Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 269 - 321, 30.06.2023

Mükerrem Onur Başar

https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1324550

Öz

Türkiye’nin de dâhil olduğu Kara Avrupası hukuk sistemi ile Anglo Sakson hukuk sistemi arasındaki yaklaşım farklılıkları, teknolojinin ve internetin gelişimi ile birlikte, özellikle teknoloji transferini konu alan ticari ilişkilerde kullanılan sözleşmelerde, daha da belirgin bir hal almaktadır. Her ikisi de sözleşme özgürlüğü prensibini esas almasına rağmen, Kara Avrupası hukuk sisteminin, sözleşmelerde ceza koşuluna yer verme hususundaki liberal yaklaşımı ile Anglo Sakson hukukunun ceza koşulunu yasaklayıcı bakış açısı, anılan iki hukuk sisteminin bu konudaki önemli bir yaklaşım farklılığını ortaya koymaktadır. Diğer yandan, Anglo Sakson hukukunda yer alan cezalandırıcı tazminat düzenlemelerine -kural olarak- Kara Avrupası hukuk sistemlerinde yer verilmiyor olması, iki hukuk sistemi arasında bu konuda mevcut olan önemli bir diğer ayrışmayı oluşturmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknoloji transferi sözleşmeleri ceza koşulu götürü tazminat cezalandırıcı tazminat

