MODERN ULUSLARARASI TAHKİMİN GELİŞİMİNDE JAY ANDLAŞMASI’NIN YERİ

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 50, 443 - 472, 30.03.2022

Mehmet Emin Büyük

https://doi.org/10.54049/taad.1093139

Öz

Uluslararas tahkim, devletleraras uyumazlklarn hukuk yoluyla kesin ve nihai bir ekilde çözülmesini amaçlayan barçl uyumazlk çözüm yöntemlerinden biridir. Bu yönleriyle, müzakere, arabuluculuk veya uzlatrma gibi dier uyumazlk çözüm yöntemlerinden farkllar. Tahkim müessesesinin özel hukukta kullanm tarihe yaylr. Kamu hukuku alannda günümüz uluslararas tahkiminin kökenine ise Antik Yunan ve Antik Roma’da rastlanabilir. Orta Ça boyunca farkl biçimlerde uygulanan tahkim yönteminin modern devletlerin ortaya çkmasndan sonra etkinliini kaybettii görülür zira uluslararas tahkim barçl bir yöntem olarak savan karsndadr ve Modern Ça, uyumazlklarn çözümünde sava birincil yöntem olarak gören mutlakiyetçi egemen devletlerin sahne alandr. Avrupa dönüüm sanclar yaad bu dönemde uluslararas tahkim için yeni ktadan bir giriim modern uluslararas yargnn seyrini deitirmitir. ABD Dileri Bakan John Jay’in adyla bilinen 1794 tarihli andlamayla Birleik Devletler ve Büyük Britanya aralarndaki uyumazlklar çözmek üzere üç farkl komisyonun kurulmasn kararlatrmlardr. Bu komisyonlarn ksmi baars uluslararas tahkim yöntemine olan ilgiyi arttrm ve önce Kuzey ve Güney Amerika’dan balamak üzere modern dünya, sorunlarn çözmek üzere tahkime daha sk bavurmaya balamtr. 1872 Alabama Tahkimi ile bu ilgi zirveye ulam ve bu dönemin uluslararas hukukçularnn çalmalar nda, 1899-1907 Lahey Konferanslarnda uluslararas tahkim usulüne ilikin kurallar ve tahkim sürecinin kolaylatrlmas adna bir Daimi Tahkim Mahkemesi kurulmas üzerinde katlan devletler arasnda uzlama salanmtr. Jay Andlamas’yla balayan süreç, zaman içinde Uluslararas Daimi Adalet Divan ve onun devamnda kurulacak dier yerleik mahkemelerin kurulmasna kadar gidecek bir ekilde uluslararas yargnn gelimesine hizmet etmitir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararas Hukuk, Tahkim, Devletleraras Tahkim, Uluslararas Tahkim, Jay Andlamas, Daimi Tahkim Mahkemesi, Uluslararas Tahkim Tarihi

The Place of the Jay Treaty in the Development of Modern International Arbitration

Öz

International arbitration is one of the peaceful dispute resolution methods that aims to resolve interstate disputes through law in a final and definitive way. In these aspects, arbitration differs from other dispute resolution methods such as negotiation, mediation or conciliation. The use of arbitration in private law goes back to history. The origins of today’s international arbitration in the field of public law can be found in Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. It is seen that the arbitration method, which was applied in different forms during the Middle Ages, lost its effectiveness after the emergence of modern states, because, as a peaceful method, international arbitration is against war, and the Modern Age is the stage of absolutist sovereign states that see war as the primary method in the resolution of disputes. In this period when Europe was in the throes of transformation, an attempt from a new continent for international arbitration changed the course of modern international judiciary. With the treaty of 1794, known by the name of US Secretary of State John Jay, the United States and Great Britain decided to establish three different commissions to settle disputes between them. The partial success of these commissions has increased the interest in the international arbitration method and the modern world, starting with North and South America, has started to resort to arbitration more frequently to solve its problems. This interest reached its peak with the 1872 Alabama Arbitration, and in the light of the work of international lawyers of this period, a consensus was reached between the participating states in the 1899-1907 Hague Conferences on the rules of international arbitration procedure and the establishment of a Permanent Court of Arbitration in order to facilitate the arbitration process. The process, which started with the Jay Treaty, served the development of the international judiciary, going up to the establishment of the Permanent Court of International Justice and other permanent courts to be established after it.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Law, Arbitration, International Arbitration, Jay Treaty, Permanent Court of Arbitration, History of International Arbitration

