Bitle Yayılan Felaket: Tifüs

Öz

Tifüs, insanlık tarihinin en eski hastalıklarındandır. Tarihi ve coğrafi kökenleri tartışmalı olmakla birlikte bazı tıp tarihçileri tifüsün Thucydides tarafından tanımlanan eski bir Avrupa hastalığı olduğunu ileri sürmektedirler. Vücut biti “Pediculus humanus” ile bulaşan tifüsün belirtileri arasında yüksek ateş, halsizlik, zihinsel karışıklık ve karakteristik bir döküntü bulunmaktadır. Hastalık, vücut bitinin çoğalmasına ve geçişine elverişli koşullarda özellikle de soğuk, aşırı kalabalık ve sağlıksız yaşam koşullarında gelişir. Bu çalışma Avrupa tarihine yön veren bazı savaşlarda kendisini gösteren ve savaşın sonucuna etki eden tifüs salgınları hakkında bilgi vermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu sayede bir hastalığın siyasi, askeri ve sosyal etkileri ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır. Tifüs salgınlarının birçok savaşta etkili olduğu bilinmektedir. Çalışmamızda bunlardan Granada Savaşları, Habsburg-Valois mücadelesi, Osmanlı-Macar savaşları, Otuz Yıl Savaşları, Napolyon Savaşları, Kırım Savaşı, 1877-1878 Osmanlı-Rus Savaşı, I. Dünya Savaşı yıllarında Sırbistan’daki tifüs salgını ve Rusya İç Savaşı (1918-1922) sırasındaki tifüs salgını ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tifüs
• Otuz Yıl Savaşları
• Napolyon
• Osmanlı-Rus Savaşları
• Sırbistan
• Rusya.

The Disaster Spreading with Louse: Typhus

Öz

Typhus is one of the oldest diseases in human history. Although its historical and geographical origins are controversial, some medical historians suggest that typhus is an ancient European disease described by Thucydides. Transmitted by the body louse “Pediculus humanus”, the symptoms of typhus include high fever, weakness, mental confusion and a characteristic rash. The disease develops in conditions favourable to the reproduction and transmission of the body louse, especially in cold, overcrowded and unsanitary living conditions. This study aims to provide information about typhus epidemics that manifested themselves in some of the wars that shaped European history and affected the outcome of the war. In this way, the political, military and social effects of a disease will be tried to be revealed. It is known that typhus epidemics were effective in many wars. In our study, we have attempted to deal with the wars of Granada, the Habsburg-Valois struggle, the Thirty Years' War, the Napoleonic Wars, the Crimean War, the Ottoman-Russian War of 1877-1878, the typhus epidemic in Serbia during World War I and the typhus epidemic during the Russian Civil War (1918-1922).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Typhus
• Thirty Years
• Napoleon
• Ottoman-Russian Wars
• Serbia
• Russia.

Kaynakça

1. Allen, B. M. (1998). The effects of infectious disease on Napoleon’s Russian campaign. A research report submitted to the faculty in partial fulfillment of the graduation requirements. Alabama. (https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA398046.pdf). Erişim 25.01.2023.
2. Angelakis, E, Bechah, Y. & Raoult, D. (2016). The history of epidemic typhus. Microbiology Spectrum. 4 (4). 1-9.
3. Balckburn, C. (2021). When typhus rode a red horse: weaponizing disease during the Polish-Bolshevik War. Przegląd Historyczno-Wojskowy. 2(276). ARTYKUŁY I STUDIA. 87-112.
4. Bıraud, Y. (1943). The present menace of typhus fever in Europe and the means of combating ıt. League of nations bulletin of the health organisation. Vol. X (1). 1-64.
5. Conlon, J.M. The historical impact of epidemic typhus. (https://www.montana.edu/ historybug/documents/TYPHUS-Conlon.pdf) Erişim 24.01.2023.
6. Drali, R. , Brouqui, P. & Raoult, D. (2014). Typhus in World War I. Microbiology Today. 41. 68-71.
7. Duraković, İ. (2014). Serbia as a health threat to Europe: the wartime typhus epidemic. 1914-1915. Other fronts, other wars ? first world war studies on the eve of the centennial. Joachim Bürgschwentner, Matthias Egger&Gunda Barth-Scalmani. 259-279. Leiden: Brill.
8. Encyclopedia of plague and pestilence: from ancient times to the present. (2008). George Childs Kohn (Ed.). New York: Facts on file. An imprint of infobase publishing.

