YAPAY ZEKA ÇAĞINDA DİPLOMASİ

Yıl 2022, , 91 - 112, 09.12.2022

Sefa Can Yılmazel

https://doi.org/10.55773/tda.1153159

Cited By: 2

Öz

Teknolojik gelişmeler toplumsal değişimin ve gelişimin önemli belirleyicisi ola gelmiştir. Topluluklar arası etkileşimin önemli bir aracı olarak diplomasi de teknolojik gelişmelerden dolayısıyla etkilenmektedir. Diplomasinin tarih boyunca teknolojik gelişmelerden etkilendiği ve bu doğrultuda dönüştüğü kabul edilmektedir. Demiryolunun yaygınlaşmasından telgrafın icadına değin diplomasinin bu tür teknolojik gelişmelerden etkilendiği ve bu teknolojilerle birlikte geliştiği düşünülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, günümüz dünyasının en önemli teknolojilerinden biri olarak kabul edilen yapay zekâ teknolojisinin de diplomasiyi etkileyeceği yerinde bir varsayım olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu makale de yapay zekâ teknolojisinin diplomasi üzerindeki etkilerini konu edinmektedir. Yapay zekâ çağında diplomasinin nasıl bir hâl aldığı diplomatik bir konu olarak yapay zekâ, diplomasinin uygulandığı ortamı şekillendiren bir faktör olarak yapay zekâ ve diplomatik bir araç olarak yapay zekâ şeklinde üç alt başlıkta ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yapay zeka, uluslararası ilişkiler, diplomasi