Kaynakça

• Akal CB, İktidarın Üç Yüzü (6. Bası, Dost Kitabevi Yayınları 2013).
• Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, Tome I – 1877 (réimp. Schmidt Periodicals GmbH 1994).
• Ballaire H, Étude Historique sur les Arbitrages dans les Conflits Internationaux (Librairie Franklin 1872).
• Bevans CI (Ed.), Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America, 1776-1949, Volume 12 (Department of State Publication 1974).
• Büyük ME, Uluslararası Hukukta Hukukun Genel İlkeleri (On İki Levha 2018).
• Descamps É, ‘Essai sur L’Organisation de L’Arbitrage International’ (1896) 28 Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 5-74.
• Dreyfus F, L’Arbitrage International (Calmann Lévy 1892).
• Fraser HS, ‘Sketch of the History of International Arbitration’ (1926) 11(2) Cornell Law Review 179-208.
• Gallaudet EM, A Manual of International Law (A.S. Barnes & Co. 1879).
• Gennadius J, A Record of International Arbitration (Four Articles Reprinted From Broad Views) ((For Private Circulation) 1904).
• Grewe WG, The Epochs of International Law (Trans. Michael Byers) (De Gruyter 2000).
• Hall WE, International Law (The Clarendon Press 1880).
• Hall WE, International Law (3. Ed., The Clarendon Press 1890).
• Halleck HW, Elements of International Law and Laws of War (J. P. Lippincott & Co. 1866).
• Halleck HW, International Law or Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States In Peace and War (H.H. Bancroft & Company 1861).
• Heffter AG, Le Droit International Public de l’Europe (Fr. Çev. Jules Bergson) (A. Cotillon & Cie. 1883).
• Hershey AS, ‘History of International Law Since the Peace of Westphalia’ (1912) 6(1) The American Journal of International Law 30-69.
• Kuran S, Aydın Okur D, Günel RŞ, Sarıbeyoğlu M, Uluslararası Hukuk Temel Metinler (3. Baskı, Beta 2014).
• La Fontaine H, ‘Histoire Sommaire et Chronologique des Arbitrages Internationaux (1794-1900)’ (1902) 4 Revue de Droit International et de Legislation Comparée 349-380; 558-582; 623-648.
• La Fontaine H, Pasicrisie internationale: 1794-1900 Histoire Documentaire des Arbitrages Internationaux (Stämpfli & Cie. 1902).
• Lamers K, ‘Pious Fund Arbitration’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Instalment 2 (North Holland - Elsevier 1981) 74-75.
• Lapradelle AG de, Politis N, Recueil des Arbitrages Internationaux, Tome 1, 1798-1855 (A. Pedone 1905).
• Lauterpacht H, ‘The Grotian Tradition in International Law’ (1946) 23 British Year Book of International Law 1-53.
• Lauterpacht H, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (with special reference to international arbitration) (Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd. 1927).
• Lauterpacht H, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford University Press (1933) 2011).
• Lawrence WB, ‘Note pour Servir a L’Histoire des Arbitrages Internationaux’ (1874) 6 Revue de Droit International et de Legislation Comparee 117-141.
• Levallois J, La Vérité sur l’Arbitrage, Dates et Faits (Imprimerie Chaix 1885).
• Lord EL, ‘International Arbitration’ (1892) 2(4) American Academy of Political and Social Science 471-487.
• Mairet G, ‘Podovalı Marsilius’dan Louis XIV’e Laik Devletin Doğuşu’ in Cemal Bali Akal (ed), Devlet Kuramı (4. Bası, Dost Kitabevi Yayınları 2013) 215-242.
• Martens F de, Traité de Droit International, Tome: I-II, (Fr. Çev. Alfred Léo) (Librairie Marescq Aine 1883-1887).
• Martens G de, Recueil des Principaux Traités d’Alliance, de Paix, de Trêve, de Neutralité, de Commerce, de Limites, d’Échange, etc.: Conclus par les Puissances de l’Europe tant entre Elles qu’avec les Puissances et États dans d’autres Parties du Monde Depuis 1761 Jusqu’à Présent, Tome V., 1791-1795 in Charles De Martens (Ed.) (2. Ed, Librairie de Dieterich 1826).
• Mérignhac A, Traite Theorique et Pratique de L’Arbitrage International (L. Larose 1895).
• Moore JB (Ed.), International Adjucations - Ancient and Modern - History and Document, Modern Series, Vol. 4 (Oxford University Press 1931).
• Moore JB, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to Which the United States Has Been a Party – 5 (Government Printing Office 1898).
