DRYDEN, OR THE NAME WELL LOST IN HISTORY

Öz

In most cases the word history gives researchers a start and pause at once. Gives start because the immensity of history can take one by surprise, thereby swerving the researcher off the intended course of a project; gives pause because setting eyes on history from a standpoint that is more or less influenced by the critical thinking as well as the ever-changing perspectives of the present day carries the risk of divorcing the historical figures from their contexts. These two issues and decontextualising the historical subject/s in particular, can thus be taken as the main pitfalls of historical research. No matter how the researcher attempts at clinging to tackle the subject in question from a historical point of view, either in the introductory part or in the concluding section of the study, contemporary perspective inevitably comes into play. The point in undertaking a historical research, therefore, is to maintain a balance amid the modern day perspective and the historical perspective with the purpose of drawing parallels between past and present. And when that is fairly done, or even honestly sought to, these parallels are not without their interest or their use to the contemporary perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• DRYDEN
• NAME
• WELL

DRYDEN YA DA TARİHTE YİTEN İSİM

Öz

Antik dönemlerden beri entelektüellerin merakını celbeden bir olgu olan çeviri eylemine dair yapılan tarihsel araştırmalar ayrı bir öneme haizdir. Çünkü çeviri eyleminin tarihsel süreç içerisinde geçirdiği süreçleri izlemek, bir bakıma, çağdaş çeviri anlayışını şekillendiren olguların da izini sürmek anlamına gelmektedir. Bununla birlikte, yapılan bu tarihsel yolculuğu salt çeviri odaklı düşünmek büyük oranda yanıltıcıdır. Zira tarih boyunca çeviriyle gerek kuramsal gerekse uygulama alanında uğraşmış hemen hemen her kişi, söz konusu edimle farklı bağlamlar dâhilinde uğraşmıştır. Hâl böyle olmakla beraber, çeviri kuramlarının tarih yazımında bu durum nedense ikinci plana itilmiştir. Gerçekten de, Çeviribilim’in tarih yazımında önemli konumlara sahip tarihsel isimler, yalnızca çeviri hakkında yazdıklarıyla anılmaktadır. Bu doğal bir sonuçtur. Bir bilim dalı—herhangi bir bilim dalı—tarihi, kendi bakış açısından mercek altına alır ve yazar. Ancak bundan daha fazlasını yapmak her zaman için mümkündür. Bu makale, Çeviribilim ve çeviri kuramlarının tarih yazımındaki başat isimlerden biri olan John Dryden üzerinedir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde, çeviri kuramları külliyatında adı, “motamot”, “açımlama” ve “taklit” kavramlarıyla birlikte anılan Dryden tarihselleştirilmiştir. Makalenin bu kısmında, Çeviribilim alanında Dryden’ın bu üç seçenek arasında bir orta yol olarak gördüğü açımlamayı tercih ettiğini belirterek sona eren tartışmaların yüzeyselliği sorgulanmaktadır. Restorasyon Dönemi’nin önde gelen oyun yazarlarından Dryden’ın, aynı zamanda çağının en önemli eleştirmenlerden biri olduğu gerçeğinden yola çıkarak, yazarın orta yol arayışının neşet ettiği tiyatro eserlerine, kuramsal yazılarına ve tragedya kavramıyla hesaplaşmasına odaklanan makalenin bir sonraki bölümündeyse, Dryden’ın Çeviribilim ve çeviri kuramlarının tarih yazımındaki yeri sorunsallaştırılmaktadır. Çalışmanın son kısmındaysa Dryden’ın, William Shakespeare’in Antonius ile Kleopatra’sı üzerinden kaleme aldığı Her şey Aşk İçin adlı oyunu üzerinde durulmakta ve makalenin bu bölümüne kadar yürütülen tarihsel tartışma ışığında, bahsi geçen eserin çağdaş çeviri kuramlarındaki yansımaları araştırılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• tarih
• tarih yazımı
• tiyatro tarihi
• çeviri tarihi
• Dryden

