ANALYSIS OF LARGE-SCALE PATH LOSS MODEL AT 33 GHZ IN INDOOR LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 41, 1 - 9, 28.06.2022

Cihat Şeker , Muhammet Tahir Guneser

https://doi.org/10.55071/ticaretfbd.954475

Öz

In this study, two important large-scale path loss models, which are Close-In (CI) model with free space reference distance and Float Intercept (FI) model, were compared in indoor laboratory scenario for fifth-generation (5G) radio systems. Comparisons are conducted using a ray-tracing-based simulation environment at ten different measurement points, at 33 GHz center frequency, and distances between 1,5 to 9 m. According to the results obtained, the one-parameter CI model is simpler and more consistent than the two-parameter FI model. CI model offers better simulation accuracy, greater simplicity, and better iterability between experiments, besides better adaptation to both line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight conditions. In addition, the CI model exhibit high stability at wide frequency ranges.

Anahtar Kelimeler

33 GHz, large-scale path loss model, CI model, FI model, indoor laboratory environment

BİNA-İÇİ LABORATUVAR ORTAMINDA 33 GHZ'DE BÜYÜK ÖLÇEKLİ YOL KAYBI ANALİZİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, beşinci nesil (5G) radyo sistemleri için bina-içi laboratuvar ortamında iki önemli geniş ölçekli yol kaybı modeli karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu modeller, yakın mesafe (YM) referans modeli ve kayan kesme (KK) modelidir. Ölçümler ışın izleme temelli bir simülasyon programı ile 10 farklı noktada, 33 GHz merkez frekansında yapılmıştır. Verici ile alıcı arasındaki mesafe 1,5 ila 9 m arasında değişmektedir. Elde edilen sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, bir parametreli YM modeli, iki parametreli KK modelinden daha basit ve daha tutarlıdır. YM modeli, verici ile alıcı arasında görüş hattı olan ve olmayan koşullara daha iyi adaptasyon sağlayabilmektedir. Ayrıca ölçümler sırasında daha iyi simülasyon doğruluğu, daha fazla basitlik ve tekrarlanabilirlik sağlamaktadır. Bunların yanı sıra YM modeli geniş frekans aralıklarında yüksek kararlılık sergileyebilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

33 GHz, geniş ölçekli yol kaybı modeli, bina-içi laboratuvar ortamı, kayan kesme (KK) modeli, yakın mesafe (YM) modeli

Kaynakça

• Agubor, C.K., Akwukwuegbu, I., Olubiwe, M., Nosiri, C.O., Ehinomen, A., Olukunle, A.A., Okozi, S.O., Ezema, L. & Okeke, B.C. (2019). A comprehensive review on the feasibility and challenges of millimeter wave in emerging 5G mobile communication. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 4(3), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj040318.
• Al-samman, A.M., Azmi, M.H., Al-gumaei, Y.A., Al-hadhrami, T., Abd Rahman, T., Fazea, Y. & Al-mqdashi, A. (2020). Millimeter wave propagation measurements and characteristics for 5G system. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010335.
• Al-Samman, A.M., Abd Rahman, T., Al-Hadhrami, T., Daho, A., Hindia, MHD.N., Azmi, M.H., Dimyati, K. & Alazab, M. (2019). Comparative study of indoor propagation model below and above 6 GHZ for 5G wireless networks. Electronics (Switzerland), 8(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8010044.
• Bechta, K., Rybakowski, M. & Du, J. (2019, March 31 - April 5). Efficiency of antenna array tapering in real propagation environment of millimeter wave system. 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP, Krakow, Poland.
• Boccardi, F., Heath, R., Lozano, A., Marzetta, T.L. & Popovski, P. (2014). Five disruptive technology directions for 5G. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2014.6736746.
• Dahlman, E., Parkvall, S. & Sköld, J. (2021). What Is 5G? In 5G NR. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822320-8.00001-5.
• Dupleich, D., Müeller, R., Landmann, M., Shinwasusin, E.A., Saito, K., Takada, J.I., Luo, J., Thomä, R. & Del Galdo, G. (2019). Multi-Band propagation and radio channel characterization in street canyon scenarios for 5G and beyond. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2948869.
• Faruk, N., Abdulrasheed, I.Y., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N.T., Adetiba, E., Oloyede, A.A., Abdulkarim, A., Sowande, O., Ifijeh, A.H. & Atayero, A.A. (2021). Large-Scale radio propagation path loss measurements and predictions in the VHF and UHF bands. Heliyon. 7(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07298.
• Güneşer, M. T. & Şeker, C. (2019). Compact microstrip antenna design for 5G communication in millimeter wave at 28 GHz. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 12 (2), 679-686. https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.477293.
• Haneda, K., Zhang, J., Tan, L., Liu, G., Zheng, Y., Asplund, H., Jian Li, et al. (2016, May, 15-18). 5G 3GPP-like channel models for outdoor urban microcellular and macrocellular environments. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Nanjing, China, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCSpring.2016.7503971.
• Hemadeh, I.A., Satyanarayana, K., El-Hajjar, M. & Hanzo, L. (2018). Millimeter-wave communications: Physical channel models, design considerations, antenna constructions, and link-budget. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials. 20(2) 870-913. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2783541.
• Hong, W., Jiang, Z.H., Yu, C.. Zhou, J., Chen, P., Yu, Z., Zhang, H., et al. (2017). Multibeam antenna technologies for 5G wireless communications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 65, 6231-6249. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2017.2712819.
• Kyrö, M., Kolmonen, V.M. & Vainikainen, P. (2012). Experimental propagation channel characterization of Mm-wave radio links in urban scenarios. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 11, 865-868. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2012.2210532.
• Løvnes, G., Reis, J. J. & Raekken, R. H. (1994). Channel sounding measurements at 59 GHz in city streets. IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC. https://doi.org/10.1109/WNCMF.1994.529139.
• Maccartney, G.R., Samimi, M.K. & Rappaport, T.S. (2014). Omnidirectional path loss models in New York City at 28 GHz and 73 GHz. In IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, PIMRC, 227-231. https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2014.7136165.
• Rappaport, T.S., Gutierrez, F., Ben-Dor, E., Murdock, J.N., Qiao, Y. & Tamir, J.I. (2013). Broadband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and models using adaptive-beam antennas for outdoor urban cellular communications.” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 61(4), 1850-1859. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2012.2235056.
• Rappaport, T.S., MacCartney, G.R., Samimi, M.K. & Sun, S. (2015). Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and channel models for future wireless communication system design. IEEE Transactions on Communications. 63(9), 3029–3056. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2434384.
• Remcom. (2020). Wireless InSite reference manual. State College, PA 16801.
• Sun, S., Rappaport, T.S., Shafi, M., Tang, P., Zhang, J. & Smith, P.J. (2018). Propagation models and performance evaluation for 5G millimeter-wave bands. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(9), 8422-8439. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2848208.
• Svensson, T., Werner, M., Legouable, R., Frank, T. & Costa, E. (2007). “D1.1.2 WINNER II channel models: Part I channel models.” Projects. Celtic-Initiative.Org.
• Violette, E.J., Espeland, R.H., Debolt, R.O. Schwering, F. (1988). Millimeter-wave propagation at street level in an urban environment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26(3), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3038.
• Xing, Y., Rappaport, T.S. & Ghosh, A. (2021). Millimeter wave and sub-THz indoor radio propagation channel measurements, models, and comparisons in an office environment. IEEE Communications Letters, 25(10), 3151-3155. https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2021.3088264.