Kaynakça

  • Akil Cenk, “İtirazın İptali Davasında İcra İnkâr Tazminatının Şartı Olarak Borçlunun İtirazının Haksızlığına Karar Verilmesi”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, 317-337
  • Aksoy Hüseyin Can, “Ceza Koşulunun Borca Aykırı Davranıştaki Kusuru ile İlişkisi Nedir?”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2018, C. 24, S.2, 999-1018.
  • Apaydın Bahar Öcal / Akman Nurten İnce, “Götürü Tazminatın Hâkim Tarafından İndirilmesi Meselesi”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Haziran 2019, C.25, S. 1, s. 220-260.
  • Araz Nilgün Dinçer, Roma Hukukunda Ceza Koşulu, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara: 1. Baskı, 2018.
  • Arslanyürek Yasemin Kabaklıoğlu, Ceza Koşulu ve Özellikle Zarar ve Tazminatla İlişkisi, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2018.
  • Atalı Murat / Ermenek İbrahim / Erdoğan Ersin, Medeni Usul Hukuku, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, İstanbul, 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Atamer Yeşim M., Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Satıcının Yükümlülükleri ve Sözleşmeye Aykırılığın Sonuçları, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2005.
  • Baş Ece, “Satım Hukukunda Aynen İfa Talebinin Birincil Yaptırım Olması Sorunu”, Journal of Yaşar University, Özel Sayı, Armağan Volume 8, s. 623-655.
  • Baysal Başak, Sözleşmenin Uyarlanması, On İki Levha Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2009.
  • Bilge Necip, Cezai Şart, Güzel Matbaası, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 1957.
  • Börü Şafak Parlak, “Götürü Tazminat Kavramına Bir Bakış”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, S. 129, 195-228.
  • Calleros Charles, “Punitive Damages, Liquidated Damages, and Clauses Penales in Contract Actions: A Comparative Analysis of the American Common Law and the French Civil Code”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2006, Volume 32, Issue 1, 67-119
  • Cansel Erol / Özel Çağlar, “Türk Borçlar Hukukunda Ceza Koşulu” Journal of Yaşar University, Özel Sayı, Armağan, 2013, Volume 8, s. 713-733.
  • Choi Albert H., “Deal Protection Devices”, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2021, Volume 88, No 4, 757-827.
  • Clarkson Kenneth W. / Miller Leroy Roger / Muris Timothy J., “LiquIdated Damages v.Penalties: Sense or Nonsense?”, Wisconsin Law Review, 1978, Issue 2, 351-390
  • Çevik Seda Öktem, “Ceza Koşulu-Bağlanma Parası-Cayma Parası”, Prof. Dr. İsmet Sungurbey’e Armağan, Borçlar Kanunu Genel Hükümler Konferansları III, 26-27 Mayıs 2012, İstanbul Barosu Yayınları, 2014, s. 97-112.
  • Davies Martin / Snyder David V., International Transactions in Goods, Global Sales in Comparative Context, Oxford University Press, New York: 1st Edition, 2014.
  • Dodge William S., “The Case for Punitive Damages in Contracts”, Duke Law Journal, 1999, Volume 48, Number 4, 629-699, s. 630.
  • Doğan Gülmelahat, Teknoloji Transfer Sözleşmeleri ve Rekabet Hukuku Uygulamaları, Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara 2020.
  • Eisenberg Theodore / Miller GeoffreyP., “Damages Versus Specific Performance: Lessons from Commercial Contracts”, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2015 Volume 12, Issue 1, s. 29-69.
  • Ekinci Hüseyin, Özel Hukuk Sözleşmelerinde Ceza Koşulu, Seçkin, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2015.
  • Erdem Mehmet, “Tazminatın Götürü Olarak Belirlenmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Sorumluluk ve Tazminat Hukuku Sempozyumu, 2009, s. 97-124.
  • Eren Fikret, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 26. Baskı, 2021.
  • Ferrari Franco, “Hadley v Baxendale v Foreseability under Article 74 CISG”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Oregon, 1th Edition, Hart Publishing, 2008.
  • Fortin Lisa A., "Why there Should be a Duty to Mitigate Liquidated Damages Clauses", Hofstra Law Review, 2009, Vol. 38, No. 1, 285-318.
  • Gaitán Manuel Guerrero, “Licensing as a Central Structure of Technology Transfer Agreements – Joint Venture and Franchising Agreements”, GRUR International Journal of European and International IP Law, 2021, Volume 70, Issue 5, 427-439.
  • García Ignacio Marín, “Enforcement of Penalty Clauses in Civil and Common Law: A Puzzle to be Solved by the Contracting Parties”, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2012 Volume 5, Issue 1, s. 98-123.
  • Goetz Charles J. / Scott Robert E., “Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach”, Columbia Law Review, May 1977, Vol. 77, No. 4, 554- 594.
  • Graves Jack, “Penalty Clauses as Remedies: Exploring Comparative Approaches to Enforceability”, Touro Law Review, 2013, Volume 29, No: 3, s. 681- 694.
  • Gül İbrahim, ABD ve Türk Hukukunda Medeni Ceza, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2015.
  • Güleryüz Tarık M. / Zorluoğlu Ayça Yılmaz, “Bir Anglo-Amerikan Hukuk Müessesesi Olarak Cezalandırıcı Tazminatın Bazı Türk Hukuku Müessesleri ile Mukayesesi”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2019, Sayı 141, 325-362.
  • Günay Cevdet İlhan, Cezai Şart,Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2001. Halson Roger, Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1st Edition, 2018.
  • Hatzis N. Aristides, “Having the cake and eating it too: efficient penalty clauses in Common and Civil contract law”, International Review of Law and Economics, 2003, Volume 22 Issue 4, s. 381-406.
  • Huber Peter / Mullis Alastair, The CISG A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners, Sellier European Law Publishers, Resenburg: 1st Edition, 2007.
  • Hüseyin Ekinci, Özel Hukuk Sözleşmelerinde Ceza Koşulu, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2015.
  • Hodgin Ray W. / Veitch Edward, “Punitive Damages: Reassessed”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1972, Vol.21, No.1, 119-132.
  • Holmes Oliver Wendell, “The Path of the Law”, Harvard Law Review, 1987, Volume 10, No:8, 457-478.
  • Hyland Richard, “Pacta Sund Servanda: A Mediation”, Virginia Journal of International Law Association, 1994, Volume 34, s. 405-433.
  • International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Model Technology Transfer Contract, ICC Publication, Paris 2009.
  • Jan Hellner, “Consequential Loss and Exemption Clauses”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, Vol 1, No 1, s. 13-49.
  • Jian Wong Wen, “Penalty Clauses Lessons From Australia and England and Possible Legislative Reforms”, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, March/September 2018, 104-127, s. 104-105.
  • Kahraman Zafer, Saf Garanti Taahhütleri, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2017.
  • Kapancı Berk, “Götürü Tazminat Anlaşması ve Bunun Ceza Koşulundan Ayırt Edilmesi”, Prof. Dr. Mustafa Dural’a Armağan, Filiz Kitapevi, İstanbul, 2013, s. 655-684.
  • Kayak Sevgi, “Roma Hukukunda Cezai Şart”, İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2006, Cilt LXIV, Sayı 1, s. 237-258.
  • Kocaağa Köksal, Ceza Koşulu, (Sözleşme Cezası), Yetkin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2018, s. 233.
  • Komarov Alexander, “The Limitation of Contract Damages in Domestic Legal Systems and Internaitonal Instruments”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Hart Publishing, Oregon, 1th Edition, 2008.
  • Kröll Stefan / Mistelis Loukas / Viscasillas Perales Pilar, UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), Verlag C. H. Beck, München, 1st Edition, 2011.
  • Kuru Baki, Medeni Usul Hukuku El Kitabı Cilt I, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2020, s. 615.
  • Lando Henrik / Rose Caspar, “On the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries”, International Review of Law and Economics, December 2004, Volume 24, Issue 4, s. 473-487.
  • Lookofsky Joseph, Understanding the CISG, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn: 3rd Edition, 2008.
  • Magnus Ulrich, “The Vienna Sales Convention (CISG) Between Civil and Common Law – Best of All Worlds?”, Journal of Civil Law Studies, 2010, Volume 3, Issue 1, s. 67-97.
  • Mattei Ugo, “The Comparative Law and Economics of Penalty Clauses in Contracts”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1995, Vol. 43, No.3, 427- 444.
  • McCormack Gerard, “Universalism in Insolvency Proceedings and the Common Law”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, Volume 32, No. 2, s. 325-347.
  • McEneaney Conor, "Penalty Clauses and Liquidated Damages: The Divergence in English and Irish Jurisprudence", King's Inns Law Review, 2019, Vol: 8
  • Merhacı Selin Özden, Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Cezalandırıcı Tazminat (Punitive Damages), Yetkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013, s.87
  • Miller Lucind, “Penalty Clauses in England and France: A Comparative Study”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 53, No. 1, s. 79- 106.
  • Morgan Fred W. / Boedecker Karl A., “Punitive Damages after BMW v. Gore”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Spring, 1997, Vol.16, No.1, 163-172.
  • Nomer Haluk Nami, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 18. Baskı, 2021.
  • Nordin Emily, “The Penalty Clause Bias”, Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, 2014, Vol.21 No.1, 162-187.
  • Oğuzman Kemalettin / Öz Turgut, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler Cilt 2, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 16. Baskı, 2021.
