Konferans Bildirisi

Hadis Şerhleri Literatürüne Mütevazı Bir Katkı: Tek Hadis Şerhlerine Bir Giriş Denemesi

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1 1 Aralık 2019
PDF İndir
EN TR

A Contribution to Hadith Commentaries Literature: An Attempt of Introduction to Single Hadith Commentaries

Abstract

Single hadith commentaries are defined as “commentaries that were written on a single, specific hadith” and they are one of the most important kinds of the commentaries written on a specific number of hadiths. It is observed that single hadith commentaries were highly neglected in the modern era. To the best of our knowledge, there are only three studies on single hadith commentaries all of which are bibliographic studies; none of these studies gives any information about the history and reasons for the compilation of this kind of commentaries. As much as being a starting point for this study, this situation constitutes an evidence for the necessity of further studies in this area. On the basis of the data taken from the bibliographic sources, it is possible to track the increase and decrease in the number of single hadith commentaries through centuries; and using this data, it is possible to deduce some information about their history. Single hadith commentaries, first of which was written in the 3rd/9th century, were observed to be very prevalent in the 8th/14th century, and reached their peak in quantity in the 15th/21st century. In addition, the reasons for their compilation are so diverse that they span an area from individual reasons to the scholarly debates, which gives a clue to those who trace the process of producing scholarly works in the Islamic world throughout the history

Keywords

The Science of hadith • Hadith commentaries • Single hadith commentaries • History of the science of the hadith • Hadith literature • Reasons for compilation

Kaynakça

  1. Ahatlı, E. & Korkmazer, G. (2018). Osmanlı hadis şerhçiliğinde niyet hadisi örneği. Usûl: İslam Araştırmaları, 29, 7-38.
  2. Akay, T. R. (2019). Osmanlı’da Tek Hadis Şerhçiliği: Kâfiyecî (879/1474) Örneği (Yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul).
  3. el-Askalânî, A. (2015). Cüz’ün fi’l-kelâmi ‘alâ kavlihî inne’mraetî lâ teruddü yede lâmis. (Cemâl el-Hecresî, Nşr.) Beyrût: Dâru’l-Beşâiri’l-İslâmiyye.
  4. el-Atîk, Y. (1997). et-Ta‘rîf bimâ üfride mine’l-ehâdîsi bi’t-tasnîf. Riyâd: Dâru’s-Sumey‘î. el-A‘zamî, M. M. (1992). Buhârî, Muhammed b. İsmâil. DİA, VI, 368-372.
  5. Bâzmûl, M. (2009). İlmü şerhi’l-hadîs ve ravâfidü’l-bahsi fîhi. Mekke: Mahedü’l-Buhûsi’l-İlmiyye.
  6. Blecher, J. (2018). Ḥadīth commentary. In: Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE, Edited by: Kate Fleet, Gudrun Krämer, Denis Matringe, John Nawas, Everett Rowson. Consulted online on 02 November 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_32080
  7. el-Buhârî, M. (2017). Sahîhu’l-Buhârî. (Mervân Da‘bûl, Nşr.) Dimeşk: Müessesetü’r-Risâle Nâşirûn.
  8. Ceyhan, A. (1991). Sırat-ı Müstakim ve Sebilürreşâd Mecmuaları Fihristi. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları.
  9. Cihan, S. (1977). Osmanlı devrinde Türk hadisçileri tarafından kırk hadis dışında muayyen sayıda derlenen hadis mecmuaları ve bir hadis üzerine yazılan risaleler. Atatürk Üniversitesi İslâmî İlimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 157-173.
  10. Çakan, İ. L. (2015). Hadis Edebiyatı. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Vakfı Yayınları.

Kaynak Göster

ISNAD
Yücedağ, Rıdvan Talha. “Hadis Şerhleri Literatürüne Mütevazı Bir Katkı: Tek Hadis Şerhlerine Bir Giriş Denemesi”. Talim 3/1 (01 Aralık 2019): 49-70. https://doi.org/10.37344/talim.2020.7.