Power and Autonomy: Subaltern Studies and the History of the Subaltern Groups

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1 - 12, 21.06.2020

Serhan Afacan

Öz

Historiography or the philosophy of history is an integral part of history-writing. The findings of historians do not only bring into light new information regarding what happened in the past but can also pose challenges to the theoretical frameworks used while dealing with the existing historical source materials. In this sense, historical and historiographical discussions are closely interrelated. This study deals with Subaltern Studies initiative which started in the early 1980s to revisit and rewrite the Indian history and in time developed into a useful history-writing paradigm for historians from all over the world. First of all, the article discusses the context in which Subaltern Studies came into being by paying attention to the links between that and post-modernism and post-colonialism. Subaltern Studies was developed at a time when the fundamentals of modernism had already been vociferously put into question for a few decades by intellectuals from the East and the West. This intellectual legacy enabled the Subalternists to question the British rule in Indian history by paying particular attention to agency the understudied groups in the making of Indian independence. Secondly, the basic approaches of the Subalternists to the Indian history and to historical source materials are investigated. Here, the relationship between Subaltern Studies and other Marxist intellectual trends are emphasized. Finally, the article shares certain concluding remarks regarding the use of Subaltern Studies for historians working on other cases.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Subaltern Studies, subalternity, post-modernism, post-colonialism

Kaynakça

• Arnold, D. (2000). Gramsci and Peasant Subalternity in India. Vinayak Chaturverdi (Ed.) Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial London: Verso, 24-49. Bahl, V. (2000). Situating and Rethinking Subaltern Studies for Writing Working Class History. Arif Dirlik, Vinay Bal & Peter Gran (Eds.) History after the Three Worlds, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 85-124. Barthes, R. (1997). The Discourse of History. Keith Jenkins (Ed.) The Postmodern History Reader, London: Routlegde, 120-123. Brown, C. G. (2005). Postmodernism for Historians. London: Pearson. Burke, P. (2005). History and Social Theory. London: Polity. Carr, E. H. (1990). What is History?. London: Penguin Books. Chakrabarty, D. (1998). Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for “Indian” Pasts?. Ranajit Guha (Ed.) A Subaltern Studies Reader: 1986-1995, Delhi: Oxford University. Chandavarkar, R. (2000). “The Making of the Working Class”: E. P Thampson and Indian History. Vinayak Chaturverdi (Ed.) Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, London: Verso, 50-71. Chatterjee, P. (2000). The Nation and its Peasants. Vinayak Chaturverdi (Ed.) Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, London: Verso, 8-23. Chatterjee, P. (2011). A Brief History of Subaltern Studies. Gunilla Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (Eds.) Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 94-104. Dirlik, A. (2000). Whither History? Encounters with Historism, Postmodernism, Postcolonialism. Arif Dirlik, Vinay Bal & Peter Gran (Eds.) History after the Three Worlds, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 241-259. Guha, R. (1982). On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India. Ranajit Guha (Ed.) Subaltern Studies 1: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Delhi: Oxford University, 37-44. Guha, R. (1986). Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University. Ives, P. (2004). Language and Hegemony in Gramsci. London: Pluto. Sarkar, S. (2000). The Decline of the Subaltern in Subaltern Studies. Vinayak Chaturverdi (Ed.) Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, London: Verso, 300-323. Sharpe, J. (1991). History from Below. Peter Burke (Ed.) New Perspectives on Historical Writing, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991, 25-42. Spiegel, G. (1997). History, Historicism and the Social Logic of the Text in the Middle Ages. Keith Jenkins (Ed.) The Postmodern History Reader, London: Routlegde, 180-203. Spivak, G. C. (1985). Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiograpy. Ranajit Guha (Ed.) Subaltern Studies IV: Writings on South Asian History and Society, Delhi: Oxford University, 351-356. Spivak, G. C. (2000). The New Subaltern: A Silent Interview. Vinayak Chaturverdi (Ed.) Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, London: Verso, 324-339. Stone, L. (1997). History and Post Modernism. Keith Jenkins (Ed.) The Postmodern History Reader, London: Routlegde, 239- 259.