  • Oluwadamilola Odetola, “Penalties and Liquidated Damages in a Changing World: Rethinking the Common Law Position”, AFE Babalola The Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2015, Volume:6, Issue: 1, s. 248- 271.
  • OˋSullivian Janet, “Lost on Penalties”, The Cambridge Law Journal, November 2014, Vol.73, No.3, 480-483.
  • Owen David G., “A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform”, Villanova Law Review, 1994, Volume 39, Issue 2, 363-463.
  • Pargendler Mariana “The Role of the State in Contract Law: The Common-Civil Law Divide”, The Yale Journal of International Law, 2018, Volume 43, s. 144-189.
  • Pressman Michael, “The Two-Contract Approach to Liquidated Damages: A New Framework for Exploring the Penalty Clause Debate”, Virginia Law Business Review, 2013, Vol.7, Number 4, 651-708.
  • Reed Benjamin B., "Liquidated Damages Provisions: Strategic Drafting and Enforcement Issues", Franchise Law Journal, 2018, Vol. 37, No. 4, 523-552.
  • Rubin Paul H., “Unenforceable Contracts: Penalty Clauses and Specific Performance”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, Vol.10, No.2, 237-247.
  • Sarı Suat, ““Götürü Tazminat” Kavramı Üzerine”, Medeni Hukukta Güncel Sorunlar ve Önemli Gelişmeler Sempozyumu: Medeni Hukuk Hocalarına Saygı Günleri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Mayıs 2011, 299-304.
  • Saidov Djakhongir, “Damage to Business Reputation and Goodwill under the Vienna Sales Convention”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Hart Publishing, Oregon, 1th Edition, 2008.
  • Schlechtriem Peter / Schwenzer Ingeborg, Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 3rd Edition, 2010.
  • Schmit Joan T. / Pritchett S. Travis / Fields Paige, “Punitive Damages: Punishment or Further Compensation”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1988, Vol. 55, No. 3, 453-466.
  • Schwenzer Ingeborg/ Hachem Pascal / Kee Christopher, Global Sales and Contract Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1St Edition, 2012.
  • Scott Robert E. / Triantis George G., “Embedded Options in the Case Against Compensation in Contract Law”, Columia Law Review, 2004, Vol.104, 1428-1491.
  • Sebok Anthony J., “Punitive Damages in the Unıted States”, Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives by Helmut Koziol Vanessa Wilcox, Springer Verlag, Vienna, 1th Edition, 2009, 155-189.
  • Solorzano Jonathan S., “An Uncertain Penalty: A Look at the International Community's Inability to Harmonize the Law of Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses”, Law & Business Review of the Americas, 2009, Volume 15, Number 4, 779-818.
  • Stone Rebecca, “Economic Anaylsis of Contract Law from the Internal Point of View”, Columbia Law Review, December 2016, Vol. 116, No.8, 2005-2057.
  • Şanlı Cemal /Esen Emre / Figenmeşe Ataman İnci, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Beta Basım, İstanbul, 2020, 8. Baskı, s. 407.
  • Şenol Hatice Kübra Erçoşkun, “Sözleşmenin İçeriğini Belirleme Özgürlüğü ve Bunun Genel Sınırı: TBK M. 27”, İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2016, C. LXXIV, S. 2, 709-737, s.709.
  • Taliadoros Jason, “The Roots of Punitive Damages at Common Law”, Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, Volume 64, 251-302.
  • Talley Eric L., "Contract Renegotiation, Mechanism Design, and the Liquidated Damages Rule", Stanford Law Review, 1994, Vol, 46, No. 5, 1195-1243, s. 1196
  • Tanrıver Süha, Medeni Usul Hukuku Cilt I, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Taşkın Zeynep Damla, “Borçlunun Kusurunun Ceza Koşulu Anlaşması Üzerine Etkisi” Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Aralık 2020, Cilt 26, Sayı 2, 1305-1348.
  • Tekelioğlu Numan, “İnşaat Sözleşmelerinde Cezai Şart ve Götürü Tazminat” Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi, 2017, Sayı 2, 159-186.
  • Tekinay Selahattin Sulhi / Burcuoğlu Haluk / Akman Sermet / Altop Atilla, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Filiz Kitapevi, İstanbul: 6. Baskı, 1988. Tiwari, Avni, "Transfer of Technology Agreements and Competition Law", Supremo Amicus, 2019, Volume 13 45-50.
  • Tomescu Raluca Antoanetta, "Tort Liability. Damages and Penalty Clause", Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2018, Vol. 7 No. 2, s. 254- 259.
  • Topçu Deniz, Patent Lisans Sözleşmeleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2021.
  • Tunçomağ Kenan, Cezai Şart, Baha Matbaası, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 1963.
  • Ulusu Ayşe Elif, Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin BM Antlaşmasında ve Avrupa Borçları Hukuku Prensiplerinde Tazminat Sorumluluğunun Sınırlandırılması: Öngörülebilirlik İlkesi, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2011.
  • Uzun Tuba Birinci, Götürü Tazminat, Yetkin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2015.
  • Wade Patricia, "United Kingdom - Outside the Penalty Box - The Latest on Liquidated Damages", Construction Law International, 2009, Vol. 4, No. 2, s. 11- 13.
  • Wilcox Vanessa, Punitive Damages in England, Punitive Damages Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives, Springer Verlag, Wien, 1th Edition, 2009.
  • Yağcıoğlu Burcu, Türk ve İsviçre Hukuku’nda Ceza Koşulu (Cezai Şart), Seçkin, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2022.
  • Yıldırım Ayça Akkayan, “Cezai Şartın İşlevi Türk Amerikan Hukukları Açısından Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2003,C. LXI, S. 1-2, 357-414.
  • Yılmaz Ejder, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Şerhi Cilt 3, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara: 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Yılmaz Süleyman, Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Sözleşmenin İhlalinde Alıcının Hakları, Yetkin Yayınları , Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2013.
  • Zeller Bruno, "When Is a Fixed Sum Not a Fixed Sum but a Penalty Clause", Journal of Law and Commerce, 2012, Vol.30, 173-184.
  • Zeytin Zafer, Milletlerarası Mal Satım Sözleşmeleri (CISG) Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2015.
  • Zimmermann Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Oxford University Press Oxford: 1st Edition, 1996.
  • https://casetext.com/case/banta-v-stamford-motor-co
  • https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/453299?ln=en
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri= CELEX:32014R0316&from=EN
  • https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district- courts/FSupp/505/1072/1950596/.
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-3-hd-e-2020-6904-k-2021-921-t-04-02- 2021/4048677/
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-3-hd-e-2017-5855-k-2019-2884-t-03-04- 2019/3581844/
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-19-hd-e-2015-17632-k-2016-9261-t-24-05- 2016/2502725/.
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-22-hd-e-2014-8596-k-2015-19057-t-01-06- 2015/2415465/
  • https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTM Content?doc umentId=0900001680505599.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media- documents/uncitral/en/19- 09951_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media- documents/uncitral/en/1997- model-law-insol-2013-guide-enactment-e.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/19-08779_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/19- 09955_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/vol14-p272-273-e.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/1997- model-law-insol-2013-guide-enactment-e.pdf
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/559/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/408/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/532/424/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/512/415/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/1/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/492/257/
  • http://webftp.gazi.edu.tr/hukuk/sorumluluk/s_5.pdf
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1964/1.html.
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1909/1.html
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1915/1.html
  • http://www.cisgac.com/file/repository/Turkish_No_10_SON.pdf.
  • https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002/9.509. html.
  • https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-304.
  • https://www.law.kuleuven.be/personal/mstorme/2009_02_DCFR_Outli neEdition. pdf .
  • https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/commercial-contracts/unidroit- principles- 2016
  • https://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/p rinciples2016 -e.pdf.
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/400200/_/pecl/#head_153
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/450300/_/american-restatement-2nd-of-the- law-of-contracts/
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/382600/_/yam-seng-pte-limited-v- international-trade-corporation-limited-01st-february-2013-%5B2013%5D-ewhc- 111-/.
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/302900/_/philips-hong-kong-ltd-v-att-gen-of- hong-kong- 61-build-l-r-(1993)-at-49/df
  • https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0280-judgment.pdf
  • https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/licensing/903/wipo_pub_903.p
  • https://www.wipo.int/technology-transfer/en/agreements.html