Kaynakça

1. • Adamo, Sergia, “Microhistory of Translation”, in Georges L. Bastin and Paul F. Bandia (eds.) Charting the Future of Translation History, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2006, pp. 80-99.
2. • Bassnett, Susan, Translation Studies, London and New York: Rout- ledge, [1980] 2004
3. • Benjamin, Walter, “The Task of the Translator”, trans. James Hynd and E. M. Valk, in Delos A Journal On & Of Translation, Texas: National Translation Center, No. 2, [1923] 1968, pp. 76-99.
4. • Benjamin, Walter, The Origin of German Tragic Drama, trans. John Osbourne, London: Verso, [1928] 2003a
5. • Benjamin, Walter, Understanding Brecht, trans. Anna Bostock, Lon- don: Verso, 2003b
6. Paul Davis, Translation and the Poet’s Life: The Ethics of Translating in English
7. Culture, 1646-1726, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 134
8. • Berman, Antoine, The Experience of the Foreign, trans. S. Heyvaert, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992

9. • Castelvetro, Lodovico, “The Poetics of Aristotle Translated and Explai- ned”, trans. R. L. Montgomery, in Hazard Adams (ed.), Critical Theory Since Plato, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, [1570] 1971, pp. 145-153.
10. • Chamberlain, Lori, “Gender and the Metaphorics of Translation”, in Lawrence Venuti (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader, London and New York: Routledge, [1988] 2000, pp. 314-329.
11. • Chesterman, Andrew (ed.), Readings in Translation Theory, Finland: Oy Finn Lectura, 1989
12. • Clark, Sandra, “Shakespeare and Other Adaptations”, in Susan J. Owen (ed.), A Companion to Restoration Drama, Oxford: Blackwell Pub- lishing, 2001, pp. 274-290.
13. • Corneille, Pierre, “Of the Three Unities of Action, Time, and Place”, trans. Donald Schier, in Hazard Adams (ed.), Critical Theory Since Plato, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, [1660] 1971pp. 219-226.
14. • Cronin, Michael, Translating Ireland, Cork: Cork University Press, 1996
15. • Davis, Paul, Translation and the Poet’s Life: The Ethics of Translating in English Culture, 1646-1726, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008
16. • Dolet, Etienne, “The Way to Translate Well From One Language into Another, trans. James S. Holmes, in Douglas Robinson (ed.), Western Translation Theory from Heredotus to Nietzsche, Manchester: St Jerome, [1540/1997] 2002, pp. 95-97.
17. • Dryden, John, All for Love, or the World Well Lost, in Sir Walter Scott (ed.), The Collected Works of John Dryden Vol. 5, London: James Ballantyne and Co, Edinburgh, [1678] 1808a, pp. 285-411.
18. • Dryden, John, The Tempest, or the Enchanted Island, in Sir Walter Scott (ed.), The Collected Works of John Dryden Vol. 3, London: James Ballantyne and Co, Edinburgh, [1667] 1808b pp. 95-205.
19. • Dryden, John, Troilus and Cressida; or Truth Found too Late, in Sir Walter Scott (ed.), The Collected Works of John Dryden Vol. 6, Lon- don: James Ballantyne and Co, Edinburgh, [1679] 1808c, pp. 227-363.
20. • Dryden, John, An Essay of Dramatic Poesy, in Hazard Adams (ed.), Critical Theory Since Plato, San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, [1668] 1971, pp. 228-257.
21. • Dryden, John, “On Translation”, in Schulte, Rainer and John Biguenet. (eds.), Theories of translation : an anthology of essays from Dryden to Derrida, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, [1680/1685/1697] 1992 pp. 17-31.
22. • D’hulst, Lieven, “Why and How to Write Translation Histories”, in Crop. Emerging Views on Translation History in Brazil, No. 6, 2001, pp. 21-32.
23. • Foz, Clara, “Translation, History and the Translation Scholar”, in Georges L. Bastin and Paul F. Bandia (eds.), Charting the Future of Transla- tion History, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2006, pp. 131-144.
24. • Frost, William, Dryden and The Art of Translation, Hamden, Conn: Archon Books [1955] 1969
25. • Genette, Gérard, Paratexts: thresholds of interpretation, trans. Jane E. Lewin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997