9. Harden, A. V. (2003). Typhus epidemic. The Cambridge historical dictionary of disease. Kenneth F. Kiple (Ed.). 352-355. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Hays, J.N. (2009). The Burdens of disease, epidemics and human response in western history. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
11. Kocatürk, U. (1986). Açıklamalı tıp terimleri sözlüğü. Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası.
12. Maureira, H. A. (2012). “Los culpables de la miseria”: poverty and public health during the spanish influenza epidemic in Chile, 1918-1920. a disertation submitted to the faculty of the graduate school af arts and sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in history. Washington. (https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/557620/Maureira_georgetown_0076D_11823.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y). Erişim 24.01.2023
13. Meyer, K.F. (1957). Some observations on infective diseases in Russia. American journal of public health (AJPH). 47 (9). 1083-1092. (https://ajph.aphapublications. org/doi/abs/ 10. 2105 /AJPH.47.9.1083). Erişim 25.01.2023.
14. Osmanlıca tıp terimleri sözlüğü (2004). Ekrem Kadri Unat, Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, Suat Vural (Haz.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.
15. Özer, S. (2016). I. Dünya Savaşı’nda Osmanlı Devleti’nde tifüs (lekeli humma) salgını. Belleten. LXXX (287) . 219-260.
16. Patterson, K.D. (1993). Typhus and ıts control in Russia 1870-1940. Medical History. 37. 361-381.
17. Pisarri, M. (2018). The typhus epidemic in Serbia in 1915: the role of Dr. Richard Strong’s American medical mission. Acta Historica Medicianae, Stomatologiae, Pharmaciae, Medicinae Veterinae. 37 (1-2). 71-85.
18. Prinzing, F. (1916). Epidemics resulting from wars. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.
19. Renouvin, P. (1993). I. Dünya Savaşı. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
20. Rose, A. (1913). Napoleon’s campaign in Russia anno 1812. medico-historical. New York: The Author.
21. Salgado, M.J.R. (2008). The new Cambridge modern history. II. The reformation 1520-1559. G.R. Elton (Ed.). 377-400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Šimkutė, V. & Gudienė, V. (2022). Epidemic typhus in the Lithuanian army from 1919 to 1923. Vojnosanitetski Pregled. 79 (6). 628-635.
23. Smallman-Raynor, M.R.& Cliff, A.D. (2004). War epidemics, an historical geography of infectious diseases in military conflict and civil strife 1850-2000. New York: Oxford Universıty Press.
24. Soubbotitch, V. (1917). A pandemic of typhus in Serbia in 1914 and 1915. Section of epidemiology and state medicine. November 30, 1917. 31-39. (https://www. ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/ articles/ PMC 206 64 52/pdf/procrsmed01162-0035.pdf). Erişim 25.01.2023.
25. Stuart, E. (1920). Sanitation in Serbia. American journal of Public Health (AJPH). 10 (2), 124-131. (https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.10.2.124). Erişim 25.01.2023.
26. The Rockefeller Foundation. The relief of suffering non-combatants in Europe. Destitution and disease in Serbia. 28 April 1915. New York.
27. Thomas, G. (2007). Napoleon and typhus: a tale of two generals. Microbiology today. february. 8-11.
28. Tomar, C. (2009). Sarasinler. İslam Ansiklopedisi. (C. 36. 116-117). İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları.
29. Tuğlacı, P. (1973).Tıp sözlüğü. Ankara: Başnur Matbaası.
30. Ülman, A.H. (1973). Birinci Dünya Savaşı’na giden yol (ve savaş). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayını.
31. White III, J.J. (2018). Typhus: Napoleon’s tragic invasion of Russia, the war of 1812. epidemics and war. The impact of disease on major conflicts in history. Rebecca M. Seaman (Ed.). 69-82.California: ABC-CLİO.
32. Zavadivker, P. (2020). “Jewish Fever”: myths and realities in the history of Russia’s typhus epidemic, 1914-22. Jewish Social Studies. 26 (1). 101-112.
33. Zinnser, H. (2010). Rats, lice and history. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.