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 269 - 321, 30.06.2023

Mükerrem Onur Başar

https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1324550

Öz

The differences in approach between the Continental European legal system, including Turkey, and the Anglo-Saxon legal system, become more apparent with the development of technology and the internet, especially in contracts used in commercial relations on technology transfer. Although both are based on the principle of freedom of contract, the liberal approach of the Continental European legal system to include penal clauses in contracts and the prohibitive point of view of the Anglo-Saxon law on the penal clause reveal an important difference in approach in this regard. On the other hand, the fact that punitive compensation arrangements in Anglo Saxon law are not included in the Continental European legal systems as a rule, which constitutes another important divergence between the two legal systems in this regard.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technology transfer agreements penal clause liquidated damages punitive compensation

Kaynakça

  • Akil Cenk, “İtirazın İptali Davasında İcra İnkâr Tazminatının Şartı Olarak Borçlunun İtirazının Haksızlığına Karar Verilmesi”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, 317-337
  • Aksoy Hüseyin Can, “Ceza Koşulunun Borca Aykırı Davranıştaki Kusuru ile İlişkisi Nedir?”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2018, C. 24, S.2, 999-1018.
  • Apaydın Bahar Öcal / Akman Nurten İnce, “Götürü Tazminatın Hâkim Tarafından İndirilmesi Meselesi”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Haziran 2019, C.25, S. 1, s. 220-260.
  • Araz Nilgün Dinçer, Roma Hukukunda Ceza Koşulu, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara: 1. Baskı, 2018.
  • Arslanyürek Yasemin Kabaklıoğlu, Ceza Koşulu ve Özellikle Zarar ve Tazminatla İlişkisi, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2018.
  • Atalı Murat / Ermenek İbrahim / Erdoğan Ersin, Medeni Usul Hukuku, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, İstanbul, 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Atamer Yeşim M., Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Satıcının Yükümlülükleri ve Sözleşmeye Aykırılığın Sonuçları, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2005.
  • Baş Ece, “Satım Hukukunda Aynen İfa Talebinin Birincil Yaptırım Olması Sorunu”, Journal of Yaşar University, Özel Sayı, Armağan Volume 8, s. 623-655.
  • Baysal Başak, Sözleşmenin Uyarlanması, On İki Levha Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2009.
  • Bilge Necip, Cezai Şart, Güzel Matbaası, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 1957.
  • Börü Şafak Parlak, “Götürü Tazminat Kavramına Bir Bakış”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, S. 129, 195-228.
  • Calleros Charles, “Punitive Damages, Liquidated Damages, and Clauses Penales in Contract Actions: A Comparative Analysis of the American Common Law and the French Civil Code”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2006, Volume 32, Issue 1, 67-119
  • Cansel Erol / Özel Çağlar, “Türk Borçlar Hukukunda Ceza Koşulu” Journal of Yaşar University, Özel Sayı, Armağan, 2013, Volume 8, s. 713-733.
  • Choi Albert H., “Deal Protection Devices”, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2021, Volume 88, No 4, 757-827.
  • Clarkson Kenneth W. / Miller Leroy Roger / Muris Timothy J., “LiquIdated Damages v.Penalties: Sense or Nonsense?”, Wisconsin Law Review, 1978, Issue 2, 351-390
  • Çevik Seda Öktem, “Ceza Koşulu-Bağlanma Parası-Cayma Parası”, Prof. Dr. İsmet Sungurbey’e Armağan, Borçlar Kanunu Genel Hükümler Konferansları III, 26-27 Mayıs 2012, İstanbul Barosu Yayınları, 2014, s. 97-112.
  • Davies Martin / Snyder David V., International Transactions in Goods, Global Sales in Comparative Context, Oxford University Press, New York: 1st Edition, 2014.
  • Dodge William S., “The Case for Punitive Damages in Contracts”, Duke Law Journal, 1999, Volume 48, Number 4, 629-699, s. 630.
  • Doğan Gülmelahat, Teknoloji Transfer Sözleşmeleri ve Rekabet Hukuku Uygulamaları, Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara 2020.
  • Eisenberg Theodore / Miller GeoffreyP., “Damages Versus Specific Performance: Lessons from Commercial Contracts”, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2015 Volume 12, Issue 1, s. 29-69.
  • Ekinci Hüseyin, Özel Hukuk Sözleşmelerinde Ceza Koşulu, Seçkin, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2015.
  • Erdem Mehmet, “Tazminatın Götürü Olarak Belirlenmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Sorumluluk ve Tazminat Hukuku Sempozyumu, 2009, s. 97-124.
  • Eren Fikret, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 26. Baskı, 2021.
  • Ferrari Franco, “Hadley v Baxendale v Foreseability under Article 74 CISG”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Oregon, 1th Edition, Hart Publishing, 2008.
  • Fortin Lisa A., "Why there Should be a Duty to Mitigate Liquidated Damages Clauses", Hofstra Law Review, 2009, Vol. 38, No. 1, 285-318.
  • Gaitán Manuel Guerrero, “Licensing as a Central Structure of Technology Transfer Agreements – Joint Venture and Franchising Agreements”, GRUR International Journal of European and International IP Law, 2021, Volume 70, Issue 5, 427-439.
  • García Ignacio Marín, “Enforcement of Penalty Clauses in Civil and Common Law: A Puzzle to be Solved by the Contracting Parties”, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2012 Volume 5, Issue 1, s. 98-123.
  • Goetz Charles J. / Scott Robert E., “Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach”, Columbia Law Review, May 1977, Vol. 77, No. 4, 554- 594.
  • Graves Jack, “Penalty Clauses as Remedies: Exploring Comparative Approaches to Enforceability”, Touro Law Review, 2013, Volume 29, No: 3, s. 681- 694.
  • Gül İbrahim, ABD ve Türk Hukukunda Medeni Ceza, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2015.
  • Güleryüz Tarık M. / Zorluoğlu Ayça Yılmaz, “Bir Anglo-Amerikan Hukuk Müessesesi Olarak Cezalandırıcı Tazminatın Bazı Türk Hukuku Müessesleri ile Mukayesesi”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2019, Sayı 141, 325-362.
  • Günay Cevdet İlhan, Cezai Şart,Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2001. Halson Roger, Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1st Edition, 2018.
  • Hatzis N. Aristides, “Having the cake and eating it too: efficient penalty clauses in Common and Civil contract law”, International Review of Law and Economics, 2003, Volume 22 Issue 4, s. 381-406.
  • Huber Peter / Mullis Alastair, The CISG A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners, Sellier European Law Publishers, Resenburg: 1st Edition, 2007.
  • Hüseyin Ekinci, Özel Hukuk Sözleşmelerinde Ceza Koşulu, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2015.
  • Hodgin Ray W. / Veitch Edward, “Punitive Damages: Reassessed”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1972, Vol.21, No.1, 119-132.
  • Holmes Oliver Wendell, “The Path of the Law”, Harvard Law Review, 1987, Volume 10, No:8, 457-478.
  • Hyland Richard, “Pacta Sund Servanda: A Mediation”, Virginia Journal of International Law Association, 1994, Volume 34, s. 405-433.
  • International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Model Technology Transfer Contract, ICC Publication, Paris 2009.
  • Jan Hellner, “Consequential Loss and Exemption Clauses”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, Vol 1, No 1, s. 13-49.
  • Jian Wong Wen, “Penalty Clauses Lessons From Australia and England and Possible Legislative Reforms”, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, March/September 2018, 104-127, s. 104-105.
  • Kahraman Zafer, Saf Garanti Taahhütleri, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2017.
  • Kapancı Berk, “Götürü Tazminat Anlaşması ve Bunun Ceza Koşulundan Ayırt Edilmesi”, Prof. Dr. Mustafa Dural’a Armağan, Filiz Kitapevi, İstanbul, 2013, s. 655-684.
  • Kayak Sevgi, “Roma Hukukunda Cezai Şart”, İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2006, Cilt LXIV, Sayı 1, s. 237-258.
  • Kocaağa Köksal, Ceza Koşulu, (Sözleşme Cezası), Yetkin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2018, s. 233.
  • Komarov Alexander, “The Limitation of Contract Damages in Domestic Legal Systems and Internaitonal Instruments”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Hart Publishing, Oregon, 1th Edition, 2008.
  • Kröll Stefan / Mistelis Loukas / Viscasillas Perales Pilar, UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), Verlag C. H. Beck, München, 1st Edition, 2011.
  • Kuru Baki, Medeni Usul Hukuku El Kitabı Cilt I, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2020, s. 615.
  • Lando Henrik / Rose Caspar, “On the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries”, International Review of Law and Economics, December 2004, Volume 24, Issue 4, s. 473-487.
  • Lookofsky Joseph, Understanding the CISG, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn: 3rd Edition, 2008.
  • Magnus Ulrich, “The Vienna Sales Convention (CISG) Between Civil and Common Law – Best of All Worlds?”, Journal of Civil Law Studies, 2010, Volume 3, Issue 1, s. 67-97.
  • Mattei Ugo, “The Comparative Law and Economics of Penalty Clauses in Contracts”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1995, Vol. 43, No.3, 427- 444.
  • McCormack Gerard, “Universalism in Insolvency Proceedings and the Common Law”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, Volume 32, No. 2, s. 325-347.
  • McEneaney Conor, "Penalty Clauses and Liquidated Damages: The Divergence in English and Irish Jurisprudence", King's Inns Law Review, 2019, Vol: 8
  • Merhacı Selin Özden, Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Cezalandırıcı Tazminat (Punitive Damages), Yetkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013, s.87
  • Miller Lucind, “Penalty Clauses in England and France: A Comparative Study”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 53, No. 1, s. 79- 106.
