The Effects of Urban Poverty: An Evaluation on Students' Experiences

Öz

Children of urban poor families living in cities may be deprived of many opportunities offered by the city, especially quality education and quality life. This study aims to determine the situations that may affect the education life of children and to reveal their characteristics within the framework of face-to-face interviews with the children of urban poor families. The study was carried out using a phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods. While choosing the study group, attention was paid to the fact that the students were urban poor and had a secondary disadvantage (broken family, imprisoned parents, having different ethnic origins, etc.). In this direction, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 14 students and a semi-structured interview form was used. The data obtained from the interviews were analyzed by content analysis technique. The findings of the study are presented in order, regarding the family and home arrangement, the neighborhood they live in, the sociocultural environment, and the needs of the participating children. In light of these findings, how urban poverty affects quality education outcomes is discussed. It has been suggested that adverse effects can be improved by the coordinated work of teachers, school administrators, families, and other social actors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urban poverty
• ecological system
• disadvantaged students

Kent Yoksulluğunun Etkileri: Öğrencilerin Deneyimleri Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Kentlerde yaşayan kent yoksulu ailelerin çocukları başta nitelikli eğitim ve kaliteli yaşam olmak üzere kentin sunduğu birçok olanaktan mahrum olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada kent yoksulu ailelerin çocukları ile yüz yüze yapılan derinlemesine görüşmeler çerçevesinde çocukların öğrenim hayatına etki edebilecek durumları belirlemek ve özelliklerini ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenolojik desen kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubu seçilirken, öğrencilerin kent yoksulu olmalarını ve ikincil bir dezavantaja sahip olma durumlarına (parçalanmış aile, mahkûm ebeveyn, farklı etnik kökene sahip olma vs) dikkat edilmiştir. Bu doğrultuda 14 öğrenciyle yüz yüze görüşmeler yapılmış ve görüşmelerde yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler içerik analizi tekniğiyle çözümlenmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları katılımcı çocukların aile ve ev düzenine, oturdukları mahalleye, sosyo-kültürel ortamına ve ihtiyaçlarına ilişkin olmak üzere sırasıyla sunulmuştur. Bu bulgular ışığında kent yoksulluğunun nitelikli eğitim çıktılarını nasıl etkilediği tartışılmıştır. Olumsuz etkilerin öğretmenler, okul yöneticileri, aile ve diğer sosyal aktörlerin koordineli bir şekilde çalışmasıyla iyileştirilebileceğine yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kent yoksulluğu
• ekolojik sistem
• dezavantajlı öğrenciler
• ecological system
• disadvantaged students

Kaynakça

1. Akar, H. (2010). Challenges for schools in communities with internal migration flows: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.11.003
2. Angrist, J. & Lang, K. (2004). Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston’s Metco Program. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1613-1634. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828043052169 Aslanargun, E., Bozkurt, S. & Sarıoğlu, S. (2016). Sosyo-ekonomik değişkenlerin öğrencilerin akademik başarısı üzerine etkileri. [The impacts of socioeconomic variables on the academic success of the students]. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(27/3), 214-234.
3. Avcı, M. (2008). Tutuklu çocuklar üzerine bir araştırma: Çocukların suça yönelmesinde etkili olan toplumsal nedenler ve çözüm önerileri. [A study on detained children: Social reasons and solution suggestions for children's tendency towards crime]. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 11(1), 49-73.
4. Baker, J. L. (2008). Urban poverty: a global view. World Bank Group.
5. Barış, İ. (2009). Sokakta yaşayan çocuklar ve aileleri (İstanbul örneği). [Children living on the streets and their families (Istanbul case study)]. Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, 0(39), 87-114.
6. Berigel, S. & Eroğlu, İ. (2019). Türkiye’de çocuk işçiliğinin dinamikleri. [The dynamics of child labor in Turkey]. Social Sciences Researches Journal, (Special issue), 39-56.
7. Berman, J.D., McCormack, M.C., Koehler, K.A., Connolly, F., Clemons-Erby, D., Davis, M.F., Gummerson, C., Leaf, P.J., Jones, T.D. & Curriero, F.C. (2018). School environmental conditions and links to academic performance and absenteeism in urban, mid-Atlantic public schools. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 221(5), 800-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.04.015
8. Black, M. M. & Krishnakumar, A. (1998). Children in low-income, urban settings: Interventions to promote mental health and well-being. American Psychologist, 53(6), 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.6.635

9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development, 45(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127743
10. Bronfenbrenber, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University.https://khoerulanwarbk.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/urie_bronfenbrenner_the_ecology_of_human_developbokos-z1.pdf
12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
13. Capra, T. (2009). Poverty and its impact on education: Today and tomorrow. Thought & Action, 75-81.
14. Chamhuri, N. H., Karim, H. A. & Hamdan, H. (2012). Conceptual Framework of urban poverty reduction: A review of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 804-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.268
15. Cole, J. (2011). A research review: The importance of families and the home environment. National Literacy Trust. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521654.pdf
16. Conger, R. D. & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551
17. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (3rd Edition). SAGE.
