EN
TR
How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study
Öz
Aim: This study aims to determine whether the debriefings performed by different health professions for nearly a decade meet the INACSL standards of best debriefing practices.
Methods: In order for learning to occur in simulation, there must be a adequate debriefing session. An adequate debriefing should be based on the criteria described in the standards of best practices published by the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL). A high quality, adequate, and effective debriefing must be carried out in accordance with each standard.
Results: Most of the debriefers are female. Over half had two years or less experience with simulation, and a quarter had training in simulation or debriefing. The results are presented in five contexts (Competent Debriefer, Environment, Effective Debriefing, Theoretical Framework, and Objectives and Outcomes.), which conform to the four standards covered by the INACSL standards of best practices.
Conclusions: Except for the feedback, the debriefings do not meet the INACSL standards of best practices. However, the debriefers are aware of the importance of debriefing and are willing to improve their skills. Most of the debriefers have learned debriefing from observation or the literature. With this study, it was ensured that debriefers gained awareness in terms of INACSL standards. At the same time, this study will also provide awareness about the standards for the literature.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. McGowan JJ. Commentary: information technologies and the transformation of nursing education. Nursing Outlook 2008;56(5):231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.04.006.
- 2. Nyström S, Dahlberg J, Edelbring S, Hult H, Dahlgren MA. Debriefing practices in interprofessional simulation with students: a sociomaterial perspective. BMC Medical Education 2016;16(1):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016- 0666-5
- 3. Dieckmann P, Friis SM, Lippert A, Østergaard D. The art and science of debriefing in simulation: ideal and practice. Medical Teacher 2009;31(7):287-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590902866218.
- 4 .Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: a concept analysis. Nurse Education Perspective 2009;30(2):109–114.
- 5. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation Healthcare 2007;2(2):115-125. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Tıp Eğitimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi
12 Ağustos 2023
Kabul Tarihi
1 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2023 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 68
APA
Özata, K., Caz, B., & Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer, Ş. (2023). How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 22(68), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1342019
AMA
1.Özata K, Caz B, Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer Ş. How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study. TED. 2023;22(68):106-115. doi:10.25282/ted.1342019
Chicago
Özata, Kevser, Büşra Caz, ve Şenay Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer. 2023. “How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study”. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 22 (68): 106-15. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1342019.
EndNote
Özata K, Caz B, Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer Ş (01 Aralık 2023) How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 22 68 106–115.
IEEE
[1]K. Özata, B. Caz, ve Ş. Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer, “How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study”, TED, c. 22, sy 68, ss. 106–115, Ara. 2023, doi: 10.25282/ted.1342019.
ISNAD
Özata, Kevser - Caz, Büşra - Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer, Şenay. “How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study”. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 22/68 (01 Aralık 2023): 106-115. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1342019.
JAMA
1.Özata K, Caz B, Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer Ş. How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study. TED. 2023;22:106–115.
MLA
Özata, Kevser, vd. “How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study”. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, c. 22, sy 68, Aralık 2023, ss. 106-15, doi:10.25282/ted.1342019.
Vancouver
1.Kevser Özata, Büşra Caz, Şenay Sarmasoğlu Kılıkçıer. How Close Are Interprofessional Debriefers to Meet the INACSL Standards of Debriefing Practices? A Qualitative Study. TED. 01 Aralık 2023;22(68):106-15. doi:10.25282/ted.1342019