BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kuduz Riskli Temas Sonrası Başvuran Çocuk Olguların ve Profilaksi Uygulamalarımızın Geriye Dönük Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 104 - 107, 01.08.2018

Öz

Amaç: Kliniğimize kuduz riskli temas sonrası başvuran çocuk olguların epidemiyolojik verilerinin ve temas sonrası profilaksi uygulamalarının gözden geçirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2015- Aralık 2017 arasında kliniğimize başvuran kuduz riskli temaslı olguların retrospektif kayıtları incelendi.Bulgular: Kuduz riskli temas ile başvuran toplam 162 çocuk olgunun ortalama yaşları 9±4.8 yıl olup en sık temas %66.1 oranında erkek çocuktu. Kuduz riskli hayvan türü en sık %53.1 ile kedi olup aşılı hayvan yüzdesi %14.8’di. Temaslı kategorisi %61.1 kategori III, %38.9 kategori II’di. %59.3 üst ekstremite, %21 baş-boyun ve %19.8 alt ekstremite en sık kuduz riskli temas bölgeleriydi. Olguların %66.7’sinde temas çıplak deriden olup başvuru sırasında tüm olguların %86’sında yara bakımı yapılmadan merkezimize başvurmuştu. Yara bakımı yapılanların %79.3’ünde yalnızca antiseptik solüsyon ile yara bakımı yapıldığı öğrenildi. Kuduz aşılama oranı %95.1, immünoglobülin uygulanma oranları ise %46.9’di.Sonuç: Kuduz riskli hayvan ısırıkları fatalite oranı çok yüksek olduğundan temas sonrası profilaksi uygun ve zamanında yapıldığında %100 koruyucudur. Toplumun ve sağlık personelinin eğitimi kuduz riskini önlemede en önemli adımdır.

Kaynakça

  • Goldstein EJC. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds). Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2010: 3911-5.
  • WHO Technical Report Series. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85346/1/978924120982 3eng.pdf. Last accessed on 2014 Feb 07.
  • T.C Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Kuduz Saha Rehberi. Erişim tarihi: ?. Available from: https://www.tkhk.gov.tr/ Dosyalar/89f1102696e642c79edcccfe2a9c3fcf.pdf
  • Söğüt Ö, Sayhan MB, Gökdemir MT, Kara HP. Türkiye’nin güneydoğusunda önlenebilir bir halk sağlığı sorunu: Kuduz riskli temas olguları. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2011;10:14-7.
  • Zhu S, Guo C. Rabies control and treatment: From prophylaxis to strategies with curative potential. Viruses 2016;8:279.
  • Barrat J, Picard-Meyer E, Cliquet F. Rabies diagnosis. Dev Biol 2006;125:71-7.
  • Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention. Rabies. Atlanta: CDC; 2014. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/rabies/index.html. updated 15 March 2013; cited 31 August 2014.
  • Krzowska-Firych J, Tomasiewicz K, Kozİowska A. Post-exposure rabies prophylaxis in humans exposed to animals in Lublin province (Eastern Poland) in 2012-2015. A retrospective study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017;6:1-6.
  • Temiz H, Akkoç H. Diyarbakır Devlet Hastanesi Kuduz Aşı Merkezi- ne başvuran 809 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2008; 35:181-4.
  • Sahu KK, Manar MK, Singh SK, Singh H. Epidemiological characteristics of patients attending for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis at the infectious diseases hospital of lucknow, India. J Glob Infect Dis 2015;7:30-2.
  • Poorolajal J, Babaee I, Yoosefi R, Farnoosh F. Animal bite and deficiencies in rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Tehran, Iran. Arch Iran Med 2015;18:822-6.
  • Gülaçtı U, Üstün C, Gürger M, Şahan M, Satıcı Ö. Kuduz şüpheli temas vakalarının epidemiyolojisi ve kuduz profilaksisi uygulamasının değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012;32:759-65.
  • Shankaraiah RH, Rajashekar RA, Veena V, Hanumanthaiah AN. Compliance to anti-rabies vaccination in post-exposure prophylaxis. Indian J Public Health 2015;59:58-60.
  • Sudarshan MK, Madhusudana SN, Mahendra BJ, Rao NS, Ashwath Narayana DH, Abdul Rahman S, et al. Assessing the burden of human rabies in India: Results of a national multi-centre epidemiological survey. Int J Infect Dis 2007;11:29-35.
  • Ramezankhani R, Shirzadi MR, Ramezankhani A, Poor Mozafary J. A comparative study on the adverse reactions of Purified Chick Embryo Cell Vaccine (PCECV) and Purified Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (PVRV). Arch Iran Med 2016;19:502-7.
  • Kularatne SA, Ralapanawa DM, Weerakoon K, Bokalamulla UK, Abagaspitiya N. Pattern of animal bites and post exposure prophylaxis in rabies: A five-year study in a tertiary care unit in Sri Lanka. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16:62.

Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 104 - 107, 01.08.2018

Öz

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess epidemiological and anti-rabies vaccination status in children in our hospital.Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of the patients who presented to our clinic with complaint of animal bite between January 2015 and December 2017.Results: A total of 162 children presenting with animal bites were included in this study. The mean age was 9±4.8 years and 66.1% of the patients were boys. Most (53.1%) of the patients were injured by cats and 14.8% of the animals were vaccinated. In the study group, 61.1% of the patients had category III contact and 38.9% had category II contact. The wound was in the upper limbs in 59.3% of the patients, the head and neck in 21% and the lower limbs in 19.8%. Lesions were on the bare skin in 66.7% of the cases and 86% of the patients presented to our clinic without previous wound care. Only an antiseptic solution was used in 79.3% of the patients who had received wound care before admission. The vaccination rate was 95.1% and human rabies immune globulin was used in 46.9% of the patients.Conclusion: The outcome of an animal bite can be fatal. The only preventive and curative measures are anti-rabies vaccination and the use of human rabies immunoglobulin. Education of the population and health professionals is therefore crucial to ensure 100% compliance with appropriate management

Kaynakça

  • Goldstein EJC. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds). Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2010: 3911-5.
  • WHO Technical Report Series. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85346/1/978924120982 3eng.pdf. Last accessed on 2014 Feb 07.
  • T.C Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. Kuduz Saha Rehberi. Erişim tarihi: ?. Available from: https://www.tkhk.gov.tr/ Dosyalar/89f1102696e642c79edcccfe2a9c3fcf.pdf
  • Söğüt Ö, Sayhan MB, Gökdemir MT, Kara HP. Türkiye’nin güneydoğusunda önlenebilir bir halk sağlığı sorunu: Kuduz riskli temas olguları. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2011;10:14-7.
  • Zhu S, Guo C. Rabies control and treatment: From prophylaxis to strategies with curative potential. Viruses 2016;8:279.
  • Barrat J, Picard-Meyer E, Cliquet F. Rabies diagnosis. Dev Biol 2006;125:71-7.
  • Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention. Rabies. Atlanta: CDC; 2014. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/rabies/index.html. updated 15 March 2013; cited 31 August 2014.
  • Krzowska-Firych J, Tomasiewicz K, Kozİowska A. Post-exposure rabies prophylaxis in humans exposed to animals in Lublin province (Eastern Poland) in 2012-2015. A retrospective study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017;6:1-6.
  • Temiz H, Akkoç H. Diyarbakır Devlet Hastanesi Kuduz Aşı Merkezi- ne başvuran 809 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2008; 35:181-4.
  • Sahu KK, Manar MK, Singh SK, Singh H. Epidemiological characteristics of patients attending for rabies post-exposure prophylaxis at the infectious diseases hospital of lucknow, India. J Glob Infect Dis 2015;7:30-2.
  • Poorolajal J, Babaee I, Yoosefi R, Farnoosh F. Animal bite and deficiencies in rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Tehran, Iran. Arch Iran Med 2015;18:822-6.
  • Gülaçtı U, Üstün C, Gürger M, Şahan M, Satıcı Ö. Kuduz şüpheli temas vakalarının epidemiyolojisi ve kuduz profilaksisi uygulamasının değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012;32:759-65.
  • Shankaraiah RH, Rajashekar RA, Veena V, Hanumanthaiah AN. Compliance to anti-rabies vaccination in post-exposure prophylaxis. Indian J Public Health 2015;59:58-60.
  • Sudarshan MK, Madhusudana SN, Mahendra BJ, Rao NS, Ashwath Narayana DH, Abdul Rahman S, et al. Assessing the burden of human rabies in India: Results of a national multi-centre epidemiological survey. Int J Infect Dis 2007;11:29-35.
  • Ramezankhani R, Shirzadi MR, Ramezankhani A, Poor Mozafary J. A comparative study on the adverse reactions of Purified Chick Embryo Cell Vaccine (PCECV) and Purified Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (PVRV). Arch Iran Med 2016;19:502-7.
  • Kularatne SA, Ralapanawa DM, Weerakoon K, Bokalamulla UK, Abagaspitiya N. Pattern of animal bites and post exposure prophylaxis in rabies: A five-year study in a tertiary care unit in Sri Lanka. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16:62.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA36HF26CR
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Bilge Aldemir Kocabaş Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ağustos 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Ağustos 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kocabaş, B. A. (2018). Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic. Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease, 12(2), 104-107.
AMA Kocabaş BA. Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg. Ağustos 2018;12(2):104-107.
Chicago Kocabaş, Bilge Aldemir. “Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic”. Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease 12, sy. 2 (Ağustos 2018): 104-7.
EndNote Kocabaş BA (01 Ağustos 2018) Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic. Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease 12 2 104–107.
IEEE B. A. Kocabaş, “Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic”, Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg, c. 12, sy. 2, ss. 104–107, 2018.
ISNAD Kocabaş, Bilge Aldemir. “Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic”. Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease 12/2 (Ağustos 2018), 104-107.
JAMA Kocabaş BA. Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg. 2018;12:104–107.
MLA Kocabaş, Bilge Aldemir. “Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic”. Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease, c. 12, sy. 2, 2018, ss. 104-7.
Vancouver Kocabaş BA. Retrospective Assessment of Children Exposed to Animals and the Anti-Rabies Prophylaxis Practices in Our Clinic. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg. 2018;12(2):104-7.

13548  21005     13550