İç Hukukta Sosyoekonomik Hakların Korunması Sistemi: Etiyopya ve Türk İnsan Hakları Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 6, 63 - 100, 25.01.2021

Biruk Paulos Seydi Çelık

Öz

Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Kültürel Haklar Uluslararası Sözleşmesi (CESCR), taraf devletlerden sosyoekonomik hakların ulusal düzeyde tam olarak gerçekleşmesi için tüm mekanizmaları, özellikle yasal ve kurumsal önlemleri benimsemelerini, mevcut kaynakları dâhilinde gerektirir. Bu amaçla Sözleşmeye taraf olan devletler, sosyoekonomik haklara etkili iç hukuksal koruma sağlamak için çeşitli tedbirler almıştır. Bununla birlikte sosyoekonomik haklar, ulusal yasal sistemlerde geleneksel olarak tam koruma ve uygun uygulama mekanizmalarından yoksundur. CESCR’a taraf olan Etiyopya ve Türkiye, kendi iç hukuklarında sosyoekonomik hakları korumuşlardır. Buna göre, insan hakları enstrümanları tarafından belirlenen asgari uluslararası standartları bir karşılaştırma birimi olarak kullanan bu makale, Etiyopya ve Türk sistemlerini ulusal yargı alanlarında sosyoekonomik hakların korunması açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz etmeye çalışmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etiyopya, İnsan Hakları, Sosyoekonomik Hakların Korunması, Uluslararası İnsan Hakları Araçları, Türkiye

System For The Protection Of Socioeconomic Rights In Domestic Law: A Comparative Analysis Of Ethiopian And Turkish Human Rights Systems

