Investigation of February 6, 2023, Pazarcık and Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) Earthquakes in terms of Input Energy

Öz

Two major earthquakes with magnitudes of Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6 occurred on 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, which is located on active earthquake zones. Unfortunately, the earthquakes caused more than 50,000 casualties and significant structural damage in 11 different provinces. This study evaluated the Kahramanmaras earthquakes from an energy perspective. First of all, the acceleration records from seismic stations in the region most affected by the earthquakes were analyzed and the input energy spectra of each station was obtained. Consequently, the input energy density maps of the studied region for different period values are presented and evaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kahramanmaraş earthquakes
• Energy spectrum
• Input energy

6 Şubat 2023 Pazarcık ve Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) Depremlerinin Giren Enerji Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Aktif deprem kuşakları üzerine yer alan Türkiye’de, 6 Şubat 2023 tarihinde Mw =7.7 ve Mw =7.6 büyüklüğünde iki büyük deprem meydana gelmiştir. Depremler ne yazık ki 50.000'den fazla can kaybına neden olmuş ve 11 farklı ilde önemli yapısal hasarlara yol açmıştır. Bu çalışma kapsamında Kahramanmaraş depremleri enerji esaslı değerlendirilmiştir. Öncelikle depremlerin en çok etkilediği bölgede bulunan sismik istasyonlarda kaydedilen ivme kayıtları ele alınmış ve her bir istasyona ait giren enerji spektrumları elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak farklı periyot değerleri için çalışılan bölgeye ait giren enerji yoğunluk haritaları sunulmuş ve değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş depremleri
• Enerji spektrumu
• Giren enerji

Kaynakça

1. AFAD, 2023. 06 ŞUBAT 2023 PAZARCIK-ELBİSTAN KAHRAMANMARAŞ (Mw: 7.7 – Mw: 7.6) DEPREMLERİ RAPORU, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı Deprem ve Risk Azaltma Genel Müdürlüğü Deprem Dairesi Başkanlığı 02 Haziran 2023. Erişim adresi: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Kahramanmara%C5%9F%20Depremi%20%20Raporu_02.06.2023.pdf.
2. AFAD, 2025. Türkiye İvme Veritabanı ve Analiz Sistemi (TADAS), T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı, Afet ve Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Deprem Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara, Erişim adresi: https://tadas.afad.gov.tr/.
3. Altunsu E., Güneş O., Öztürk S., Sorosh S., Sarı A., Beeson S.T., 2024. Investigating the structural damage in Hatay province after Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquake sequences, Engineering Failure Analysis, 157, 107857, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107857.
4. Atar M., Ince O., Tas O.F., Ozmen A., Sayin E., 2024. Investigation of the Damage Conditions of Reinforced Concrete Buildings and Steel Structures in Malatya Province Following the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turk Deprem Arastirma Dergisi, 6(1), 60-80, https://doi.org/10.46464/tdad.1394039.
5. Avcil F., Işık E., İzol R., Büyüksaraç A., Arkan E., Arslan M.H., Aksoylu C., Eyisüren O., Harircihian E., 2024. Effects of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake on structures in Kahramanmaraş city, Natural Hazards 120(3), 2953-2991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06314-1.
6. Baltzopoulos G., Baraschino R., Chioccarelli E., Cito P., Vitale A., Iervolino I., 2023. Near‐source ground motion in the Mw=7. 8 Gaziantep (Turkey) earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 52(12), 3903-3912, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3939.
7. Bozkurt E., 2001. Neotectonics of Turkey–a synthesis, Geodinamica açta, 14(1-3), 3-30, https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2001.11432432 .
8. Cejka F., Zahradník J., Turhan F., Sokoz E., Gallovic F., 2023. Long-period directivity pulses of strong ground motion during the 2023 Mw7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake, Communications Earth and Environment 4(1), 413, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01076-x.

