THE TRICKSTER FIGURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IDENTITY IN THOMSON HIGHWAY’S KISS OF THE FUR QUEEN
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Brydon, D. (2001). Compromising postcolonialisms: Tomson Highway’s Kiss of the Fur Queen and contemporary postcolonial debates. In G. Ratchcliffe & G. Turcotte (Eds.), Compromising post/colonialism(s): Challenging narratives and practices (pp. 15–29). Sydney: Dangaroo.
- Clayton, S. (2000). Kiss of the Fur Queen. Norman: University of Oklahoma.
- Combs, A. & Mark, H. (1990). Synchronicity: Science, myth, and the trickster. New York: Paragon House.
- Eaton, H. (2005). Introducing ecofeminist theologies. T&T Clark International.
- Howells, C. A. (2014). Towards a recognition of being: Tomson Highway’s Kiss of the Fur Queen and Eden Robinson’s Monkey Beach. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 43, 145–149.
- Hyde, L. (1998). Trickster makes this world. New York: North Point.
- Jung, C. G. (1972). Four archetypes: Mother, rebirth, spirit, trickster. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Kristeva, J. (1975). The system and the speaking subject. The Peter De Ridder.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İngiliz ve İrlanda Dili, Edebiyatı ve Kültürü
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Fulya Kincal
*
0000-0002-7800-6141
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi
7 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi
10 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2024 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4
Cited By
The Discourse Created by the Animal in Gölgesizler and İnce Memed
Melius: Journal of Narrative and Language Studies
https://doi.org/10.62425/melius.1697656