Research Article

Easing the Burden: How Does Teacher Self-Efficacy Mediate the Association Between Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction? International Evidence from PISA 2022

Volume: 8 Number: 1 March 25, 2026

Easing the Burden: How Does Teacher Self-Efficacy Mediate the Association Between Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction? International Evidence from PISA 2022

Abstract

While teaching is a rewarding profession, its inherent stress often undermines job satisfaction, highlighting the need to understand factors that influence this relationship. This study investigated the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy (TSE) in the association between occupational stress and job satisfaction using data from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). Drawing on the Transactional Model of Stress and Social Cognitive Theory, the study analyzed responses from 68054 teachers across 18 countries. Linear regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses were employed to investigate direct and indirect effects. The findings revealed that while occupational stress significantly and negatively predicted both TSE and job satisfaction, TSE was found as a significant and positive predictor of job satisfaction. Mediation analysis confirmed the partial mediator role of TSE, accounting for %14.6 of the total effect. These findings highlighted the buffering role of TSE in mitigating the adverse impact of occupational stress on job satisfaction. The findings offer key implications for teacher training, policy, and leadership by emphasizing the role of TSE.

Keywords

teacher self-efficacy , occupational stress , job satisfaction , mediation analysis , PISA2022

References

  1. Acar, Ö. F. (2021). Examination of job satisfaction, occupational burnout and job stress levels of special education teachers (Publication No. 659991) [Master’s Thesis, Marmara University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  4. Benmansour, N. (1998). Job satisfaction, stress and coping strategies among Moroccan high school teachers. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 13–33.
  5. Boe, E. E., Cook, L. H., & Sunderland, R. J. (2008). Teacher turnover: Examining exit attrition, teaching area transfer, and school migration. Exceptional Children, 75(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029080750010
  6. Büyükşahin Çevik, G. (2017). The roles of life satisfaction, teaching efficacy, and self-esteem in predicting teachers’ job satisfaction. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050306
  7. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers' job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  9. Demirdağ, S. (2015). Assessing teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Middle school teachers. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5(3), 35–43.
  10. Demirtas, Z. (2010). Teachers’ job satisfaction levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1069–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.287
APA
Ekici, G., & Kaçak, T. (2026). Easing the Burden: How Does Teacher Self-Efficacy Mediate the Association Between Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction? International Evidence from PISA 2022. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1776536