Bitki yetiştirme ortamında torf, ahır gübresi ve kimyasal gübre uygulamalarına bazı toprak özelliklerinin tepkisi

Öz

Çalışmada torf, ahır gübresi ve kimyasal gübre uygulamalarının Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) yetiştirme ortamının toprak özellikleri üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Deneme, Toprak (T), Torf (Tf) ve Toprak:Torf:Ahır gübresi (T:Tf:AG), Toprak:Kum:Ahır gübresi (T:K:AG) olmak üzere altı farklı yetiştirme ortamı kullanılarak, her bir yetiştirme ortamı için 1:1:1 ve 2:1:1 oranlarında hem temel gübre uygulanarak hem de uygulanmaksızın, şansa bağlı deneme desenine göre üç tekrarlamalı olarak yürütülmüştür. Temel gübre olarak sırasıyla 100 mg kg-1 P2O5, 150 mg kg-1, K2O ve 250 mg kg-1 N Triple Süper Fosfat, K2SO4 ve (NH4)2SO4 olarak uygulanmıştır. Araştırmada en düşük pH ortalamaları kimyasal gübresiz ve kimyasal gübreli uygulamaların ikisinde de torf yetiştirme ortamında sırası ile 5.08 ve 5.10 olarak, en yüksek pH ortalaması 7.72 olarak kimyasal gübre uygulanmayan toprak ortamında belirlenmiştir. En düşük EC ortalaması kimyasal gübresiz uygulamalarda 791.66 µS cm-1 olarak torf yetiştirme ortamında, en yüksek EC ortalamaları ise kimyasal gübreli ve gübresiz uygulamaların her ikisinde de T:Tf:AG (1:1:1) yetiştirme ortamlarında sırası ile 4713.35 µS cm-1 ve 5860.00 µS cm-1 olarak bulunmuşlardır. En düşük organik madde içeriği ise kimyasal gübreli uygulamalarda T:K:AG (2:1:1) yetiştirme ortamında %0.76 olarak elde edilmiştir. En yüksek organik madde içerikleri kimyasal gübreli ve gübresiz uygulamaların her ikisinde de T:Tf:AG (1:1:1) yetiştirme ortamlarında sırası ile %12.14 ve %18.77 olarak bulunmuşlardır. Araştırma sonucunda, genel olarak ortamlardaki torf ve ahır gübresi oranı arttıkça organik madde içeriği ve EC değerlerinin arttığı, pH değerlerinin ise azaldığı belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yetiştirme ortamı
• Turba
• Ahır gübresi
• Kimyasal gübre
• Toprak özellikleri

Response of some soil properties to peat, farmyard manure and chemical fertilizer applications in plant growth media

Öz

The study investigates the effects of Peat, Farm Yard Manure and Chemical Fertilizer Applications on soil properties of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) growth media. The experiment was conducted using six different growing media as Soil (S), Peat (P) and Soil:Peat:Farmyard Manure (S:P:FYM), Soil:Sand:Farmyard Manure (S:Sand:FYM) in the ratios of 1:1:1 and 2:1:1 for each combined growth media both with and without the application of basic fertilizer and carried out in three replications according to the randomized experimental design. As a basic fertilizer 100 mg kg-1 P2O5, 150 mg kg-1, K2O and 250 mg kg-1 N were applied as triple super phosphate K2SO4 and (NH4)2SO4, respectively. In the study, the lowest pH means were determined as 5.08 and 5.10 in the peat ( Tf ) growth media in both the applications without and with chemical fertilizer, respectively, and the highest pH means was determined as 7.72 in the soil (S) media without chemical fertilizer application. The lowest EC means was found as 791.66 µS cm-1 in peat growth media in applications without chemical fertilizer, while the highest EC means were found as 4713.35 µS cm-1 and 5860.00 µS cm-1 in S:P:FYM (1:1:1) growth media in both chemical fertilizer and non-fertilizer applications, respectively. The lowest organic matter content was 0.76% in the S:Sand:FYM (2:1:1) growth media in chemical fertilizer applications. The highest organic matter contents were found in the S:P:FYM (1:1:1) growth media in both chemical fertilizer and non-fertilizer applications as 12.14% and 18.77%, respectively. As a result of the research, it was determined that, in general, as the proportion of peat and farmyard manure in the media increases, the organic matter content and EC values increase, while pH values decrease.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Growth media
• Peat
• Barn Manure
• Chemical Fertilizer
• Soil Properties

Kaynakça

1. Armanto ME. 2019. Comparison of chemical properties of peats under different land uses in south sumatra, indonesia. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(5), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/105440
2. Atiyeh RM, Subler S, Edwards CA, Bachman G, Metzger JD, Shuster W. 2000. Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia, 44(5), 579-590.
3. Bahuguna A, Sharma S, Yadav J. 2021. Effect of different organic sources on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil in inceptisols of varanasi. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i530436
4. Bandaogo AA, Ouattara K, Sermé I. 2020. Long term effect of tillage and organo-mineral fertilizer application on phosphorus dynamics on ferric lixisol in burkina faso. Journal of Agricultural Studies, 8(4), 240. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v8i4.17328
5. Bayrakli B, Gülser C. 2023. Changes in some physical properties of the soils tread with wheat straw and rice husk under the rotation of white-head cabbage, tomato and wheat. Soil Studies, 12(1), 30-39.
6. Black CA, 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
7. Bleizgys R, Povilaitis A, Pekarskas J, Naujokienė V. 2024. Effectiveness of the sustainable manure pile model for ammonia emission and soil. Agronomy, 14(7), 1475.
8. Candemır F, Gülser C. 2007. Changes in some chemical and physical properties of a sandy clay loam soil during the decomposition of hazelnut husk. Asian Journal of Chemistry 19 (3), 2452-2460.

