Teaching and research nexus: Cases of research-based and research-led learning approaches in geographical education

Abstract

The central focus of current research in higher education has been on understanding and using the framework that comes from the conceptualization of the interaction between research and education in this context. The geography programs have notable deficiencies in their theoretical and conceptual aspects when it comes to discussing this subject. The primary aim of this research is to enhance the understanding of the connection between teaching and research in the field of Geography by providing examples from both the United Kingdom and Turkey. The objective here is to offer a theoretical and conceptual framework, together with practical examples, that demonstrate how researchbased learning enhances the quality of learning experiences for higher education students. This is achieved through studentfocused research projects. Consequently, it is hypothesized that implementing researchbased teaching methods in Geography programs and courses can enhance instructors' experiences and promote the adoption of effective educational practices.

Keywords

• Geography education
• esearchinformed teaching
• researchoriented teaching
• researchbased teaching
• researchteaching nexus
• higher education

Öğretme ve araştırma arasındaki ilişki: Coğrafya eğitiminde araştırma-odaklı ve araştırma-tabanlı uygulama örnekleri

Öz

Yükseköğretimde araştırma ve öğretme ilişkinin nasıl kavramsallaştırılacağı ve bu kavramsallaştırmadan çıkan çerçevenin nasıl uygulanabileceği yükseköğretim araştırmalarının son yıllarda tartıştığı en önemli konuların başında gelmektedir. Coğrafya programları özelinde bu konunun tartışılmasına yönelik teorik ve kavramsal boyutta önemli eksikler bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, coğrafya disiplini sınırları içerisinde öğretim ve araştırma ilişkisi perspektifinin nasıl geliştirilebileceğini ortaya koymaktır. Bu kapsamda, yükseköğretim öğrencilerinin öğrenme deneyimlerinin kalitesinin artırılmasında araştırma tabanlı öğrenmenin nasıl bir katkı sağladığına ilişkin teorik ve kavramsal çerçeve sunularak, bu süreçlere ilişkin yurtdışından (İngiltere) ve Türkiye’den birer iyi uygulama örneği sunulması hedeflenmektedir. Sonuç olarak, araştırma tabanlı öğrenmeye ilişkin iyi uygulama örneklerine dayalı olarak ortaya konulan sonuçlar çerçevesinde coğrafya programlarında ve farklı disiplinlerde verilen coğrafya derslerinde öğretim elemanlarının araştırma tabanlı öğretim uygulamalarına katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu araştırma aracılığıyla coğrafya bölümü müfredatlarının ve diğer müfredatlarda yer alan coğrafya alan derslerinde ise araştırma-odaklı ve araştırma-tabanlı uygulamalara yönelmek isteyen akademisyenlere bir yol göstericilik içermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Coğrafya eğitimi
• araştırma destekli
• araştırma-odaklı teaching
• araştırma-tabanlı öğretme
• araştırma-öğretim ilişkisi
• yükseköğretim

Kaynakça

1. Akdoğan, E., & Altınok, V. (2024). Türkiye’de yükseköğretimin misyonu ve etkililiği. Eğitim Yönetimi ve Politikaları Dergisi, 4(2), 16-31. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eypd
2. Badley, G. (2002) A really useful link between teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 443-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/135625102760553937
3. Barnett, R. (2003). Beyond all reason: Living with ideology in the university. Open University Press. Bilgili, M. (2018). The lack of ınterdisciplinarity in undergraduate geography teaching in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(2), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i2.2957
4. Butler, R. (2006). The tourism area life cycle (Vol. 1). Channel view publications.
5. Cihangir, E. & Şeremet, M. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in tourism-oriented vocational degree programmes in Turkey. In Pénzesné Kónya, E., Křeček, J., & Haigh, M. (Eds.), Environmental sustainability education for a changing world (pp.173-189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66384-1_11
6. Coe, N. M., & Smyth, F. M. (2010). Students as tour guides: Innovation in fieldwork assessment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902954095
7. Gottlieb, E. E., & Keith, B. (1997). The academic research-teaching nexus in eight advanced-industrialized countries. Higher Education, 34(3), 397-419. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1003028023964
8. Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287212

9. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507-542. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004507
10. Healey, M. (2005a). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130387
11. Healey, M. (2005b). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning, in R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67-78). SRHE and Open University Press.
12. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340008978967
13. Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B. & Short, C. (2003, April 9-11). The student experience of research and consultancy, SEDA-Society for Research into Higher Educational Joint Conference on the Scholarship of Academic and Staff Development: Research, Evaluation and Changing Practice [Conference presentation], Bristol.
14. Healey, M., Kneale, P., Bradbeer, J., & with other members of the INLT Learning Styles and Concepts Group. (2005). Learning styles among geography undergraduates: an international comparison. Area, 37(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00600.x
15. Higgitt, M. (1996). Addressing the new agenda for fieldwork in higher education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269608709382
16. Jenkins, A. (2000). The relationship between Teaching and Research: where does geography stand and deliver?. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(3), 325-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/713677414
17. Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2010). Undergraduate research and international initiatives to link teaching and research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 30(3), 36-42. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA228908818&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=10725830&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ec86d4fa9&aty=open-web-entry
18. Kent, M., Gilbertson, D. D., & Hunt, C. O. (1997). Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269708725439
19. Kropotkin, P. (1885). What geography ought to be. The Nineteenth Century, 18, 940-956. https://mirror.anarhija.net/lib.anarhija.net/mirror/p/pk/petr-kropotkin-what-geography-ought-to-be.pdf Liburd, J. J. (2012). Tourism research 2.0. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 883-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.10.006
20. Marvell, A. (2008). Student-led presentations in situ: The challenges to presenting on the edge of a volcano. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(2), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260701514173
21. Marvell, A., Simm, D., Schaaf, R., & Harper, R. (2013). Students as scholars: evaluating student-led learning and teaching during fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(4), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2013.811638
22. McEwen, L. (1996). Fieldwork in the undergraduate geography programme: Challenges and changes. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098269608709380
23. Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143643
24. Pawson, E., Fournier, E., Haigh, M., Muniz, O., Trafford, J., & Vajoczki, S. (2013). Problem-based learning in geography: Towards a critical assessment of its purposes, benefits and risks, in M.Healey, E.Pawson, M.Solem (Eds.), Active Learning and Student Engagement (pp. 58-71). Routledge.
25. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
26. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413937
27. Robertson, J., & Blackler, G. (2006). Students’ experiences of learning in a research environment. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600792889
28. Şeremet, M. & Cihangir, E. (2023). Fostering geocapabilities of students in Tourism Geography through Project-Based Learning (PBL) and volunteering approaches. In Karabatak, S. (Ed), Education & Science 2023IV (pp.177-200). Efe Academy Publishing. https://doi.org/10.59617/efepub202355
29. Şeremet, M. (2015). Türkiye ve İngiltere yükseköğretimindeki uluslararasılaşma politikalarına karşılaştırmalı bir yaklaşım. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.106
30. Şeremet, M. (2016). Yükseköğretim’de öğrenme deneyiminin öğrenci görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi: Coğrafya eğitimi örneği. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24, 1095-1120. https://arastirmax.com/en/system/files/dergiler/58088/makaleler/8/24/arastirmax-yuksekogretimde-ogrenme-deneyiminin-ogrenci-goruslerine-gore-degerlendirilmesi-cografya-egitimi-ornegi.pdf
31. Spronken-Smith, R. (2005). Implementing a problem-based learning approach for teaching research methods in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500130403
32. Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research?. Studies in Higher education, 35(6), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903315502
33. Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J. O., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2013). Where might sand dunes be on Mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography, in M.Healey, E.Pawson, M.Solem (Eds.), Active learning and student engagement (pp. 72-87). Routledge.
34. Van der Horst, D., Harrison, C., Staddon, S., & Wood, G. (2016). Improving energy literacy through student-led fieldwork–at home. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1089477
35. Wagner, C., Garner, M., & Kawulich, B. (2011). The state of the art of teaching research methods in the social sciences: Towards a pedagogical culture. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903452594
36. Winlow, H., Simm, D., Marvell, A., & Schaaf, R. (2013). Using focus group research to support teaching and learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(2), 292-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2012.696595