The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey

Sabahaddin Ünal; Bilal Şahın; Öztekin Urla; Berna Efe

doi:10.21566/tarbitderg.366390

The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey

Öz

Monitoring of vegetation change is essential to detect good management practices for the sustainable

use of natural rangeland resources. An understanding of how the existing species in vegetation react to

management methods is important for decision makers. For this reason, the vegetation changes should

be determined by suitable techniques. The multivariate analysis as Detrended Correspondence Analysis

and Principal Components Analysis was highly examined and its results were easily interpreted to draw

conclusions. A relatively homogenous data set first, a matrix of 221 species and 44 sample sites in the

province of Yozgat in the Central Anatolia Region in year 2010, was used by detrended correspondence

analysis (DCA). The effects of environmental variation was minimized by this method (DCA) so that the

major pattern of vegetation composition change was explained by grazing impact. Principal components

analysis was performed to detect the distribution of sites along the first axis, and the distance off the

x-axis. Fifteen species out of the promising 89 plant species were found to be indicators. These indicator

species should be benefited for the vegetation change status and sustainable rangeland management

under semiarid rangeland conditions. The fifteen plant species and bare ground showed clear responses

along the first axis (grazing impact gradient), and became abundant over certain ranges of this axis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Monitoring,grazing impact,ecological model

Kaynakça

Abulea, E., H.A. Snymanb, and G.N. Smitb, 2007. Rangeland evaluation in the middle Awash valley of Ethiopia: I. Herbaceous vegetation cover. Journal of Arid Environments, 70: p. 253-271
Ash, A.J. and Stafford Smith, M. 1996. Evaluating stocking rate impacts in rangelands: Animals don’t practice what we preach. Rangeland Journal 18, 216-43
Bashari, H. 2006. Development of processes and tools to support the adaptive management in complex rangelands systems. The School of Natural and Rural Systems Management, The University of Queensland Gatton (Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy)
Bestelmeyer B. T. and Herrick J. E. 2004. Land management in the American Southwest: A state – and- transition approach to ecosystem complexity. Environmental Management 34(1): 38-51
Bosch O.J.H. 1989. Degradation of the semi-arid grasslands of southern Africa. J. Arid Environ. 16: 165-175
Bosch O.J.H. and Gauch, H.G. 1991. The use of degradation gradients for the assessment and ecological interpretation of rangeland condition. Tydskrif Weidingsveren. S. Afr. , 8 (4)
Bosch O.J.H. and Kellner K. 1991. The use of a degradation gradients for ecological interpretation of range condition assessments in the western grassland biome of Southern Africa. J. Arid Environ. 21: 21-29
Bosch O.J.H., Gauch, H.R., Booysen, J., Stols S.H.E., Gouws, G.A., Nel M.W., Van Zyl E. 1992. ISPD - An Integrated System for Plant Dynamics (Computer Software Package and Users Guide). Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, Potchefstroom, South Africa. 101 pp