18. Dirikoç, A. & Akıllı, H. (2017). Türkiye’de kent yoksulluğu ve çocuk: Nevşehir Örneği. [Urban poverty and children in Turkey: The case of Nevsehir] Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 26, 197-224.
19. Duan, W., Guan, Y. & Bu, H. (2018). The effects of parental involvement and socioeconomic status on junior school students’ academic achievement and school behavior in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00952
20. Duran, R. (2022). Türkiye aile yapısının geleceğine yönelik çıkarımların değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of implications for the future of the family structure of Turkey]. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Women’s and Family Studies, 2(1), 147-164.
21. Durgun, Ö. (2011). Türkiye’de yoksulluk ve çocuk yoksulluğu üzerine bir inceleme. [A study on poverty and child poverty in Turkey]. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, 6(1), 143-154.
22. Durgun, Ö. & Çak, D. (2010). Yoksul kent nüfusunun istihdam yapısı ve geçinme biçimleri: İstanbul örneği. [Employment structure and subsistence patterns of poor urban population: The case of Istanbul]. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, (20), 32-55.
23. Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(1), 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.03.003
24. Fırat, A. S. (2008). Yoksulluk, kentlerde suç artışı ve kent merkezlerinde özel güvenlik hizmetleri verilmesi. [Poverty, urban crime, and the provision of private security services in urban centers]. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(3), 201-228.
25. Gehrke, R. S. (2005). Poor schools poor students successful teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(1), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2005.10532079
26. Gilpin, G. A. (2012). Teacher salaries and teacher aptitude: An analysis using quantile regressions. Economics of Education Review, 31(3), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.01.003
27. Gürler-Hazman, G. (2010). Kentsel yoksulluk sorunu ve belediyelerin rolü. [The problem of urban poverty and municipalities’ roles]. Türk İdare Dergisi, 467, 135-152.
28. Hancı, İ. H. (1995). Gecekondulaşma ve çocuk suçluluğu. [Slums and juvenile delinquency]. Turkish Journal of Forensic Medicine, 11, 55-62.
29. Harris, A. & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802309424
30. Hermansen, A. S. & Birkelund, G. E. (2015). The impact of immigrant classmates on educational outcomes. Social Forces, 94(2), 615-646.
31. Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation. NBER working paper 7867. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7867
32. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1981). Çocuğun değeri: Türkiye’de değerler ve doğurganlık. [The value of the child: Values and fertility in Turkey]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi.
33. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Kültürel psikoloji: Kültür bağlamında insan ve aile. [Cultural psychology: People and family in the context of culture]. Evrim.
34. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. & Ataca, B. (2017). Çocuğun değeri ve aile değişimi: Türkiye’den otuz yıllık bir portre. [The value of the child and family change: A thirty-year portrait from Turkey]. Journal of Sociology, (35), 77-101.
35. Kaplan, A. (2021). Türkiye’de aile yapısında ve kültüründe yakın gelecekte önem kazanacak gelişmelerin değerlendirilmesi. [In family structure and culture in Turkey evaluation of developments that will get important in the near future]. International Journal of Social Work Research, 1(2), 69-81.
36. Kiser, L. J. (2007). Protecting children from the dangers of urban poverty. Clinical Psychological Review, 27(2), 201-225. https://10.1016/j.cpr.2006.07.004
37. Koç, İ. (2018). Türkiye’de aile yapısının değişimi sürecinde tek ebeveynli ailelerin oluşumu, belirleyicileri ve refah durumu (2006-2016). [Formation, determinants and welfare status of single-parent families in the process of changing family structure in Turkey (2006-2016)]. Y. Esen ve C. Nuhrat (Ed.), Türkiye aile yapısı ileri istatistik analizi (s. 33-85) içinde. [In Advanced statistical analysis of family structure in Turkey (pp. 33-85)]. Ministry of Family, Labor, and Social Services Türkiye.
