Credit Success Rates of Certified Green Buildings in Turkey

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4, 10063 - 10084, 01.07.2020

Vedat Toğan , Xhensila Thomolları

https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.449251

Cited By: 5

Öz

The green building rating systems have been used
as a tool to evaluate the environmental impact of buildings since 1990. In
Turkey, LEED is in the first place concerning the total number of certified
green buildings and then followed by BREEAM and DBGN. This paper aims to give
general information concerning the 287 certified green buildings, and further
investigate an updated situation of credit success rates of 127 LEED new
construction certified green buildings in Turkey. The results of the study show
that the certified green buildings in Turkey have a lower average percentage of
credit success rates in indoor environmental quality, energy efficiency and
material and resources categories compared with the other groups. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

LEED, Credit success, sustainable development, Turkey

Credit Success Rates of Certified Green Buildings in Turkey

Öz

The green building rating systems have been used as a tool to evaluate the environmental impact of buildings since 1990. In Turkey, LEED is in the first place concerning the total number of certified green buildings and then followed by BREEAM and DBGN. This paper aims to give general information concerning the 287 certified green buildings, and further investigate an updated situation of credit success rates of 127 LEED new construction certified green buildings in Turkey. The results of the study show that the certified green buildings in Turkey have a lower average percentage of credit success rates in indoor environmental quality, energy efficiency and material and resources categories compared with the other groups. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Credit success, LEED, sustainable development, Turkey