Bosch O. 2009. Manual for the use of ISPD and COMPOSE and other notes. Head School of Integrative Systems, The University of Queensland, Australian. The course notes in 2009, Ankara
Cao Y., Larsen D. P., Thorne R. ST-J. 2001. Rare species in multivariate analysis for bioassessment: some considerations. J. N. Am. Benthol Soc. 20 (1): 144-153
Chartier, M. P., Rostagna C.M. 2006. Soil erosion tresholds and alternative states in Northeastern Patagonian Rangelands. Rangeland Ecology Management, 59: 616-624
Cockayne, L. 1920. An economic investigation of the montane tussock-grassland of New Zealand. IX. Further details regarding the Earnscleugh (Central Otago) palatability experiment. New Zeal J Agr 20: 324–334
Connor, H.E. 1964. Tussock grassland communities in the Mackenzie Country, South Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zeal J Bot 2: 325–351
Connor, H.E., MacRae, A.H. 1969. Montane and subalpine tussock grasslands in Canterbury. In: The Natural History of Canterbury (Ed. GA Knox). Reed, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 167–204
CSFWRRI 2010. Soil analysis results of studied sites of Yozgat province. Central Soil, Fertilizer and Water Resources Research Institute, Ankara
David A., Jeffrey P., Herrick E., Shaver P., Pellant M. 2002. Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment. J. Range Manage. 55: 584-597
David W. 2011. Rangeland Condition Monitorıng, A Guide For Pastoral Lessees. Department of Agriculture and Food, Government of Western Australia, p. 1-31
Davis, P.H. (ed.). 1965 - 1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 1 – 9, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh
Davis, P.H. (ed.), Mill, R.R., Tan, K. 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edinburgh Univ. Press., (supple. 1), Vol. 10, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh
Del Giorgio, P. A., Vinocur, A. L., Lombardo, R. J. & Tell, H. G. 1991. Progressive changes in the structure and dynamics of the phytoplankton community along a pollution gradient in a lowland river—a multivariate approach. Hydrobiologia 224: 129–54
De Soyza AG, Van Zee JW, Whitford WG, Neale A, Tallent-Hallsel N, Herrick JE, Havstad KM. 2000. Indicators of Great Basin rangeland health, Journal of Arid Environments 45: 289-304
Dyksterhuis, E.J., 1949. Condition and management of range land based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management, 2: 104-115
FAO, 2012. Vegetation assessment, section 3. Manual for Local Level Assessment of Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management and livelihoods, Field methodology and tools, Land Degradation assessment in Drylands (LADA) Project, p. 40-66
Fernandez-Gimenez, M.E., Allen-Diaz, B. 2001. Vegetation change along gradients from water sources in three grazed Mongolian ecosystems. Plant Ecology. v. 157, 101-118
Fernández V., Sotiropoulos T., Brown P. H. 2013. Foliar Fertilisation: Principles and Practices. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA)
Friedel, M.H. 1991. Range condition assessment and the concept of thresholds: A viewpoint. J. Range Management, 44 (5): 422-426
Fuhlendorf, S. D., Smeins, F. E. 1997. Long-term vegetation dynamics mediated by herbivores, weather and fire in a Juniperus-Quercus savanna. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 819-828
Fuls, E.R. 1992. Semi-arid and arid rangelands: A resource under siege due o patch-selective grazing. Journal of Arid Environment 22: 191-93
Gauch, H.G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.S.A. 298 pp
GDSMS 2010. The climatic data of Yozgat province. The General Director of State Meteorological Service, Ankara, Turkey
Gee G W, Bauder J W 1986. Particle-size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 383 – 411
Gibson R.S., Bosch O.J.H. 1996. Indicator species for the interpretation of vegetation condition in the St Bathans area, Central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand journal of ecology, vol.20. No.2
Gibson, R.S., Allen, W., Bosch, O.J.H. 1995. Condition assessment concepts and their role in facilitating sustainable range management. Annals of the Arid Zone 34: 179-189
Güner, A., Özhatay, N., Ekim, T., Başer, K.H.C. 2000. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, (supple. 2), Vol. 11, Edinburgh Univ. Press., Edinburgh
Herrick J.E., Bestelmeyer B.T., Archer S., Tugel A. J., Brown, J.R. 2006. An integrated framework for science-based arid land management. Journal of Arid Environments 65: 319-335
Hill, M.O., Gauch, H.G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58
Holechek J. L., Pieper R. D., Herbel C. H. 2004. Range inventory and monitoring. Range Management, Principles and Practices, 186-215
Hurt C. R. Bosch, O. J. H. 1991 A comparison of some range condition assessment techniques used in southern African grasslands. J. Grassl. Soc. South. Afr. 8: 131-137
Hurt, C.R.; Hardy, M.B.; Tainton, N.M. 1993. Identification of key grass species under grazing in the highland sourveld of Natal. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 10: 96- 102
Inam-ur-Rahim and Maselli D. 2004. Improving Sustainable Grazing Management in Mountain, Rangelands of the Hindu Kush–Himalaya, An Innovative Participatory Assessment Method in Northern Pakistan, Mountain Research and Development 24 ( 2): 124–133
Jacobo E. J., Rodriguez A.M., Bartoloni N.,Deregibus V.A. 2006. Rotational grazing effects on rangeland vegetation at a farm scale. Journal of Range Management, 59: 249-257