38. Konuk-Şener, D. & Ocakçı, A. F. (2014). Yoksulluğun çocuk sağlığı üzerine çok boyutlu etkileri. [Multidimensional effects of poverty on child health]. Ankara Journal of Health Services, 13(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ashd_0000000098
39. Koray, M. (2010). Büyüyen yoksulluk-yoksunluk sorunu ve sosyal hakların sınırları. [The growing problem of poverty and deprivation and the limits of social rights]. Siyasal: Journal of Political Sciences, (42), 1-31.
40. Lavy, V. & Schlosser, A. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 1-33. https://10.1257/app.3.2.1
41. Liu, X. & Lu, K. (2008). Student performance and family socioeconomic status: Results from a survey of compulsory education in Western China. Chinese Education and Society, 41(5), 70-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932410505   Macit, Y. (2020). Türkiye’de aile ve kültürel yapıda meydana gelmesi düşünülen değişimlerin yaşlanma, yoksulluk ve evlilik kurumu açısından değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of changes in family and cultural structure in Turkey in terms of aging, poverty, and marriage institution]. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Journal of Health Sciences, 1(3), 149-157.
42. Marcenko, M., Lyons, S. J. & Courtney, M. (2011). Mothers’ experiences, resources and needs: The context for reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(3), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.020
43. Mutlu, V. E. (2017). Türkiye’de çocuk hakları ve kentsel yoksulluk. [Urban poverty and child rights in Turkey]. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, (35), 51-57.
44. Othman, A., Mohd Ali, H., Hussien, S., Abdullah, M. A., Ruslan, N. & Souad, M. (2021). Influence of urban poverty on students’ academic optimism: Does government assistance play a role? IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 9(4), 37-57. https://10.31436/ijes.v9i4.378
45. Owusu-Acheaw, M. & Larson, A. G. (2014). Reading habits among students and its effect on academic performance: A study of students of Koforidua Polytechnic Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2908&context=libphilprac
46. Özbay, F. (2009). Urban poverty and social exclusion [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. İstanbul University.
47. Özbek-Sönmez, İ. (2007). Concentrated urban poverty: the case of Izmir area, Turkey. European Planning Studies, 15(3), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310601017026
48. Öztürk, A.B. (2008). Rights to life, health, and nutrition in the context of child poverty. Society and Social Work, 19(2), 67-80.
49. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & Evaluation methods. SAGE.
50. Pelton, L. (2015). The continuing role of material factors in child maltreatment and placement. Child Abuse & Neglect, (41), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.001
51. Petersen, A. (1993). Presidential address: Creating adolescents: The role of context and process in developmental trajectories. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3(1), 1-18.
52. Radyo ve Televizyon Üst Kurulu. (2021, 14 April). Supreme board decisions. Retrieved on July 12, 2022 from https://www.rtuk.gov.tr/UstKurulKarar/Detay/15896.
53. Rodríguez, L. F. & Conchas, G. Q. (2009). Preventing truancy and dropout among urban middle school youth: Understanding community-based action from the student’s perspective. Education and Urban Society, 41(2), 216-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124508325681
54. Russell, M., Harris, B. & Gockel, A. (2008). Parenting in poverty: Perspectives of high-risk parents. Journal of Children and Poverty, 14(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10796120701871322
55. Ryan, A. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents' motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101-111. https://10.1207/T15326985EP3502_4
56. Ryan, D. & Paquette, D. (2001). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. https://dropoutprevention.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/paquetteryanwebquest_20091110.pdf
57. Sadıkoğlu, Z. Z. (2022). Modern Türk aile yapısında ve kadınların uğraşlarında değişme. [Change in modern Turkish family structure and women's occupations]. Journal of TESAM Akademy, 9(1), 317-347. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.986225
58. Satterthwaite, D. (2001). Reducing urban poverty: Constraints on the effectiveness of aid agencies and development banks and some suggestions for change. Environment and Urbanization, 13(1), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300111
59. Silva-Laya, M., D’Angelo, N., García, E., Zúñiga, L. & Fernández, T. (2020). Urban poverty and education. A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 29. 100280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.002
60. Spengler, M., Gottschling, J., Hahn, E., Tucker-Drab, E.M., Harzer, C. & Spinath, F.M. (2018). Does heritability of cognitive abilities vary as a function of parental education? Evidence from a German twin sample. Plos One, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196597
61. Sümer, O. (2022). Kent yoksulluğu ile mücadelede yerel yönetimlerin rolü. [Role of local administrations in combating urban poverty]. Planlama, 32(2), 221-246. https://10.14744/planlama.2021.53215
62. Tabak, H. (2020) Eğitime aile katılımı: Sosyo-ekonomik özellikler etkiliyor mu?. [Parental involvement in education: Does it affect socio-economic characteristics?]. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 39(1), 104-121.