Kaynakça

• [1] Dixit, M.K., Culp, C.H., & Fernandez-Solis, J.L. (2013). System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 153–164.
• [2] Yeheyis, M., Hewage, K., Alam, M.S., Eskicioglu, C., & Sadiq, R. (2013). An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 15, 81–91.
• [3] Udawatta, N., Zuo, J., Chiveralls, K., & Zillante, G. (2015) Attitudinal and behavioural approaches to improving waste management on construction projects in Australia: Benefits and limitations. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(2), 137–147.
• [4] Doan, D.T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., & Tookey, J. (2017). A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243–260.
• [5] Vimpari, J., & Junnila, S. (2014). Value influencing mechanism of green certificates in the discounted cash flow valuation. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18, 238–252.
• [6] Scofield, J.H. (2013). Efficacy on LEED-certification in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for large New York City office buildings. Energy and Building, 67, 517–524.
• [7] Dobias, J., & Macek, D. (2014). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and its impact on building operational expenditures. Procedia Engineering, 85, 132–139.
• [8] Dwaikat, L.N., & Ali, K.N. (2016). Green buildings cost premium: A review of empirical evidence. Energy and Building, 110, 396–403.
• [9] Darko, A., Chan, A.P.C., Owusu-Manu, D.G., & Ameyaw, E.E. (2017). Drivers for implementing green building technologies: An international survey of experts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 386–394.
• [10] Rezaallah, A., Bolognesi, C., & Khoraskani, R.A. (2012). LEED and BREEAM; Comparison between policies, assessment criteria and calculation methods. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Building Sustainability Assessment (BSA). Porto, Portugal.
• [11] LEED, LEED Homepage. (2017). Top 10 countries for LEED national profile: Turkey. Available from: https://www.usgbc.org/articles/top-10-countries-leed-national-profile-turkey, Assessed 07 October 2017.
• [12] Suzer, O. (2015). A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems. Journal of Environment Management, 154, 266–283.
• [13] Darko, A., & Chan, A.P.C. (2016). Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International, 57, 53–63.
• [14] Awadh, O. (2017). Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS and Estidama critical analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 11, 25–29.
• [15] Hu, M., Cunningham, P., & Gilloran, S. (2017). Sustainable design rating system comparison using a life-cycle methodology. Building and Environment, 126, 410–421.
• [16] Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Hu, F., & Wang, Y. (2017). Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China, Britain, United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 262–271.
• [17] Mattoni, B., Guattarib, C., Evangelisti, L., Bisegnaa, F., Gorib, P., & Asdrubali, F. (2018). Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, 950-960.
• [18] Rastogi, A., Choi, J.K., Hong, T., & Lee, M. (2017). Impact of different LEED versions for green building certification and energy efficiency rating system: A multifamily midrise case study. Applied Energy, 205, 732–740.
• [19] Roderick, C., Mcewan, Y., & Alonso, D. (2009). Comparison of energy performance assessment between LEED, BREEAM and Green Star, in building simulation. In: Eleventh International IBPSA Conference. Scotland, p. 1167–1176.
• [20] Ma, J., & Cheng, J.C.P. (2016). Data-driven study on the achievement of LEED credits using percentage of average score and association rule analysis. Building and Environment, 98, 121–132.
• [21] Wu, P., Mao, C., Wang, J., Song, Y., & Wang, X. (2016). A decade review of the credits obtained by LEED v2.2 certified green building projects. Building and Environment, 102, 167–178.
• [22] Wu, P., Song, Y., Shou, W., Chi, H., Chong, H.Y., & Sutrisna, M. (2017). A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 370–379.
• [23] Wu, P., Song, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, X., Zhao, X., & HE, Q. (2018). Regional Variations of Credits Obtained by LEED 2009 Certified Green Buildings-A Country Level Analysis. Sustainability, 10(20), 1-18.
• [24] Da Silva, L. and Ruwanpura, Y.(2009). Review of theLEED points obtained by Canadian bulding projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 15(2), 38-54.
• [25] Xia, B., Zuo, J., Skitmore, M., Pullen, S., & Chen Q. (2013). Green Star Points Obtained by Australian Building Projects. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 19(4), 302-308.
• [26] Zuo, J., Xia, B., Chen, Q., Pullen, S., & Skitmore, M. (2016). Green building rating for office buildings – lessons learned. Journal of Green Building, 11(2), 131-146.
• [27] Celik, K. (2016). LEED certification systems and evaluation of their implementation in Turkey (in Turkish). Master Thesis. Istanbul Culture University, Turkey.
• [28] Bastanoglu, E. (2017). Evaluation of LEED green building certification system practices: Europe and Turkey (in Turkish). Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Turkey.
• [29] Gokbayrak, (2016). A. Evaluation of green building criteria according to development level of countries (in Turkish). Master Thesis. Gazi University, Turkey.
• [30] Gunes, S.B. (2017). Analysis of buildings with LEED and BREEAM green building certificate in Turkey (in Turkish). Master Thesis. Haliç University, Turkey.
• [31] LEED, LEED Homepage. (2017). Directory of projects. Available from: https://www.usgbc.org/projects/list/?keys=turkey, Assessed 11 November 2017.
• [32] BREEAM, BREEAM Homepage. (2017). Directory of projects. Available from: https://www.breeam.com/projects/explore/buildings.jsp?sectionid=0&projectType=&rating=&certNo=&buildingName=&client=&developer=&certBody=&assessor=&location=&countryID=7&partid=10023&Submit=Search, Assessed 11 November 2017.
• [33] CEDBIK, CEDBIK Homepage. (2017). Available from: https://cedbik.org/tr/cedbik-zirve-15-pg/cedbik-kongre-2016-16-pg/cedbik-kongre-2016-belgelendirme-18-pg, Assessed 11 November 2017.
• [34] DGNB, DGNB Homepage. (2017) DGNB pre-certified and certified projects-Turkey. Available from: http://www.dgnb-system.de/en/projects/index.php?filter_Freitextsuche=&filter_Land=T%C3%BCrkei&filter_Bundesland=&filter_Standort=&filter_Jahr=&filter_Zertifizierungsart=&filter_Nutzungsprofil=&filter_Zertifiziert_von_1=&filter_Verliehenes_Guetesiegel=&filter_Architekt=, Assessed 11 November 2017.
• [35] Aktas, B., & Ozorhon, B. (2015). Green building certification process of existing buildings in developing countries: Cases from Turkey. Journal of Management Engineering, 31(6), 05015002-05015002-9.
• [36] Uslu, Y.D., Hancioglu, Y., & Demir, E. (2015). Applicability to green entrepreneurship in Turkey: A situation analysis. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 195, 1238–1245.
• [37] Canitez, I.S. (2013). System approaches appropriate model for Turkey conditions relating to the sustainable building production process based on certification (in Turkish). Doctoral dissertation. Trakya University, Turkey.
• [38] Komurlu, R., Arditi, D., & Gurgun, A.P. (2014). Applicability of LEED’s energy and atmosphere category in three developing countries. Energy and Building, 84, 690-697.
• [39] Olubunmi, O.A, Xia, P.B., & Skitmore, M. (2016). Green building incentives: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1611–1621.
• [40] Saglam, N.G., Yilmaz, A.Z., Becchio, C., & Corgnati, S.P. (2017). A comprehensive cost-optimal approach for energy retrofit of existing multi-family buildings: Application to apartment blocks in Turkey. Energy and Building, 150, 224–238.
• [41] Green Building Information Gateway (GBIG), GBIG Homepage. (2017). Available from: <http://www.gbig.org/collections/14544/buildings>, Assessed 11 November 2017.
• [42] Thomollari, X., Bahadir, U., Togan, V., & Tokdemir, O.B. (2017). Reducing water consumption with sustainable building design: A case study. The Turkish Journal of Occupational / Environmental Medicine and Safety, 2(3), 444–453.
• [43] Aktas, B. (2011). Converting existing buildings to green buildings: Implementations in Turkey. Master thesis. Boğaziçi University, Turkey.
• [44] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), EPA Homepage. (2016). Report on the Environment (ROE). Available from: https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/chapter/air/indoorair.cfm, Assessed 18 January 2018.
• [45] European Commission (EC), EC Homepage. (2003). Indoor air pollution new EU research reveals higher risks than previously though. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-03-1278_en.htm, Assessed 18 January 2018.
• [46] Kubba, S. (2017). Handbook of green building design and construction LEED, BREEAM, and Green Globes. (P. Jardim, Ed.) (Second). United States: Joe Hayton. p. 353-359.
• [47] Ekincioglu, O., Gurgun, A.P., Engin, Y., Tarhan, M., & Kumbaracibasi, S. (2013). Approaches for sustainable cement production: A case study from Turkey. Energy and Building, 66, 136–142.
• [48] Ulubeyli, S., Kazaz, A., & Arslan, V. (2017). Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: Management issues. Procedia Engineering, 172, 1190–1197.
• [49] Arslan, H., Cosgun, N., & Salgin, B. (2012). Construction and demolition waste management in Turkey. Intechopen, 313-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/46110.
• [50] Gundogan, H. (2012). Motivators and barriers for green building construction market in Turkey. Master thesis. Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
• [51] Mohammadi, S. (2015). The future of green buılding contracts in Turkey. Master thesis. Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
• [52] Arik, A. (2016). Sustainability of renewable energy policies: an evaluation in terms of EU countries and Turkey (in Turkish). Master thesis. Ordu University, Turkey.
• [53] Gurgun, A.P., & Arditi, D. (2018). Assessment of energy credits in LEED certified buildings based on certification levels and project ownership. Building, 8(29), 1-20.
• [54] Illankoon, I.M.C.S., Tam, V. W.Y., Le, K.N., Shen, L. (2017). Key credit criteria among international green building rating tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 209-220.
• [55] Uğur, L.O, Leblebici N. (2019). Investigation of the effects of energy and water saving benefits on property value in LEED-certified green buildings. Teknik Dergi, 30(1), 8753-8776.