Research Article

Exploring pre-service pre-school teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science: A qualitative study

Volume: 4 Number: 2 December 31, 2022
EN

Exploring pre-service pre-school teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science: A qualitative study

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine pre-service pre-school teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. In this study, phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. A total of 36 pre-service pre-school teachers who were studying in the fourth grade of a university in Turkey in the Preschool Teaching Department of the Faculty of Education in the 2020-2021 spring semester participated in the research. A questionnaire consisting of ten open-ended questions was used in the study. The data were analyzed by content analysis. As a result of this research, it was observed that pre-service pre-school teachers mostly did not have sufficient views on the examined dimensions of the nature of science and they had misconceptions. Based on the results of the research, it can be suggested that postgraduate education, in-service training and workshops focused on the nature of science will be beneficial for teachers and pre-service teachers. In addition, it may be suggested to improve the courses on the nature of science and scientific inquiry and/or add such courses to the undergraduate program. It can be suggested that the courses on the nature of science should be given not only at the undergraduate level, but also in other teaching levels in accordance with the grade level.

Keywords

Preservice preschool teachers , nature of science , qualitative study

References

  1. Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785-810.
  2. Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
  3. Akerson, V. L., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity‐based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.
  4. Akerson, V. L., Avsar Erumit, B., & Elcan Kaynak, N. (2019). Teaching nature of science through children’s literature: An early childhood preservice teacher study. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2765-2787.
  5. Akerson, V. L., Buck, G. A., Donnelly, L. A., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. S. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537-549.
  6. Arı, Ü. (2010). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının ve sınıf öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
  7. Aslan, O. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşleri ve bu görüşlerin sınıf uygulamalarına yansımaları (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  8. Baykara, H., & Yakar, Z. (2020). Preservice Science Teachers’ Views about Scientific Inquiry: The Case of Turkey and Taiwan. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 161-192.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. International Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
  10. Doğan Bora, N. (2005). Türkiye genelinde ortaöğretim fen branşı öğretmen ve öğrencilerinin bilimin doğası üzerine görüşlerinin araştırılması (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
APA
Sönmez Eryaşar, A., & Tanık Önal, N. (2022). Exploring pre-service pre-school teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science: A qualitative study. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1190960