Jameson D. A. 1988. Modelling rangeland ecosystems for monitoring and adaptive management. Edi: Tueller P.T. Vegetation science applications for rangeland analysis and management. pp. 189-224
Koc, A., Oztas, T.,Tahtacioglu, L. 2000. Rangeland–livestock interaction in our near history: problems and recommendations. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Desertification, 13–17 June2000, Konya, Turkey, pp. 293–298
Koç, A., Gökkuş, A., Altın, M. 2003. Comparison of the world-widely used methods in definition of range condition and a suggestion for Turkey. Turkey 5. Field Crop Cong. 13-17 October 2003, Diyarbakır. pp. 36-42
Koç, A. Çakal, Ş. 2004. Comparison of some rangeland canopy coverage methods. Int. Soil Cong. On Natural Resource Manage. For Sust. Develp, June 7-10, 2004, Erzurum, Turkey, D7, 41-45
Laycock, W. A. 1991. Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands: A viewpoint. J. Range Management, 44 (5): 427-433
Marshall, J.K., 1973. Drought, land use and soil erosion. In: Lovett, J.V. (Ed.), In the Environmental, Economic and Social Significance of Drought. Angus and Robertson Publ., Inc., London, pp. 55–77
McLean E O 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, Madison, Wisconsin USA, pp. 199 -224
Mentis, M.T. 1983. Towards objective veld condition assessment. Proceedings of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa 18: 77-80
Nelson R. E. 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, Madison, Wisconsin USA, pp. 181 – 197
Nelson D W, Sommers L. E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, Madison, Wisconsin USA, pp. 539 – 579
O’Connor, K.F. 1982. The implications of past exploitation and current developments to the conservation of South Island tussock grasslands. New Zeal J Ecol 5: 97–107
Olsen S. R.,Sommers L. E. 1982. Phosphorus. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, Madison, Wisconsin USA, pp. 403-427
Oztas, T., Koc, A.,Comakli B. 2003. Changes in vegetation and soil properties along a slope on overgrazed and eroded rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments 55: 93–100
PAED 2011. Agricultural data of Yozgat Province. The Provincial Agriculture Extension Directorates, Yozgat Palmer, M.W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: The advantages of canonical corres- pondance analysis. Ecology 74: 2215-2230
Pellant M., Patrick S., David A. P.,Herrick J. E. 2005. Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, Technical Reference, 1734-6. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management National Science and Technology Center Division of Science Integration Branch of Publishing Services, P. O. Box 25047Denver,Colorado. www.blm.gov/nstc/library/techref.htm
Pietzsch D. 2008. Vegetation response along grazing gradients in Artemisia-semi-desert of Gobustan (Azerbaijan). Diploma thesis in the study program of Biology at the Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald
Rajabov, T. 2009. Ecologıcal assessment of spatıo-temporal changes of vegetatıon in response to pıosphere effects in semı-arıd rangelands of Uzbekıstan. Land Restoration Training Programme Final Project Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavík, Iceland
Smith E. L. 1988. Successional concepts in relation to range condition assessment. Editor: P.T. Tueller, Vegetation science applications for rangeland analysis and management, p. 113-133
Sokal, R.R.; Rolf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, U.S.A. 859 pp Tamzen , K. S., Krueger W.C., Shaver P.L. 2003. State and transition modeling: An ecological process approach. J. Range Management, Vol, 56: 106-113
Teague, W.R., Dowhower, S.L., Waggoner, J.A., 2004. Drought and grazing patch dynamics under different grazing management. Journal of Arid Environments 58, 97–117
Teague, W.R., S.L. Dowhower, S.A. Baker, N. Haile, P.B. DeLaune, and D.M. Conover. 2011. Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 141:310-22
ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77
Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Prentice I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18: 271-317 Thomas G. W. 1982. Exchangeable Cations. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, Madison, Wisconsin USA, pp. 159-165
Thurow, T.L. 1991. Hydrolory and erosion. In grazing management an ecological perspective (Ed: R.K. Heitschmidt and J.W. Stuth), Timber Press, Inc., p. l41-159
Unal, S., Mutlu Z., Urla O., Sahin B., Koc A. 2013. The determination of indicator plant species for steppe rangelans of Nevşehir Province in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 37 (4): 401-409 van der Westhuizen H C, Snyman, H. A., Fouché H. J. 2005. A degradation gradient for the assessment of rangeland condition of a semi-arid sourveld in southern Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 22 (1): 47–58
Wikeem B. M., Pitt, M. D. 1991. Grazing effects and range trend assessment on California bighorn sheep range. J. Range Management, 44 (5): 446-470
Willmott, C.J. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 63: 1309- 1313
Wilson A.D., Hodgkinson K.C., Noble J.C. 1988. Vegetation attributes and their application to the management of Australian rangelands. Editor: P.T. Tueller, Vegetation science applications for rangeland analysis and management, p. 253-294
Zemmrich A. 2007. Vegetation-ecological investigations of rangeland ecosystems in Western Mongolia: the assessment of grazing impact at various spatial scale levels: Diss. … Dr. rer. nat. / Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät. - Greifswald, 2007. - v, 146 p.: ill., graph. - Ref.: p.132-146

