PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ CONCEPTIONS ABOUT SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND METHOD
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-436.
- Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665-701.
- Akgül, E., M. (2006). Teaching science in an inquiry-based learning environment: What it means for pre-service elementary science teachers? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 71-81.
- Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352– 377.
- Cobern, W. W. (2000). The nature of science and role of knowledge and belief. Science and Education, 9, 219-246.
- Çelik, S. (2003). Öğretmen adaylarının bilim anlayışları ve fen-teknoloji-toplum dersinin bu anlayışlara etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Good, R., Shymansky, J. (2001). Nature of science literacy in benchmarks and standarts: post-modern/relativist or modern/realist. In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto, M. R. Matthews (Eds.), Science Education and Culture. The contribution of history and philosophy of science (pp.53-65). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yazarlar
Halil Turgut
Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Mart 2009
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Mart 2009
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2009 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1