26. • Griffin, Dustin, Literary Patronage in England, 1650-1800, Camb- ridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996
27. • Halliwell, Stephen, The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002
28. • Ham, Roswell G., “Dryden as Historiographer Royal: The Authorship of His Majesties Declaration Defended, 1681”, in Review of English Studies, Vol. 11, no. 43, 1935, pp. 284-298.
29. • King, Bruce (ed.), Twentieth Century Interpretations of All for Love, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968
30. • Kelly, L. G., The True Interpreter: A History of Translation Theory and Practice in the West, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979
31. • Lefevere, André (ed.), Translation/History/Culture: A Sourcebook, London and New York: Routledge, 1992a
32. • Lefevere, André, Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame, London and New York: Routledge, 1992b
33. • Munday, Jeremy, Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications, London and New York: Routledge, 2001
34. • Niranjana, Tejaswini, Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism, and the Colonial Context, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992
35. • Owen, Susan J., “Restoration Drama and Politics: An Overview” in Susan J. Owen (ed.), A Companion to Restoration Drama, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001, pp. 126-139.
36. • Potolsky, Matthew, Mimesis. London and New York: Routledge, 2006
37. • Pym, Anthony, Method in Translation History, Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 1998
38. • Quintilian, “On What We Should Employ Ourselves When We Write”, trans. John Selby Watson, in Douglas Robinson (ed.), Western Trans- lation Theory from Heredotus to Nietzsche, Manchester: St Jerome, [96 CE?/1997] 2002, pp. 19-20.
39. • Robinson, Douglas (ed.), Western Translation Theory from Heredotus to Nietzsche, Manchester: St Jerome, [1997] 2002
40. • Saint Jerome, “The Best Kind of Translator: Letter to Pammachius”, trans. Paul Carroll, in Douglas Robinson (ed.), Western Translation Theory from Heredotus to Nietzsche, Manchester: St Jerome, [395 CE/1997] 2002, pp. 23-30.
41. • Saslow, Edward L., “Dryden as Historiographer Royal: The Authorship of ‘His Majesties Declaration Defended’”, in Modern Philology, Vol. 75, no. 3, 1978, pp. 261-272.
42. • Schulte, Rainer and John Biguenet (eds.), Theories of translation : an anthology of essays from Dryden to Derrida, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1992
43. • Shakespeare, William, Anthony and Cleopatra, M. R. Ridley (ed.), The Arden Shakespeare Paperbacks, London: Methuen, [~1607] 1965
44. • St André, James, “History”, in Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha (eds.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (Second Edition), London and New York: Routledge, 2009, pp. 133-136.
45. • Steiner, George, The Death of Tragedy, Yale: Yale University Press, [1961] 1996
46. • Steiner, George, After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1975] 1977
47. • Steiner, T.R. (ed.), English Translation Theory: 1650-1800, Assen and Amsterdam: van Gorcum, 1975
48. • Tahir-Gürçağlar, Şehnaz, The Politics and Poetics of Translation in Turkey, 1923-1960, Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2008
49. • Venuti, Lawrence, The Translator’s Invisibility, London and New York: Routledge, 1995
50. • Wallerstein, Ruth, “Dryden and the Analysis of Shakespeare’s Techniqu- es”, in Review of English Studies, Vol. 19, no. 74, 1943, pp. 165-185.
51. • Woodsworth, Judith, “History of Translation”, in Mona Baker (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 1998, pp. 100-105.
52. • Wraith, Eugene M., The Herculean Hero, New York: Columbia Uni- versity Press, 1962
53. • Zarandona, Juan Miguel, “The Amadis of Gaul (1803) and The Chronicle of the Cid (1808) by Robert Southley: The Medieval History of Spain Translated” in Georges L. Bastin and Paul F. Bandia (eds.), Charting the Future of Translation History, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2006, pp. 309-332.