Çift İlişkilerinde Kendini Açma ve İhtiyaçlara Cevap Verilebilirliğin İlişkideki Yakınlık Açısından Önemi: Kısa Bir Derleme

Öz

Son yıllarda yakın ilişkiler ile ilgili araştırmalar hızla artmaktadır. Araştırma alanlarının hızla artması bazı spesifik konuları incelemeyi olanaklı kılmaktadır. Bu makalede öncelikle yakın ilişkinin ne demek olduğu üzerinde durulmuş ve şu soruya yanıt aranmıştır: “İnsanlar biriyle « yakın « bir ilişkileri olduğunu söylediklerinde ne demek istiyorlar?” Ardından ilişkilerin sürdürülebilirliğini ve yakın ilişkilerde yakınlığı önemli ölçüde etkileyen iki kavram üzerinde durulmuştur. Bunlar, kendini açma ve ihtiyaçlara cevap verilebilirliktir. Partnerlerin ilişkide birbirlerine kendilerini açmaları ve birbirlerinin ihtiyaçlarına cevap veriyor olmaları yakınlık derecelerini nasıl etkilemektedir? sorusu ele alınmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yakın ilişkiler
• Kendini açma
• ihtiyaçlara cevap verilebilirlik

The Importance of Self-Disclosure and Responsiveness in Couple Relationships in Terms of Intimacy

Öz

In recent years, research on close relationships has been rapidly increasing. The increase in research areas makes it possible to examine some specific topics. In this article, we first focus on what a close relationship is and seek an answer to the following question: What do people mean when they say they have a “close” relationship with someone? Then, two concepts that significantly affect the sustainability of relationships and intimacy in close relationships were emphasized; These are self-disclosure and responsiveness. In this paper, we also address the question, “How does the fact that partners open themselves to each other in the relationship and respond to each other’s needs affect the degree of intimacy?”

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Close relationships
• self-disclosure
• responsiveness

Kaynakça

1. Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939–954.
2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (2004). Close relationships as including other in the self. In H. T. Reis & C. E. Rusbult (Eds.), Close relationships: Key readings (pp. 365–379). Taylor & Francis.
3. Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363–377. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167297234003
4. Aron, A., Norman, C. C., Aron, E. N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273
5. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
6. Berg, J. H. (1984). Development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.346
7. Berg, J. H. (1987). Responsiveness and self-disclosure. In V. J. Derlega & J. H. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 101–130). Plenum Press.
8. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2004). Measuring Closeness: The Relationship

9. Closeness Inventory (RCI) Revisited. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 81–101). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Birnbaum,
10. G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski- Milner, C. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000069.
11. Canevello, A., & Crocker, J. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018186
12. Clark, M. S., & Lemay, E. P., Jr. (2010). Close relationships. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 898–940). John Wiley & Sons, Inc... https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002025
13. Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457-475.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
14. Drigotas, S. M. (2002). The Michelangelo phenomenon and personal well-being. Journal of Personality, 70(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00178
15. Duprez, C., Christophe, V., Rim´e, B., Congard, A., & Antoine, P. (2015). Motives for the Social sharing of an emotional experience. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(6),757–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514548393.
16. Feeney, B. C. (2004). A Secure Base: Responsive Support of Goal Strivings and Exploration in Adult Intimate Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87(5), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.631
17. Fehr, B. (2008). Friendship formation. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 29–54). Psychology Press.
18. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449),1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512.
19. Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904
20. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245.
21. Greenberg, L. S., & Safran, J. D. (1987). Emotion in psychotherapy: Affect, cognition, and the process of change. Guilford Press.
22. Greene, K., Derlega, V. J. and Mathews, A. (2006). Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships. In: Vangelisti, A. and Perlman, D., Eds., Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships,
23. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 409-427.
24. Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 38, pp. 283–357). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9
25. Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
26. Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
27. Lodi-Smith, J., & DeMarree, K. G. (2018). Self-concept clarity: Perspectives on assessment, narrative self. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 89–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.
28. London, M. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of self-verification: Implications for individual and group development. Human Resource Development Review, 2(3), 273–293.
29. Pasupathi, M., McLean, K. C., & Weeks, T. (2009). To tell or not to tell: Disclosure and the
30. Regan, P. (2011). Close relationships. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
31. Reis, H. T. (1994). Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 87–110). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. Reis, H. T. (2012). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing theme for the study of relationships and well-being. In L. Campbell & T. J. Loving (Eds.), Interdisciplinary research on close relationships: The case for integration (pp. 27–52). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13486-002
33. Reis, H. T., & Clark, M. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). Oxford University Press.
34. Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). The Guilford Press.
35. Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). The Guilford Press.
36. Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins, & A. Kruklanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523-563). New York: Guilford.
37. Reis, H. T., & Rusbult, C. E. (Eds.). (2004). Close relationships: Key readings. Taylor & Francis.
38. Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.
39. Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying Social Interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24(C), 269-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60332-9
40. Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Construct in the Study of Intimacy and Closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
41. Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., Kubacka, K. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2009). “The part of me that you bring out”: Ideal similarity and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014016
42. Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of perceived communication for romantic and friendship attraction experienced during a get-acquainted date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294204006.
43. Vittengl, J. R., & Holt, C. S. (2000). Getting acquainted: The relationship of self-disclosure and social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171003