Kaynakça

• ACHARYA Amitav, Barry BUZAN, The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• ADESINA Olubukola S., “Foreign Policy in an Era of Digital Diplomacy”, Cogent Social Sciences, ed. James Summers, c. 3, sy. 1 (2017), s. 1297175.
• “Artificial Intelligence Is the Future of Warfare (Just Not in the Way You Think)”, Modern War Institute, 20.04.2020, https://mwi.usma.edu/artificial-intelligence-future-warfare-just-not-way-think/ (Çevrimiçi 25.07.2022).
• BERRIDGE Geoff, Alan JAMES, A dictionary of diplomacy, 2. bs., New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
• BJOLA Corneliu, “Diplomacy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence”, The Emirates Diplomatic Academy, January 2020.
• BJOLA Corneliu, Marcus HOLMES, (ed.), Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London ; New York: Routledge, 2015.
• BRISCOE Erica, James FAIRBANKS, “Artificial Scientific Intelligence and Its Impact on National Security and Foreign Policy”, Orbis, c. 64, No: 4, 2020, s. 544-54.
• BULL Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 4. bs., New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
• CHESSEN Matt, “Understanding the Psychology Behind Computational Propaganda”, thk. Shawn Powers, Markos Kounalakis, Can Public Diplomacy Survive the Internet? Bots, Echo Chambers, and Disinformation, United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, May 2017.
• CRESCI Elena, “Chatbot That Overturned 160,000 Parking Fines Now Helping Refugees Claim Asylum”, The Guardian, (06.03.2017), https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/06/chatbot-donotpay-refugees-claim-asylum-legal-aid, (Çevrimiçi 27.07.2022).
• “Cumhurbaşkanlığı Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi Başkanı: Dünya GAFAM’tan büyüktür”, www.haberturk.com, 28.02.2021, https://www.haberturk.com/cumhurbaskanligi-dijital-donusum-ofisi-baskani-dunya-gafam-tan-buyuktur-2988790 (Çevrimiçi 25.07.2022).
• DAFOE Allan, “AI Governance: A Research Agenda”, Centre for the Governance of AI Future of Humanity Institute University of Oxford, 2018.
• "diplomasi" TDK Sözlük Anlamı”, (27.07.2022), https://sozluk.gov.tr/?kelime=diplomasi (Çevrimiçi 15.07.2022).
• DREZNER Daniel W, “Technological Change and International Relations”, International Relations, C. 33, No: 2 (2019), s. 286-303.
• FARGE Emma, “U.N. Chief Urges Action on ‘killer Robots’ as Geneva Talks Open”, Reuters, (13.12.2021), https://www.reuters.com/world/un-chief-urges-action-killer-robots-geneva-talks-open-2021-12-13/ (Çevrimiçi 25.07.2022).
• GREGORY Bruce, “American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation”, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, c. 6, No: 3-4 (2011), s. 351-72.
• HAENLEİN Michael, Andreas KAPLAN, “A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence”, California Management Review, c. 61, No. 4 (2019), s. 5-14.
• HANER Justin, Denise GARCIA, “The Artificial Intelligence Arms Race: Trends and World Leaders in Autonomous Weapons Development”, Global Policy, c. 10, No: 3 (2019), s. 331-37.
• HOROWITZ Michael C., “Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power (May 2018)”, Texas National Security Review, c. 1, No: 3 (2018).
• ———, “When Speed Kills: Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, Deterrence and Stability”, Journal of Strategic Studies, c. 42, No. 6 (2019), s. 764-88.
• ISAAK Jim, Mina J. HANNA, “User Data Privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Privacy Protection”, Computer, c. 51, No: 8 (2018), s. 56-59.
• İSKİT Temel, Diplomasi: Tarihi, Teorisi, Kurumları ve Uygulaması, 7. bs., İstanbul: stanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2020.
• J. PASTOR-GALINDO vd., “The Not Yet Exploited Goldmine of OSINT: Opportunities, Open Challenges and Future Trends”, IEEE Access, c. 8 (2020), s. 10282-304.
• KATHARINA E. Höne, “Mapping the Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence for the Conduct of Diplomacy”, DiploFoundation, 2019.
• KISSINGER Henry, SCHMIDT Eric, HUTTENLOCHER Daniel, The age of AI: and our human future, Little Brown and Company, New York, 2021.
• KURBALIJA Jovan, “Diplomacy in the Age of Information Technology”, Innovation in Diplomatic Practice, ed. Jan Melissen, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1999, s. 171-91.
• LEIRA Halvard, “A Conceptual History of Diplomacy”, The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, ed. Costas M. Constantinou, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016.
• LIPSEY Richard G, Kenneth I CARLAW, Clifford T BEKAR, Economic transformations: general purpose technologies and long-term economic growth, OUP Oxford, 2005.
• MANHEIM Karl M., Lyric KAPLAN, “Artificial Intelligence: Risks to Privacy and Democracy”, 21 Yale Journal of Law and Technology 106, sy. 2018-37 (2018).
• MCCORDUCK Pamela, Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry Into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence., Place of publication not identified: CRC Press, 2019.
• PETRİČ Ernest, Foreign Policy: From Conception to Diplomatic Practice, Brill | Nijhoff, 2013.
• POLYAKOVA Alina, Chris MESEROLE, “Exporting digital authoritarianism The Russian and Chinese models”, Brookings, 08.2019.
• “Robots, Immune to Fear or Favour, Are Making China’s Foreign Policy”, South China Morning Post, 30.07.2018, https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2157223/artificial-intelligence-immune-fear-or-favour-helping-make (Çevrimiçi 27.07.2022).
• SANDRE Andreas, Twitter for Diplomats, Serbia: DiploFoundation, 2013.
• SATARIANO Adam, “The World’s First Ambassador to the Tech Industry”, The New York Times, (03.09.2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/03/technology/denmark-tech-ambassador.html (Çevrimiçi 25.07.2022).
• SCHULZKE Marcus, “Autonomous Weapons and Distributed Responsibility”, Philosophy & Technology, c. 26, No: 2 (2013), s. 203-19.
• SOFER Sasson, “Old and New Diplomacy: A Debate Revisited”, Review of International Studies, c. 14, sy. 3 (1988), ss. 195-211.
• SOUSA Weslei Gomes de v.dğr., “How and Where Is Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector Going? A Literature Review and Research Agenda”, Government Information Quarterly, c. 36, No: 4 (2019), s. 101392.
• SPIES Yolanda Kemp, Global Diplomacy and International Society, 1. bs., 2019., Cham: Springer International Publishing, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• WANG Pei, “On Defining Artificial Intelligence”, Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, c. 10, No: 2 (2019), s. 1-37. WILLIAMS Robyn, “‘New-new’ Diplomacy: A new Technological Dawn”, Digital Policy Studies, c. 1, No: 1 (2022), s. 27-38.