Öz

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) requires states party to adopt all mechanisms, within the limits of their available resources, particularly legislative and institutional measures, for the progressive and full realization of Socio-economic Rights (SER) at national level. To this end, states party to the Covenant have taken various measures to give effective domestic legal protection to SER. However, SER customarily lack full protection and proper enforcement mechanisms at national legal systems. Ethiopia and Turkey, being parties to the CESCR, have protected SER in their respective domestic laws. Accordingly, using the minimum international standards set by human rights instruments as a unit of comparison, this article strives to comparatively analyze the Ethiopian and Turkish systems for the protection of SER at their national jurisdictions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ethiopia, Human Rights System, International Human Rights Instruments, Protection of SER, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Akbulut, O. (2015). Turkey's Reaction to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 5(2), 75–86.
• Algan, B. (2007). Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights . Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Bindman, E. (2018). Social Rights in Russia: From Imperfect Past to Uncertain Future. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge.
• Birhane, F. T. (2018). Justiciability of Socio-Economic Rights in Ethiopia: Exploring Conceptual Foundations and Assessing the FDRE Constitution and Judicial Perspective. Beijing Law Review, 322-344.
• Boyle, K. (2018, November). Models of Incorporation and Justiciability for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Scottish Human Rights Commission.
• Çakar, A. S. (2018). Realization of Social Rights . Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Izmit, Kocaeli Province, Turkey: Kocaeli University, Institute of Social Science, Department of Public Law.
• Çali, S. M.-G. (2006). The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary perspectives on human rights and human rights law. New York, USA: Routledge.
• ÇAMUR, E. G. (2017). Civil and Political Rights vs. Social and Economic Rights: A Brief Overview. Journal of Bitlis Eren University Institute of Social Sciences, 6(1), 205-214.
• Casier, M. (2009). Contesting the ‘Truth’ of Turkey’s Human Rights Situation: State-Association Interactions in and outside the Southeast. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4190
• Castermans-Holleman, M. C. (2009). The Protection of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights within the UN Framework. Netherlands International Law Review, 42(3), pp 353-373.
• Center for Economic and Social Rights. (2015). Twenty Years of Economic and Social Rights Advocacy: Marking the twin anniversaries of CESR and the Vienna Declaration and Program of Action.
• Cistelecan, A. S. (2011). Wronging Rights? Philosophical Challenges for Human Rights. New Delhi: Routledge.
• Council of Europe. (2019). European Social Charter and European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from European Social Charter: https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-social-charter/-european-social-charter-and-european-convention-on-human-rights
• Dean, H. (2015). Social Rights and Human Welfare. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge.
• DUVAN, A. Ö. (2015). The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law in Turkey . CHKD, Cilt, 1-15.
• Eatwell, T. (2018, December). State Responsibilty for Human Rights Violations Committed in the Sate's Territory by Armed Non-State Actors. Academy Briefing No.13. Geneva, Switzerland: The Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Academy%20Briefing%2013.pdf
• Ertan, I. M. (2015). International Protection of Social Rights and the European Social Welfare System (Uluslararası Sosyal Hakların Korunması ve Avrupa Sosyal Şart Sistemi). Istanbul: Beta Publishing.
• Gorman, J. (2014). Rights and Reason: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Rights. New York: Routledge.
• Helena Alviar García, K. K. (2015). Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice: Critical Inquiries . 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge.
• ICJ. (2008). Courts and the Legal Enforcement of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Comparative experiences of justiciability. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists (ICJ).
• IJRC. (2019). International Justice Resource Center. Retrieved from African Human Rights System: https://ijrcenter.org/regional/african/
• Kaya, Y. A. (2019). International Law: Basic Text Book (Turkish). Ankara: Seckin Academic and Vocational Publishers.
• Mayessa, A. D. (2012). Derivation of Rights: Affording Protection to Latent Socio-Economic Rights in the FDRE Constitution. Oromia Law Journal.
• Ministry of Justice. (2016). Turkey and Human Rights. Ankara: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice General Directorate of International Law and Foreign Relations Department of Human Rights.
• Ministry of Justice. (2019, December 8). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from Department of Human Rights: http://www.humanrights.justice.gov.tr/Department/mission.html
• Mubangizi, J. C. (2006). The Constitutional Protection of Socio-Economic Rights in Selected African Countries: A Comparative Evaluation. The African Journal of Legal Studies, 1-19.
• O’Cinneide, C. (2015). The constitutionalization of social and economic rights. In G. K. Helena Alviar, Social and Economic Rights in Theory and Practice (pp. 258-266). New York: Routledge.
• O’Connell, P. (2012). Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences. Routledge.
• O’Connell, P. (2012). Vindicating Socio-Economic Rights: International Standards and Comparative Experiences. New York: Routledge.
• OHCHR. (2019). Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/Justice/OmbudsmanInstitutionTurkey.pdf
• Palmer, E. (2007). Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights Act. Worcester Place: Hart Publishing.
• Regassa, T. (2009). Making Legal Sense of Human Rights: The Judicial Role in Protecting Human Rights in Ethiopia. Mizan Law Review, 3(2).
• Simon Halliday, P. S. (2004). Human Rights Brought Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on Human Rights in the National Context. Hart Publishing.
• Ssenyonjo, M. (2009). Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law. Portland: Hart Publishing.
• Taket, A. (2012). Health Equity, Social Justice and Human Rights. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge.
• Teshome, R. G. (2019, February 16). Does the revised Ethiopian civil society proclamation deliver the promise of reform? Retrieved from The Reporter: https://www.thereporterethiopia.com/article/does-revised-ethiopian-civil-society-proclamation-deliver-promise-reform
• Third Sector Foundation of Turkey. (2018). Highlights on Civil Society in European Union’s 2018 Turkey Report. Retrieved from Content Regarding Civil Society in Turkey: https://tusev.org.tr/en/civil-society-law-reform/other/highlights-on-civil-society-in-european-commission-2018-turkey-report
• Trilsch, M. A. (2012). Justiciability of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Domestic Law. Retrieved November 20, 2019, from https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf1/beitr234.pdf
• Vasak, K. (1977, November). Human Rights: A Thirty-year Struggle. The Sustained Efforts to give Force of Law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris, France: UNESCO Courier.
• Veitch, T. K. (2017). Social Rights in the Welfare State: Origins and Transformations. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017: Routledge.
• Viljanen, J. (n.d). The Role of the European Court of Human Rights as a Developer of International Human Rights Law. University of Tampere, Finland. Retrieved from http://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r26759.pdf
• Yildiz, K. (2005). The Kurds in Turkey : EU Accession and Human Rights. London: Pluto Press.
• Yılmaz, H. (2016). Realizing Social And Economic Rights: The Example of Judicial Attitudes Towards The Rationing of Healthcare in Turkey. Hacettepe HFD, 6(1), 47–62.
• Young, R. (2012). Justiciable Socio-Economic Rights? South African Insights into Australia’s Debate. Australian International Law Journal.