HAVLU KALİTE ALGISININ SUBJEKTİF VE OBJEKTİF DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2024, , 99 - 108, 30.06.2024

Gülşah Susurluk , Erkan Turker , Yüksel İkiz

https://doi.org/10.7216/teksmuh.1376706

Öz

Bu çalışmada, tekstil sektöründe ev tekstili ürünleri içerisinde önemli bir yere sahip olan havlu kumaşların kalite algısı öncelikle havlu alanında profesyonel deneyime sahip uzman kişiler tarafından subjektif olarak değerlendirilmiş, daha sonra havlu kumaşlar Kawabata KES sistemi ile ölçülerek objektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Havlu kalite algısının hem subjektif hem de objektif olarak değerlendirilmesi amacıyla 10 farklı havlu üretici firma ziyaret edilmiş ve bu firmalardan 73 adet havlu numunesi toplanmıştır. Yapılan değerlendirme sonuçları incelendiğinde; herhangi bir havlu kumaşın kalite değerini yapılan testler sonucunda belirli limitler içinde veren, üretici ve kullanıcıların kabul edeceği objektif bir yöntem geliştirerek, ölçülen veriler arasında korelasyon kurulup TQV (Total Quality Value) değeri için, subjektif ve objektif değerlendirmeler arasında max korelasyon katsayısı 0,963 olarak bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Havlu, havlu kalite algısı, subjektif değerlendirme, objektif değerlendirme, KES sistemi, TQV

Destekleyen Kurum

TUBİTAK ve DENİB

Proje Numarası

1059B191700771 numaralı TUBİTAK projesi

Teşekkür

1059B191700771 numaralı projeye destek veren TUBİTAK ve DENİB'e teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