63. Tarikci, S. & Eraslan, F. (2015). Kültürel ve sosyal hizmet modeli oluşturulması için yoksulluk araştırması. [Poverty survey for cultural and social service modeling]. The Community Volunteers Foundation. https://e-kutuphane.ihem.barobirlik.org.tr/items/9b7c4b15-c545-4c37-a542-adfb032de1e1
64. Topal, M. (2020). Modernleşme bağlamında Türkiye’de ailenin dönüşümü. [The transformation of the family in Turkey in the context of modernization]. E. Dindi, A. İnan-Kılıç, D. Fırıncı ve F. Koçak (Ed.). In International family symposium contemporary opportunities/threats for the survival of the family institution book of proceedings volume-I (pp. 381-398). Sinop University Press and Public Relations Directorate. https://www.academia.edu/45587801/Modernle%C5%9Fme_Ba%C4%9Flam%C4%1nda_T%C3%BCrkiyede_Ailenin_D%C3%B6n%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCm%C3%BC
65. Turkheimer, E., Beam, C.R., Sundet, J.M. & Tombs, K. (2017). Interaction between parental education and twin correlations for cognitive ability in a Norwegian conscript Sample. Behavioral Genetics, 47(5), 507-515. https://10.1007/T10519-017-9857-z
66. Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B. & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Psychological Science, 14(6), 623-628. https://10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x
67. Vandenberghe, V. (2002). Evaluating the magnitude and the stakes of peer effects analysing science and math achievement across OECD. Applied Economics, 34, 1283-1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110094446
68. Walsh, M. E., Madaus, G. F., Raczek, A. E., Dearing, E., Foley, C., An, C. & Beaton, A. (2014). A new model for student support in high-poverty urban elementary schools: Effects on elementary and middle school academic outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 704-737. https://10.3102/0002831214541669
69. Won-Kim, S. (2018). Parental involvement in developing countries: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.07.006
70. Yamanoğlu, M. A. (2006). Kent yoksulu gençlerin yaşam koşulları ve yoksulluğun yeniden üretimi. [Living conditions of urban poor youth and reproduction of poverty]. Turkish Review of Communication Studies, 4(1), 9-48. https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12575/ 63029/19177.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
71. Yavuz, S. & Güllüpınar, F. (2019). Türkiye’de çocuğun ekonomik değerini etkileyen faktörler: 2016 Aile Yapısı Araştırması analizi üzerinden sosyolojik bir değerlendirme. [Factors affecting children’s economic value in Turkey: A sociological analysis of the 2016 family structure research]. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 39(2), 379-409. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2019.39.2.0101
72. Yenipınar, Ş. & Yıldırım, K. (2017). Analyzing the psychological unsafety in schools in terms of individual and institutional variables. Educational Administration Theory and Practice, 23(4), 717-747. https://10.14527/kuey.2017.022
73. Yetim, N. & Çağlayandereli, M. (2007). Toplumsal algı boyutuyla sokakta çalışan çocuklar: Mersin örneği. [Children working on the streets in terms of social perception: Mersin case]. The Journal of Sociology, 3(14), 32-55.
74. Yıldız, Ö. (2006). Türkiye’de çocuk işçi sorununun toplumsal görünümü. [The social prospect of the problem of child labour in Turkey]. Journal of Qafqaz University, (18), 134-139.
75. Yılmaz, B. (2006). Yakındaki uzak: İstanbul’un bir kentiçi mahallesinde sosyal dışlanma ve mekânsal sürgün. [Nearby is distant: Social exclusion and spatial exile in an inner-city neighborhood of Istanbul]. F. Adaman & Ç. Keyder (Ed.). In Poverty and social exclusion in the gecekondu and slum neighborhoods of big cities in Turkey (pp. 27-39). European Commission, Local Community Action Program on Combating Social Exclusion 2002-2006. https://www.academia.edu/5228305/Yak%C4%B1ndaki_Uzak_ %C4%B0stanbul_un_bir_Kenti%C3%A7i_Mahallesinde_Sosyal_D%C4%B1%C5%9Flanma_ve_Mekansal_S%C3%BCrg%C3%BCn_ Zilberstein, K. (2016). Parenting in families of low socioeconomic status: A review with implications for child welfare practice. Family Court Review, 54(2), 221-231. https://10.1111/fcre.12222