9. Candemir F, Gülser C, 2011. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes at clay and loamy sand fields. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 42 (1):13-28.
10. Choo LNLK, Ahmed OH, Majid NMBN, Aziz ZFA. 2019. Improving nitrogen availability on a tropical peat soil cultivated with ananas comosus l. merr. using pineapple residue ash. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 20(2), 657-672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00154-4
11. Çelebi M. 2019. Effects of different growing media on the yield in tomato, cucumber and pepper, and on seedling in tomato. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.332857
12. Demir Z, Gülser C. 2021. Effects of rice husk compost on some soil properties, water use efficiency and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield under greenhouse and field conditions. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 52(9), 1051-1068.
13. Demirkaya S, Gülser C. 2025. Biochar innovations for sustainable agriculture: Acidification and zinc enrichment strategies to improve calcareous soil fertility and wheat yield. Soil and Water Research. 20(2):105-118.
14. Damulira G, Malaala A, Otim A, Florence N, Maphosa M. 2022. Soil amendments improved tomato growth, yield and soil properties. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13(07), 960-971. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.137063
15. Fornés F, Liu-Xu L, Lidón A, Sánchez‐García M, Cayuela ML, Sánchez-Monedero MÁ, Belda RM. 2020. Biochar improves the properties of poultry manure compost as growing media for rosemary production. Agronomy, 10(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020261
16. Goutami N, Rani P, Pathy RL, Babu PR. 2015. Soil properties and biological activity as influenced by nutrient management in rice- fallow sorghum. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology, 5(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v5i1.24581
17. Gülser F, Çığ A, Gökkaya TH, Atmaca H. 2020. Effects of different growing media on plant growth and nutrient contents of petunia (petunia hybrida). International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, 6(4), 302-309. https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.554693
18. Harris CN, Dickson RW, Fisher PR., Jackson BE, Poleatewich A. 2020. Evaluating peat substrates amended with pine wood fiber for nitrogen immobilization and effects on plant performance with container-grown petunia. HortTechnology, 30(1), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech04526-19
19. Hu Y, Mgelwa AS, Singh AN, Zeng D. 2018. Differential responses of the soil nutrient status, biomass production, and nutrient uptake for three plant species to organic amendments of placer gold mine‐tailing soils. Land Degradation and Development, 29(9), 2836-2845. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3002
20. Iyobe T, Haraguchi A. 2008. Ion flux from precipitation to peat soil in spruce forest–sphagnum bog communities in the ochiishi district, eastern hokkaido, japan. Limnology, 9(2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-007-0228-y
21. Jackson ML. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Verlag Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 498 S. DM 39.40.
22. Kumar S, Kumar TKS, Kumar R, Pathak D, Kumar D, Kumar A, Tiwari H. 2023. Assessment of physico-chemical properties of soil as influenced by different moisture regimes and nitrogen sources in wheat crop. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 35(19), 765-772. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i193609
23. Kwaghe EK, Saddiq AM, Solomon RI, Musa SA. 2017. Integrated nutrient management on soil properties and nutrient uptake by red onion. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(5), 471-475. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v5i5.471-475.927
24. Lazcano C, Arnold JT, Tato A, Zaller JG, Domínguez J. 2009. Compost and vermicompost as nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(4), 944-951. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009074-1107
25. Li R, Hao H, Hui S, Wang L, Wang H. 2022. Composted rabbit manure as organic matrix for manufacturing horticultural growing media: composting process and seedling effects. Sustainability, 14(9), 5146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095146
26. Ortiz-Delvasto N, García-Ibáñez P, Olmos‐Ruiz R, Bárzana G, Carvajal M. 2023. Substrate composition affects growth and physiological parameters of blueberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 308, 111528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111528
27. Rehim A, Khan M, Imran M, Bashir MA, Ul‐Allah S, Khan MN, Hussain M. 2020. Integrated use of farm manure and synthetic nitrogen fertilizer improves nitrogen use efficiency, yield and grain quality in wheat. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 15(1), 1360. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2020.1360
28. Romanyà J, Arco N, Solà-Morales Id, Armengot L, Sans FX. 2012. Carbon and nitrogen stocks and nitrogen mineralization in organically managed soils amended with composted manures. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(4), 1337-1347. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0456
29. Ronga D, Mantovi P, Pacchioli MT, Pulvirenti A, Bigi F, Allesina G, Prà AD. 2020. Combined effects of dewatering, composting and pelleting to valorize and delocalize livestock manure, improving agricultural sustainability. Agronomy, 10(5), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050661
30. Shober AL, Wiese C, Denny GC, Stanley CD, Harbaugh BK, Chen J. 2010. Plant performance and nutrient losses during containerized bedding plant production using composted dairy manure solids as a peat substitute in substrate. HortScience, 45(10), 1516-1521. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.45.10.1516
31. Skuodienė R, Repšienė R, Karčauskienė D, Matyžiūtė V. 2021. The effect of liming and organic fertilisation on the incidence of weeds in the crops of the rotation. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 108(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2021.108.004
32. SPSS, 2018. IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Steinberga V, Dubova L, Alsina I, Gmizo G, Malecka S. 2014. The Effect of Peat and Vermicompost Cavitation Products on the Soil Biological Activity. Proc. Latv. Univ. Agr, 32(327).
33. Uka UN, Chukwuka KS, Iwuagwu M. 2013. Relative effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth of okra Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade, 58(3), 159-166.
34. Wang X, Tong Y, Gao Y, Gao P, Fen L, Zhao Z, Pang Y. 2014. Spatial and temporal variations of crop fertilization and soil fertility in the loess plateau in china from the 1970s to the 2000s. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112273