  • Morgan Fred W. / Boedecker Karl A., “Punitive Damages after BMW v. Gore”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Spring, 1997, Vol.16, No.1, 163-172.
  • Nomer Haluk Nami, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 18. Baskı, 2021.
  • Nordin Emily, “The Penalty Clause Bias”, Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, 2014, Vol.21 No.1, 162-187.
  • Oğuzman Kemalettin / Öz Turgut, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler Cilt 2, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 16. Baskı, 2021.
  • Oluwadamilola Odetola, “Penalties and Liquidated Damages in a Changing World: Rethinking the Common Law Position”, AFE Babalola The Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2015, Volume:6, Issue: 1, s. 248- 271.
  • OˋSullivian Janet, “Lost on Penalties”, The Cambridge Law Journal, November 2014, Vol.73, No.3, 480-483.
  • Owen David G., “A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform”, Villanova Law Review, 1994, Volume 39, Issue 2, 363-463.
  • Pargendler Mariana “The Role of the State in Contract Law: The Common-Civil Law Divide”, The Yale Journal of International Law, 2018, Volume 43, s. 144-189.
  • Pressman Michael, “The Two-Contract Approach to Liquidated Damages: A New Framework for Exploring the Penalty Clause Debate”, Virginia Law Business Review, 2013, Vol.7, Number 4, 651-708.
  • Reed Benjamin B., "Liquidated Damages Provisions: Strategic Drafting and Enforcement Issues", Franchise Law Journal, 2018, Vol. 37, No. 4, 523-552.
  • Rubin Paul H., “Unenforceable Contracts: Penalty Clauses and Specific Performance”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, Vol.10, No.2, 237-247.
  • Sarı Suat, ““Götürü Tazminat” Kavramı Üzerine”, Medeni Hukukta Güncel Sorunlar ve Önemli Gelişmeler Sempozyumu: Medeni Hukuk Hocalarına Saygı Günleri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Mayıs 2011, 299-304.
  • Saidov Djakhongir, “Damage to Business Reputation and Goodwill under the Vienna Sales Convention”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Hart Publishing, Oregon, 1th Edition, 2008.
  • Schlechtriem Peter / Schwenzer Ingeborg, Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 3rd Edition, 2010.
  • Schmit Joan T. / Pritchett S. Travis / Fields Paige, “Punitive Damages: Punishment or Further Compensation”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1988, Vol. 55, No. 3, 453-466.
  • Schwenzer Ingeborg/ Hachem Pascal / Kee Christopher, Global Sales and Contract Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1St Edition, 2012.
  • Scott Robert E. / Triantis George G., “Embedded Options in the Case Against Compensation in Contract Law”, Columia Law Review, 2004, Vol.104, 1428-1491.
  • Sebok Anthony J., “Punitive Damages in the Unıted States”, Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives by Helmut Koziol Vanessa Wilcox, Springer Verlag, Vienna, 1th Edition, 2009, 155-189.
  • Solorzano Jonathan S., “An Uncertain Penalty: A Look at the International Community's Inability to Harmonize the Law of Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses”, Law & Business Review of the Americas, 2009, Volume 15, Number 4, 779-818.
  • Stone Rebecca, “Economic Anaylsis of Contract Law from the Internal Point of View”, Columbia Law Review, December 2016, Vol. 116, No.8, 2005-2057.
  • Şanlı Cemal /Esen Emre / Figenmeşe Ataman İnci, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Beta Basım, İstanbul, 2020, 8. Baskı, s. 407.
  • Şenol Hatice Kübra Erçoşkun, “Sözleşmenin İçeriğini Belirleme Özgürlüğü ve Bunun Genel Sınırı: TBK M. 27”, İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2016, C. LXXIV, S. 2, 709-737, s.709.
  • Taliadoros Jason, “The Roots of Punitive Damages at Common Law”, Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, Volume 64, 251-302.
  • Talley Eric L., "Contract Renegotiation, Mechanism Design, and the Liquidated Damages Rule", Stanford Law Review, 1994, Vol, 46, No. 5, 1195-1243, s. 1196
  • Tanrıver Süha, Medeni Usul Hukuku Cilt I, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Taşkın Zeynep Damla, “Borçlunun Kusurunun Ceza Koşulu Anlaşması Üzerine Etkisi” Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Aralık 2020, Cilt 26, Sayı 2, 1305-1348.
  • Tekelioğlu Numan, “İnşaat Sözleşmelerinde Cezai Şart ve Götürü Tazminat” Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi, 2017, Sayı 2, 159-186.
  • Tekinay Selahattin Sulhi / Burcuoğlu Haluk / Akman Sermet / Altop Atilla, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Filiz Kitapevi, İstanbul: 6. Baskı, 1988. Tiwari, Avni, "Transfer of Technology Agreements and Competition Law", Supremo Amicus, 2019, Volume 13 45-50.
  • Tomescu Raluca Antoanetta, "Tort Liability. Damages and Penalty Clause", Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2018, Vol. 7 No. 2, s. 254- 259.
  • Topçu Deniz, Patent Lisans Sözleşmeleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2021.
  • Tunçomağ Kenan, Cezai Şart, Baha Matbaası, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 1963.
  • Ulusu Ayşe Elif, Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin BM Antlaşmasında ve Avrupa Borçları Hukuku Prensiplerinde Tazminat Sorumluluğunun Sınırlandırılması: Öngörülebilirlik İlkesi, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2011.
  • Uzun Tuba Birinci, Götürü Tazminat, Yetkin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2015.
  • Wade Patricia, "United Kingdom - Outside the Penalty Box - The Latest on Liquidated Damages", Construction Law International, 2009, Vol. 4, No. 2, s. 11- 13.
  • Wilcox Vanessa, Punitive Damages in England, Punitive Damages Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives, Springer Verlag, Wien, 1th Edition, 2009.
  • Yağcıoğlu Burcu, Türk ve İsviçre Hukuku’nda Ceza Koşulu (Cezai Şart), Seçkin, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2022.
  • Yıldırım Ayça Akkayan, “Cezai Şartın İşlevi Türk Amerikan Hukukları Açısından Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2003,C. LXI, S. 1-2, 357-414.
  • Yılmaz Ejder, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Şerhi Cilt 3, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara: 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Yılmaz Süleyman, Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Sözleşmenin İhlalinde Alıcının Hakları, Yetkin Yayınları , Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2013.
  • Zeller Bruno, "When Is a Fixed Sum Not a Fixed Sum but a Penalty Clause", Journal of Law and Commerce, 2012, Vol.30, 173-184.
  • Zeytin Zafer, Milletlerarası Mal Satım Sözleşmeleri (CISG) Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2015.
  • Zimmermann Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Oxford University Press Oxford: 1st Edition, 1996.
  • https://casetext.com/case/banta-v-stamford-motor-co
  • https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/453299?ln=en
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri= CELEX:32014R0316&from=EN
  • https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district- courts/FSupp/505/1072/1950596/.
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-3-hd-e-2020-6904-k-2021-921-t-04-02- 2021/4048677/
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-3-hd-e-2017-5855-k-2019-2884-t-03-04- 2019/3581844/
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-19-hd-e-2015-17632-k-2016-9261-t-24-05- 2016/2502725/.
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-22-hd-e-2014-8596-k-2015-19057-t-01-06- 2015/2415465/
  • https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTM Content?doc umentId=0900001680505599.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media- documents/uncitral/en/19- 09951_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media- documents/uncitral/en/1997- model-law-insol-2013-guide-enactment-e.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/19-08779_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/19- 09955_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/vol14-p272-273-e.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/1997- model-law-insol-2013-guide-enactment-e.pdf
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/559/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/408/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/532/424/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/512/415/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/1/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/492/257/
  • http://webftp.gazi.edu.tr/hukuk/sorumluluk/s_5.pdf
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1964/1.html.
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1909/1.html
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1915/1.html
  • http://www.cisgac.com/file/repository/Turkish_No_10_SON.pdf.
  • https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002/9.509. html.
  • https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-304.
  • https://www.law.kuleuven.be/personal/mstorme/2009_02_DCFR_Outli neEdition. pdf .
  • https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/commercial-contracts/unidroit- principles- 2016
  • https://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/p rinciples2016 -e.pdf.
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/400200/_/pecl/#head_153
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/450300/_/american-restatement-2nd-of-the- law-of-contracts/
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/382600/_/yam-seng-pte-limited-v- international-trade-corporation-limited-01st-february-2013-%5B2013%5D-ewhc- 111-/.
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/302900/_/philips-hong-kong-ltd-v-att-gen-of- hong-kong- 61-build-l-r-(1993)-at-49/df
  • https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0280-judgment.pdf
  • https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/licensing/903/wipo_pub_903.p
  • https://www.wipo.int/technology-transfer/en/agreements.html