• Slater, K. (1997). Subjective textile testing, The Journal of The Textile Institute, 88, 79-91.
• Sülar, V., & Okur, A. (2007). Sensory evaluation methods for tactile properties of fabrics, Journal of Sensory Studies, 22 (1): 1-16.
• Susurluk, G., Türker, E., & İkiz, Y. (2020). Uzman bakış açısına göre havlu kalite algısının değerlendirilmesi, Uşak Üniversitesi Fen ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 96-104.
• Peirce, F. T. (1930). The handle of cloth as a measurable quantity, Journal of The Textile Institute, 21, 377-416.
• Kawabata, S.,& Niwa, M. (1996). Modern textile characterization methods, Chapter 10, Objective Measurement of Fabric Hand, 329-353.
• Chang, S. (2010). Olfactory-tactile interactions and their implications for retailing, MSc Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
• Citrin, A. V., Stem, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer need for tactile input an internet retailing challenge, Journal of Business Research, 56, 915-922.
• Goett, S. (2010). Linking threads of experience and lines of thought: Everyday textiles in the narration of the self, PhD Thesis, The University of East London, London, England.
• Grohmann, B., Spangenberg, E. R., & Sprott, D. E. (2007). The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings, Journal of Retailing, 83, 237-245.
• Kandzhikova, G. D., & Germanova-Krasteva, D. S. (2016). Subjective evaluation of terry fabrics handle, The Journal of the Textile Institute, 107(3), 353-363.
• Kergoat, M., Giboreau, A., Nicod, H., Faye, P., Diaz, E., Beetschen, M. A., & Meyer, T. (2012) Consumer preference for tactile softness: A question of affect intensity?, Journal of Sensory Studies, 27, 232–246.
• Mahar, T. J., Wang, H., & Postle, R. (2013). A review of fabric tactile properties and their subjective assessment for next-to-skin knitted fabrics, The Journal of The Textile Institute, 104, 572-589.
• McCabe, D. B., & Nowlis, S. M. (2003). The effect of examining actual products or product descriptions on consumer preference, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 431-439.
• Nogueira, C., Cabeco-Silva, M. E., Schacher, L., & Adolphe, D. (2009). Textile materials: Tactile describers, Journal of Food Technology, 7, 66-70.
• Pan, N. (2007). Quantification and evaluation of human tactile sense towards fabrics, International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 1, 48-60.
• Sülar, V., & Okur, A. (2008). Objective evaluation of fabric handle by simple measurement methods, Textile Research Journal, 78(10), 856-868.
• Ikiz, Y., Sato, T., Arık, B., Matsumoto, Y., & Sarıkaya, G. (2017). The effects of psychological manners on visual and tactile evaluation of towel preferences of Turkish and Japanese consumers, The Journal of The Textile Institute, 108(7), 1150-1156.
• Susurluk, G., Ikiz, Y., & Türker, E. (2020). Subjective evaluation of towel quality perception according to the experts’ and non-experts’ viewpoint, Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 3(2), 113-122.
• Overvliet, K. E., Karana, E., & Soto-Faraco S. (2016). Perception of naturalness in textiles, Materials and Design, 90, 1192-1199.
• Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing, Journal of Business Research, 59, 765-769.
• Kawabata, S. (1980). The standardization and analysis of hand evaluation 2nd edition, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka.
• Kawabata, S. (1982). The development of the objective measurement of fabric hand, Proceedings of First Japan-Australia Symposium on Objective Spesification of Fabric Quality, Mechanical Properties and Performance, Kyoto, 31-59.
• Kawabata, S., & Niwa, M. (1989). Fabric performance in clothing and clothing manufacture, Journal of Textile Institute, 80(1), 19- 49.
• Kawabata, S., & Niwa, M. (1998). Clothing engineering based on objective ve measurement technology, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 10, 263-272.
• Kawabata, S., Niwa, M., & Wang, F. (1994). Objective hand measurement of non-woven fabrics. Part I: Development of equations. Textile Research Journal, 6, 597–610.
• Singh, J. P., Behera, B. K., & Matsudaira, M. (2014). Objective evaluation of terry fabric hand, The Journal of The Textile Institute, 105, 467-476.
• Mahar, T. J., & Postle R. (1989). Measuring and interpreting low-stress fabric mechanical and surface properties Part IV: Subjective evaluation of fabric handle, Textile Research Journal, 721-733.
• Grover, G., Sultan, M. A., & Spivak, S. M. (1993). A screening technique for fabric handle, Journal of The Textile Institute, 84(3), 486- 494.
• Radhakrishnaiah, R., Tejatanalert, S., & Sawhney, A. P. S. (1993). Handle and comfort properties of woven fabrics made from random blend and cotton-covered cotton/polyester yarns, Textile Research Journal, 63(10), 573-579.
• Alimaa, D., Matsuo, T., Nakajima, M., & Takahashi, M. (2000). Sensory measurements of the main mechanical parameters of knitted fabrics, Textile Research Journal, 70(11), 985-990.
• Barker, R. L. (2002). From fabric hand to thermal comfort: The evolving role of objective measurements in explaining human comfort response to textiles, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 14, 181-200.
• Mukhopodhyay, A., Sharma I. C., & Sharma M. (2002). Evaluation of comfort properties of polyester-viscose suiting fabrics, Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 27(1), 72-76.
• Arı, E. (2010). Poliester/yün karışımı dokuma kumaşların konfor özelliklerinin KES-F sistemi ile araştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
• Güney, E. (2012). Tekstil mühendisliğinde kullanılan performans değerlerinin istatistiksel analizi, Bitirme Tasarım Projesi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, İstanbul.
• Nishimatsu, T., Kanai, H., Fujiwara, M., Takahashi, K., Kishine, N., Fujita, H., Furuta, A., & Masukawa, A. (2014). Relation between hand of bath towel and physical properties, Journal of Textile Engineering, 60(6), 91-98.
• Yuriko, K., Sachiko, S., & Hiroko, Y. (2019). Tactile feel of washed towels and their compression and surface properties, Journal of Textile Engineering, 65(6), 97-103.
• Yick, L. K., Cheng, K. P. S., & How, Y. L. (1995). Subjective and objective evaluation of men`s shirting, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 7(4), 17-29.
• Kayseri, G. Ö., Özdil, N., & Mengüç, G. S. (2012). Sensorial comfort of textile materials, Woven Fabrics, Han-Yong Jeon, InTechOpen, 235.
• Gladwell, M. Outliers, Mediacat. 2016.
• Mäkinen, M., Meinander, H., Luible, C., & Magnenat-Thalmann, N. (2005). Influence of physical parameters on fabric hand, proceedings of the haptex'05 workshop on haptic and tactile perception of deformable objects, University of Hannover, December.
• AATCC. (2011). AATCC Evaluation procedure 5, Fabric hand: Guidelines for the Subjective Evaluation of, USA.
• Howorth, W. S., & Oliver, P. H. (1958). The Application of multiple factor analysis to the assessment of fabric, The Journal of The Textile Institute, 49(11), 540-553
• Winakor, G., Kim, C. J., & Wolins, L. (1980). Fabric hand: Tactile sensory assessment, Textile Research Journal, 50, 601-610.
• Chen, Y., Collier, B., Hu, P., & Quebedeaux, D. (2000). Objective evaluation of fabric softness, Textile Research Journal, 70(5), 443-448.
• Frydrych, I., & Matusiak, M. (2003). Changes in fabric handle resulting from different fabric finishing, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 11(2), 42-47.
• Grinevicuite, D., Daukantiene, V., & Gutauskas, M. (2005). Textile hand: Comparison of two evaluation method, Materials Science, 11(1), 57-63.
• Özçelik, G., Süpüren, G., Gülümser, T., & Tarakçıoğlu, I. (2008). A study on subjective and objective evaluation of the handle properties of shirt fabrics, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 16(3), 56-62.
• Arık, B., İkiz, Y., Çalışkan, M., & Karaibrahimoğlu, K. (2018). Gömleklik kumaşların tuşe özelliklerinin duyusal analiz ve fiziksel test yöntemleriyle belirlenmesi ve aralarındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(7), 1262-1271.
• An, S. K., Gam, H. J., & Cao, H. (2013). Evaluating thermal and sensorial performance of organic cotton, bamboo-blended, and soybean-blended fabrics, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31, 157-166.
• Luible, C., Varheenmaa, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., & Meinander, H. (2007). Subjective fabric evaluation, International Conference on Cyberworlds, 57, 285 291.