Araştırma Makalesi

Role of Electronic Warehouse Receipt System in Development of Commodity Exchanges: An Assessment for Turkey

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2019
Nurten Gün *, Emine Tahsin
PDF İndir
TR EN

Role of Electronic Warehouse Receipt System in Development of Commodity Exchanges: An Assessment for Turkey

Abstract

Commodity exchange is a centralized platform where buyers and sellers reduce transaction costs by carrying out commodity transactions under a set of clearly defined rules. Institutional mechanisms which commodity exchanges offer to reduce the transaction costs are stated as central trading platform, central counterparty service, central clearing and settlement service and integration with licensed warehousing and electronic warehouse receipt (EWR) system within the framework of Transaction Cost Theory. Although the literature contains some studies coping with the analysis of commodity exchange system in Turkey, little attention has been paid to mentioned institutional mechanisms by a holistic approach. This article tries to fill this gap by revealing the development of commodity exchange system in Turkey and evaluating it especially with regards to integration with licensed warehousing and EWR system in the consideration of Transaction Cost Theory. In the light of the findings obtained, the establishment of Specialized Commodity Exchange is highlighted for the deepening of the commodity markets in Turkey.

Keywords

Transaction Costs,Commodity Exchange,Licensed Warehousing,Warehouse Receipts

Kaynakça

  1. Akovalı, U. 2014. Merkezi Karşı Taraf, Türkiye Future Piyasalarında Risk Yönetimi ve Teminatlandırma [MSc Tezi]. İstanbul: Galatasaray Üniversitesi.
  2. Black, D. 1986. “Success and Failure of Futures Contracts: Theory and Empirical Evidence” Monograph Series in Finance and Economics. New York: New York University.
  3. Bollman, K. 2003. “What Killed the Di-ammonium Phosphate Futures Contract”. Review of Agricultural Economics, 25, 483-505.
  4. Bronsen, B. & Fofana,N. 2001. “Success and Failure in Agricultural Futures Contracts”. Journal of Agribusiness, 19, 129-145.
  5. Coase R.H., 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 3, s. 1-44.
  6. Doğu Akdeniz Kalkınma Ajansı. 2015. Tarım Ürünleri Lisanslı Depoculuk Araştırması ve Ön Fizibilite.Çalışması. http://www.dogaka.gov.tr/Icerik/Dosya/www.dogaka.gov.tr_520_RE2N81DD_Tarim-urunleri-Lisansli-Depoculuk-Arastirmasi-ve-on-Fizibilite-calismasi.pdf. Erişim: 25/11/2018.
  7. Dumludağ, D., 2014. “Kurumlar, Kurumsal Değişim ve Ekonomik Kalkınma, s.15-36” Kalkınmada Yeni Yaklaşımlar. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  8. Erbay, R., 2002. Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Tarım Ürünlerinin Futures ve Options Piyasaları: Türkiye Örneği [PhD Tezi]. Edirne: Trakya Üniversitesi.
  9. Erbay, R., 2003. Gelişmiş Ülkelerde Tarım Piyasalarının Organizasyonu. İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Odası Yayınları.
  10. Furubotn, E.G. & Richter, R., 2005. Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gün, N., & Tahsin, E. (2019). Role of Electronic Warehouse Receipt System in Development of Commodity Exchanges: An Assessment for Turkey. Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 9-24. https://izlik.org/JA92WR22RD