Eine Bewertung der Schadensersatz- und Vertragsstrafeklauseln in Technologietransferverträgen aus der Sicht des angelsächsischen und türkischen Rechts

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 269 - 321, 30.06.2023

Mükerrem Onur Başar

https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1324550

Öz

Der Begriff Technologietransfer deckt ein breites Spektrum von Sachverhalten ab, von der Gewährung von Patenten und/oder Know-how Lizenzen bis hin zu komplexeren Transaktionen, die technische Unterstützung und die Bereitstellung einiger technischer Ausrüstungen beinhalten.
Gegenstand einer Technologietransfervereinbarung ist die Vergabe von Technologierechten in Form einer Lizenz, wie beispielsweise die Nutzung einer entwickelten Technologie oder die Nutzung der gewissen Technologien im Zusammenhang mit einem anderen Produkt sowie die Entwicklung und Herstellung eines Produktes unter Verwendung dieser Technologie.

Kaynakça

  • Akil Cenk, “İtirazın İptali Davasında İcra İnkâr Tazminatının Şartı Olarak Borçlunun İtirazının Haksızlığına Karar Verilmesi”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012, Cilt 3, Sayı 1, 317-337
  • Aksoy Hüseyin Can, “Ceza Koşulunun Borca Aykırı Davranıştaki Kusuru ile İlişkisi Nedir?”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2018, C. 24, S.2, 999-1018.
  • Apaydın Bahar Öcal / Akman Nurten İnce, “Götürü Tazminatın Hâkim Tarafından İndirilmesi Meselesi”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Haziran 2019, C.25, S. 1, s. 220-260.
  • Araz Nilgün Dinçer, Roma Hukukunda Ceza Koşulu, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara: 1. Baskı, 2018.
  • Arslanyürek Yasemin Kabaklıoğlu, Ceza Koşulu ve Özellikle Zarar ve Tazminatla İlişkisi, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2018.
  • Atalı Murat / Ermenek İbrahim / Erdoğan Ersin, Medeni Usul Hukuku, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, İstanbul, 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Atamer Yeşim M., Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine İlişkin Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Satıcının Yükümlülükleri ve Sözleşmeye Aykırılığın Sonuçları, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2005.
  • Baş Ece, “Satım Hukukunda Aynen İfa Talebinin Birincil Yaptırım Olması Sorunu”, Journal of Yaşar University, Özel Sayı, Armağan Volume 8, s. 623-655.
  • Baysal Başak, Sözleşmenin Uyarlanması, On İki Levha Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2009.
  • Bilge Necip, Cezai Şart, Güzel Matbaası, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 1957.
  • Börü Şafak Parlak, “Götürü Tazminat Kavramına Bir Bakış”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, S. 129, 195-228.
  • Calleros Charles, “Punitive Damages, Liquidated Damages, and Clauses Penales in Contract Actions: A Comparative Analysis of the American Common Law and the French Civil Code”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2006, Volume 32, Issue 1, 67-119
  • Cansel Erol / Özel Çağlar, “Türk Borçlar Hukukunda Ceza Koşulu” Journal of Yaşar University, Özel Sayı, Armağan, 2013, Volume 8, s. 713-733.
  • Choi Albert H., “Deal Protection Devices”, The University of Chicago Law Review, 2021, Volume 88, No 4, 757-827.
  • Clarkson Kenneth W. / Miller Leroy Roger / Muris Timothy J., “LiquIdated Damages v.Penalties: Sense or Nonsense?”, Wisconsin Law Review, 1978, Issue 2, 351-390
  • Çevik Seda Öktem, “Ceza Koşulu-Bağlanma Parası-Cayma Parası”, Prof. Dr. İsmet Sungurbey’e Armağan, Borçlar Kanunu Genel Hükümler Konferansları III, 26-27 Mayıs 2012, İstanbul Barosu Yayınları, 2014, s. 97-112.
  • Davies Martin / Snyder David V., International Transactions in Goods, Global Sales in Comparative Context, Oxford University Press, New York: 1st Edition, 2014.
  • Dodge William S., “The Case for Punitive Damages in Contracts”, Duke Law Journal, 1999, Volume 48, Number 4, 629-699, s. 630.
  • Doğan Gülmelahat, Teknoloji Transfer Sözleşmeleri ve Rekabet Hukuku Uygulamaları, Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara 2020.
  • Eisenberg Theodore / Miller GeoffreyP., “Damages Versus Specific Performance: Lessons from Commercial Contracts”, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2015 Volume 12, Issue 1, s. 29-69.
  • Ekinci Hüseyin, Özel Hukuk Sözleşmelerinde Ceza Koşulu, Seçkin, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2015.
  • Erdem Mehmet, “Tazminatın Götürü Olarak Belirlenmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Sorumluluk ve Tazminat Hukuku Sempozyumu, 2009, s. 97-124.
  • Eren Fikret, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 26. Baskı, 2021.
  • Ferrari Franco, “Hadley v Baxendale v Foreseability under Article 74 CISG”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Oregon, 1th Edition, Hart Publishing, 2008.
  • Fortin Lisa A., "Why there Should be a Duty to Mitigate Liquidated Damages Clauses", Hofstra Law Review, 2009, Vol. 38, No. 1, 285-318.
  • Gaitán Manuel Guerrero, “Licensing as a Central Structure of Technology Transfer Agreements – Joint Venture and Franchising Agreements”, GRUR International Journal of European and International IP Law, 2021, Volume 70, Issue 5, 427-439.
  • García Ignacio Marín, “Enforcement of Penalty Clauses in Civil and Common Law: A Puzzle to be Solved by the Contracting Parties”, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2012 Volume 5, Issue 1, s. 98-123.
  • Goetz Charles J. / Scott Robert E., “Liquidated Damages, Penalties and the Just Compensation Principle: Some Notes on an Enforcement Model and a Theory of Efficient Breach”, Columbia Law Review, May 1977, Vol. 77, No. 4, 554- 594.
  • Graves Jack, “Penalty Clauses as Remedies: Exploring Comparative Approaches to Enforceability”, Touro Law Review, 2013, Volume 29, No: 3, s. 681- 694.
  • Gül İbrahim, ABD ve Türk Hukukunda Medeni Ceza, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2015.
  • Güleryüz Tarık M. / Zorluoğlu Ayça Yılmaz, “Bir Anglo-Amerikan Hukuk Müessesesi Olarak Cezalandırıcı Tazminatın Bazı Türk Hukuku Müessesleri ile Mukayesesi”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 2019, Sayı 141, 325-362.
  • Günay Cevdet İlhan, Cezai Şart,Turhan Kitapevi, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2001. Halson Roger, Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1st Edition, 2018.
  • Hatzis N. Aristides, “Having the cake and eating it too: efficient penalty clauses in Common and Civil contract law”, International Review of Law and Economics, 2003, Volume 22 Issue 4, s. 381-406.
  • Huber Peter / Mullis Alastair, The CISG A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners, Sellier European Law Publishers, Resenburg: 1st Edition, 2007.
  • Hüseyin Ekinci, Özel Hukuk Sözleşmelerinde Ceza Koşulu, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2015.
  • Hodgin Ray W. / Veitch Edward, “Punitive Damages: Reassessed”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1972, Vol.21, No.1, 119-132.
  • Holmes Oliver Wendell, “The Path of the Law”, Harvard Law Review, 1987, Volume 10, No:8, 457-478.
  • Hyland Richard, “Pacta Sund Servanda: A Mediation”, Virginia Journal of International Law Association, 1994, Volume 34, s. 405-433.
  • International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Model Technology Transfer Contract, ICC Publication, Paris 2009.
  • Jan Hellner, “Consequential Loss and Exemption Clauses”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, Vol 1, No 1, s. 13-49.
  • Jian Wong Wen, “Penalty Clauses Lessons From Australia and England and Possible Legislative Reforms”, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, March/September 2018, 104-127, s. 104-105.
  • Kahraman Zafer, Saf Garanti Taahhütleri, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2017.
  • Kapancı Berk, “Götürü Tazminat Anlaşması ve Bunun Ceza Koşulundan Ayırt Edilmesi”, Prof. Dr. Mustafa Dural’a Armağan, Filiz Kitapevi, İstanbul, 2013, s. 655-684.
  • Kayak Sevgi, “Roma Hukukunda Cezai Şart”, İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2006, Cilt LXIV, Sayı 1, s. 237-258.
  • Kocaağa Köksal, Ceza Koşulu, (Sözleşme Cezası), Yetkin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2018, s. 233.
  • Komarov Alexander, “The Limitation of Contract Damages in Domestic Legal Systems and Internaitonal Instruments”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Hart Publishing, Oregon, 1th Edition, 2008.
  • Kröll Stefan / Mistelis Loukas / Viscasillas Perales Pilar, UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), Verlag C. H. Beck, München, 1st Edition, 2011.
  • Kuru Baki, Medeni Usul Hukuku El Kitabı Cilt I, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2020, s. 615.
  • Lando Henrik / Rose Caspar, “On the Enforcement of Specific Performance in Civil Law Countries”, International Review of Law and Economics, December 2004, Volume 24, Issue 4, s. 473-487.
  • Lookofsky Joseph, Understanding the CISG, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn: 3rd Edition, 2008.
  • Magnus Ulrich, “The Vienna Sales Convention (CISG) Between Civil and Common Law – Best of All Worlds?”, Journal of Civil Law Studies, 2010, Volume 3, Issue 1, s. 67-97.
  • Mattei Ugo, “The Comparative Law and Economics of Penalty Clauses in Contracts”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 1995, Vol. 43, No.3, 427- 444.
  • McCormack Gerard, “Universalism in Insolvency Proceedings and the Common Law”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, Volume 32, No. 2, s. 325-347.
  • McEneaney Conor, "Penalty Clauses and Liquidated Damages: The Divergence in English and Irish Jurisprudence", King's Inns Law Review, 2019, Vol: 8
  • Merhacı Selin Özden, Karşılaştırmalı Hukukta Cezalandırıcı Tazminat (Punitive Damages), Yetkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2013, s.87
  • Miller Lucind, “Penalty Clauses in England and France: A Comparative Study”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 53, No. 1, s. 79- 106.
  • Morgan Fred W. / Boedecker Karl A., “Punitive Damages after BMW v. Gore”, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Spring, 1997, Vol.16, No.1, 163-172.
