Data Collection for Implementation of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) in Izmir, Turkey

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 6, 11361 - 11380, 01.11.2021

Mohammad Razeq Shakhan Ali Topal Burak Şengöz

https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.651399

Cited By: 4

Öz

Developing countries like Turkey are trying to implement the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The implementation of this method requires comprehensive local data collection, evaluation, and, if necessary, a local calibration. The objective of this study is to prepare local data such as climate, traffic, and materials for evaluation and local calibration of MEPDG for Izmir City. For this purpose, the climate and traffic data were obtained, analysed, and converted to the MEPDG format. Besides, the bound and unbound pavement material properties were determined. Since some of the obtained local data like climate, vehicle classification, traffic growth factor, and axle load distribution cannot be directly used as design inputs, they were developed and converted to a suitable format to be used in the MEPDG. The output of this study can be used as design inputs for the evaluation and local calibration the MEPDG in Izmir and serves as a guide for data preparation for other parts of the country.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Climate, Data collection, material, Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG), traffic

Kaynakça

• [1] AASHTO, Mechanistic empirical pavement design guide. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., USA, 2008.
• [2] Timm, D. H., Roobin, M. M., Tran N., Rodezno C., Flexible pavement design – State of the practice, NCAT Report 14‐04, National Asphalt Pavement Association, USA, 2014.
• [3] AASHTO, Guide for the local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Washington, D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C., USA, 2010.
• [4] Öztürk, H. I., Tan, E. B., Şengün, E., Yaman, İ. Ö., Farklı trafik, zemin, malzeme ve iklim koşulları için mekanistik-ampirik (M-E) yöntemle tasarlanan derzli donatısız rijit üstyapı sistemlerinin karşılaştırılması, J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., 34(2), 771–783, 2019.
• [5] E. Şengün, E. H. I. ÖZTÜRK, H. I. and İ. Ö. YAMAN, İ. Ö., Mekanistik-Ampirik ve Geleneksel Beton Yol Tasarım Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması: Afyon-Emirdağ Deneme Kesimi, Tek. Dergi, 31 (5), 2020.
• [6] Caliendo, C., Local calibration and implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for flexible pavement design, J. Transp. Eng., 138(3), 348–360, 2012.
• [7] Ghosh, A., Padmarekha, A., Krishnan, J. M., Implementation and proof-checking of mechanistic-empirical pavement design for Indian highways using AASHTOWARE Pavement ME Design Software, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 104, 119–128, 2013.
• [8] Tarefder, R., Rodriguez-Ruiz, J. I., Local calibration of MEPDG for flexible pavements in New Mexico, J. Transp. Eng., 139(10), 981–991, 2013.
• [9] Elshaeb, M. A., El-Badawy, S. M., Shawaly, E. S. A., Development and impact of the Egyptian climatic conditions on flexible pavement performance, Am. J. Civ. Eng. Archit., 2(3), 115–121, 2014.
• [10] M. Dadwan, M. Abo-Hashema, H. Faheem, and M. Hashem, “Modeling Pavement Performance Using LTPP Database for Flexible Pavements,” Tek. Dergi, 31(4), 2020.
• [11] Sadek, H. A., Masad, E. A., Sirin, O., Al-Khalid, H., Sadeq, M. A., Little, D., Implementation of mechanistic-empirical pavement analysis in the state of Qatar, Int. J. Pavement Eng., 15(6), 495–511, 2014.
• [12] Ma, H., Wang, D., Zhou, C., Feng, D., Calibration on MEPDG low temperature cracking model and recommendation on asphalt pavement structures in seasonal frozen region of China, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 2015, 1–11, 2015.
• [13] Alqaili, A. H., Alsoliman H. A., Preparing data for calibration of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in central Saudi Arabia, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. J. Urban Civ. Eng., 11(2), 248–255, 2017.
• [14] Chhade, R. H., Mrad, R., Houssami, L., Chehab, G., Asce, A. M. Formulation of traffic inputs required for the implementation of the M-E PDG formulation of traffic inputs required for the implementation of the M-E PDG in data-scarce regions : Lebanon case study, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. ASCE, 30(9), 04018198-14, 2018.
• [15] Turkish General Directorate of Highways, Karayolları esnek üstyapılar projelendirme rehberi. Ankara, Turkey, 2008.
• [16] Huang, Y. H., Pavement Analysis and Design, Second Edi. Pearson/Prentice Hall, USA, 2004.
• [17] Schwartz, C. W., Carvalho, R. L., Evaluation of Mechanistic-Empirical Design Procedure, SP0077B41, University of Maryland, Maryland State, USA, 2007.
• [18] AASHTO, Mechanistic-empirical pavement design. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,Washington, D.C., USA, 2015.
• [19] Turkish General Directorate of Highways, Trafi̇k ve ulaşım bi̇lgi̇leri̇, Trafik Güvenliği Dairesi Başkanlığı Ulaşım Etütleri Şubesi Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Turkey, 2018.
• [20] Turkish General Directorate of Highways, Karayollarında ağır taşıt trafiğinin ve yük taşımacılığının özellikleri ve eğilimleri, Trafik Güvenliği Dairesi Başkanlığı Ulaşım Etütleri Şubesi Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2016.
• [21] Turkish General Directorate of Highways, Devlet yolları trafik akımı özellikleri ve trafik parametreleri, Strateji Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı Ulaşım ve Maliyet Etütleri Şubesi Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Turkey, 2009.
• [22] Özcana, S., Akpinar, M. V., Esnek Üstyapılarda Kritik Tekerlek ve Aks Konfigürasyonların Mekanistik Analizlere Göre Tespit Edilmesi, Teknik Dergi, 25(121), 6625-6654, 2014.
• [23] Turkish General Directorate of Highways, Karayolu teknik şartname, Vol. 1. Turkish General Directorate of Highways, Ankara, Turkey, 2013.
• [24] Orhan, F., Bitümlü karışımlar lab. çalışmaları, Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü, Ar-Ge Dairesi Başkanlığı Üstyapı Geliştirme Şubesi Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2012.
• [25] Güngör, A. G., Sağlık, A., Mekanistik ampirik üstyapı tasarımında esneklik modülünün şartnamelere uyarlanması, 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume, 455–463, 2012.