Bazı Tritikale Çeşitlerinin Besleme Değeri ve İn vitro Gaz Üretiminin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada bazı tritikale çeşitlerine ait tanelerin kimyasal bileşimi, in vitro toplam gaz üretimi (TG), metabolik enerji (ME) ve organik madde sindirim derecelerinin (OMSD) belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çeşitlerin ham kül (HK) içerikleri %2.05-2.30, ham yağ (HY) içerikleri %1.82-3.00, ham protein (HP) içerikleri %9.44-13.25, asit çözücülerde çözünmeyen lif (ADF) ve nötr çözücülerde çözünmeyen lif (NDF) içerikleri sırasıyla %2.51-4.50, %15.15-17.65 aralığında yer almıştır. Çeşitlerin in vitro TG üretimleri 57.59-62.51 ml, ME ve OMSD dereceleri ise sırasıyla 11.69 - 12.55 Mj kg-1 KM ve %78.06 ile 82.24 arasında değişmiştir. Metabolik enerji değeri bakımından Bera ve Tatlıcak 97, OMSD bakımından Bera çeşidi ön plana çıkmıştır. Tritikale tanelerinin kimyasal bileşimleri, in vitro TG, ME ve OMSD değerleri üzerine çeşitlerin etkisinin önemli olduğu görülmüştür (P<0.05). Kimyasal bileşim ve fermentasyon parametrelerine göre HP, ME ve OMSD bakımından yüksek değerlere sahip olan Bera çeşidinin tane üretimi için tavsiye edilebileceği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Chemical composition
• Triticale
• Varieties
• İn vitro total gas
• Chemical composition, Triticale, Varieties, İn vitro total gas

Determination of Nutritive Value and In Vitro Gas Production of Some Triticale Varieties.

Öz

The aim of this study to determine the chemical composition, in vitro total gas production (TG), metabolisable energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) of grains belonging to different triticale varieties. Crude ash (CA) contents of varieties range from 2.05 to 2.30%, ether extract (EE) contents of the varieties is range of 1.82%-3.00%, crude protein (CP) content of varieties between 9.44 and 13.25%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) contents of were range of 2.51-4.50% and 15.15-17.65%, respectively. In vitro total gas production of varieties was between 57.59 and 62.51, ME and OMD also between 11.69-12.55 Mj kg-1 DM and 78.06-82.24%, respectively. While Bera and Tatlıcak 97 leap out in terms of ME, Bera variety leap out in terms of OMD. Effects of varieties on chemical composition, in vitro TG, ME and OMD of triticale grains were found to be significant (P<0.05). According to chemical composition and fermentation parameters, Bera variety, has high values in terms of CP, ME and OMD can be recommended for grain production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Chemical composition
• Triticale
• Varieties
• In vitro total gas

Kaynakça

1. [1] Mut Z, Köse Erbaş ÖD. Grain yield and some quality properties of triticale genotypes. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2018;33(1):47-57.
2. [2] Dolgun C, Çiftçi Aydoğan E. Determination of Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Triticale Genotypes in Bursa Ecological Conditions. KSU J. Agric Nat 2019;22(5):664-670.
3. [3] Demir İ, Aydem N, Korkut KZ, Şölen P. Triticale breeding studies in Turkey. Plant Breeding Symposium, 1979. İzmir: 22-25 Mayıs 1979, p.158-165.
4. [4] Mergoum M, Ryan J, Shroyer JP, Monem MA. Potential for adapting triticale in Morocco. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 1992;21(2):137-141.
5. [5] Keleş G. Nutritive Value of Morphological Components in Triticale Forage Harvested at Different Maturity Stages. Journal of Animal Production 2014;55(1):1-6.
6. [6] Fernandez-Figares I, Marinetto J, Royo C, Ramos JM, Garcia del Moral LF. Amino-acid composition and protein and carbohydrate accumulation in the grain of triticale grown under terminal water stress simulated by a senescing agent. Journal of Cereal Science 2000;32:249-258.
7. [7] Glamočlıja N, Starčevıć M, Ćırıć J, Šefer D, Glıšıć M, Baltıć M, et al. The importance of triticale in animal nutrition. Ветеринарски журнал републике српске 2018;18(1).
8. [8] Biel W, Kazimierska K, Bashutska U. Nutritional value of wheat, triticale, barley and oat grains. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica 2020;19(2):19-28.

9. [9] Çiftçi İ, Yenice E, Eleroğlu E. Use of triticale alone and combination with wheat or maize: effect of diet type and enzyme supplementation on hen performance, egg quality, organ weights, intestinal viscosity and digestive system characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2003;105:149-161.
10. [10] Denek N, Deniz S. The determination of energy levels in some cereal grains used in ruminant diets by in vivo and in vitro methods. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 2004;28(1):185-193.
11. [11] Kaplan M, Üke Ö, Kale H, Yavuz S, Kurt Ö, Atalay Aİ. Effect of vegetative stages on potential nutritive value, gas production and methane of teff hay. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech. 2016;6(4):181-186.
12. [12] Uslu OS, Kurt O, Kaya E, Kamalak A. Effect of species on the chemical composition, metabolisable energy, organic matter digestibility and methane production of some legume plants grown in Turkey. J App Anim Res 2018;46(1):1158-1161.
13. [13] Kurt O. Effect of variety on nutritive value and anti-methanogenic potential of oat grain. Progress In Nutrition 2021;23(3).
14. [14] AOAC. Official method of analysis..Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed., DC, USA, Washington; 1990. pp.66-88.
15. [15] Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74(10): 3583- 3597.
16. [16] Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci (Camb), 1979; 93:217-222.
17. [17] Menke KH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 1998,28:7–55.
18. [18] Alijošius S, Švirmickas GJ, Bliznikas S, Gružauskas R, Šašytė V, Racevıčıūtė-Stupelıenė A, et al. Grain chemical composition of different varieties of winter cereals. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2016;103(3).
19. [19] Kowieska A, Lubowicki R, Jaskowska I. Chemical composition and nutritional characteristics of several cereal grain. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Zootechnica 2011;10(2):37-50.
20. [20] Umucalilar HD, Coşkun B, Gülşen N. In situ rumen degradation and in vitro gas production of some selected grains from Turkey. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition 2002; 86(9‐10):288-297.
21. [21] Chrenková M, Čerešňáková Z, Formelová Z, Poláčiková M, Mlyneková Z, Fľak P. Chemical and nutritional characteristics of different types of DDGS for ruminants. J Anim Feed Sci 2012;21(425):35.
22. [22] Krieg J, Seifried N, Steingass H, Rodehutscord M. In situ and in vitro ruminal starch degradation of grains from different rye, triticale and barley genotypes. Animal 2017;11(10): 1745-1753.
23. [23] Brandt DA, Brand TS, Cruywagen CW. The use of crude protein content to predict concentrations of lysine and methionine in grain harvested from selected cultivars of wheat, barley and triticale grown in the Western Cape region of South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science 2000;30(1):22-25.
24. [24] Dennett AL, Wilkes MA, Trethowan RM. Characteristics of modern triticale quality: The relationship between carbohydrate properties, α‐amylase activity, and falling number. Cereal Chemistry 2013;90(6):594-600.
25. [25] Kılıç Ü. Determination of some fermentation products and energy contents of some feed raw materials used in ruminant feeding using in vitro gas production technique. University of Ondokuz Mayıs; 2005.