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Sabahaddin Ünal ^* Bu kişi benim

Bilal Şahın Bu kişi benim

Öztekin Urla Bu kişi benim

Berna Efe Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Aralık 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Eylül 2017

Kabul Tarihi

21 Aralık 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.366390

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA73JB55DN

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Ünal, S., Şahın, B., Urla, Ö., & Efe, B. (2017). The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(2), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.366390

AMA

1.Ünal S, Şahın B, Urla Ö, Efe B. The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017;26(2):190-202. doi:10.21566/tarbitderg.366390

Chicago

Ünal, Sabahaddin, Bilal Şahın, Öztekin Urla, ve Berna Efe. 2017. “The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey”. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 26 (2): 190-202. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.366390.

EndNote

Ünal S, Şahın B, Urla Ö, Efe B (01 Aralık 2017) The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 26 2 190–202.

IEEE

[1]S. Ünal, B. Şahın, Ö. Urla, ve B. Efe, “The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey”, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 26, sy 2, ss. 190–202, Ara. 2017, doi: 10.21566/tarbitderg.366390.

ISNAD

Ünal, Sabahaddin - Şahın, Bilal - Urla, Öztekin - Efe, Berna. “The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey”. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 26/2 (01 Aralık 2017): 190-202. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.366390.

JAMA

1.Ünal S, Şahın B, Urla Ö, Efe B. The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2017;26:190–202.

MLA

Ünal, Sabahaddin, vd. “The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey”. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 26, sy 2, Aralık 2017, ss. 190-02, doi:10.21566/tarbitderg.366390.

Vancouver

1.Sabahaddin Ünal, Bilal Şahın, Öztekin Urla, Berna Efe. The Use of Indicator Species and Ecological Degradation Model for Condition Assessment in Turkey. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 01 Aralık 2017;26(2):190-202. doi:10.21566/tarbitderg.366390

Cited By

Investigation of rangeland indicator species using parametric and non-parametric methods in hilly landscapes of central Iran

Journal of Mountain Science

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5184-y

Exploring the most important indicators for environmental condition assessment using structural equation modeling and InVEST habitat quality model

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10825-y