• Murty BS, ‘Settlement of Disputes’ in Max Sørensen (Ed.), Manual of Public International Law (Palgrave Macmillan 1968) 672-735.
• Poggi G, Devlet: Doğası, Gelişimi ve Geleceği (4. Baskı, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2014).
• Ræder AH, L’Arbitrage International Chez Les Hellenes (Félix Alcan 1912).
• Revon M, ‘L’Arbitrage International dans la Civilization Grecque’ (1892) 16 Nouvelle Revue Historique de Droit Français et Étranger 314-329.
• Schlochauer HJ, ‘Arbitration’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Instalment 1 (North Holland - Elsevier 1981) 13-28.
• Schlochauer HJ, ‘Jay Treaty’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Instalment 1 (North Holland - Elsevier 1981) 108-111.
• Schlochauer HJ, ‘Permanent Court of Arbitration’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Instalment 1 (North Holland - Elsevier 1981) 157-163.
• Schwarzenberger G, ‘Present-Day Relevance of the Jay Treaty Arbitrations’ (1978) 53 Notre Dame Law Review 715-733.
• Scott JB, The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, Volume I (The John Hopkins Press 1909).
• Scott JB, The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, Volume II – Documents (The John Hopkins Press 1909).
• Shabtai Rosenne, The World Court – What It Is And How It Works (A. W. Sythoff 1962).
• Stuyt AM, Survey of International Arbitrations 1794–1938 (Springer-Science+Business Media 1939.
• Taube MA, ‘Les Origines de l’Arbitrage international: Antiquité et Moyen Age’ (1932) 42(IV) Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International (Librairie du Recueil Sirey 1933).
• Tod MN, International Arbitration Amongst the Greeks (Clarendon Press 1913).
• Türkay Kahraman FŞ, ‘Hugo Grotius Anlayışının Uluslararası Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yollarına Etkileri’ (2019) 25(2) Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi (Prof. Dr. Ferit Hakan Baykal Armağanı) 925-947.
• Westermann WL, ‘Interstate Arbitration in Antiquity’ (1907) 2(5) The Classical Journal 197-211.
• Affaire Canevaro, (Italie, Pérou), 1912 (2006) Volume XI Recueil Des Sentences Arbitrales, Nations Unies 397-410.
• Affaire de Casablanca, 1909 (2006) Volume XI Recueil Des Sentences Arbitrales, Nations Unies 119-131.
• Affaire de l’Indemnité Russe (Russie, Turquie), 1912 (2006) Volume XI Recueil Des Sentences Arbitrales, Nations Unies 421-447.
• Alabama Claims of the United States of America Against Great Britain, 1872 (2012) Volume XXIX Reports of International Arbitral Awards, United Nations 125-134.
• Award between the United States and the United Kingdom relating to the rights of jurisdiction of United States in the Bering’s sea and the preservation of fur seals, 1893 (2007) Volume XXVIII Reports of International Arbitral Awards, United Nations 263-276.
• Island of Palmas Case (Netherlands, USA), PCA, 1928 (2006) Volume II Reports of International Arbitral Awards, United Nations 829-871.
• Sentence finale du Tribunal arbitral du Delagoa, prononcée à Berne, le 29 mars 1900, La Fontaine H, Pasicrisie internationale: 1794-1900 Histoire Documentaire des Arbitrages Internationaux (Stämpfli & Cie. 1902) 398-410.
• Sentence arbitrale relative aux requêtes de la Grande-Bretagne et du Portugal sur certains territoires de la côte Est de l’Afrique appartenant autrefois aux Rois de Tembe et Mapoota, incluant les îles de Inyack et Éléphant (Baie de Delagoa ou Lorenzo Marques), 1875 (2007) Volume XXVIII Recueil Des Sentences Arbitrales, Nations Unies 157-162.
• The Betsey, Jay Treaty (Art. VII) Arbitration, Moore JB (Ed.), International Adjucations - Ancient and Modern - History and Document, Modern Series, Vol. 4 (Oxford University Press 1931) 179-290.
• The Neptune, Jay Treaty (Art. VII) Arbitration, Lapradelle AG de, Politis N, Recueil des Arbitrages Internationaux, Tome 1, 1798-1855 (A. Pedone 1905) 138-157.
• The Pious Fund Case (United States of America v. Mexico), 1902 (2006) Volume IX Reports of International Arbitral Awards, United Nations 1-14