9. Chopra A.K., 1995. Dynamics of structures = Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, 1995.
10. Çalım F., Güllü A., Yüksel E., 2024. Comparison of Various Input Energy Spectra for the February 6th, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Sequence, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2024.2336202.
11. Decanini L.D., Mollaioli F., 1998. Formulation of elastic earthquake input energy spectra, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 27(12), 1503-1522, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199812)27:12<1503::AID-EQE797>3.0.CO;2-A.
12. Decanini L.D., Mollaioli F., 2001. An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demand, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(2), 113-137, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00102-0.
13. Dedeoğlu İ.Ö., Calayır Y., 2024. Türkiye’de meydana gelmiş depremlere dayalı elastik giren enerji üzerine bir araştırma, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(3), 1439-1454, https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1168898.
14. Dindar A.A., Yalçın C., Yüksel E., Özkaynak H., Büyüköztürk O., 2015. Development of earthquake energy demand spectra, Earthquake Spectra, 31(3), 1667-1689, https://doi.org/10.1193/011212EQS010M.
15. Erkek H., Yetkin M., 2023. Assessment of the performance of a historic minaret during the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6), Structures (58), 105620, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105620.
16. Erkmen C., Özsaraç V., Eravcı B., Tekin B.M., Kuterdem N.K., Yaman M., Albayrak H., Aktan T., Tepeuğur E., 2009. Doğu Anadolu Fayı’nın Paleosismolojisi Pilot Bölge: “Türkoğlu Gölbaşı Arası”. Türkiye Ulusal Jeodezi ve Jeofizik Birliği (TUJJB) Ulusal Deprem Programı Proje No: TUJJB-UDP-1-07 sonuç raporu, Ocak 2009.
17. Girmay N., Poulos A., Miranda E., 2024. Directionality and polarization of response spectral ordinates in the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Türkiye earthquake doublet. Earthquake Spectra, 40(1), 486-504, https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930231203989.
18. Isık E., 2023. Structural Failures of Adobe Buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) Earthquakes, Appl. Sci., 13(15), 8937, https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158937.
19. Isık E., Avcil F., Arkan E., Büyüksaraç A., İzol R., Topalan M., 2023a. Structural damage evaluation of mosques and minarets in Adıyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, Engineering Failure Analysis, 151, 107345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107345.
20. Isık E., Avcil F., Büyüksaraç A., İzol R., Arslan M.H., Aksoylu C., Harirchian E., Eyisüren O., Arkan E., Güngür M.Ş., Günay M., Ulutaş H., 2023b. Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 2023, Engineering Failure Analysis, 151, 107405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107405 .
21. Ivanov M.L., Chow W.K., 2023. Structural damage observed in reinforced concrete buildings in Adiyaman during the 2023 Turkiye Kahramanmaras Earthquakes, In Structures, 58, 105578, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105578.
22. Kahya V., Genç A.F., Sunca F., Roudanr B., Altunişik A.C., Yilmaz S., Günaydin M., Dok G., Kirtel O., Demir A., Aykanat B., Arslan M.E., Saribiyik A., Aydin F., Aslan B., Sezdirmez T., Tatar T., Emiroğlu M., Atmaca B., Adanur S., Atmaca E.E., Güleş O., Demirkaya E., Öztürk H., Akgül T., 2024. Evaluation of earthquake-related damages on masonry structures due to the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquakes: A case study for Hatay Governorship Building, Engineering Failure Analysis, 156, 107855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107855.
23. Kuwamura H., Galambos T.V., 1989. Earthquake load for structural reliability, Journal of Structural Engineering, 115(6), 1446-1462, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:6(1446).
24. Lashgari A., Soghrat M.R., Jafarian Y., Zafarani H., 2024. The 2023 Turkey–Syria Earthquake Sequence: Ground-Motion and Local Site-Effect Analyses for Kahramanmaras City, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(5), 877-899, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00917-2.
25. Ozturk M., Arslan M.H., Dogan G., Ecemis A.S., Arslan H.D., 2023a. School buildings performance in 7.7 Mw and 7.6 Mw catastrophic earthquakes in southeast of Turkey, Journal of Building Engineering, 79, 107810, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107810.
26. Ozturk M., Arslan M.H., Korkmaz H.H., 2023b. Effect on RC buildings of 6 February 2023 Turkey earthquake doublets and new doctrines for seismic design, Engineering Failure Analysis, 153, 107521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107521.
27. Sagbas G., Sheikhi Garjan R., Sarikaya K., Deniz D., 2024. Field reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence, Bulletin Earthquake Engineering, 22, 227-254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01741-8.
28. Sen F., Sunca F., Altunişik A.C., 2024. Seismic performance assessment of a base-isolated hospital building subjected to February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquakes (Mw 7.7 Pazarcık and Mw 7.6 Elbistan) and seismic fragility analysis considering different construction stages, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 185, 108876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108876.
29. TBDY, 2018. Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye.
30. SBB, 2023 Kahramanmaraş ve Hatay Depremleri Raporu, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı, Erişim adresi: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/2023-kahramanmaras-ve-hatay-depremleri-raporu/ .
31. Uang C.M., Bertero V.V., 1988. Use of energy as a design criterion in earthquake-resistant design (Vol. 88), Berkeley, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
32. Ucar T., Merter O., 2024. Ductility demands for stiffness-degrading SDOF systems under pulse-like ground motions of the 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) earthquake, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(6), 3243-3260, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01882-4.
33. Vuran E., Serhatoğlu C., Timurağaoğlu M.Ö., Smyrou E., Bal İ.E., Livaoğlu R., 2024. Damage observations of RC buildings from 2023 Kahramanmarasş earthquake sequence and discussion on the seismic code regulations, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01843-3.
34. Wang Z., Zhang W., Taymaz T., He Z., Xu T., Zhang Z., 2023. Dynamic rupture process of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake (SE Türkiye): Variable rupture speed and implications for seismic hazard, Geophysical Research Letters, 50(15), e2023GL104787, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104787.
35. Wu F., Xie J., An Z., Lyu C., Taymaz T., Irmak T.S., Li X., Wen Z., Zhou B., 2023. Pulse-like ground motion observed during the 6 February 2023 MW7. 8 Pazarcık Earthquake (Kahramanmaraş, SE Türkiye), Earthquake Science, 36(4), 328-339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2023.05.005.
36. Yetkin M., 2024. 6 Şubat 2023 depremleri için kırsaldaki yığma yapıların performansları üzerine bir saha araştırması: Nurdağı/Gaziantep örneği, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(3), 821-837, https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.1430177.
37. Yetkin M., Dedeoğlu İ.Ö., Tunç G., 2024. February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş twin earthquakes: Evaluation of ground motions and seismic performance of buildings for Elazığ, southeast of Türkiye, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 181, 108678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108678.
38. Yıldız Ö., Kına C., 2023. Geotechnical and structural investigations in Malatya Province after Kahramanmaraş Earthquake on February 6, 2023, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(3), 686-703, https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1282555.
39. Yön B., Dedeoğlu İ.Ö., Yetkin M., Erkek H., Calayır Y., 2024. Evaluation of the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings in the light of lessons learned from the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye earthquake sequences, Nat Hazards, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06859-9.