohlstedt, K. (2016, April 4). Floor M: Avoiding unlucky numbers amounts to design by omission. 99% Invisible. https://99percentinvisible.org/article/floor-m-avoiding-unlucky-numbers-amounts-design-omission/
23. Konya Metropolitan Municipality. (2012, October 16). Konya yeni stadyumuna kavuşuyor [Konya gets its new stadium]. https://www.konya.bel.tr/haber/konya-yeni-stadyumuna-kavusuyor
24. Kulesite AVM. (2024). Kurumsal: Selçuklu Kulesi [Corporate: Selçuklu Tower]. https://www.kulesite.com/
25. Kusno, A. (2000). Behind the postcolonial: Architecture, urban space and political cultures in Indonesia. Routledge.
26. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
27. Liddell, I., & Miller, P. (1999). The Millennium Dome. Structural Engineering International, 9(3), 194–196.
28. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
29. Magli, G. (2013). Architecture, astronomy and sacred landscape in ancient Egypt. Cambridge University Press.
30. Michl, J. (1995). Form follows WHAT? The modernist notion of function as a carte blanche. 1:50 – Magazine of the Faculty of Architecture & Town Planning, 10, 31–40.
31. Miksic, J. N. (1990). Borobudur: Golden tales of the Buddhas. Periplus Editions.
32. Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. Harcourt, Brace & World.
33. National Park Service. (2020). Lincoln Memorial design and symbolism. U.S. Department of the Interior. https://www.nps.gov/linc/learn/historyculture/lincoln-memorial-design-and-symbolism.htm
34. Ng, T., Chong, T., & Du, X. (2010). The value of superstitions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.12.002
35. Panesar, N. S., Chan, N. C. Y., Li, S. N., Lo, J. K. Y., Wong, V. W. Y., Yang, I. B., & Yip, E. K. Y. (2003). Is four a deadly number for the Chinese? Medical Journal of Australia, 179(11), 656–658. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05741.x
36. Pelli, C. (2001). Petronas Towers: The architecture of high construction. Academy Editions.
37. Portal, J. (2005). Art under control in North Korea. Reaktion Books.
38. Schmitt, C. (1985). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1922)
39. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
40. Smith, A. (2011, August 2). Kingdom Tower: Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture design world’s tallest building. AS+GG Press Release. https://smithgill.com/
41. SOM [Skidmore, Owings & Merrill]. (n.d.). Jin Mao Tower project profile. Retrieved May 12, 2026, from https://www.som.com/
42. SSNNL [Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd.]. (2018). Statue of Unity: The pride of nation. Government of Gujarat.
43. Sullivan, L. H. (1896). The tall office building artistically considered. Lippincott’s Magazine, 57, 403–409.
44. TFF [Turkish Football Federation]. (2024). Stadium details and capacities. https://www.tff.org/
45. The Denver Post. (2014, January 10). Mile 420 sign on I-70 replaced with 419.9 to thwart stoners. https://www.denverpost.com/2014/01/10/mile-420-sign-on-i-70-replaced-with-419-9-to-thwart-stoners/
46. Vyse, S. A. (2014). Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition (Updated ed.). Oxford University Press.
47. Waxman, O. B. (2016, April 19). The true story behind 420. Time. https://time.com/4292844/420-april-20-marijuana-pot-holiday-history/
48. Willis, C. (1995). Form follows finance: Skyscrapers and skylines in New York and Chicago. Princeton Architectural Press.
49. Yaneva, A. (2009). The making of a building: A pragmatist approach to architecture. Peter Lang.
50. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.