  • Nomer Haluk Nami, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 18. Baskı, 2021.
  • Nordin Emily, “The Penalty Clause Bias”, Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, 2014, Vol.21 No.1, 162-187.
  • Oğuzman Kemalettin / Öz Turgut, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler Cilt 2, Vedat Kitapçılık, İstanbul, 16. Baskı, 2021.
  • Oluwadamilola Odetola, “Penalties and Liquidated Damages in a Changing World: Rethinking the Common Law Position”, AFE Babalola The Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 2015, Volume:6, Issue: 1, s. 248- 271.
  • OˋSullivian Janet, “Lost on Penalties”, The Cambridge Law Journal, November 2014, Vol.73, No.3, 480-483.
  • Owen David G., “A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform”, Villanova Law Review, 1994, Volume 39, Issue 2, 363-463.
  • Pargendler Mariana “The Role of the State in Contract Law: The Common-Civil Law Divide”, The Yale Journal of International Law, 2018, Volume 43, s. 144-189.
  • Pressman Michael, “The Two-Contract Approach to Liquidated Damages: A New Framework for Exploring the Penalty Clause Debate”, Virginia Law Business Review, 2013, Vol.7, Number 4, 651-708.
  • Reed Benjamin B., "Liquidated Damages Provisions: Strategic Drafting and Enforcement Issues", Franchise Law Journal, 2018, Vol. 37, No. 4, 523-552.
  • Rubin Paul H., “Unenforceable Contracts: Penalty Clauses and Specific Performance”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 1981, Vol.10, No.2, 237-247.
  • Sarı Suat, ““Götürü Tazminat” Kavramı Üzerine”, Medeni Hukukta Güncel Sorunlar ve Önemli Gelişmeler Sempozyumu: Medeni Hukuk Hocalarına Saygı Günleri, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Mayıs 2011, 299-304.
  • Saidov Djakhongir, “Damage to Business Reputation and Goodwill under the Vienna Sales Convention”, Contract Damages: Domestic and International Perspectives, Ed. by. Djakhongir Saidov, Ralph Cunnington, Hart Publishing, Oregon, 1th Edition, 2008.
  • Schlechtriem Peter / Schwenzer Ingeborg, Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 3rd Edition, 2010.
  • Schmit Joan T. / Pritchett S. Travis / Fields Paige, “Punitive Damages: Punishment or Further Compensation”, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1988, Vol. 55, No. 3, 453-466.
  • Schwenzer Ingeborg/ Hachem Pascal / Kee Christopher, Global Sales and Contract Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1St Edition, 2012.
  • Scott Robert E. / Triantis George G., “Embedded Options in the Case Against Compensation in Contract Law”, Columia Law Review, 2004, Vol.104, 1428-1491.
  • Sebok Anthony J., “Punitive Damages in the Unıted States”, Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives by Helmut Koziol Vanessa Wilcox, Springer Verlag, Vienna, 1th Edition, 2009, 155-189.
  • Solorzano Jonathan S., “An Uncertain Penalty: A Look at the International Community's Inability to Harmonize the Law of Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses”, Law & Business Review of the Americas, 2009, Volume 15, Number 4, 779-818.
  • Stone Rebecca, “Economic Anaylsis of Contract Law from the Internal Point of View”, Columbia Law Review, December 2016, Vol. 116, No.8, 2005-2057.
  • Şanlı Cemal /Esen Emre / Figenmeşe Ataman İnci, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Beta Basım, İstanbul, 2020, 8. Baskı, s. 407.
  • Şenol Hatice Kübra Erçoşkun, “Sözleşmenin İçeriğini Belirleme Özgürlüğü ve Bunun Genel Sınırı: TBK M. 27”, İstanbul Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2016, C. LXXIV, S. 2, 709-737, s.709.
  • Taliadoros Jason, “The Roots of Punitive Damages at Common Law”, Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, Volume 64, 251-302.
  • Talley Eric L., "Contract Renegotiation, Mechanism Design, and the Liquidated Damages Rule", Stanford Law Review, 1994, Vol, 46, No. 5, 1195-1243, s. 1196
  • Tanrıver Süha, Medeni Usul Hukuku Cilt I, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara, 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Taşkın Zeynep Damla, “Borçlunun Kusurunun Ceza Koşulu Anlaşması Üzerine Etkisi” Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Aralık 2020, Cilt 26, Sayı 2, 1305-1348.
  • Tekelioğlu Numan, “İnşaat Sözleşmelerinde Cezai Şart ve Götürü Tazminat” Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi, 2017, Sayı 2, 159-186.
  • Tekinay Selahattin Sulhi / Burcuoğlu Haluk / Akman Sermet / Altop Atilla, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Filiz Kitapevi, İstanbul: 6. Baskı, 1988. Tiwari, Avni, "Transfer of Technology Agreements and Competition Law", Supremo Amicus, 2019, Volume 13 45-50.
  • Tomescu Raluca Antoanetta, "Tort Liability. Damages and Penalty Clause", Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 2018, Vol. 7 No. 2, s. 254- 259.
  • Topçu Deniz, Patent Lisans Sözleşmeleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2021.
  • Tunçomağ Kenan, Cezai Şart, Baha Matbaası, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 1963.
  • Ulusu Ayşe Elif, Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin BM Antlaşmasında ve Avrupa Borçları Hukuku Prensiplerinde Tazminat Sorumluluğunun Sınırlandırılması: Öngörülebilirlik İlkesi, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2011.
  • Uzun Tuba Birinci, Götürü Tazminat, Yetkin Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1. Baskı, 2015.
  • Wade Patricia, "United Kingdom - Outside the Penalty Box - The Latest on Liquidated Damages", Construction Law International, 2009, Vol. 4, No. 2, s. 11- 13.
  • Wilcox Vanessa, Punitive Damages in England, Punitive Damages Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives, Springer Verlag, Wien, 1th Edition, 2009.
  • Yağcıoğlu Burcu, Türk ve İsviçre Hukuku’nda Ceza Koşulu (Cezai Şart), Seçkin, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2022.
  • Yıldırım Ayça Akkayan, “Cezai Şartın İşlevi Türk Amerikan Hukukları Açısından Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 2003,C. LXI, S. 1-2, 357-414.
  • Yılmaz Ejder, Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu Şerhi Cilt 3, Yetkin Hukuk Yayınları, Ankara: 4. Baskı, 2021.
  • Yılmaz Süleyman, Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) Uyarınca Sözleşmenin İhlalinde Alıcının Hakları, Yetkin Yayınları , Ankara, 1. Baskı, 2013.
  • Zeller Bruno, "When Is a Fixed Sum Not a Fixed Sum but a Penalty Clause", Journal of Law and Commerce, 2012, Vol.30, 173-184.
  • Zeytin Zafer, Milletlerarası Mal Satım Sözleşmeleri (CISG) Hukuku, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2. Baskı, 2015.
  • Zimmermann Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Oxford University Press Oxford: 1st Edition, 1996.
  • https://casetext.com/case/banta-v-stamford-motor-co
  • https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/453299?ln=en
  • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri= CELEX:32014R0316&from=EN
  • https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district- courts/FSupp/505/1072/1950596/.
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-3-hd-e-2020-6904-k-2021-921-t-04-02- 2021/4048677/
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-3-hd-e-2017-5855-k-2019-2884-t-03-04- 2019/3581844/
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-19-hd-e-2015-17632-k-2016-9261-t-24-05- 2016/2502725/.
  • https://legalbank.net/belge/y-22-hd-e-2014-8596-k-2015-19057-t-01-06- 2015/2415465/
  • https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTM Content?doc umentId=0900001680505599.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media- documents/uncitral/en/19- 09951_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media- documents/uncitral/en/1997- model-law-insol-2013-guide-enactment-e.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/19-08779_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/19- 09955_e_ebook.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/vol14-p272-273-e.pdf.
  • https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/ uncitral/en/1997- model-law-insol-2013-guide-enactment-e.pdf
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/559/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/538/408/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/532/424/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/512/415/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/1/
  • https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/492/257/
  • http://webftp.gazi.edu.tr/hukuk/sorumluluk/s_5.pdf
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1964/1.html.
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1909/1.html
  • https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1915/1.html
  • http://www.cisgac.com/file/repository/Turkish_No_10_SON.pdf.
  • https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.principles.parts.1.to.3.2002/9.509. html.
  • https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-304.
  • https://www.law.kuleuven.be/personal/mstorme/2009_02_DCFR_Outli neEdition. pdf .
  • https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/commercial-contracts/unidroit- principles- 2016
  • https://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/p rinciples2016 -e.pdf.
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/400200/_/pecl/#head_153
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/450300/_/american-restatement-2nd-of-the- law-of-contracts/
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/382600/_/yam-seng-pte-limited-v- international-trade-corporation-limited-01st-february-2013-%5B2013%5D-ewhc- 111-/.
  • https://www.trans-lex.org/302900/_/philips-hong-kong-ltd-v-att-gen-of- hong-kong- 61-build-l-r-(1993)-at-49/df
  • https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0280-judgment.pdf
  • https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/licensing/903/wipo_pub_903.p
  • https://www.wipo.int/technology-transfer/en/agreements.html
Toplam 136 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Özel Hukuk ve Medeni Yükümlülükler (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Mükerrem Onur Başar Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-5002-6132

