Evaluation of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Photovoltaic Panels in Sinop Province Conditions

Yıl 2021, , 176 - 181, 25.06.2021

Mehmet Onur Karaagac , Hasan Oğul , Fatih Bulut

https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.855488

Cited By: 4

Öz

Sinop İli Koşullarında Monokristal ve Polikristal Fotovoltaik Panellerin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Due to the increase in energy consumption and environmental pollution in recent years, countries have included renewable energy in their long-term energy policies by supporting researches to increase the usage diversity and performance of renewable energy sources. Solar energy, one of these renewable energy types, and its various applications are of great importance to increase the energy production diversity. In this context, evaluation of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic panel performance was performed under Sinop climate conditions. In the first stage, the most suitable panel tilt for Sinop province was found by recording the voltage and current values of the panels at different panel angles. Then, in different days, the efficiencies of the panels were calculated using the determined optimum angle and compared with the literature. Finally, the effect of temperature change on the panels was evaluated. With this study, the most suitable panel type is determined for Sinop province and its surrounding conditions, thus preventing unnecessary investments and efficiency losses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

PV panel, Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline PV panel, Renewable energy

Kaynakça

• [1] Vaishak S, Purnanand V B. Photovoltaic/thermal-solar assisted heat pump system: current status and future prospects. Solar Energy. 2019;189:268-284.
• [2] Daniela D, Gina B, Björn M, Reise Christian R. On the impact of solar spectral irradiance on the yield of different PV technologies. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2015;132:431-442.
• [3] Makrides G, Zinsser B, Phinikarides A, Schubert M, Georgiou G. Temperature and thermal annealing effects on different photovoltaic technologies. Renewable Energy. 2012;43: 407-417.
• [4] Rahman M M, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim N A. Effects of various parameters on PV-module power and efficiency. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;103:348-358.
• [5] Camargo Nogueiro C E, Bedin J, Krauss Niedzialkoski R, Melegari de Souza S N, Munhoz das Neves J C. Performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in a water pumping system in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;51:1610-1616.
• [6] Tascıoglu A, Taskın O, Vardar A. A power case study for monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in Bursa city, Turkey. International Journal of Photoenergy. 2016;732:4138.
• [7] Zagorska V, Ziemelis I, Ancevica L, Putans H. Experimental investigation of photovoltaic thermal hybrid solar collector. Agronomy Research Biosystem Engineering. 2012;1: 227-234.
• [8] Mirzaei M, Mohiabadi M Z. A comparative analysis of long-term field test of monocrystalline and polycrystalline PV power generation in semi-arid climate conditions. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2017;38:93-101.
• [9] Singh G K, Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: A review. Energy. 2013;53:1-13.
• [10] Telkes M, Solar cooking ovens. Solar Energy. 1959;3(1):1-11.
• [11] Shukla R, Sumathy K, Erickson P, Gong J, Recent advances in the solar water heating systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;19:173-190.
• [12] Li B, Chen X, Cheng X, Zhai X, Zhao X. Solar Systems for Urban Building Applications: Heating, Cooling, Hot Water, and Power Supply. Advanced Energy Efficiency Technologies for Solar Heating, Cooling and Power Generation. 2019;11: 373-416.
• [13] Kumar D, Pandey A, Prakash O, Kumar A, DevRoy A. Simulation, Modeling, and Experimental Studies of Solar Distillation Systems. Solar Desalination Technology. 2019;1:149-166.
• [14] Abdelkader M R, Al-Salaymeh A, Al-Hamamre Z, Sharaf F. A comparative analysis of the performance of monocrystalline and multicrystalline PV cells in semi-arid climate conditions: the case of Jordan. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. 2010;4:543-552.
• [15] Jacques S, Calderia A, Ren Z Schellmanns A, Batut N. The impact of the cell temperature on the energy efficiency of a single glass PV module: thermal modeling in steady state and validation by experimental data. International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality. 2013. Spain. v. 11.
• [16] Mitdgard O M, Saetre T O, Yordanov G, Imenes A G, Nge C L. A qualitative examination of performance and energy yield of photovoltaic modules in southern Norway. Renewable Energy.2010;35:1266-1274.
• [17] Congedo P M, Malvoni M, Mele M, De Giorgi M G. Performance measurements of monocrystalline silicon PV modules in south-eastern Italy. Energy Conversion and Management. 2013;68:1-10.
• [18] Engin M, Çolak M. Güneş-Rüzgar Hibrid Enerji Üretim Sisteminin İncelenmesi. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2005;11(2):230-225.
• [19] Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. Güneş ve Rüzgâr Enerjisi Kullanılarak Şebeke ile Paralel Çalışabilen Hibrit Enerji Santrali Tasarımı ve Uygulaması”. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. 2006. Türkiye. Ankara. 2921.
• [20] Yanıktepe B, Özalp C, Savrun M, Köroğlu T, Cebeci Ç. Rüzgâr-Güneş Hibrid Güç Sistemi: Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Uygulama Örneği. 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11). 2011Elazığ: Turkey. 16-18.
• [21] Aktacir M A, Yeşilata B, Işıker Y. Fotovoltaik-Rüzgâr Hibrid Güç Sistemi Uygulaması. Yenilenebilir Enerji Teknolojileri. 2016;3:56-62.
• [22] Akyüz E, Bayraktar M, Oktay Z. Hibrid yenilenebilir enerji sistemlerinin endüstriyel tavukçuluk sektörü için ekonomik açıdan değerlendirilmesi: Bir uygulama. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2009;11(2): 54-44.
• [23] Skoplaki E, Palyvos J A. On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: a review of efficiency/power correlations. Solar Energy. 2009;83: 614-624.