The Assessment of Economics and Sociology on The Basis of "Market": A Contemporary Review

Yıl 2021, , 27 - 48, 26.02.2021

Emrah Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.824437

Cited By: 1

Öz

The nonchalant attitude of economics to the social function of the market has been an obstacle in building an intellectual bridge between economics and sociology. Even though classical economics had paid a little attention to the market, it never considered the market as a social structure. Neoclassical economics boiled the market down to an abstract field in which an individual behavior was predictable as an individual was assumed as rational and had perfect information in a transaction. During the late 19th century, sociologists criticized neoclassical assumptions of the market on the ground that the market plays a constitutional role in social action. The close attention of classical sociologists to the market provided a favorable ground for the birth of economic sociology. Economic sociology peaked twice in the history of sociology while sociology had a close interest in the market. In this study, I will pursue the question of why economics has not seen the market as a social structure, although sociology stresses the social dimension of the market.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Market, Neoclassical Economics, Sociology, Economic Sociology

İktisat ve Sosyoloji İlişkisini ‘Piyasa’ Üzerinden Değerlendirmek: Güncel Bir Okuma

Öz

İktisadın piyasanın sosyal yönünü görmezden gelmesi, onun sosyal bilimlerin diğer alanlarıyla iş birliği kurmasını engellemektedir. İktisat düşüncesinde sosyal yanına vurgu yapılmayıp, alıcı ve satıcıların bir araya geldiği ama toplumdan soyutlanmış olan piyasa tasavvuru, sosyolojik muhayyilede yerini eylemin ve haliyle toplumsallaşmanın başladığı somut bir alana bırakır. Sosyolojinin piyasaya yorumu, bir ekonomizm eleştirisinin ötesinde, ekonomi sosyolojisinin doğmasına neden olmuştur. En yalın anlamıyla iktisadi olgulara sosyolojik yaklaşım anlamına gelen ekonomi sosyolojisi, sosyoloji tarihi boyunca iki kez yükseliş trendi yakalamıştır. Ekonomi sosyolojinin yükseliş trendleri incelediğinde, her iki dönemde de sosyolojinin piyasaya ve iktisadi olgulara olan ilgisinin arttığı rahatlıkla görülebilir. Piyasa mefhumunun iktisat ve sosyoloji içindeki serüveni, bir yönüyle iki bilim arasındaki ilişkinin seyri hakkında da fikir vermektedir. Bu çalışmada ilk olarak klasik ve neoklasik iktisatçıların ellerinde yolculuğuna toplumsuz olarak başlayan piyasanın, hangi tartışmalar ışığında, önce klasik sosyologların, ardından ise çağdaş sosyoloji yorumlarının etkisiyle toplumsal sistemin bir parçası haline geldiği tartışmaya açılacaktır. Bu yönüyle çalışma, sosyolojinin piyasayı toplumla buluşturma çabasından hareketle, iktisat ve sosyolojinin değişen bilimsel sınırlarını ve ekonomi sosyolojinin tarihsel yolculuğunu da aktaracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Piyasa, Neoklasik Ekonomi, Sosyoloji, Ekonomi Sosyolojisi

Kaynakça

• Abolafia, Y. Mitchel. (1996a). Markets as cultures: An ethnographic approach, in Michel Callon (Eds.), The Law of Market. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Abolafia, Y. Mitchel. (1996b). Hyper-rational gaming. Journal of Contemporary Etnography, 25(2), 226-250.
• Arrow, Kenneth. (1963). Uncertanity and the welfare economics of medical care. The American Economic Review, 53, 941-973.
• Aspers, Patrick. (1999). The economic sociology of Alfred Marshall: An overview. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4).
• Baker, Wayne. (1981). Markets as networks: A multimethod study of trading networks in securities market (Basılmamış doktora tezi, Northwestern Üniversitesi).
• Bandelj, Nina., Wherry, F. and Zelizer, V. (2017). Money talks: Explaining how money really works. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Becker, Gary. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and emprical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Becker, Gary. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach, Journal of Politial Economy, 76, 169-217.
• Becker, Gary. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, Massachusets: Harvard University Press.
• Bourdeiue, Pierre. (2005). The principles of economic anthropology. In Richard Swedberg and Neil Smelser (Eds.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Coleman, James S. (1993). The impact of Gary Becker on Sociology. Acta Sociologica, 36(3), 169-178.
• Collins, Randall. (2015). Sosyolojide dört ana gelenek (Ümit Tatlıcan, Çev. ). Bursa: Sentez Yayıncılık.
• DiMaggio, Paul. (1994). Culture and economy. In Richard Swedberg and Neil Smelser (Eds.). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Fligstein, Neil. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions, American Sociological Review, 61, 657-671.
• Fligstein, Neil. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first century capitalist societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Granovetter, Mark. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and carreers. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.
• Granovetter, Mark. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
• Groenewegen, Peter. (1995). A soaring eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842-1924. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Hirshleifer, Jack.(1985). The expanding domain of economics. The American Economic Review, 75, 53-68.
• Homans, George. (1961). Social behavior: Its elemantary forms. New York: Harcourt
• Jevons, W. Stanley. (1965). The theory of political economy. New York: Kelley Press.
• Marshall, Alfred. (1919). Industry and trade. London: MacMillan.
• Marshall, Alfred. (1961). The principle of economics. London: MacMillan.
• Maus, Marcell. (1967). The gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic society. New York: Norton Press.
• Mill, J. Stuart. (1987). Principles of political economy. New York: August Kelley.
• Özatalay, Cem. (2011). Türkiye’de "geri dönemeyen" ekonomi sosyolojisi ya da "açılamayan" Sosyal Bilimler!... Sosyoloji Dergisi, 23, 165-182.
• Polanyi, Karl. (1986). Büyük dönüşüm: Çağımızın siyasal ve ekonomik kökenleri (Ayşe Buğra, Çev.). İstanbul: Alan Yayıncılık.
• Ricardo, David. (1973). The principles of political economy and taxation. London: J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd.
• Simmel, George. (2014). Paranın felsefesi (Öykü Didem Aydın, Yavuz Alogan, Çev.). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
• Smith, Adam. (2015). Milletlerin zenginliği (Haldun Derin, Çev.). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
• Souther, Ralph W. (1933). Prolegomena to relativity economics: An elementary study in the mechanics of an expanding economic universe. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Spence, Michael. (1974). Market signaling: The informational structure of hiring and related process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Swedberg, Richard. (1990). Economics and sociology redifining their boundaries coversations with economists and sociologists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Swedberg, Richard. (2003). The principles of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Trigilia, Carlo. (2002). Economic sociology: State, market, and society in modern capitalism. Massachusset: Blakwell Publishing
• Uzzi, Brain. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddednes, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
• Walras, Leon. (2010). Elements of pure economics. New York: Routledge Press.
• Weber, Marx. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• White, Harrison. (1981). Where do markets come from, American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 517-547.
• White, Harrison. (2002). Markets from networks: Socioeconomics models of production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Zelizer, Viviana. (1994). The social meaning of money: Pin Money, pay Checks, poor relief and other currencies. New York: Basic Books.