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Başar, M. O. (2023). Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi. Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 269-321. https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1324550
AMA Başar MO. Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi. TAÜHFD. Haziran 2023;5(1):269-321. doi:10.59933/tauhfd.1324550
Chicago Başar, Mükerrem Onur. “Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat Ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson Ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi”. Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 5, sy. 1 (Haziran 2023): 269-321. https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1324550.
EndNote Başar MO (01 Haziran 2023) Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi. Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 5 1 269–321.
IEEE M. O. Başar, “Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi”, TAÜHFD, c. 5, sy. 1, ss. 269–321, 2023, doi: 10.59933/tauhfd.1324550.
ISNAD Başar, Mükerrem Onur. “Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat Ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson Ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi”. Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 5/1 (Haziran 2023), 269-321. https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1324550.
JAMA Başar MO. Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi. TAÜHFD. 2023;5:269–321.
MLA Başar, Mükerrem Onur. “Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat Ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson Ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi”. Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 5, sy. 1, 2023, ss. 269-21, doi:10.59933/tauhfd.1324550.
Vancouver Başar MO. Teknoloji Transferi Sözleşmeleri Örneğinde Götürü Tazminat ve Ceza Koşulu Hükümlerinin Anglo Sakson ve Türk Hukuku Perspektifinden Değerlendirilmesi. TAÜHFD. 2023;5(1):269-321.
 Kapak Resmi İndir